Ethics Flashcards
Attwells v Jackson Lalic Lawyers Pty Ltd [2016] What are the relevant principles?
Advocate’s immunity does not extend to advice re: settlement
Prothonotary v McCaffery [2004] What are the relevant principles? What are the relevant rules?
Deceit in holding self out as counsel inconsistent with duty of candour to court and amounted to professional misconduct Relevant rules: r 24 (barrister must not deceive or knowingly or recklessly mislead court)
NSW Bar Association v Dwyer (2015) What are the relevant principles? What are the relevant rules?
Holding self out as barrister and engaging in legal practice without PC amounts to professional misconduct Knowingly misleading or deceptive conduct in dealings with Bar Council may amount to professional misconduct Relevant rules: r 24 (barrister must not deceive court)
Re B (1981) What are the relevant principles? What are the relevant rules?
Barrister’s duty to court is paramount Conduct outside practice may be inconsistent with barrister’s duty of honesty and candour to court Relevant rules: r 23 (barrister has overriding duty to court), r 24 (barrister must not deceive court)
A Solicitor v Law Society (2004) What are the relevant principles? What are the relevant sections?
Distinction between professional misconduct and personal misconduct Professional misconduct must be connected to professional practice, although personal conduct can demonstrate that a practitioner is not a fit and proper person to practice Even if offences do not amount to professional misconduct, failure to disclose offences may be Professional misconduct does not necessarily lead to removal from roll Relevant section: s 297 (definition of professional misconduct)
NSW Bar Association v Costigan (2013) What are the relevant principles?
Professional misconduct through misuse of trust moneys paid to barrister through direct access brief Professional misconduct by practicing without practicing certificate Unsatisfactory professional conduct through failure to notify bar association of creditors’ petitions, traffic/driving offences
NSW Bar Association v Evatt (1968) What are the relevant principles? What are the relevant rules?
Professional misconduct by facilitating overcharging by solicitors Lack of contrition relevant to severity of offence Relevant rules: r 35 (barrister must promote and protect client’s best interests without regard to self-interest), r 47 (barrister must not exercise undue influence on client to benefit barrister)
NSW Bar Association v Meakes (2006) What are the relevant principles? What are the relevant sections?
Gross overcharging amounted to professional misconduct Relevant section: s 172 (legal costs must be fair and reasonable)
Glissan (1990) What are the relevant principles? What are the relevant rules?
Pressure on client to settle should not overbear client’s will Pressure on client to settle constituted unsatisfactory professional conduct (not professional misconduct) Relevant rules: r 35 (barrister must promote and protect client’s best interests), r 36 (barrister must inform client about alternatives to fully contested adjudication), r 37 (barrister must seek to assist client to understand issues in case sufficiently to permit client to give instructions)
di Suvero v NSW Bar Association (2001) What are the relevant principles? What are the relevant rules?
Insulting and offensive language in Court amounted to unsatisfactory professional conduct Relevant rules: r 8 (barrister must not engage in conduct likely to diminish public confidence in legal profession or administration of justice)
Re Davis (1947) What are the relevant principles?
Failure to disclose past convictions as indicating not of good fame and character
NSW Bar Association v Bryson (2003) (NSWADT) What are the relevant principles? What are the relevant rules?
Professional misconduct includes personal conduct short of that warranting removal from the roll Relevant section: s 297 (definition of professional misconduct)
Bryson v NSW Bar Association (2003) (NSWADTAP) What are the relevant principles?
No power to order barrister to complete further legal education
NSW Bar Association v Sahade (2007) What are the relevant principles? What are the relevant rules?
Professional misconduct in personal life: deceit in making multiple applications for shares, even though acquitted of criminal conduct Professional misconduct not warranting removal from roll Relevant section: s 297 (definition of professional misconduct)
Prothonotary v P (2003) What are the relevant principles? What are the relevant rules?
Conviction for serious offence not sufficient for striking out Distinction between fame and good character: fame is reputation, character is actual nature Order striking off roll should only be made if lawyer is permanently unfit to practice Question of present fitness, not fitness at past time Relevant section: s 297 (definition of professional misconduct)
Ziems v Prothonotary (1957) What are the relevant principles?
‘Fit and proper’ person test Court can look into circumstances underlying conviction; conviction is not of itself dispositive Striking off is protective, not punitive
NSW Bar Association v Cummins (2001) What are the relevant principles? What are the relevant sections?
Professional misconduct through longstanding failure to pay taxes Conduct outside practice may in some circumstances amount to professional misconduct Relevant sections: ss 297 (definition of professional misconduct), 298 (examples of forms of professional misconduct)
NSW Bar Association v Murphy (2002) What are the relevant principles? What are the relevant sections?
Distinction between decision to issue practicing certificate and decision whether to remove from the roll Bankruptcy and tax liabilities not sufficient to warrant removal from roll Relevant sections: ss 297 (definition of professional misconduct), 298 (examples of forms of professional misconduct)