Ethics Flashcards

1
Q

Describe what should be performed in each steps of the Ethical cycle

A
Moral problem statement
Problem analysis
Options for action
Ethical evaluation
Reflection
  1. Moral problem statement
    o The start of the ethical cycle in an ethical analysis is to formulate a moral problem
    o The moral problem should be stated as precisely and clear as possible
    o Clearly state:
     The problem - “are there some ethical reasons for why this tech should be used or for why the use of this tech should be limited or avoided?”
     The actors who must act, for whom is it a problem
     The moral problem, moral nature of the problem
    o Often not possible to formulate the moral problem when the ethical cycle is started, but can start with a vague notion and then try to formulate the moral problem once it is more clear
  2. Problem analysis
    o Includes
     Stakeholders and the stakeholders’ interests
     What values are there and values crashes
     Relevant, important, uncertain, and possible missing information
    o Potential consequences – both positive and negative – from the use of this technology
     Distinguish between the facts that are:
    • Well known, agreed upon
    • Disputed, uncertain or unknown
    o Who is suffering or profiting from the use
    o Interests of different stakeholders
    o Different people will make different assumptions
    o Potential consequences
     Positive
    • The service you get from the product
    • Other values
     Negative
    • Connected to the three sustainability constraints
    • Other ethical issues
    o Code of conduct – set of rules outlining the responsibilities of or proper practices for an individual, party, or organization
  3. Options for action
    o Includes:
     Black and white strategy – acceptable to engage in a certain action or not, only two options considered
     Creative middle way strategy
     Co-operative strategy – consulting other stakeholders for a possible win-win
     Whistle-blowing – speaking out to the media or the public – last resort
    o Identify possible options for action:
     1. Use the product in a long-term and large scale
     2. Not use the product at all
     3. Use the product but with some restrictions or requirements
  4. Ethical judgement
    o Include:
     Intuition
     Common sense – determining dominant values
     Ethical theories
    o The moral acceptability of the possible options for action is judged
    o This fourth phase results in moral judgements about the various options for action – there judgements need not be the same because different frameworks can result in different preferred options for action in a given situation
  5. Reflection
    o Since the different ethical framework, no not necessarily lead to the same conclusion, a further reflection on the outcomes of the previous step is usually required
    o Goal of the reflection is to come to a well-argued choice among the various options for actions, using the outcomes of the earlier phases
    o Should primarily be based on the outcome of the ethical judgement in the previous phase
    o Includes:
     Criticism of ethical theories
     Moral relevance
     Comparison with intuition
     Wide reflective equilibrium
    o Reflection based on argumentation for an action
     General criticism of ethical theories
     Reflection on the concrete situation on which a certain option for action bas to be chosen
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How could you reason and which decision could you end up with for the following moral problem, when you use

i) utilitarianism or
ii) deontological ethics?

A
  • Utilitarianism
    o An action is judged based on its consequences
    o One should choose the action that causes the maximum utility (good) for most people
    o The utility of all people counts equally
    o Utility (good) can be measure as, eg:
     Happiness
     Fulfilment of desire
     Welfare
    o Different weightings for different utilities
     Weighting different consequences against each other
    o Ex methods: cost-benefit analysis, risk analysis
  • Deontologism
    o An action is right if it follows a moral duty (rule, principle)
    o Moral (ethical) dilemma: conflict between duties in a specific situation
    o Moral duties can vary between cultures and religion
    o Also weighting different moral aspects against one another
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly