ethnic differences in achievement Flashcards
Ethnicity - EXTERNAL
- Cultural deprivation
- Material deprivation and class
- Racism in wider society
Cultural deprivation CD
CD theory sees the underachievement of some ethnic groups as the result of inadequate socialisation in the home. The explanation has 3 main aspects
- Intellectual and linguistic skills
- Attitudes and values
- Family structure and parental support
Intellectual and linguistic skills
Cultural deprivation theorists see the lack of intellectual and linguistic skills as a major cause of underachievement for many minority children - argue that many children from low income black families lack intellectual stimulation and enriching experiences, leaving them poorly equipped for school because they have not been able to develop reasoning and problem solving skills
Engelmann
Considers the language spoken by low income black American families as inadequate for educational success. They see it as ungrammatical, disjointed and incapable for expressing abstract ideas
There has also been concern that children who do not speak English at home may be held back educationally - official statistics show this is not a major factor
Attitudes and values
CD theorists see lack of motivation as a major cause of the failure of many black children. Most children are socialised into the mainstream culture, which installs ambition, competitiveness and willingness to make the sacrifices necessary to achieve long term goals. By contrast CD theorists argue some black children are socialised into a subculture that installs fatalistic, ‘live for today’ attitude that does not value education and leaves them unequipped for success
Family structure and parental support
Black families - CD theorists argue that this failure to socialise children adequately is the result of a dysfunctional family structure
Family structure and parental support - MOYNIHAN
- argues that due to many black families are headed by a lone mother, their children are deprived of adequate care since she has to struggle financially in the absence of the male breadwinner
- the fathers absence also means that boys lack a role model of male achievement
- sees CD as a cycle where inadequately socialise children from unstable families go on to fail at school and become inadequate parents themselves
Family structure and parental support - MURRAY
Argues that a high rate of lone parenthood and a lack of positive male role models lead to the underachievement of some minorities
Family structure and parental support - SEWELL
- says “the biggest barrier facing black boys is actually black peer pressure. we need to talk about how black students discourage their peers” - he argues that black students do worse then their peers due to cultural differences in socialisation and attitudes to education
- argues it’s not the absence of fathers as role models that leads to black boys underachieving, instead thought the problem to be a lack of fatherly nurturing or ‘tough love’
Absence of fathers
Results in street gangs of other fatherless boys affecting black boys ‘perverse loyalty and love’ - these present boys with a media inspired role model of anti school black masculinity who’s ideal ARNOT describes as the ‘ultra tough ghetto superstar, an image constantly reinforced through rap lyrics and MTV videos’
Chinese families
- Amy CHUA said the superiority of chinese parenting and unveiled a manifesto for ‘tiger mother’s who drove their kids hard, whether in exams or piano practise
- Some of the things she never allowed her daughters to do - attend a sleepover, be in a school play
- Other studies have suggested that study focused Chinese parenting may hamper students later in life
Asian families
While many black families have absent fathers, in Sewell’s view Indian and Chinese pupils benefit from supportive families that have an ‘Asian work ethic’ and place a high value on education
Lupton
Argues that adult authority in Asian families is similar to the model that operates in schools. She found that respectful behaviour towards adults was expected from children. This had a knock on effect in school, since parent were more likely to be supportive of school behaviour policies
White WC families
Most research has focused on black family structures as possible causes of underachievement. However, white WC pupils often underachieve and have lower aspirations - this low level of aspiration and achievement may be the result of a lack of parental support
Lupton
- studied 4 mainly WC schools, 2 predominantly white, are serving a largely Pakistani community and the 4th drawing pupils from an ethically mixed community
- she found that teachers reported poorer levels of behaviour and discipline in the white WC schools, despite the fact that they had fewer children on FSM
- teachers blamed this on lower levels of parental support and the negative attitude that white MC parents had towards education
- ethnic minority parents were more likely to see education as ‘a way up in society’