Ethical Language: Meta ethics (Chapter 8) Flashcards
What is meta-ethics?
Study of the meaning and justification of moral ideas
What is normative ethics?
Theories of ethics that give guidance on how we should behave and/or the character traits we should develop.
What is naturalism?
The belief that values can be defined in terms of some natural property in the world
What is intuitionism?
The belief that basic moral truths are indefinable but self-evident
developed by W.D Ross and H.A Pritchard
What is emotivism?
The belief that ethical terms evince approval or disapproval
aj ayer
What is the is/ought problem?
David Hume
Problem of finding any logical justification of ethical judgements from the facts of the world.
The is/ought problem is based on the principle that any factual proposition is reducible to involving the verb ‘to be’
Give an example of the is/ought problem?
(i) all men are mortal (major premise)
(ii) socrates is a man (minor premise)
(iii) therefore socrates is mortal (conclusion)
it is illegitamate to put into the conclusion anything not stated in the premise e.g. socrates likes the olympic games could not be discovered from the premise
how does plato’s form of the good respond to hume is/ought
There is something factual about goodness
Plato attempts to fix the meaning of good by taking it as a singular spiritual being
the form of the good argued to have even greater reality than the objects of our perception
such a form for plato exists as it is necessary to make sense both of our ability to describe and our perceptions of reality
what is hedonism?
belief that pleasure is the good and nothing is the good. ‘pleasure’ and ‘good’ are interchangeable terms
bentham
epicurus
form of naturalism
aristotle says pleasure accompanies good activities like ‘the bloom on the cheek of youth’
what is absolutism?
view that there are some things which are always obligatory. Examples include utilitariaism and kantian ethics
some claim that if naturalism is adopted as an ethical theory we commit to absolutism because if the nature of good is fixed then it might seem we should always pursue that fixed good
what is the naturalist fallacy?
Offered by british philosopher ge moore, defence of non-naturalism (criticism of naturalism)
is the error of assuming that the good is identical with some natural quality, such as pleasure. Moore’s argument makes use of the open question argument
what is the open question argument?
- X is pleasant but is it good?
- following version of sentence, bear-baiting is pleasant but is it good?
- But, hedonists claim that pleasure is the good (and nothing else) meaning ‘pleasure’ and ‘good’ are synonomous
- so, the sentence can be re-written as “bear baiting is good, but is it good?
- this makes no sense so naturalism is wrong as good cannot be a natural quality
what is the underlying idea of intuitionism?
we know the good - it is a simple perception of non-natural but simple property rather ‘like yellow’ (moore)
what is mores yellow idea?
moore was influenced by german Francz Brentano who developed the idea of internationality (that our minds are never neutral observers of the world
we see at once that something is yellow, we know it with great certainty , yet there is no one thing that is yellow. But when we see yellow it is undeniable such as how we know good with intuitionism
what is intuitionists problem with the term intuition?
according to moore this view is not subjective, things are not right or wrong as i say so its how its perceived by the mind
moore said “when i call such propositions intuitions i mean merely to assert they are incapable of proof”
what moore means here is the mind is able to reason whether a proposition is true but cannot prove so.