Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Eu law > Eu LAW > Flashcards

Eu LAW Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
Civil Procedure 1L flashcards MBE flashcards MPRE flashcards
1
Q

Direct effect

A

Van Gend en Loos, Reyners, Marshall, Faccini Dori

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Indirect effect

A

Marleasing and Pfeffier

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

EU COMPETENCE

A

Tobacco Adevertising I

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

State liability

A

Brasserie du Pecheur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Mutual recognition

A

Cassis de Dijon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Supremacy EU LAW

A

Costa v ENEL, Simmenthal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Internal taxation - discrimination

A

Chemial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Internal taxation - protective taxation

A

Commission v UK

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

MEEs for Quantitative restrictions

A

Dassonville, Cassis, Keck and Mithouard, Familiapress, Italian Trailers, Mickelsson and Roos

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

MEE quantitative restricitons - definition

A

Dassonville

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

MEEs - Imperative requirements

A

Cassis de Dijon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Exception for selling arrangements

A

Keck

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Rules on the use of a good

A

Italian Trailers, Mickelsson and Roos

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Justification grounds for goods

A

Conegate, Commission v Denmark, Schmidberger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Duration criterion (services - establishment)

A

Gebhard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Cassis de Dijon applies by analogy to service

A

Sager

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Service provider crosses borders

A

Sager

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Service receiver crosses border

A

Luisi and Cabrone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Service itself crosses border

A

Alpine Investements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Product requirements = MEEs

A

Familliapress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

No Keck rule for services

A

Alpine Investements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Personal scope services

A

Laval un Partneri

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Freedom of services against your own MS

A

Alpine Investements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Indistinctly applicable measures - freedom of establishment

A

Gebhard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Justifications freedom of establishment

A

Gebhard
Centros

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Mandatory requirements freedom of establishment

A

Gebhard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Personal scope - freedom of establishment

A

Viking Line

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Recognition of equivalent professional certificates - freedom of establishment

A

Gebhard, Vlassopoulou

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Material scope - workers

A

Levin, Trojani, Antonissen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Personal scope workers

A

Angonese, Bosman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Justifications workers

A

L’Olymphique Lyonnais, Tsakouridis

32
Q

Expulsion based on Directive 38/2004

A

Tsakouridis

33
Q

Keck exception for workers

A

Bosman

34
Q

What is EU citizenship?

A

Rottmann

35
Q

Revoking citizenship

A

Rottmann

36
Q

Personal scope of Directive 38/2004

A

Marshall, Faccini Dori

37
Q

Right to residence - Directive 38/2004 v Treaty

A

Zhu and Chen, Ruiz Zambrano, Singh

38
Q

Right to equal treatment - Directive 2004/38

A

Dano

39
Q

The principle of non-discrimination

A

Mangold, Kucuckdeveci

40
Q

Personal scope of Art 21 Charter

A

Egenberger

41
Q

EAW

A

Melloni, Aranyosi and Caldararu, LM

42
Q

What is EU market integration?

A

Consten and Grunding

43
Q

Undertaking definition

A

Hofner and Elser

44
Q

Concerted practice

A

Huls

45
Q

Affect trade - competition law

A

STM

46
Q

Restrictions by object/effect - competition law

A

STM

47
Q

Exclusive distribution

A

STM, Consten and Grunding

48
Q

Selective distribution

A

Metro I

49
Q

Franchising

A

Pronuptia

50
Q

Restrictions by object

A

Cartes Bancaires

51
Q

Dominant position

A

United Brands

52
Q

Exploitative abuse

A

United Brands

53
Q

Exclusionary abuse

A

AKZO Chemie, Bronner, Hoffman-La Roche

54
Q

Predatory pricing

A

AKZO Chemie

55
Q

Refusal to deal

A

Bronner

56
Q

Fidelity rebates

A

Hoffman-La Roche

57
Q

Implied external competence of the EU

A

Opinion 1/75

58
Q

What does the CCP cover?

A

Opinion 1/75

59
Q

New generation of FTAs under the CCP

A

Opinion 2/15 Singapore

60
Q

WTO law and EU law

A

Portugal v Council, International Fruit

61
Q

CFSP v TFEU (= AFSJ)

A

Al-Quaeda Sanctions

62
Q

CFSP v CCP

A

Kazakhstan

63
Q

Limits to national procedural law

A

Rewe

64
Q

Principle of effectiveness - national remedy

A

Factortame I

65
Q

Admissibility questions already answered by the CJEU

A

Da Costa

66
Q

Inadmissible questions

A

Dias

67
Q

Exceptions to the obligation to refer to the CJEU

A

CLIFIT

68
Q

Obligation to refer - parties don’t bring up the EU issues

A

Van Schijndel

69
Q

Validity of EU law - national courts

A

Foto-Frost

70
Q

Standing - act of direct concern

A

International Fruit

71
Q

Standing - act of individual concern

A

Plaumann

72
Q

Regulatory act

A

Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami

73
Q

Implementing measure

A

Telefonica

74
Q

Proportionality test for breach of a ground for review

A

Fedesa

75
Q

Direct effect of Art 49

A

Reyners

76
Q

Direct effect Art 56 services

A

Van Bierbergen

77
Q

MS can choose their own nationals

A

Michelletti

Eu law (2 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions