EU - Competition - Art 101 Flashcards

1
Q

Metro v Commission

A

Objective of treaty include creation of single market.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Inter Brand Competition

Intra Brand Competition

A

equivalent goods competing

Distributors competing for sales of a brand or product

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How is Market Power defined?

A

Defining Relevant Market

Calculating market Shares of the firm and other relevant firms

Considering whether there are any barriers to entry or expansion in the market.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Market definition made up of:

Market Share

Then barriers to entry or expansion

A

Relevant product market, Geographical market, and temporal factors.

Calculated by determining sales of relvant roduct in the geographical area. i

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Commission Notice on Market Definition

A

Does not have force of law but recognised by eu courts as authorititative source for interpretation.

State as confirmed in Commission notice and united brands.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Relevant product market: Interchangeability

Product demand (Authority?) (2)

A

United brands - Other types of fruit not interchangeable with the banana because it has characteristics that differentiate it - softness etc.

Football World Cup - gave a narrow definition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Product Market Definition

Product Supply

Considered

A

Michelin - no intercngeability between products mean the market was limited to seperate markets for Vans cars lorries etc.

Structure of Demand - Car users brough occassionally while commerial users brought frequently.

Structure of Supply - Lack of substitutability for manufacterers to switch production.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Market Share

Hugin

A

Cash Registers - market limited to Hugin’s products - very narrowly defined market. N.B. for 101/2 to be infringed it must have an effect on interstate trade which did not occur here.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

_Geographical Market _

  1. Easily transported may mean the whole of the EU
  2. Special rules may exclude certain countries making it some of the EU.
  3. Can be one country
  4. Can be part of A member state
A
  1. Hiliti - Nails easily sold and transported across whole of eu.
  2. United Brands: French and British Legislation exculded these countries from European banana market.
  3. Michelin -market limited to certain vehicles in Belgium.
  4. Sea link - market was port of hollyhead.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Commission notice on Geographical merket:

A

conditions of competition must be sufficienty homogenous in one area whcih can be differentiated from another here conditions are appreciably different.

Will customers switch orders to companies elsewhere at a negligible cost?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Additional guidance from Commission

SSNIP Test

Authorities?

A

Small but significant non transitor increase in prices of the relevant product market and geographical market.

Football world cup tickets : world cup tickets were not substitutable as customers would not switch.

France Telecom v commission: High Speed internet market was seperate as customers would not switch to another provider.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Art 101 Prohibits (5)

A

A) directly or indirectly fixing purchase or selling prices or other trading conditions .

B) Limiting or controlling production markets, technical development or investment

C) sharing markets or sources of supply.

D) Applying dissimilar conditions to equivalent transactions.

E) making conclusin fcntracts subject to acceptance by parties of other obligations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Undertaking

Polypropeleyne (def)

Hofner

Van Landewyck

Fenin

A

Undetaking is any entity engaged i commercial activity regardless of its legal status (Hofner and Polypropelyne)

VnL - no need for the entity to be profit driven.

A body procuring drugs for spanish health service was not an undertaking.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Undertakings

Need more than one

Viho Europe / Parker

Akzo

Woodpulp

A

Racal Group - must be more htn onecompanyfor the purposed of art 101(1)

Viho Europe/ Parker pens - owned its subsidiaries so action fell outsid of art 101 not subsidiaries etc.

Rebuttable presumption that parent is responsible for subsidiary’s activity / breaches.

Art 101(1) may apply to undertakings outside of EU as long as agreement operates inside the EU.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

_Agreeements - Broad Definition. _

Quinine Cartel Case + Bayer AG

Iaz International v Commission

Wouters v Nederlandse

A

Gentleman’s agreemnt could constitute agreement, did not need to be written.

Non binding recomendation from trade association fell foul of art 101(1)

Bar asation of the netherlands was an undertaking a it regulated barristers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Oligopoly or Concerted practice?

ICI v Commission (Dyestuffs)

Sugar Cartel

AC - Treuhand v Commission

A

Paralell behaviour maybe normal in an oligopoly, breach if concerted practice.

Found to be concted pracice because prior announcement of price changes rendered the market transparent and producers were large enough to act independantly.

Critical issue held to be whether the undertaking operated independantly

An undertaking that was not a contracting party could still breach art 101 if it was involved in the controlin behaiour. (such as consultancy)

17
Q

Aim is to restrict competition

or

Effect is restriction of competition

A

If aim is to restrict competition, it is unnescessary to show whether has anti competitive effect. Therefore no need economic analysis.

If it is unclear that the agreement aims to restrict competition analysis wil be necessary.

18
Q

Consten and Grundig

A

Consten and Grundig argued art 101 only applied to interbrand competition.

CJ held that it applied to intra-brand too. the agreemeent intended to divide european markets and therefore restrict competition, no need to consider the efect of the agreement. absolute territorial protection not permissable.

19
Q

STM

A

In contrast to Consten, distributor had not been given a complete monopoly and therefore necessary to consider the effect of the agreement on trade.

Court stated that if the agrement was necessary to penetrate market it may be permitted. A de minimis effect will not infringe art 101.

20
Q

T mobile Netherlands and others

Glaxosmithkline

A

In order for concerted practice to be regarded as having anti competitive object its sufficient that it has the potential to have a negative impact on competition.

An anti competitve agreement need not actually deprive consumers of effective competition in supply or pricing.

21
Q

Rule of Reason in art 101

(3)

A

Eurotunnel - agreement between parties buidling tunnel was not anti competitve as it was necessary to project.

Rule of reason may apply where there is high commercial risk.

Generally RoR not accepted in competition law.

22
Q

Types of vertical agreement

(4)

A

STM - Excusive distributorship

Brasserie de Haecht - Exclusive purchasing agreement

SABA: Selective distribution agreements - May restrict intrabrand competition and access to markets.

Quantitative Criteria - selective distribution system requires minimun turnover in products or stocking.

23
Q

Affecting Trade Between Member States

STM

Belasco

A

Must be possible to forsee with a sufficient degree of probability that agreement may have an influence direct or indirect, actual or potential on trade between states.

Conduct confined to one state can affect interstate trade.

24
Q

Art 101(2)

Automatic Nullity

2 Cases

A

Any agreement prohibited pursuant to the article shall be automatically void.

Beguelin Import co - agreement that is in breach will be automatically void and cannot be pleased against thrid parties.

STM - art 10(2) does not void all agreement - only provisions which are are subject to prohibition or not severable from the agreement.

25
Q

De Minimis, Legal and Block Exemptions

Appreciability - Applies to objective of agreement and effect on trade between member states.

A

Art 101(1) will not apply if agreement does not have appreciable impact on competition or interstate trade.

Volk - Washing Machines less than 1% of market share though CJ did not state threshold for what would be de minimis.

26
Q

_Market Share Thresholds _

Commission notice quantifies what is an appreciable restriction

Agreements between undertakings which are competitors and those which are not.

A

Aggregate market share 10% for agreements between actual or potential comptetitors.

15% market share by each party for agreements between non competitors, if difficult to quantify, use 10%.

27
Q

European Night Services

A

Agreement may not be sufficiently appreciable to fall within art 101(1) even if thresholds are exceeded.

28
Q

_Paralell Networks _

Hardcore Restrictions

A

Brasserie de Haecht - network of small agreements may have cumulative agregate effect.

The notice does not apply to agreements containing hardcore restrictions.

29
Q

Hardcore Restricitions

Agreements between competitors to

Agreements between non-competitors

A

Fix Prices

Limit Output; or

Allocate markets or customers.

Fix prices, or

Impose export ban (on active sales ok, passive sales ban not ok)

30
Q

Legal Exemptions Art 101(3)

if satisfy legal exemption will not be subject to prohibition

Must satisfy 4 criteria.

A

1) There must be a benefit to the agreement - technical economic etc that outweighs anti comptetive effect.
2) benefit to consumers
3) No unnecessary restrictons
4) Reference to product and geographical markets
e. g. bayer and Gist Brocades.

or ford/vw - joint venture to produce new car in portugal would benefit technology.

31
Q

_Block Exemption _

Regulation 330/2010 Article 101(3)

Applies to:

A

Vertical agreements

Verticale agreements where each party is on a different level of comercial chain.

Market Share threshold of 30% Article 2(1) safe harbour. Depends on market power of undertakings. Presumption of legality when market share of supplier does not exceed 30%.

32
Q

Hardcore restrictions: art 4 ??

Block Exemptions, Excluded restrictions

A

Parties to an agreement may agree not to compete, this would be unenforceable. Falls outside of the scope of a block exemption. severability would apply to such obligations.

33
Q

Horizontal Agreements between competitors

Block Exemptions under regs:

1217/2010 on the application of 101(3) TFEU

1218/2010 application art 101(3) TFEU

A

Applies to certain joint venture technology / reserach agremeents.

Applies to specialisation agreements where two parties divide work.

34
Q

Block exemption summary

Regulation 330/2010 (general authority)

A

** Vertical Agreements: **

Market Share threshold

No Hardcore Restrictions

**Horizontal Agreement: **

Research and development

Specialisation

Similar approach as vertical BE

35
Q

Structure

A
  • Does de minimis apply?
  • is there appriciable restriction of competition?
  • Is there appreciable effect on interstate trade?

**If de minimis does not apply: **

  • Can the agreement benefit from block exemption?
  • What is the market share?
  • are there hardcore restrictions?

**If Block exemption does not apply: **

  • Does agreement fall within legal exception under 101(3)?
  • All four conditions satisfied.
  • Conditions are exhasutive.
    *