Euthanasia Flashcards

1
Q

Sanctity of life

A

The sanctity of life is the idea that human life is made in God’s image and so is sacred in value.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Quality of life

A

means human life has to possess certain attributes in order to have value. For example, someone having good physical and mental health, an education, financial stability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Origins of sanctity of life

A

there is something special and holy about life. For Christians, human life is different because we share something of the nature of God. The first book of the Old Testament (Genesis) describes how God made Adam, and: “Breathed into his nostrils the breath of life”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Secular origins of quality of life

A

Singer believes that people nowadays make decisions based on their quality of life rather than sanctity of life.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Euthanasia

A

is the deliberate ending of someone’s life out of compassion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Voluntary euthanasia

A

Voluntary euthanasia means a person’s life is ended at their request or with their consent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Reasons for using voluntary euthanasia

A

Suffering from a terminal illness.
Unlikely to benefit from the discovery of a cure for that illness during what remains of their life expectancy.

Suffering intolerable pain.
Their life is unacceptably burdensome.

Has an enduring, voluntary and competent wish to die.
Unable without assistance to end their life.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Non-voluntary euthanasia

A

Non-voluntary euthanasia means a person’s life is ended without their consent but with the consent of someone representing their interests.
Non-voluntary euthanasia should be in the interest of the person who dies and not anyone else.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Tony Bland example

A

When doctors at Airedale Hospital in Yorkshire asked the High Court for permission to withdraw artificial nutrition and hydration from Hillsborough victim Tony Bland, his family supported the application.
After the Hillsborough stadium tragedy, Tony was left in a persistent vegetative state - and hence was not legally dead. His parents believed their son would not want to be kept alive in such a condition. They petitioned the court to sanction the withdrawal of hydration and artificial nutrition, which it did.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Situation ethics and euthanasia

A

The debate over euthanasia relies on one basic question according to Fletcher.
For the situationist, the issue is whether it is harder to justify letting someone die a slow and ugly death, dehumanised than it is to justify helping them escape from such misery.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Natural law and euthanasia

A

When applying natural law, the primary precepts should be recalled.
In the case of euthanasia, the key precept to do good and avoid evil and the primary precept to preserve life, which upholds the sanctity of life and consequently the belief that only God has the right to give and take life, are particularly important.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Catholic teaching on euthanasia

A

According to the Bible, we are created in God’s image and knitted together by God in the womb (Psalm 139:13).
The Catholic Church’s teachings on euthanasia conclude that euthanasia is wrong (Pastoral Constitution, Gaudium et Spes, no. 27, 1965) as life is sacred and a gift from God, ‘which they are called upon to preserve and make fruitful’ (Declaration on Euthanasia, 1980).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Sanctity of life is meaningful

A

The sanctity of life principle is based on the Jewish and Christian biblical belief that life is a gift from God and is on loan to humans.Genesis says that people are made “in the image of God” (Genesis 1:26-27).
This means people are in some way reflections of God. Christians and Jews make up a large proportion of the UK. In the last census, nearly 50% of people considered themselves to be Christian. For them, the SOL has meaning in medical ethics.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Secular argument against SOL

A

Sanctity of life is a religious concept. In many parts of Western Europe, people are becoming more secular (less religious). So religious teachings and concepts/laws arguably have less significance and importance. Peter Singer has strongly argued that it is now time to abandon the sanctity of life principle in favour of the non-religious quality of life argument.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Quality of life counter-argument

A

The quality of life principle says that a life is only worthwhile if it can fulfil those things which make life worth living. There is nothing intrinsically good about being alive besides enabling us to experience those things which are desired. In other words, human life has to possess certain attributes to have value.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

People should have autonomy

A

In Genesis, humans are given dominion over the earth. This implies they have complete autonomy and should be allowed to make decisions for themselves. In his work In Rethinking Life and Death (1994), Peter Singer sets out five quality of life commandments to replace those of the traditional sanctity of life position.
For example, Singer believes we should recognise that the value of human life varies from case to case.We should also respect a person’s right to live or die.

17
Q

People should not have autonomy

A

Voluntary euthanasia is the start of a slippery slope that leads to involuntary euthanasia and the killing of people who are thought undesirable.
Natural law and Kantian ethics argue that we do not have complete autonomy.
Kant would argue that the categorical imperative is clear – if we do not want killing people universalised, then we should not accept euthanasia.
Likewise, Aquinas’ precepts say that society should be orderly and innocent life should be protected. Autonomy goes against this.

18
Q

Morally different - religious view

A

If someone takes direct action to end a person’s life, they are acting as if they were God.
If God is the author of life, then it follows that he is the one who determines when it should end. It is not up to the individual whether he or she might add or subtract from his or her life or anyone else’s because life is a gift or a loan from God.

19
Q

Morally different - legal view

A

The law in the UK clearly states that there is a moral difference between medical intervention and non-intervention.
Any act that directly ends a person’s life (whether voluntarily or not) is illegal.

20
Q

Not morally different

A

Joseph Fletcher would argue that the outcome determines whether something is morally acceptable or not.
Fletcher would argue that there is no moral difference between intervention and non-intervention if the outcome is positive and loving.

J
oseph Fletcher would argue that the outcome determines whether something is morally acceptable or not.
Fletcher would argue that there is no moral difference between intervention and non-intervention if the outcome is positive and loving.