Ethics Flashcards
Can you confer with more than one witness at a time?
No.
Day v Perisher Blue
Rules 70
Cannot confer or condone another legal practitioner conferring with more than one lay witness including a party or a client at the same time.
UNLESS:
Rule 71
Only about undertakings to a court, admissions or confessions of fact, amendments of pleadings or otherwise.
Can you confer with any witness while they are under cross examination?
No.
Day v Perisher Blue
Rule 72
Which rules relate to Integrity of Evidence?
Rules 68-74
When can you confer with more than one witness at a time??
Rule 71
Only about undertakings to a court, admissions or confessions of fact, amendments of pleadings or otherwise.
What is the case that deals with integrity of evidence?
Day v Perisher Blue Pty Ltd
To whom does a barrister owe an overriding duty?
To the court. If there is conflict between the duty to the client and duty to the court, duty to the court will prevail.
What are the five headings which describe a barristers duty to the court?
- Duty of candour
- Duty of fairness
- Duty of co-operation
- Duty to maintain the dignity of the court
- Special duty of prosecutors
Which rules deal with Duty to the Court?
Rules 25-36
Where do you find the principles of the barristers rules?
Rule 5.
Which rules apply to the general conduct and vocation of a barrister’s work?
Rules 12-20
Which rule is the Cab- rank principle?
Rule 21
What is the Cab-rank principle?
A barrister must accept any brief if:
a. Within skillset and capacity
b. The barrister is not otherwise personally or professionally committed elsewhere
c. fee is acceptable to the barrister
d. not obliged or permitted to refuse under Rules 95, 97, 98, 99
Can you inflate the fee of work to avoid taking a brief?
No.
Rule 22
Must not set higher than normal to deter a lawyer from briefing you.
Can you request a particular lawyer be instructed or briefed as a condition to take a brief?
No
Rule 23.
Which Rule relates to Direct Access Brief?
Rule 24B
What must you do if accepting Direct Access Brief?
Rule 24
a. Inform the prospective client in writing of:
i. effect of Rules 15 and 17
ii. circumstances may require client to retain instructing solicitor at short notice and possibly in performance of the work.
iii. any real possible disadvantage to client if they do not instruct a solicitor.
iv. relative capacity of B on own vs capacity if B working with instructing solicitor.
v. fair description of B’s advocacy experience.
b. obtain clients signed written acknowledgement they have been informed of the above.
COMPLY WITH PD 13 of 2024.
What is PD 13 of 2024? What are the requirements?
PD 13 of 2024 - Direct access briefing.
A barrister accepting a DAB must comply with Rule 24B
AND
Prepare a document setting out each of the matters in Rule 24B; and a certification signed by the B that they have informed the client of any complaint may be made to the LSC.
If you make a mistake in submitting evidence, case-law or legislation which is contrary to the true position - do you need to inform the court or opponent?
Yes
Rule 28.
What do you need to disclose to the court for ex parte interlocutory application?
See Rule 29
Do you need to inform the court of any binding authority, appellate court decision, or legislation if directly in point against your client’s position?
Yes Rule 31
But not if the opponent says they are withdrawing their case (Rule 32)
If you become aware of binding authority, appellate court decision or legislation after judgment or decision is reserved and still pending, do you need to inform the court?
Yes. Rule 33.
Which rules relate to Duty to the Client?
Rules 37-40
Which rules relate to Independence?
Rules 40-47
Which rules relate to Duty to Opponent?
Rules 48-55
Which rule relates to ‘mere mouthpiece’ and independence?
Rule 41
A barrister must not act as the mere mouthpiece of the client.
Exercise independent and forensic judgment after appropriate considerations and wishes of client and instructing solicitor.
If you want to expand your firm and a client’s brother in law offers to loan you the money or property for the expansion - are you able to accept this generous offer?
No.
Rule 47.
Must not accept money/ property loan from any client, relative, business entity during the course of retainer with that client.
Exception: unless the ordinary business of the client, client’s relative or business entity includes lending money.
Can you deal directly with another party in the absence of their legal representative?
Not normally.
Rule 51.
Unless:
a. to ask if they are represented
b. legal rep has previously consented
c. B believes the circumstances are so urgent it is required AND it would not be unfair to the party.
Which case deals with Duty to the Opponent?
LSC v Mullins
Rules 48 and 49
Barrister must not knowingly make false statement to opponent.
Barrister must take all necessary steps to correct false statement ASAP after becoming aware the statement was false.
LSC v Mullins [2006] LPT 012
Cancer case.
Client was victim of MV accident.
Prior to mediation diagnosed with cancer.
B advised should defer mediation, client did not want to adjourn. B did not disclose cancer facts.
Case settled without insurance knowing cancer information. Cancer information relevant to life expectancy, relevant to settlement.
Barrister knowingly misled an insurer and it’s lawyers about the life expectancy of his client.
B referred to LSC, ordered to pay $20 and shamed. Costs.
Rules 48 and 49.
Must not knowingly make false statement.
Must correct false statement ASAP after becoming aware the statement is false.
Can you deal with an unrepresented party?
Rule 52
Not unless they have indicated a willingness to do so.
Can you communicate directly with the court?
Ken Tugrul v Tarrant Financial Consultants
Virgtel v Zabusky
Rule 53
Only in ex parte applications.
OR
a. court has communicated in a way that requires the B to respond.
b. B has consent of the other party to communicate on specific matter.
OR in summary:
1. Trivial matters re:admin and procedure
2. Ex parte
3. Ordered to by the court
4. Exceptional circumstances
If you have consent of other party to communicate with the court, are you limited in that communication?
Rule 55
You can only communicate with the court with consent and ONLY about the matters you have consent to communicate about.
Ken Tugrul v Tarrant Financial Consultants Pty Ltd (in liquidation) [2013] NSWSC 1971
5th Plaintiff sent material to the court without the consent of the other parties. Defendants 2 & 3 not copied in and did not consent.
[20] Sending an email acknowledging a parties lack of knowledge or lack of consent does not cure any impropriety.
Rules 53, 54, 55
Virgtel Ltd & Anor v Zabusky & Ors [2009] QCA92
Relevance to the exam: Duty to Opponent.
Where the applicant sent further submissions to the court AFTER the hearing of the application.
Leave was not sought by Virgtel
Leave was not granted by the court
Court should decline to receive further submissions.
Rule 53.