Ethics Flashcards
1
Q
Describe what should be performed in each steps of the Ethical cycle
A
Moral problem statement Problem analysis Options for action Ethical evaluation Reflection
- Moral problem statement
o The start of the ethical cycle in an ethical analysis is to formulate a moral problem
o The moral problem should be stated as precisely and clear as possible
o Clearly state:
The problem - “are there some ethical reasons for why this tech should be used or for why the use of this tech should be limited or avoided?”
The actors who must act, for whom is it a problem
The moral problem, moral nature of the problem
o Often not possible to formulate the moral problem when the ethical cycle is started, but can start with a vague notion and then try to formulate the moral problem once it is more clear - Problem analysis
o Includes
Stakeholders and the stakeholders’ interests
What values are there and values crashes
Relevant, important, uncertain, and possible missing information
o Potential consequences – both positive and negative – from the use of this technology
Distinguish between the facts that are:
• Well known, agreed upon
• Disputed, uncertain or unknown
o Who is suffering or profiting from the use
o Interests of different stakeholders
o Different people will make different assumptions
o Potential consequences
Positive
• The service you get from the product
• Other values
Negative
• Connected to the three sustainability constraints
• Other ethical issues
o Code of conduct – set of rules outlining the responsibilities of or proper practices for an individual, party, or organization - Options for action
o Includes:
Black and white strategy – acceptable to engage in a certain action or not, only two options considered
Creative middle way strategy
Co-operative strategy – consulting other stakeholders for a possible win-win
Whistle-blowing – speaking out to the media or the public – last resort
o Identify possible options for action:
1. Use the product in a long-term and large scale
2. Not use the product at all
3. Use the product but with some restrictions or requirements - Ethical judgement
o Include:
Intuition
Common sense – determining dominant values
Ethical theories
o The moral acceptability of the possible options for action is judged
o This fourth phase results in moral judgements about the various options for action – there judgements need not be the same because different frameworks can result in different preferred options for action in a given situation - Reflection
o Since the different ethical framework, no not necessarily lead to the same conclusion, a further reflection on the outcomes of the previous step is usually required
o Goal of the reflection is to come to a well-argued choice among the various options for actions, using the outcomes of the earlier phases
o Should primarily be based on the outcome of the ethical judgement in the previous phase
o Includes:
Criticism of ethical theories
Moral relevance
Comparison with intuition
Wide reflective equilibrium
o Reflection based on argumentation for an action
General criticism of ethical theories
Reflection on the concrete situation on which a certain option for action bas to be chosen
2
Q
How could you reason and which decision could you end up with for the following moral problem, when you use
i) utilitarianism or
ii) deontological ethics?
A
- Utilitarianism
o An action is judged based on its consequences
o One should choose the action that causes the maximum utility (good) for most people
o The utility of all people counts equally
o Utility (good) can be measure as, eg:
Happiness
Fulfilment of desire
Welfare
o Different weightings for different utilities
Weighting different consequences against each other
o Ex methods: cost-benefit analysis, risk analysis - Deontologism
o An action is right if it follows a moral duty (rule, principle)
o Moral (ethical) dilemma: conflict between duties in a specific situation
o Moral duties can vary between cultures and religion
o Also weighting different moral aspects against one another