EV Flashcards
(65 cards)
What do Equity Value and Enterprise Value MEAN? Don’t explain how you calculate them - tell me what they mean!
Equity Value - Value of the company as whole (all assets) to only common equity investors
Enterprise Value - Value of company’s core operations (core assets) to all investors
So why do you look at both of them? Isn’t Enterprise Value always more accurate?
There is no such thing as a better metric, they are different based on each different investor
EV-based multiples are beneficial because they are not affected company’s capital structure
Equity value is beneficial for common shareholders to see what a company’s value is by backing into its implied equity value and implied share price
What’s the difference between Current Enterprise Value and Implied Enterprise Value?
Current enterprise value means the projected book value of the company while the implied value means the value for which you believe the company to be.
Current enterprise value can be measured by starting off with equity value, subtracting non-core assets, and adding liability and equity. But implied is a bit more complicated which required DCFs, comparable analysis, and precedent transactions.
Why might a company’s Current Enterprise Value be different from its Implied Enterprise Value?
Company value will always equal to Cash Flow / (Discount Rate - Cash Flow Growth Rate)
Everyone agrees on the cash flow, but now everyone has the same discount rate or agrees on the same cash flow growth rate so that is why implied value is always going to vary.
Everyone knows how you move from Equity Value to Enterprise Value. But WHY do you subtract Cash, add Debt, add Preferred Stock, and so on?
You subtract assets when they represent non-core assets and so cash and investments related to non-core and discontinued non-core assets fall into this.
You add liability and equity line items when they represent different investor groups beyond the common shareholders such as capital leases and unfunded pensions.
Let’s say you’re about to buy a house using a $600K mortgage and a $200K down payment. What are the real-world analogies for Equity Value and Enterprise Value in this case?
The enterprise value in this case would be 800k and it only represents the house only; the core asset.
While the equity value of the house would represent only the 200k down payment with the tools, furniture, and anything along with it included in that value; non core assets.
Can a company’s Equity Value ever be negative?
If it’s current equity value, there is no way for it to be negative because it is based on Shares Outstanding * Current Share Price and both of those figures on can’t be negative.
But implied equity value can be negative because it is based on what you assume those figures will be.
Can a company’s Enterprise Value ever be negative?
Yes, a company might have more cash than its equity value and it has no debt so the figure will total up to be negative.
Why do financing-related events such as issuing Dividends or raising Debt not affect Enterprise Value?
Because Issuing Dividends, issuing Stock, repurchasing Stock, issuing/repaying Debt, do not impact a company’s core business, so they do not affect Enterprise Value.
Let’s say you determine a company’s Implied Value with the cash flow formula: Company Value = Cash Flow / (Discount Rate - Cash Flow Growth Rate). Will this give you a company’s Implied Equity Value or Implied Enterprise Value?
It depends on what metrics you use to determine it
If you are using metrics that are available to all investors then it would create enterprise value. Unlevered FCF or Free Cash Flow to Firm for the cash flow. And WACC for the discount rate.
If you are using metrics that are available to only equity investors then its equity value. Levered FCF or Free Cash Flow to Equity for cash flow and cost of equity for the discount rate.
If financing-related events do not affect Enterprise Value, what DOES affect it?
Only core business changes so new customer contract, closing a factory, higher than expected sales.
If a company wins a major contract with a new customer, will ONLY Enterprise Value change? Or will Equity Value also change?
Both will be affected. Enterprise will especially be affected but equity value will be affected by both operational and non-operational changes.
Why does Enterprise Value NOT necessarily represent the “true cost” to acquire a company?
Because there are firstly other fees associated with purchasing; M&A and accounting costs.
And because the buyer doesn’t have to always repay the company’s debt, they can refinance the debt.
And lastly because the buyer doesn’t always get the entire cash balance of the company because some cash is needed in order for the company to continue to operate so enterprise value wouldn’t take into account of all of that.
In theory, if Companies A and B are the same in all respects, but Company A is financed with 100% Equity, and Company B is financed with 50% Equity and 50% Debt, their Enterprise Values will be the same. Why is this NOT true in reality?
Because company’s capital structure will impact the way you implied enterprise value and the way you perceive the discount rate. The market would even adjust its discount rate and the current enterprise value will therefore be lowered.
The costs of percentages of debt, equity, preferred stock would change and so will its percentages. Debt can decrease initially, but it will increase past a certain point when the risk to all investors increases.
Although EV will less impacted than equity value by capital structure changes, there will be relatively small changes.
A company issues $200 million in new shares. How do Equity Value, Enterprise Value, EV / EBITDA, and P / E change?
Equity value would go up by $200M because of the SHARES and so the P / E ratio that matches it would also go up.
Enterprise value not go up because the increase in cash, which is a negative for EV, would offset the new shares. And so the EV / EBITDA wouldn’t be changed either.
A company issues $200 million in new shares, but it will use $100 million from the proceeds to issue Dividends to shareholders. How does everything change?
Equity Value would increase by only 100M because after the 200M shares is issued, it would decrease after the 100M dividends.
EV on the other hand wouldn’t change because the extra $100M would be offset by the higher equity value.
And so EV / EBITDA wouldn’t change, but P / E would.
The company decides to use the $200 million to acquire another business for $100 million instead. How does everything change?
Equity value increases by 200M again and since it doesn’t distinguish between core and non core assets, the 100M in a business wouldn’t change it.
EV wouldn’t increase from the 200M but since the 100M is replacing the cash with a core asset, EV increases by 100M.
And both P / E and EV / EBITDA increase in this situation.
What if the company uses the $100 million to acquire an Asset rather than an entire company?
Again the Equity Value would still increase by 200M no matter what type of asset it is.
BUT for EV it would depend on what type of asset it is; if its a factory purchase, then it increases by a 100M but if its short term investment then it wouldn’t change.
The P / E would increase by 200M but the EV / EBITDA would still depend if the asset is core or non-core.
What changes with everything above if the company raises $200 million in Debt to do this instead?
Equity Value will not be affected by debt raising changes now that it is not equity based. So it wouldn’t increase by 200M anymore and it would actually decrease by 100M when dividends are issued since equity is going and cash are going down.
EV will still continue to be the same since cash and debt both cancel each other out, even when dividends are issued. It will only increase when the cash is used purchase a core-asset.
Let’s say the company raises $200 million in Debt to acquire another company for a purchase price of $200 million. The other company’s Common Shareholders’ Equity is exactly $200 million. How does everything change?
Neither EV and Equity Value would increase at first from the debt raised.
After the purchase, EV would increase by 200M since the purchase is a core asset. While Equity Value wouldn’t change since the cash (an asset), would be exchanged for the company (another asset) cancelling each other out.
So P / E would stay the same while EV / EBITDA increases
How is this scenario different if the purchase price is still $200 million, but the other company has only $100 million in Common Shareholders’ Equity?
Only change would be now there would be 100M in Goodwill that needs to be written down on the balance sheet.
EV would still increase by 200M since Goodwill is a core asset and Equity Value would continue to stay the same.
What happens to everything if a company issues $100 in Dividends?
Equity Value would go down by a 100M since cash and equity is both going down. EV would stay the same since cash and lower equity cancel each other out.
So P / E would go down and EV / EBITDA would be unchanged.
A company has a Current Equity Value of $200, $50 in Cash, and $100 in Debt. If the company spends $25 of its Cash balance to purchase PP&E, how does everything change?
So after adding everything up 200 - 50 + 100 enterprise value is 250 and spending 25 for a core asset will increase EV to 275.
Equity Value will be unchanged because the type of asset doesn’t matter to it.
So with the 25 taking into effect P / E will stay the same while EV / EBITDA increases.
A company has excess Cash. What are the valuation implications if it uses that Cash to repurchase shares vs. repay Debt?
In both cases EV and EV / EBITDA would stay the same since cash is offsetting the equity value or its reducing the debt balance.
But for Equity Value, if shares are repurchased, the equity value would go down and so will the P / E. But it would stay the same if debt was repaid.