Ethnicity and achievement Flashcards
Ethnic group
a group with shared history, culture and identity, including language cuisine and religion.
Who are the biggest underachievers
white w/c boys
What are the different types of cultural deprivation
intellectual and language skills
attitudes and values
family structure
subculture
Cultural deprivation
[intellectual and language skills]
Beriter and Englemen
- argue that children from black e/m backgrounds lack intellectual stimulation + enriching experiences needed for educational success.
As a result, they don’t develop reasoning and problem solving skills.
They use the restricted code when speaking - holds them back.
may e/m families don’t speak english as their first language.
Criticisms of Beriter & Englemen
- cultural deprivation
Many Indian British children speak an additional language but still do well
Cultural deprivation
[attitudes and values]
New Right - black e/m children are socialised into subculture values which promote fatalistic attitudes that don’t value education.
These children are therefore not encouraged to work hard at school which holds back their progress
Scruton - some e/m fail to integrate into the mainstream British culture which causes their children’s underachievement
Criticisms of cultural deprivation
[attitudes and values]
racist - assumes black culture + values are inferior and different to mainstream culture
Cultural deprivation
[family structure]
SEWELL - many students do better in education than black students because they are brought up in a supportive and clone-knit families which put a high value on education and have an Asian work ethic
LUPTON - Asian families support the schools behaviour policies which are similar to their expectations of their children’s behaviour
MOYNIHAN - many black children are being brought up in LPF’s in which they are deprived of adequate care because the mother struggles financially in the absence of a male role model
MURRAY - lack of positive male role model cause the underachievement of those children, especially boys.
- they also see deprivation as a cycle whereby poorly socialised children grow up to become inadequate parents themselves.
Criticisms of cultural deprivation - family structure
They can be criticised for ignoring the white nuclear families who fail to socialise their children properly.
McCullock - argues white w/c families have low aspirations for their children who don’t encourage their children to pursue education so they underachieve
Lupton - compare 4 schools [2 white, 1 Pakistani, 1 mixed] and the found that the white school had fewer children of FSM, but behaviour was worse.
- shows that achievement is affected by parental attitudes to education
Cultural deprivation
[subcultures]
SEWELL - argues that black fathers aren’t absent, but it is the black fathers ‘tough love’ that causes black boys to struggle to overcome emotional difficulties.
They then turn to music + gangs for male role models - anti-school subculture - underachieve
therefore the biggest cause of underachievement is peer pressure
Criticisms of cultural deprivation
Driver - argues ethnicity can have a positive effect on achievement
Lawrence - argues that black boys underachieve because of racism at school
Kedie - e/m are culturally different and underachieve because schools are ethnocentric
Material deprivation
e/m are more likely to be w/c which causes them to face material deprivation and live in poverty
PALMER - e/m such as Pakistani and Bangladeshi tend to be among the poorest in the UK
- live in areas of high unemployment
- traditional attitudes: women tend not to work
- lack of english skills - difficult to find a high paid job
Racism in wider society
The poverty e/m experience is caused by racism in society
MASON - discrimination is a persistent feature in the lives of e/m in the UK
REX - shows how this happens in housing where e/m are forced into substandard accommodation by councils
WOOD ET AL - found the same in employment. He sent 3 identical job applications for the same job, each application having a name associated with a ethnic group
- he found that applicants with english sounding names where more likely to…
Internal factors
[labelling and teacher racism]
G+Y - teachers hold racialised expectations - expect black students to present behavioural problems and misinterpret their behaviour as challenging to their authority, therefore teachers are more likely to discipline black boys even for minor offences for which white boys weren’t disciplined.
- pupils react negatively to this - further conflict
WRIGHT - studied a multi-ethnic primary school through observation of interactions of teachers and students. She found that teachers hold ethnocentric views.
Leads them to label Asian students as lacking English skills
Pupil identities
Archer - argues that teachers dominant discourse exclude e/m students from the image of the ‘ideal pupil’. these teacher attitudes created 3 different types of pupil identities:
[1] THE IDEAL PUPIL
- white m/c masculinised identity, pupils are seen as achieving as a result of natural ability
[2] THE PATHOLOGICAL PUPIL
- asian, deserving poor, feminised identity, oppressed sexuality. These pupils are seen as conformists + culture-bound achiever who has to work hard to succeed.
[3] THE DEMONISED PUPIL
- Black, white w/c, hyper-sexualised identity. These pupils are seen as unintelligent, peer-led, culturally deprived underachievers.
e/m pupils, even those who are high achievers are either seen as pathologised/demonised pupil. Archer calls this a positive-negative stereotype.