Eu LAW Flashcards

1
Q

Direct effect

A

Van Gend en Loos, Reyners, Marshall, Faccini Dori

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Indirect effect

A

Marleasing and Pfeffier

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

EU COMPETENCE

A

Tobacco Adevertising I

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

State liability

A

Brasserie du Pecheur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Mutual recognition

A

Cassis de Dijon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Supremacy EU LAW

A

Costa v ENEL, Simmenthal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Internal taxation - discrimination

A

Chemial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Internal taxation - protective taxation

A

Commission v UK

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

MEEs for Quantitative restrictions

A

Dassonville, Cassis, Keck and Mithouard, Familiapress, Italian Trailers, Mickelsson and Roos

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

MEE quantitative restricitons - definition

A

Dassonville

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

MEEs - Imperative requirements

A

Cassis de Dijon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Exception for selling arrangements

A

Keck

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Rules on the use of a good

A

Italian Trailers, Mickelsson and Roos

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Justification grounds for goods

A

Conegate, Commission v Denmark, Schmidberger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Duration criterion (services - establishment)

A

Gebhard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Cassis de Dijon applies by analogy to service

A

Sager

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Service provider crosses borders

A

Sager

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Service receiver crosses border

A

Luisi and Cabrone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Service itself crosses border

A

Alpine Investements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Product requirements = MEEs

A

Familliapress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

No Keck rule for services

A

Alpine Investements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Personal scope services

A

Laval un Partneri

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Freedom of services against your own MS

A

Alpine Investements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Indistinctly applicable measures - freedom of establishment

A

Gebhard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Justifications freedom of establishment
Gebhard Centros
26
Mandatory requirements freedom of establishment
Gebhard
27
Personal scope - freedom of establishment
Viking Line
28
Recognition of equivalent professional certificates - freedom of establishment
Gebhard, Vlassopoulou
29
Material scope - workers
Levin, Trojani, Antonissen
30
Personal scope workers
Angonese, Bosman
31
Justifications workers
L’Olymphique Lyonnais, Tsakouridis
32
Expulsion based on Directive 38/2004
Tsakouridis
33
Keck exception for workers
Bosman
34
What is EU citizenship?
Rottmann
35
Revoking citizenship
Rottmann
36
Personal scope of Directive 38/2004
Marshall, Faccini Dori
37
Right to residence - Directive 38/2004 v Treaty
Zhu and Chen, Ruiz Zambrano, Singh
38
Right to equal treatment - Directive 2004/38
Dano
39
The principle of non-discrimination
Mangold, Kucuckdeveci
40
Personal scope of Art 21 Charter
Egenberger
41
EAW
Melloni, Aranyosi and Caldararu, LM
42
What is EU market integration?
Consten and Grunding
43
Undertaking definition
Hofner and Elser
44
Concerted practice
Huls
45
Affect trade - competition law
STM
46
Restrictions by object/effect - competition law
STM
47
Exclusive distribution
STM, Consten and Grunding
48
Selective distribution
Metro I
49
Franchising
Pronuptia
50
Restrictions by object
Cartes Bancaires
51
Dominant position
United Brands
52
Exploitative abuse
United Brands
53
Exclusionary abuse
AKZO Chemie, Bronner, Hoffman-La Roche
54
Predatory pricing
AKZO Chemie
55
Refusal to deal
Bronner
56
Fidelity rebates
Hoffman-La Roche
57
Implied external competence of the EU
Opinion 1/75
58
What does the CCP cover?
Opinion 1/75
59
New generation of FTAs under the CCP
Opinion 2/15 Singapore
60
WTO law and EU law
Portugal v Council, International Fruit
61
CFSP v TFEU (= AFSJ)
Al-Quaeda Sanctions
62
CFSP v CCP
Kazakhstan
63
Limits to national procedural law
Rewe
64
Principle of effectiveness - national remedy
Factortame I
65
Admissibility questions already answered by the CJEU
Da Costa
66
Inadmissible questions
Dias
67
Exceptions to the obligation to refer to the CJEU
CLIFIT
68
Obligation to refer - parties don’t bring up the EU issues
Van Schijndel
69
Validity of EU law - national courts
Foto-Frost
70
Standing - act of direct concern
International Fruit
71
Standing - act of individual concern
Plaumann
72
Regulatory act
Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami
73
Implementing measure
Telefonica
74
Proportionality test for breach of a ground for review
Fedesa
75
Direct effect of Art 49
Reyners
76
Direct effect Art 56 services
Van Bierbergen
77
MS can choose their own nationals
Michelletti