Etiology of Paraphilia Flashcards
1
Q
Response Control Models
A
Arousal Suppression Model
Response Compatibility Model
2
Q
Arousal Suppression Model:
A
- rape/paraphilia hinges on the ability of men to suppress their sexual arousal
- ie. paraphilic men are less able to suppress their sexual arousal to paraphilic cues
3
Q
Response compatibility model:
A
- Aggression and arousal do not cancel each other out in rapists (they should in normal responses)
- a rapist is able to perform whilst experiencing both aggression & arousal; normal people cannot
4
Q
Stimuli Control Models
A
Sexual preference model
inhibition model
Disinhibition model
Emotional State augmentation
5
Q
Sexual preference model:
A
- cues of violence are excitatory (eg. force, humiliation, coercion, etc.)
- person MAY be aroused by normal stimuli but WILL be aroused by paraphilic cues
6
Q
Inhibition model:
A
- arousal is NOT inhibited by cues of violence/paraphilia
* normal person WILL be inhibited but not paraphiliacs
7
Q
Disinhibition model:
A
- an emotional or cognitive state which increases arousal to rape when it would otherwise be inhibited
- eg. alcohol, drugs, anger, victim blaming, excuses, porn
8
Q
Emotional state augmentation:
A
- nonsexual emotions (eg. anger, love) will affect sexual arousal
- strong emotions, both negative and positive, will serve to increase sexual arousal
9
Q
Social Learning Models
A
- learning will influence thoughts, behaviours, etc.
- can be direct (witnessing paraphiliac behaviour) or indirect (victimization; assoc. with sexual/non-sexual developmental issues like conduct disorder, aggression, anxiety, depression)
- there are multiple pathways to this model:
- poor parent-child attachments (insecure attachments, children learn inappropriate ways to deal with people)
- low self-esteem; anxiety
- responsive to any type of attention (eg. sexual) = more likely to tolerate sexual advances, which then becomes normalized
- therefore learns to behave in sexually inappropriate ways
- which leads to sexualized offending, resulting in a cycle of abuse (the abused becomes the abuser)
10
Q
Courtship Disorder
A
- Freud, 1990; Freud & Blanchard, 1986: normal sexual contact occurs through four stages:
- location, pre-tactile (looking, smiling), tactile (sexual touching, hugging), genital union (sex)
- certain paraphilias are distortions of certain phases
- eg. voyeurism violates location, exhibitionism violates pre-tactile, frotteurism violates tactile
- rape forgoes the entire courtship entirely
11
Q
McGuire et al., 1965: Conditioning Model
A
- Pairing of non-sexual cues with sexual arousal (eg. pair spider with arousal)
- Pavlovian conditioning through masturbation
- Reinforced with operant conditioning (reward = orgasm)
- Stimuli is generalized (spiders -> all spider-related stimuli)
- Unconditioning is possible (“aversive conditioning”; pair negative stimuli with fetish; used to “unpair” paraphilia and arousal)
12
Q
Hypersexuality
A
- PRD (paraphilia related disorders): cultural sanctioned aspects of normal sexual arousal (eg. lots of sex, porn)
- total sexual outlet measured by the sexual outlet inventory (SOI); measuring both conventional & unconventional sexual behaviours; measures time spend viewing, fantasizing, masturbating, and engaged in paraphilic/non-paraphilic behaviours
- developmental factors: younger onset = higher likelihood of paraphilia in life in terms of sexuality, variety, frequency; male = higher chance; younger onset of axis I disorders (mood disorder, depression, ADHD, etc.) = higher chance of paraphilia
- is physiological, not psychological
- high testosterone = high sex drive
- neurotransmitters responsible for attention regulation and learning; low levels = high sexual appetite = more difficult to control urges
- brain injuries
- deficits in brain functioning