Ethics - Taylor Study Method 2015 Flashcards
Animal Research
Standards for research:
1) Follow institutional requirements, governing laws, and professional standards
2) Justification of research should be clear, significant enough to justify the animal use
3) Protocol must be reviewed by appropriate animal care committee (e.g., IACUC)
4) U.S. Department of Agriculture inspects facilities twice a year
5) Records regarding the procedures used and care of animals must be kept
6) Acquisition of animals must be lawful; transportation of animals must be humane
7) Experimental procedures are acceptable if non-intrusive or if the animal is properly anesthetized
8) If Euthanasia is required, must be done humanely
9) In educational activities involving live animals, including instruction of ethics
Personnel
a) Must be properly trained or supervised
b) Must provide proper care and housing for the animals
Reasonable Alternatives
*Institutional Requirements: Regulations of a University or clinic that detail specific ethics and regulations of institutionally based research
**Laws: Legal documents setting forth rules governing a particular kind of activity (e.g., animal research)
Buckley Amendment
Established
1) 1974
2) Also known as the Family Educational Right to Privacy Act (FERPA)
3) Federal Law
Functions
a) Protects the privacy of student school records
b) Rights are given to parents of minors, and to eligible students over 18
c) May request that schools amend incorrect of misleading information
d) formal hearing may be requested if school denies to amend or correct information
e) Limits disclosure of records; in most instances, written consent required
f) Exceptions include reporting to accrediting organizations, complying with a subpoena
Reasonable Alternatives
* Least Restrictive Environment: Students with a documented disability should be placed in programs with non-disabled students whenever possible
**Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965: Guarantees a high-quality education for all individuals, with a fair and equal opportunity to obtain an education
Deception
Justification of use
1) Used to prevent participants from altering their responses
2) Use must be justified by study’s value and alternative procedures are not feasible
Ethical
a) May include false feedback or withholding information regarding study design
b) Must debrief at the earliest opportunity, explain use of deception
c) After debriefing, participants may withdraw their data
Unethical
A) Never permissible to cause emotional or physical harm, or willingness to participate in research
Informed consent
1) True informed consent is not obtained when deception is employed
2) Debriefing regarding the Deception must be conducted as soon as possible
Reasonable Alternatives
*Informed Consent: An agreement in which proposed treatment or research participation requires the disclosure of benefits, risks, and alternatives to the proposed activity; the method by which fully informed, rational persons may be involved in choices about their health care or research participation
**Avoiding Harm: Minimizing harm to research participants, supervisees, clients/patients, and others with whom the psychologist works.
Research and Publication
Conducting Ethical Research and Publication
1) Conduct research according to the general principles of APA ethics code: beneficence/non-maleficence; fidelity and responsibility; integrity; justice; respect of people’s rights and dignity
2) Applications to institutional review board: resubmit if changes made to method, compensation, procedures, informed consent, or confidentiality protections
3) Avoid biased language: follow APA publication manual
4) Obtain informed consent orally or in writing prior to their participation
5) If participant legally unable to give consent: explain study appropriately, obtain assent, obtain consent from legally authorized person if appropriate
6) Provide participants with explanations of the purpose, expected duration, procedures, voluntary nature of participation including the right to withdraw, potential risks, benefits, limits of confidentiality, contact information if questions arise
7) Do not use passive consent from legal guardians for participants not able to legally consent
8) Informed consent not necessary in studies with no reasonable risk of harm
9) Experimental treatments: consent must include information about experimental nature of treatment, how assignment to condition is concluded
10) Deception necessary at times to avoid participant “hypothesis-guessing” - value of research must outweigh costs, alternative must be infeasible or ineffective, cannot cause sever distress
11) Debrief as soon as possible
12) After Study involving deception, allow participants to withdraw data
13) Compensation may not be excessive
14) If extra credit is offered in class, offer alternative methods
15) May not ask students, clients, or subordinates to participate in research
16) Do not falsify/fabricate data, correct errors in published work if discovered, share data with other researchers for verification/reanalysis
17) Do not plagiarize
18) Authorship order according to relative contributions regardless of status
19) Minor contributions do not merit authorships
Reasonable Alternatives
*Plagiarism: Presenting another person’s ideas or words as your own; failing to cite another person’s work adequately may constitute plagiarism
**Assessment: The Process through which psychologist gather or integrate data from various sources (e.g., interviews, psych-diagnostic tests, behavior observations, record reviews) in order to evaluate an individual’s psychological, behavioral, social, emotional, or cognitive functioning for the purpose of providing a diagnosis or services to that individual.
Competency to Stand Trial
About
1) Legal decision regarding ability to participate in one’s own defense
2) Assess present mental status, not at the time of the crime
3) Assess ability to understand the nature and purpose of the legal proceedings, comprehension of his/her stats or role in the proceedings and ability to assist in his/her defense
4) If deemed incompetent, defendant receives inpatient treatment until competency regained, or released in a conservator
Reasonable Alternatives
a) Privilege: A legal term that refers to an individual’s right to refuse to have his or her information revealed or released in legal proceedings.
b) Insanity: A legal term used in a court of law to describe an individual who, as a result of a mental disorder, is psychologically impaired to the extend that he or she is unable to distinguish right from wrong and understand the consequences of his or her own behavior
c) Mental Illness: Behavioral or psychological syndromes that cause significant distress or disability or a significantly increased risk of suffering death, pain, or important loss of freedom
d) Rehabilitation: The restoration of the ill or injured patient to an optimal functional level in all areas of activity
e) Informed Consent: The therapist’s obligation to obtain consent from the client to participate in therapy, assessment, research, and so forth
f) Testamentary Capacity: Having the mental competency to execute a last will and testament at the time a will was signed and witnessed
g) Criminal Responsibility: Assessment of a person’s mental status at the time an alleged crime was committed
Court-Ordered Evaluations
Evaluations
1) Paid by court (ex., competency to stand trial, mental health status, child custody, etc.,)
2) Never the psychologist’s role to determine guilt or innocence
3) Clarify limits of confidentiality, privilege
If legal representative objects to the testing
a) Psychologist must notify the court and proceed as directed
Child Custody Evaluation
A) Written informed consent from all adults, explanation to all minors
B) No multiple relationships with the child in custody evaluation
Reasonable Alternatives
Insanity: A legal term representing the inability to know right from wrong or understand the consequences of one’s actions
Information Harmful to the Client: Information gained by a therapist in a session or evaluation that may incriminate the client is divulged when privilege or confidentiality is waived
*Waived Privilege: Occurs when the client gives up the right to prevent a therapist from divulging confidential information in a legal proceeding; this information may be harmful to the client’s case; in cases that involve minors, the privilege belongs to the parent; in cases of insanity, the privilege is waived by the courts
**Best Interest of the Child: This term is used by the courts to determine placement in child custody cases
***Privilege: A legal term that refers to an individual’s right to refuse to have his or her information revealed or released in legal proceedings; it is limited in court-ordered evaluations
**Confidentiality: A psychologist’s obligation to take reasonable steps to protect current and former clients’ information from unauthorized disclosure; is limited in court-ordered evaluations
**Guild Versus Innocence: Decision made by the court regarding the likelihood that the client committed the crime
Expert Witness
Expert Witness
1) Testify based on special training and professional competence
2) Professional Opinions regarding subject matter
3) Avoid multiple relationships - do not provide expert testimony to acquaintances, therapy clients
4) Assist jury in making their decision
5) Serve as impartial educator to jury
6) Do not accept contingency fees
Reasonable Alternatives
a) Forensic Psychology: The branch of psychology that provides psychological expertise within the legal system
b) Fact Witness: Someone who testifies in court because of his or her direct knowledge of an event
Fact Witness
Testimony
1) Regarding direct knowledge of an event
Subpoena
a) For testimony as a witness
b) Through a deposition/interrogation
Under Oath
A) Must give accurate account
B) Decline to answer questions if you do not know the answer, or it appropriate only for expert witness
C) Testify only if client has waived confidentiality/privilege, or if court-ordered
Reasonable Alternatives
Confidentiality: Refers to a psychologist’s obligation to take reasonable steps to protect current or former clients’ information from unauthorized disclosure
**Privilege: A legal term that refers to an individual’s right to refuse to have his or her information revealed or released in a legal proceeding
**Expert Witness: A person who can testify because of his or her expertise or special knowledge about a subject related to the case
Insanity
Insanity as a legal defense
1) Individual is unable to distinguish right from wrong and to understand the consequences of their behavior; must be due to a mental disorder
- Also referred to as the Not Guilt by Reason of Insanity (NGRI) defense
2) First case using Insanity defense: M’Naughten
- Most States: defendant deemed insane is not held criminally responsible
- Some States: “Guilty, But Mentally Ill” (GNMI) verdict
3) Decided by court
- Psychologist may give expert testimony regarding Insanity, but it is the court that determines Insanity in defendant
Evaluation
A) Privilege waived, psychologist should review limits of confidentiality with client
Reasonable Alternatives
*Psychosis: A general psychological (rather than legal) term encompassing mental disorders characterized by a significant impairment in reality testing (e.g., hallucinations and delusions) or other sever deficits (e.g., catatonic behavior and severe cognitive disorganization) that prevent individuals from meeting basic life demands.
**Paranoia: A psychotic state of mind characterized by intense fear or anxiety that influences the individual to believe that something or someone is after him or her, in some persecutory fashion.
Subpoena
Definition: A legal command to testify about a client or to turn over client records
Action
1) Clarify whether the subpoena constitutes a court order
2) If unclear, contact the court
3) May follow court order in releasing client information without client’s consent
4) May also contest court order by asking judge for guidance or filing a legal motion to quash
5) If Subpoena does not constitute a court order, written release of information must be obtained from client
6) If client refuses to consent to this release, and a subpoena does not constitute court order, instruct the requesting attorney that the information cannot be released without the person’s consent (do not reveal as client)
7) Requesting attorney will then stop pursuing the records, or will need to get court order
Types
A) Subpoena duces tecum: Bring physical records, only the information specifically requested
B) Subpoena ad testificandum: Oral testimony
Reasonable Alternatives
Confidentiality: A psychologist’s obligation to take reasonable steps to protect current or former clients’ information from unauthorized disclosure
Privilege: An individual’s right to refuse to have his or her information revealed or released in a legal proceeding
*Deposition: Out-of-court testimony, under oath, which is transcribed in writing; takes the place of a courtroom testimony
**Fact Witness: Someone who testifies in court because of his or her direct knowledge of an event
**Expert Witness: Someone who testifies in court because of his or her expertise or special knowledge about a subject related to the case
Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California
Case Details:
- Tarasoff murdered by Poddar, fellow student at the UC Berkeley undergoing therapy with the university psychologist
- Poddar told psychologist of specific plans to harm Tarasoff
- Psychologist broke confidentiality and warned police
- Neither police nor psychologist warned Tarasoff
- Poddar killed Tarasoff, psychologist held liable for failure to warn her and her parents
- Court ruled “protective privilege ends where the public peril begins”
Case Results:
- Duty to protect may include warning intended victim, notifying police, contacting others, hospitalization of client
- Some states have laws requiring warning of potential victims
- Ethics code allows breaking confidentiality when risk of harm to others
- Some argue that warning others may not always be the best course of action in fulfilling duty to protect, as breaking confidentiality will ruin the therapeutic alliance
Reasonable Alternatives:
Confidentiality: A psychologist’s obligation to keep anything revealed by a client in confidence private; the ethical principle or legal right that psychologists will hold all information regarding a client secret, unless the client consents to disclosure.
**Privilege: A legal term that refers to an individual’s right to refuse to have his or her information revealed or released in a legal proceeding
**Mandated Reporting: Psychologists and others’ legal obligation to disclose any knowledge of child maltreatment, and in some states, partner abuse, domestic violence, or elder abuse
Confidentiality
Confidentiality:
1) Keep client information private unless client consents or as required by law
2) Essential in building effective therapeutic relationship; “primary obligation” of psychologists
3) Maintaining security of records
4) Inform clients of limits of confidentiality at outset of therapeutic or professional relationship
Disclosing Information without client consent
A) Allowable to provide needed professional services, to protect client/psychologist/others from harm, for professional consultation, for payment of services, court-ordered evaluation
B) Provide minimum necessary information
C) Preventing self-harm: may contact family members, other professionals
D) When a client sues the therapist
Reporting Abuse:
a) Required for child abuse, depends on state law for domestic abuse, abuse of vulnerable adults
b) Tarasoff case - “duty to protect” - mandate varies by state
“Duty to protect” regarding HIV transmission
1) State laws vary; APA resolution opposes legal duty, acceptable only if the their party is identifiable, with compelling reason to be at risk, is unsuspecting, and the client is unwilling or unreliable in notifying
Employee Assistance Program (EAP): Release information about attendance, compliance may be mandatory condition of therapy
Military: Confidentiality is limited; information must be released in the lawful conduct of investigations, other special circumstances, provide informed consent of these limits
Minors: Parents retain right to records of treatment unless such release is detrimental; balance minor’s needs for privacy and parental rights, clarify with both minor and parents at outset of therapy
Privilege: client holds right to withhold information from legal proceeding; waived if client sues therapist, if therapist is acting in a court-appointed capacity, if client introduces mental health condition as a defense in a civil suit, if client seeks out assistance form psychologist for the exclusive purpose of committing a crime, if psychologist determines that a client requires hospitalization
Information regarding client requested by Professional Standards Review Committee - obtain waiver of confidentiality that is specific in wording
National Survey: Confidentiality is most ethically challenging issue
Reasonable Alternatives
Privacy: A client’s right to refrain from disclosing personal thoughts, feelings, or beliefs that are known only to the client; private information becomes confidential when it is disclosed by the client to his or her therapist; while privacy is an aspect of the individual, confidentiality is an aspect of the client-therapist relationship.
**Duty to Protect: A psychologist’s responsibility to take reasonable steps to protect the intended victim when a client has made a threat against an identifiable individual.
**Informed Consent: The process by which a psychologist explains and a client agrees to the purpose and nature of psychological services, the possible uses of information obtained during psychological services, the possible benefits of psychological services, the risks or costs associated with psychological services, and the limits of confidentiality.
**Mandated Reporting: Psychologists and other’s legal obligation to disclose any knowledge of child maltreatment, and in some states, partner abuse, domestic violence, or elder abuse.
Privacy and HIPAA
Privacy:
1) Keeping persons or information about them protected from public knowledge
2) Vital to psychological practice, closely associated with confidentiality and anonymity
1996
*Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
Privacy rule of 2003
1) Standards for the privacy, use and dissemination of health care information that is transmitted electronically
“Protected Health Information” (PHI)
1) Includes any information “about health status, provision of health care, or payment for health care that can be linked to an individual”
2) Disclose minimum amount of information necessary to their parties
3) Includes oral, written, typed, and electronic data
4) Clients must sign an “acknowledgement of receipt” regarding HIPAA policy
5) May include diagnosis, treatment plans
6) Requests for psychotherapy notes require additional written authorization
7) Keep psychotherapy notes separate from other PHI
8) Clients may request access to records, review their records, ask for a duplicate copy, and ask for an amendment to any inaccurate information
9) PHI must be kept for six years
10) Applies to covered entities that disseminate information electronically
11) When state laws and HIPAA are contradictory, Follow the more stringent law
Reasonable Alternatives
Informed Consent: The process through which psychologists ensure that clients are aware of potential risks and benefits associated with therapy or psychological testing.
**State and Federal Laws: Legal documents setting forth rules governing a particular type of activity.
**APA: American Psychological Association, a scientific and professional organization representing psychology in the US. The APA has 150,000 members worldwide.
Privilege
Rights/Limits
1) Refusal to release information to court proceedings
2) Holder of Privilege: legally competent adult, parent/guardian for minor, legal guardian for in competent client
3) May be asserted by psychologists to challenge subpoenas
Privilege between client and therapist
- supported by Jaffee v. Redmond case
Granting Privilege
A) varies by state and by court
B) Waived by client if release of information is signed
Reasonable Alternatives
*Confidentiality: A psychologists’ obligation to take reasonable steps to protect current and former clients’ information from unauthorized disclosure. Privilege is a legal right of clients; confidentiality is a therapist’s professional duty.
**Clinical Privileges: Possessing specific credentials to provide certain types of services in a clinical setting.
Consultation
Seeking advice of another therapist not involved with case
1) Do not reveal identifying information
2) Share information only pertinent to consultation issue
Used for Questions regarding:
A) Countertransference
B) Competence
C) Ethical Dilemmas
D) Clinical Decisions
Differs from supervision, which involves formal responsibility
Ideal Consultant
a) Forthright, trustworthy, ethically sensitive, and competent
Multiple opinions beneficial because advice can be flawed
Document consultation
- In writing
Reasonable Alternatives
Countertransference: The process by which the therapist has an emotional reaction to the client due to his/her own personal issues.
**Refer Out: To give a client the names of other therapists who are qualified to treat him or her.
**Confidentiality: A psychologists’ obligation to take reasonable steps to protect current and former clients’ information from unauthorized disclosure.
**Supervision: Mentoring and oversight of a psychologist-in-training. Is different from Consultation in that it has a formal responsibility.