Ethics and Editors' Code Flashcards
Which bodies regulate print and online journalism?
- IPSO and IMPRESS
- Self regulatory
Which body regulates broadcasting?
- OFCOM
- Statutory regulations
What criteria does something have to meet to be classed as in the public interest?
- Detecting or exposing crime
- Protecting public health and safety
- Protecting the public from being misled- public interest in freedom of expression
Describe the accuracy clause (Clause 1) of the IPSO code
- Take care not to publish inaccurate, misleading or distorted info or images, including headlines not supported by the text
- Distinguish clearly between comment, conjecture and fact
- NO PUBLIC INTEREST DEFENCE
Describe the privacy clause (Clause 2) of the IPSO code?
- Everyone is entitled to respect for his or her private family life, home, health, and correspondence, including digital comms
- Account will be taken of the complainant’s own public disclosures of info
- It’s unacceptable to photo individuals, without their consent, in public or private places where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy
Describe the harassment clause (Clause 3) of the IPSO code
- Do not engage in intimidation, harassment or persistent pursuit
- Don’t persist in questioning, telephoning, pursuing, or photographing individuals once asked to stop
- Don’t remain on property when asked to leave
Describe the intrusion into grief and shock clause (Clause 4) of the IPSO code
- Make enquiries and approaches with sympathy and discretion
- Handle publication sensitivity
- Don’t publish details of people caught up in traumatic events before next of kin have been informed
- NO PUBLIC INTEREST
Describe the reporting suicide clause (Clause 5) of the IPSO code
- News of suicide may prompt others to take their own lives in same way
- Avoid excessive details
- To avoid simulative acts (copycat incidents)
Describe the children clause (Clause 6) of the IPSO code
- Must not be photographed/filmed (secretly or openly) or interviewed about issues concerning their welfare or welfare of another child without consent of appropriate adult
- Children must be allowed to complete their education without interference
- Children must not be photographed on school premises without permission of the school
- Must not use fame/notoriety/position of parent as sole justification for publishing details of child’s private life
- There must be “exceptional public interest to breach these clauses
What does OFCOM say when it comes to children and vulnerable people?
- Broadcasters should pay particular attention to privacy of people under 16
- Where programme features an individual under 16 or vulnerable person in a way that infringes privacy, consent must be obtained
- Unless it is warranted to proceed without consent (ie in public interest)
Describe the children in sex cases clause (Clause 7) of the IPSO code?
- Do not, even if legally free to do so, identify children under 16 who are victims or witnesses in sex offences cases
- Adults may be identified but don’t include info that implies relationship between child and accused
Describe the hospitals clause (Clause 8) of the IPSO code
- Identify yourself as a journalist and obtain permission from a responsible executive before entering non-public areas of hospitals or similar institutions to pursue inquiries
- Remember, restrictions on intruding on privacy and particularly relevant to enquiries about individuals in hospitals or similar institutions
Describe the reporting crimes clause (Clause 9) of the IPSO code
- Relatives or friends of persons convicted or accused of crime shouldn’t generally be ID without consent, u less they are genuinely relevant to the story
- Particular regard should be paid to potentially vulnerable position of children who witness or are victims of, crime
Describe the devices/subterfuge clause (Clause 10) of the IPSO code
- Always be upfront about who you are and what you’re doing
- Irrespective of Code, using hidden cameras or microphones could breach privacy laws
- Public interest exceptions only apply when reasonable to believe open approach wouldn’t work
Is it a criminal offence to use a hidden camera/mic?
No
-Could breach civil law eg “reasonable expectation of privacy”