Ethics And Law Flashcards
Dr. Gyedu is an oncologist treating Mr. Obeng, a 70-year-old patient with advanced, terminal cancer. Mr. Obeng’s prognosis is poor, with an estimated three months to live despite aggressive treatment. He is in significant pain and has expressed a desire to end his suffering. Mr. Obeng asks Dr. Gyedu to help him die peacefully by prescribing a lethal dose of medication.
What will you do as a Doctor?
Case 1- you’ll do it cause the patient has autonomy and mental capacity for it
If he isn’t mentally stable or doesn’t have the mental capacity to make such a decision, From an ethical standpoint, the best course of action for Dr. Gyedu, given that Mr. Obeng is not mentally stable to make an informed decision about ending his life, involves several key principles of medical ethics:
1. Beneficence: Focus on actions that promote the well-being of the patient. Providing effective palliative care to alleviate pain and suffering is paramount. 2. Non-maleficence: Avoid causing harm to the patient. This means not taking any actions that could intentionally end Mr. Obeng’s life, as he cannot give informed consent. 3. Respect for Autonomy: While respecting autonomy is critical, this principle is limited when a patient lacks the capacity to make informed decisions. In such cases, advance directives or previously expressed wishes should be considered, if available. 4. Justice: Ensure fair and equitable treatment. This includes providing Mr. Obeng with the same quality of care and consideration as any other patient in similar circumstances. 5. Professional Integrity: Maintain the integrity of the medical profession by adhering to legal and ethical standards. Physician-assisted dying or euthanasia is illegal in many jurisdictions and goes against the principles of many medical ethical guidelines.
Eunice, a 14-year-old girl, walks into a pharmacy and approaches Dr. Ahmed, the pharmacist on duty. She asks to buy a pack of condoms. Dr. Ahmed is aware that Eunice is a minor and he also understands the importance of promoting safe sex practices to prevent unwanted pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections (STIs).
What will you do?
Given this clarification, here’s how Dr. Ahmed should handle the situation using bioethical principles:
- Autonomy: Acknowledge Eunice’s right to make decisions about her own health, even as a minor. Respect her privacy and ability to seek contraception.
- Beneficence: Ensure Eunice’s best interests by providing access to condoms to help prevent STIs and unwanted pregnancies.
- Non-maleficence: Avoid harm by ensuring Eunice understands how to properly use condoms to prevent misuse.
- Confidentiality: Maintain Eunice’s privacy to build trust and encourage her to seek help and advice without fear of judgment.
- Justice: Ensure Eunice has equal access to health resources, including condoms, without discrimination based on age.
-
Assess Understanding and Provide Education:
- Engage Eunice in a respectful, non-judgmental conversation. Ask if she understands how to use condoms and provide clear, age-appropriate information about safe sex practices, including the correct use of condoms and the importance of preventing STIs and unwanted pregnancies.
-
Provide the Condoms:
- If Eunice demonstrates an understanding of how to use condoms and the importance of safe sex, provide her with the condoms. This action aligns with promoting her health and preventing potential harm.
-
Offer Additional Resources:
- Provide Eunice with resources such as brochures or information about local sexual health clinics where she can get further advice and support. Encourage her to speak with a trusted adult or healthcare provider if she feels comfortable doing so.
-
Maintain Confidentiality:
- Ensure the conversation and transaction are conducted privately to protect Eunice’s confidentiality, helping her feel safe and supported.
-
Follow Legal and Professional Guidelines:
- Be aware of and adhere to local laws and pharmacy policies regarding the sale of condoms to minors. Ensure that actions are in compliance with legal and ethical standards.
By following these steps, Dr. Ahmed can responsibly support Eunice’s health and safety, respect her autonomy, and provide her with the necessary tools and knowledge to engage in safe sexual practices. This approach balances ethical principles and promotes a supportive, non-judgmental environment for Eunice.
What is the term given to the study of morality ??
What is the term given to a set of moral standards and a code for behaviour that govern an individual’s interactions with other individuals and within society.
Ethics is the study of morality. It is a set of moral standards and a code for behaviour that govern an individual’s interactions with other individuals and within society.
It involves the careful and systematic reflection on and analysis of moral decisions and behaviour, whether past, present or future
What is morality
Morality is the value dimension of human decision-making and behaviour.
Morality refers to the principles and values that determine what is considered right and wrong behaviour.
The language of morality includes nouns such as ‘rights’, ‘responsibilities’ and ‘virtues’ and adjectives such as ‘good’ and ‘bad’ (or ‘evil’), ‘right’ and ‘wrong’, ‘just’ and ‘unjust’.
What’s the difference between morality and ethics
Ethics is primarily a matter of knowing (how to go about something) whereas morality is a matter of doing.
“Morality’ is what people do in fact believe to be right and good, while ‘Ethics’ is a critical reflection about morality and the rational analysis of it.”
For example; “Should I terminate pregnancy?” is a moral question, whereas “How should I go about deciding?” is an ethical concern.
What is bioethics
State the three components of bioethics
What is medical ethics
Bioethics is a field of applied ethics that deals with ethical issues arising from biological and medical sciences.
Components of Bioethics:
Medical ethics: Physician centered
Clinical ethics: Hospital care decisions with aid of committees and consultants
Health Care Ethics: nurses & other healthcare professionals
Medical Ethics describes the moral principles by which a Doctor must conduct themselves.
Medical ethics focuses primarily on issues arising out of the practice of medicine.
Medical ethics is a set of moral principles that a doctor works with
Law and Ethics:
Laws are mandatory rules to which all citizens must adhere or risk civil or criminal liability. Ethics often relate to morals and set forth universal goals that we try to meet.
However, there is no temporal penalty for failing to meet the goals as there is apt to be in law.
Laws to some extend has been a driving force in shaping our ethics.
True or false
What is the Nuremberg code
True
Laws come with sanctions.
Civil laws- between individuals
Criminal- between state and individual and needs custodian centers such as prison
Nuremberg Code 1948
• In 1946, 23 Nazi defendants were tried for war crimes and crimes against humanity hence the Nuremberg Code
Some components of the code are:
1.Requirement for voluntary participation in research
2. Informed consent
3. Favorable risk/benefit analysis: Risk vs. Benefit:
• The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
4. Right to withdraw without penalty; Right to Withdraw:
• During the course of the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if they have reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to them to be impossible.
5.Termination of Experiment:
• During the course of the experiment, the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage if they have probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill, and careful judgment required of them, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject
Experiments Should be conducted by skilled people and in proper facilities
What’s the relationship between law and bioethics
Both :
Are Case-based (casuistic)
Have existed from ancient times
Change over time
Strives for consistency
Incorporates societal values
Form the Basis for healthcare policies
Only law:
1.Has Some unchangeable directives:example Constitutions often have entrenched provisions that are difficult to amend. Another example is that Legal systems have formal processes for changing laws, often requiring significant consensus (e.g., legislative supermajorities, referenda). This makes some legal principles relatively unchangeable
2.Has Formal rules for process
3.Is Adversarial: In law, “adversarial” refers to a legal system or process in which two opposing parties present their cases to an impartial judge or jury
Only bioethics:
1.Relies heavily on individual values
2.Is Interpretable by medical personnel
3.Has the Ability to respond relatively rapidly to changing environment
How was bioethics developed
It is traceable to three
(3) different but interrelated events:
A set of unpleasant events (“scandals”) in the history of biomedical research
• advancement in medical technology
• the civil rights movement
How bioethics is developed;
Scandals- Example is the Nazis. Humans were dehumanized for research leading to nuremburg code something something
Civil rights movement- tuskegee syphilis study conducted on blacks.
The Tuskegee Syphilis Study, also known as the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment, was a notorious clinical study conducted between 1932 and 1972 by the United States Public Health Service (USPHS). The study aimed to observe the natural progression of untreated syphilis in African American men under the guise of receiving free health care from the government.
Key Points:
- Background: The study began in 1932 in Tuskegee, Alabama, involving 600 African American men, 399 of whom had latent syphilis and 201 who did not have the disease. The men were mostly poor and illiterate sharecroppers.
- Misleading Participants: The participants were misled and were not informed of their diagnosis. Instead, they were told they were being treated for “bad blood,” a term that could refer to various ailments including syphilis, anemia, and fatigue.
- Lack of Treatment: Even after penicillin became the standard treatment for syphilis by 1947, the men were deliberately not treated with the antibiotic. The study continued without their informed consent, and they were subjected to painful and invasive procedures.
- Ethical Violations: The study was conducted without the informed consent of the participants, violating ethical standards and human rights. The men were not given adequate information about their condition or the true nature of the study.
- Exposure and Termination: The study was exposed in 1972 by a whistleblower named Peter Buxtun, leading to public outrage and its subsequent termination. By the time the study ended, many participants had died from syphilis or its complications, and others had infected their wives and children.
- Aftermath: In 1973, a class-action lawsuit was filed on behalf of the study participants and their families, resulting in a $10 million settlement. In 1997, President Bill Clinton formally apologized on behalf of the United States to the survivors of the study and their families.
- Impact on Ethics: The Tuskegee Syphilis Study had profound effects on medical ethics and research practices in the United States. It led to the establishment of the National Research Act in 1974 and the creation of the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP). Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) were also mandated to oversee and approve the ethics of research involving human subjects.
The Tuskegee Syphilis Study remains a powerful reminder of the importance of ethical standards in medical research and the need to protect vulnerable populations from exploitation.
State three importance of medical ethics
The study of ethics prepares medical students to recognize difficult situations and to deal with them in a rational and principled manner.
Ethics is important in physicians’ interactions with society and their colleagues
The conduct of medical research in a way that serves interests of individuals, groups and/or society
Celsius believed in the first century that
What happened in the willbrook hepatitis study
In the 1950 Willowbrook Hepatitis Study…
a. new admissions were closed.
b. children were not deliberately exposed to hepatitis viruses.
c. researchers obtained consent from the parents.
d. approval was given by the committee in charge.
Experience
“it is not cruel to inflict on a few criminals suffering which may benefit’s multitudes of
people through all centuries.”
-Celsius, a 1st century Roman historian
1950 Willowbrook
Hepatitis Study
• Children and adolescents with disabilities were deliberately exposed to the
hepatitts virus in order to discover a way of preventing the disease.
• New admission into the institution was closed.
• Parents of children on the waiting list were written to inform them that their children could be placed on a
research ward after which they could be
transferred to the facility.
• Researchers claimed they obtained consent from the parents and that various committees had reviewed and approved the study;
Answer is c. Researchers did obtain consent from the parents, but it was controversial because parents were pressured to give consent in exchange for their children being admitted to the overcrowded institution.
Who introduced use of written contract to confirm informed consent
Read also on pfizer study in northern nigerian
In 1796, Edward Jenner conducted his famous chickenpox vaccination using children and included his own as well.
• in 1900 a US surgeon general used 22 Spanish
immigrant workers in Cuba to prove that mosquitoes transmitted yellow fever.
• He introduced use of healthy participants in research and use of written contract to confirm informed consent.
Major Walter Reed, a U.S. Army physician, who is indeed a significant figure in the history of informed consent. In 1900, during his work on yellow fever in Cuba, Reed and his colleagues introduced the use of written contracts to obtain informed consent from research participants. This was a pioneering step in formalizing the process of informed consent in medical research
State four experiments the nazis did
German Nazi War Experimentation
• Sulfanilamide experiments
• Poison experiments
• Sterilization experiments
• Mustard gas experiments
• Freezing experiments
• Human twin studies
Who wasthe first person to use the expression,medical ethics
The WMA updated the Hippocratic Oath for 20th century use (First task)
The result was the Declaration of Geneva, adopted at the WMA’s 2nd General Assembly in 1948.
True or false
Percival was the first person to use the expression medical ethics
Thomas Percival (1740–1804), a physician from Manchester, England
Introduced it in his eponymous book Medical Ethics (Percival 1803b) as a description of the professional duties of physicians and surgeons to their patients, to their fellow practitioners, and to the public
Most historians treat the history of medical ethics as coextensive with the history of medicine.
The WMA updated the Hippocratic Oath for 20th century use (First task)
The result was the Declaration of Geneva, adopted at the WMA’s 2nd General Assembly in 1948.
Declaration of Geneva (1948):
• The Declaration of Geneva, adopted by the World Medical Association (WMA) in 1948, is a modern version of the Hippocratic Oath. It outlines ethical principles for physicians, emphasizing their commitment to patient care, confidentiality, respect for patients’ autonomy, and the importance of professional integrity.
After WMA updated the Hippocratic oath as the first task, what was the second task?
The second task was the development of an International Code of Medical Ethics, which was adopted at the 3rd General Assembly in 1949.
The next task was to develop ethical guidelines for research on human subjects.
The guidelines were adopted as the Declaration of Helsinki in 1964.
The WMA has adopted policy statements on more than 100 specific issues
Declaration of Helsinki (1964, with revisions):
• The Declaration of Helsinki is a set of ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. First adopted by the WMA in 1964 and revised several times (most recently in 2013), it provides guidelines on issues such as informed consent, protection of vulnerable populations, research protocols, and the ethical responsibilities of researchers.
State six ethical theories
Consequentialism
Deontology
Utilitarianism
Virtue ethics
Communitarianism
Principlism
These are ethical theories that guide decision-making in moral dilemmas. Here’s a concise breakdown:
1. Consequentialism – Judges actions based on their outcomes. If the consequences are good, the action is morally right.
• Example: Lying is acceptable if it saves a life.
2. Deontology – Focuses on duties and rules rather than consequences. Actions are right or wrong based on set moral principles.
• Example: Lying is wrong, even if it saves a life, because honesty is a duty.
3. Utilitarianism – A type of consequentialism that seeks the greatest good for the greatest number.
• Example: Sacrificing one person to save many is justified.
4. Virtue Ethics – Focuses on the character of the person rather than rules or consequences. Encourages moral virtues like honesty, courage, and kindness.
• Example: A good doctor should cultivate compassion, not just follow rules.
5. Communitarianism – Emphasizes the importance of community values and social good over individual rights.
• Example: Vaccination is necessary because it benefits society, even if some individuals object.
6. Principlism – Uses four key ethical principles (autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice) to guide decisions.
• Example: A doctor respects a patient’s choice (autonomy) while ensuring no harm (non-maleficence).
Would you like a more detailed comparison or application in healthcare ethics?
What is deontology
Explain the Two Major Deontological Theories
Deontology:these are the rules and you must follow them no matter what
This involves a search for well-founded rules that can serve as the basis for making moral decisions. It provides a framework for ethical decision-making based on adherence to rules, duties, and principles.
It emphasizes the intrinsic morality of actions, respect for individuals, and consistency in ethical judgments.
Two Major Deontological Theories (Kantian & Command Theories)
Kantian Theory, Immanuel Kant (1724-1804):
The concept of the categorical imperative – principle that one must follow, regardless of desires or extenuating circumstances.
Certainly! Deontological ethics, which focuses on duties, rules, and principles, includes several major theories. Here are explanations for Kantian ethics and divine command theory:
1. Kantian Ethics (Immanuel Kant, 1724-1804): Kantian ethics is founded on the philosophical ideas of Immanuel Kant. The central concept is the categorical imperative, which is a principle that directs actions regardless of desires or circumstances. According to Kant, the morality of an action depends not on its consequences but on whether it conforms to a principle that could be universally applied. This principle ensures consistency and fairness in moral reasoning, emphasizing duty, respect for others, and the intrinsic value of moral actions themselves. 2. Divine Command Theory: Divine command theory holds that an action’s morality is determined by whether it aligns with the commands or will of a divine being or beings. In this theory, moral obligations are seen as stemming from divine authority, such as God’s commands or scriptures. Actions are morally right if they conform to divine commands and wrong if they violate them, irrespective of their consequences or other considerations.
These two deontological theories provide different perspectives on moral decision-making: Kantian ethics emphasizes rationality, universalizability of moral principles, and respect for persons as autonomous agents, while divine command theory grounds morality in religious authority and obedience to divine commands. Both theories offer structured frameworks for evaluating ethical dilemmas
Certainly! Here’s another clinical scenario where Kantian ethics could be applied:
Scenario: A medical student is on rotation in a hospital and witnesses a senior resident making disparaging remarks about a patient’s cultural background in front of the medical team. The remarks are offensive and derogatory, potentially impacting patient care and team dynamics.
Application of Kantian Ethics:
- Universalizability: The medical student considers whether it would be morally acceptable for all healthcare professionals to make derogatory remarks about patients based on cultural background. Kantian ethics would argue against such behavior, as it undermines the dignity and respect owed to all individuals, regardless of cultural differences.
- Respect for Persons: Kantian ethics emphasizes treating individuals as ends in themselves, not as means to an end. Making derogatory remarks about a patient based on cultural background violates this principle by disregarding the patient’s inherent dignity and worth.
- Duty to Act Ethically: The medical student has a duty to uphold ethical standards in patient care and professional conduct. Kantian ethics would guide the student to speak up against the senior resident’s behavior, as it aligns with the duty to prevent harm, promote respect for patients, and maintain professional integrity.
- Consistency and Moral Principles: By adhering to Kantian principles, the medical student can advocate for a respectful and inclusive healthcare environment where all patients are treated with dignity and healthcare professionals uphold moral duties to act ethically and responsibly.
In this scenario, Kantian ethics helps the medical student navigate the ethical dilemma of witnessing inappropriate behavior and guides them in taking actions that uphold respect for patients and ethical standards in healthcare practice.
Command Theory:
This approach asserts that moral duties are derived from the commands of a divine being. Certain actions are morally obligatory, forbidden, or permissible based on God’s will or decrees.
Eg., “Treat all people as equals.”
Religious (for example, the belief that all God’s human creatures are equal)
Non-religious (for example, human beings share almost all of the same genes).
Certainly! Here’s another clinical scenario where aspects of Divine Command Theory could be relevant:
Scenario: A physician is consulting with a patient who has been diagnosed with a terminal illness and is experiencing severe pain. The patient expresses a desire to explore options for assisted suicide or euthanasia, which are legally prohibited in the physician’s jurisdiction but are supported by the patient’s deeply held religious beliefs.
Application of Divine Command Theory:
- Divine Commands and Moral Decisions: According to Divine Command Theory, the physician must consider whether assisting in suicide or euthanasia aligns with religious principles and divine commands. Some religious beliefs may view the sanctity of life as paramount and prohibit actions that intentionally end life, even in cases of terminal illness and severe suffering.
- Obedience to Religious Teachings: The physician may believe that respecting the sanctity of life and avoiding actions that directly cause death aligns with divine commands or religious teachings. This belief may guide the physician’s decision-making process, emphasizing the moral prohibition against euthanasia or assisted suicide.
- Ethical Dilemma and Resolution: The physician faces an ethical dilemma between respecting the patient’s autonomy and religious beliefs regarding end-of-life decisions and adhering to legal and professional obligations that prohibit assisted suicide or euthanasia. They may seek ethical guidance from religious authorities, engage in discussions with the patient and their family, and explore palliative care options to alleviate suffering while upholding moral and legal responsibilities.
- Balancing Religious Principles and Patient Care: Divine Command Theory provides a framework for the physician to navigate the complex ethical terrain of end-of-life care, ensuring that decisions respect religious convictions, uphold moral principles, and prioritize compassionate patient care.
In this scenario, Divine Command Theory offers insights into how healthcare providers can approach ethical dilemmas involving conflicting moral obligations, legal constraints, and deeply held religious beliefs regarding life and death decisions.
What is the application of deontology in medical ethics
Applications in Medical Ethics
Confidentiality: Upholding the duty to keep patient information confidential.
Informed Consent: Respecting patients’ autonomy by ensuring they are fully informed and voluntarily consent to treatment.
Truth-Telling: Being honest with patients about their diagnoses and treatment options.
Respect for Persons: Treating all patients with dignity and respect, recognizing their inherent worth.
Explain consequentialism and it’s application to medical ethics
Bases ethical decision-making on an analysis of the likely consequences or outcomes of different choices and actions.
Consequentialism: what are the effects or consequences of the decisions you take?
The right action is the one that produces the best outcomes.
One of the best-known forms of consequentialism, namely utilitarianism, uses ‘utility’ as its measure and defines this as ‘the greatest good for the greatest number’.
Other outcome measures in healthcare decision-making include cost-effectiveness and quality of life.
Applications in Medical Ethics
Resource Allocation, Public Health Policies, End-of-Life Decisions
Eg: A doctor has limited doses of a life-saving drug and must decide how to allocate it among patients.
Consequentialism Applied to End-of-Life Decisions
When applying consequentialist thinking to end-of-life decisions, the focus is on the outcomes of the decisions rather than the actions themselves. Key considerations include:
1. Maximizing Benefit and Minimizing Harm: • Example: Deciding to withdraw life-sustaining treatment because continuing it may prolong suffering without significant benefit. The decision is justified if it leads to a better overall outcome (e.g., relief from suffering). 2. Quality of Life Considerations: • Example: A consequentialist might argue that it’s ethical to forgo aggressive treatment if it significantly diminishes the patient’s quality of life without meaningful improvement, thereby prioritizing comfort and dignity in the final days. 3. Impact on Others: • Example: The consequences for family members and healthcare providers are also considered. If prolonging life causes significant emotional, financial, or psychological burden on loved ones, a consequentialist might argue that allowing a natural death could lead to a better overall outcome. 4. Resource Allocation: • Example: In a utilitarian framework, resources might be allocated to treatments that benefit more people rather than those that prolong the life of one person without significant improvement, especially in cases of limited healthcare resources.
Challenges and Criticisms
• Subjectivity of Outcomes: Predicting outcomes can be difficult and subjective, making it challenging to apply consequentialism consistently. • Conflict with Deontological Ethics: Consequentialism may conflict with deontological ethics, which focus on duties and rights. For instance, some might argue that it’s inherently wrong to withdraw life-sustaining treatment, regardless of the outcome. • Autonomy vs. Consequences: In end-of-life care, respecting patient autonomy is crucial. However, a strict consequentialist approach might prioritize outcomes over the patient’s expressed wishes.
Explain virtue ethics and how it is applied to medical ethics
Focuses less on decision-making and more on the character of decision-makers as reflected in their behaviour.
A virtue is a type of moral excellence. Examples: compassion, honesty, prudence and dedication.
Virtue ethics: depends on who is taking the decisions and the character of the person making the decisions. Upholding virtue ethics supports patient centered care
Physicians who possess these virtues are more likely to make good decisions and to implement them. Even virtuous individuals often are unsure how to act in particular situations and are not immune from making wrong decisions.
Applications in Medical Ethics
Professional Virtues are crucial.
Patient-Centered Care: It supports a patient-centered approach.
Moral Character of Healthcare Providers:
Eg: A doctor faces a situation where telling a patient the full truth about their terminal diagnosis might cause significant distress.
Explain what principlism is and state the Four principles or pillars of medical ethics which is under principlism
Four principles or pillars of medical ethics which is under principlism:
Autonomy
Beneficience
Justice
Non malevolence
It uses ethical principles as the basis for making moral decisions.
“Principles are general guides that leave considerable room for judgment in specific cases and that provide substantive guidance for the development of more detailed rules and policies” (Beauchamp & Childress, 1994).
Applies principles (the four principles of medics ethics which are under principlism) to particular cases or situations in order to determine what is the right thing to do, taking into account both rules and consequences.
What is autonomy?
Which people are an exception to the application of autonomy?
Which three things spring from the principle of autonomy
Autonomy, or more accurately, respect for autonomy, defined as the obligation of doctors to respect the right of individuals to make decisions on their own behalf.
Such respect is not simply a matter of attitude, but a way of acting so as to recognize and even promote the autonomous actions of the patient.
The autonomous person may freely choose loyalties or systems of religious belief that may adversely affect him
The patient must be informed clearly the consequences of his/her action that may affect him adversely.
Desiring to “benefit” the patient, the physician may strongly want to intervene believing it to be a clear “medical benefit.”
But the physician should give greater priority to the respect for patient autonomy than to the other duties.
However, at times this can be difficult because it can conflict with the paternalistic attitude of many health care professionals.
The principle does not extend to persons who lack the capacity (competence) to act autonomously;
examples include infants and children and incompetence due to developmental, mental or physical disorder.
Informed consent, truth-telling, and confidentiality spring from the principle of autonomy.
Explain the components of informed consent as a concept under autonomy
Requirements of an Informed consent for a medical surgical procedure
Or research are that the patient:
a.understand
competent and decide,
b. Receives a full disclosure
с.comprehends the disclosure
d.acts voluntarily, and
е.consents to the proposed
action.
Explain truth telling as a concept under autonomy
Truth-telling is a vital component in a physician-patient relationship; without this component, the physician loses the trust of the patient.
An autonomous patient has not only the right to know (disclosure) of his/her diagnosis and prognosis, but also has the option to forgo this disclosure.
Providing full information, with tact and sensitivity, to patients who want to know should be the standard.
Present the truth in a manner that’s compassionate(truth telling plus virtue ethics)