ETHC 445 Entire course/assignmentcloud.com Flashcards
DEVRY ETHC 445 Week 1 DQ 2
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ethc-445-devry/ethc-445-week-1-dq-2
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ETHC 445 Week 1 DQ 2
The study of Ethics and Philosophy is one which brings many different kinds of “thinkers” together. One person’s philosophy on Ethics is another person’s philosophy on Evil. We will be working this term on constructing personal ethical bases and understanding how Ethical Codes (both personal and professional) are created and followed.
To start us thinking about the different areas of philosophy and ethics, and how we fit into the different molds or world views, let’s discuss the differences and similarities between these views.
To do this, let’s look at the role of right and wrong, laws which regulate behavior, principles vs. morality, and the role of ethics in our society.
To start out we’ll answer some of these questions and create more of them as we go. Pick one of the following and respond to your classmates thoughts and views:
1. Do we need ethics if we have laws? Why or why not?
2. Is it ethical to change our own views of ethics based on the situation we are in?
3. Can we “legislate” ethics?
4. How does Aristotle’s “virtue ethics” mirror your ethical view, or how is it different?
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ethc-445-devry/ethc-445-week-1-dq-2
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
DEVRY ETHC 445 Week 2 DQ 1 When Siding with the Majority
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ethc-445-devry/ethc-445-week-2-dq-1-when-siding-with-the-majority
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ETHC 445 Week 2 DQ 1 When Siding with the Majority
As our opening page states, Mark Twain warned that “Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect.” It is likely that your parents warned you “not to follow the crowd,” or your school counselors warned you about “peer pressure.”
The United States utilizes a democratic republic form of government, which espouses the “majority rule” in many instances. For example, when passing laws, Congress and state Legislators use majority voting. When electing our officials, the majority rules. But, is our government unethical?
This week’s thread will look at two or three “examples” of majority findings or rules.
We will bring new ones in throughout the week, so be sure to visit back at least every other day and post your thoughts.
Here is our first one for the week:
The great majority of people seem to find nothing objectionable about the use of commercials in children’s television programming. Yet a distinguished panel commissioned by the National Science Foundation found reason to disagree. After reviewing 21 relevant scholarly studies, they concluded:
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ethc-445-devry/ethc-445-week-2-dq-1-when-siding-with-the-majority
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
DEVRY ETHC 445 Entire Course With Final Exam
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ethc-445-devry/ethc-445-entire-course
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ETHC 445 Entire Course With Final Exam
ETHC 445 Week 1 Assignment Ethics Paper
ETHC 445 Week 1 DQ 1 Helen s Wisdom of Friends Dilemma
ETHC 445 Week 1 DQ 2 Study of Ethical Philosophy
ETHC 445 Week 1 Quiz
ETHC 445 Week 2 Assignment Ethics Paper
ETHC 445 Week 2 DQ 1 When Siding with the Majority
ETHC 445 Week 2 DQ 2 The Struggle of Good vs. Evil
ETHC 445 Week 3 Assignment Ethics Paper
ETHC 445 Week 3 DQ 1 Applying the Death Penalty
ETHC 445 Week 3 DQ 2 Living in Our State of Nature
ETHC 445 Week 3 Quiz
ETHC 445 Week 4 Assignment Ethics Paper
ETHC 445 Week 4 DQ 1 Ethics of Controlling Environmental Innovation
ETHC 445 Week 4 DQ 2 Kant Accomplice to Crazed Murderer
ETHC 445 Week 5 Assignment You Decide Scenario and Response Solution Paper
ETHC 445 Week 5 DQ 1 Life & Death Politics & Ethics
ETHC 445 Week 5 DQ 2 Dealing With Emergencies and Outcomes
ETHC 445 Week 6 DQ 1 Applying Rand’s Objectivism
ETHC 445 Week 6 DQ 2 Working Conflict Resolution Methods
ETHC 445 Week 6 Quiz
ETHC 445 Week 7 DQ 1 Business Ethics & the Hovercraft Debacle
ETHC 445 Week 7 DQ 2 Assemble and Test Your Personal Ethics Statement
ETHC 445 Week 8 Final Exam
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ethc-445-devry/ethc-445-entire-course
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
DEVRY ETHC 445 Week 1 DQ 1
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ethc-445-devry/ethc-445-week-1-dq-1
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ETHC 445 Week 1 DQ 1
Helen wants to move to a new community, and she is applying for a job with a small retail establishment. She is confident that she is fully qualified and will be able to perform well if she gets the job. The employer, however, has advertised for someone with three years of retail experience, and Helen only has two-and-a-half years. She is considering whether to exaggerate slightly on her resume in order to improve her chances of getting the job.
Helen asks three friends to offer their advice on what she should do.
– Henry says, “Go ahead and claim three-and-a-half years of experience; they’re going to be so happy with your work that by the time they check (if they ever do) it won’t matter.”
– Jennifer says, “I’m sure you’ll arrive at the best decision on your own; I’ve always known you to be an honest person.”
– George says, “It is never all right to lie, even when you are unlikely to get caught and it seems relatively harmless to do so.”
To begin our discussion this week, let’s discuss some of the following questions:
1. Which of the Three Primary Schools of Ethics is each of Helen’s friends relying upon?
2. Can you imagine other people using the same approaches to arrive at different kinds of advice?
3. Do one of these Three Primary Schools of Ethics feel like the style you usually use already?
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ethc-445-devry/ethc-445-week-1-dq-1
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
DEVRY ETHC 445 Week 1 Assignment Ethics Paper
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ethc-445-devry/ethc-445-week-1-assignment-ethics-paper
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ETHC 445 Week 1 Assignment Ethics Paper
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ethc-445-devry/ethc-445-week-1-assignment-ethics-paper
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
DEVRY ETHC 445 Week 1 Quiz
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ethc-445-devry/ethc-445-week-1-quiz
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ETHC 445 Week 1 Quiz
Which of the below behaviors are inappropriate in a course?
Ethics involves issues of right and wrong, and emotionally charged issues and ideas; thus, the best way to ensure that my comments are taken in the way I mean them is to _____.
Posting in the course’s threaded discussions is an essential element in our online, asynchronous classroom. Which of the following is not true about value-adding posts in our course?
Which of the following is the most appropriate response for a student to post to another student who has posted this:
Choose from the following choices the way in which collegiality is valued in our course.
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ethc-445-devry/ethc-445-week-1-quiz
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
DEVRY ETHC 445 Week 3 Assignment Ethical Consideration
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ethc-445-devry/ethc-445-week-3-assignment-ethical-consideration
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ETHC 445 Week 3 Assignment Ethical Consideration
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ethc-445-devry/ethc-445-week-3-assignment-ethical-consideration
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
DEVRY ETHC 445 Week 2 Assignment Ethics Paper Group Discussion
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ethc-445-devry/ethc-445-week-2-assignment-ethics-paper-group-discussion
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ETHC 445 Week 2 Assignment Ethics Paper Group Discussion
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ethc-445-devry/ethc-445-week-2-assignment-ethics-paper-group-discussion
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
DEVRY ETHC 445 Week 3 DQ 1 Applying the Death Penalty
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ethc-445-devry/ethc-445-week-3-dq-1-applying-the-death-penalty
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ETHC 445 Week 3 DQ 1 Applying the Death Penalty
First, here is a word of caution. With this discussion comes a tasking to discuss the death penalty in two ways: first, as an expression of the social contract, where one person has killed another in a violation of that other person’s right to peace and safety, and second, as a rules-based function of the justice system being applied to a difficult situation.
What do you see going on that is a violation of the Hobbes/Locke social contract idea?
And you might also connect it with any of the Three Schools, plus Aristotle, that you have read in past weeks—and especially with the rules-based ethics model.
Here’s the situation: In Manatee County, Florida, a judge sentenced a man to death—the first time this had happened in the county for over 19 years. Sentenced to death was a 25-year-old man for the January 7, 2004, murder of both of his parents by bludgeoning them to death in their bed with a baseball bat.
Now, with your social contract ethicist hats on, tell us what you make of this quote by the judge at the sentencing, quoted from the front page of the November 17, 2007 Bradenton Herald: “You have not only forfeited your right to live among us, but under the laws of the state of Florida, you have forfeited the right to live at all.”
Have at it, good folks. But, rather than running off with reactions and opinions about the death penalty in general, please do keep it in the context of our social contract discussion for this week and also connected with ethics of justice.
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ethc-445-devry/ethc-445-week-3-dq-1-applying-the-death-penalty
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
DEVRY ETHC 445 Final Exam
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ethc-445-devry/ethc-445-final-exam
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ETHC 445 Final Exam
1. (TCOs 2, 4, 5, 6) The idea that the assisted suicide of terminally ill patients should be allowed simply at the patient’s direction reflects what type of ethics? (Points : 5)
Hobbes’ State of Nature
Rand’s Objectivism
Aristotle’s concept of Virtue
Thomas Aquinas’ concept of conscience
Socrates’ concept of excellence
2. (TCOs 1, 2, 7) What is the moral ideal of temperance? (Points : 5)
Exercising control over one’s own desires and inclinations
Keeping one’s temper under control
Minimizing the impact of one’s decisions
Seeking the good of others before one’s own
Overcoming one’s passions
3. (TCOs 1, 2) One of the common errors in Ethics is that of the hasty conclusions. Hasty conclusions consist of what? (Points : 5)
Rushed work under pressure
Comparing unknown cases to known ones to find precedents
Embracing conclusions before examining cases fully
Judging cases by the source of their origin
Belief that first impressions are valid until challenged
4. (TCO 2) Prescriptive language is commonly used in ethics for what reason? (Points : 5)
To indicate what is prohibited or impossible
To indicate that one choice is better than others
To show what actions are legal
To convey requirements and obligations
To indicate that there are really no choices available
5. (TCOs 7, 8) Ethical Egoism proposes that all decisions should be made to promote what? (Points : 5)
Our fiduciary responsibilities
The good will of others
Our self-interests
The welfare of the community
Stronger relationships
6. (TCOs 2, 4, 9) Free people are motivated toward forming social structures according to a social contract in order to overcome what problem identified by Thomas Hobbes? (Points : 5)
The need to overcome disagreements
A perpetual state of warfare
The establishment of a monarchy
Taxation to support the costs of government
Organized ways to select leaders
7. (TCOs 3, 6) Agricultural biofuels are not properly a renewable source of energy in the environmental ethics debate. Which of the following also is not a renewable source of energy? (Points : 5)
Windmill turbines
Hydroelectric power
Tidal flow generators
Biomass waste systems
Solar cells
8. (TCOs 3, 6, 7) The notion that the only thing good without qualification is a good will is attributed to whom? (Points : 5)
St. Thomas Aquinas
Socrates
John Locke
Immanuel Kant
Oliver Cromwell
9. (TCOs 8, 9) Which ethical concept is organized and directed toward following the greatest happiness principle? (Points : 5)
Natural ethics and law
Justice and mercy
Rights and responsibilities
Virtue-ethics of excellence
Principle of utility
10. (TCOs 3, 6, 7) Syllogisms in formal deductive logic are called “valid” when: (Points : 5)
the correct form of the syllogism style is used.
the premise statements are true.
the syllogism is first determined to be “sound.”
the verbs are written in present tense.
the conclusion proceeds from the premises.
11. (TCOs 1, 2) When choosing one course of action while working with a dilemma, the other courses of action are lost and become unavailable. This makes ethical choices in dilemma situations particularly what? (Points : 5)
Incoherent
Complicated
Illogical
Painful
Cruel
12. (TCOs 1, 2, 7) What is the role of conscience as Thomas Aquinas sees it? (Points : 5)
To teach ethical principles
To disclose and build religious faith
To enable rational thought about consequences
To align personal ethics with those of others
To guide actions through a view of right and wrong
13. (TCOs 2, 8) The rule or principle to be applied in making decisions is an example of which kind of ethical discovery process? (Points : 5)
Principle of utility
A posteriori rationality
A priori rationality
Empirical rationality
Scientific method
14. (TCOs 1, 2, 5) The Social Contract theorist whose troubled childhood was most clearly reflected in his theories was who? (Points : 5)
Thomas Aquinas
Thomas Jefferson
Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Thomas Hobbes
John Locke
15. (TCOs 3, 6, 7) Kant’s concern that people choose to observe universal laws as their duty is expressed through what actions? (Points : 5)
Their habits
Their maxims
Their desires
Their loves
Their loyalties
16. (TCOs 2, 7, 8) Aristotle’s Ethics of Virtue have found modern application for business and industry through what practice? (Points : 5)
Resolution models applications
Goals and objectives
Core values of organizations
Business models
Professional codes of discipline
17. (TCOs 2, 8) Professional codes of conduct serve what function for business and industry? (Points : 5)
Allow businesses to avoid training professional staffers
Enable transfer of valued employees across state lines
Enable contracting of temporary employees
Specify continuing education needs and requirements
Providing assurance of the professional qualifications of members
18. (TCOs 2, 7) Aristotle’s Ethical Doctrine of the Mean measured personal virtues on a scale that included the virtue itself, the excess of it, and the deficiency of it.
If the virtue is COURAGE and the deficiency is COWARDICE, what is the excess?
(Points : 5)
Wisdom
Moderation
There is no excess
Recklessness
Love
19. (TCOs 8, 9) In personal or organizational conflict, what benefits accrue to all parties when a leader or consultant employees one of the ethical conflict resolution models of Week 6? (Points : 5)
Objectives of what winning the conflict means get refined and better understood
Conflict management gets slowed down and settled.
Conflict can be handled in a sequential, step-by-step manner
Parties can be reconciled without solving the issues
Personal relationships can be separated from issues
20. (TCOs 1, 2) The Latin term a priori describes the origin of knowledge developed rationally, and the term a posteriori describes knowledge developed through observation and experience. What is an example of ethics is best described as discovered in an a postiori manner? (Points : 5)
Social ethics
Care-based ethics
Consequentialist ethics
Theological ethics
Operational ethics
Page 2 – Essays
1. (TCOs 1, 2, 3, 7) In support of TCO #7 and in the Week 7 discussions, you developed and placed into the threaded discussions your personalized ethics statement of what has become important to you in the practice of ethics as you have practiced ethics during the course. Your first task in this question is to briefly present that personalized statement in just a few sentences before continuing with the question. Much of the rest of the exam will involve your working with that personalized statement through brief applications and cases.
Use your ethical philosophy to solve the following ethical situation. Explain how your philosophy helped you make your decision.
Should citizens have an ethical obligation to serve their country when it is at war? Under what circumstances, if any, is it ethical for a person to refuse to serve?
A significant number of people believe war is always wrong, and that no circumstances justify one nation’s taking up arms against another. Is this view ethically sound? How about realistically? Please state which side you agree with, and why. Explain and defend your position using your ethical position statement.
In answering, be sure to look at both sides of war: that is, a country defending itself against aggression and of a strong country coming to the aid of a weaker country that has been attacked unjustly. Then, explain how your ethical philosophy affected how you answered this problem. (Points : 30)
- (TCOs 1, 2, 7) Analyze the following ethical situation using YOUR ethical philosophy. Read the situation and then in your answer, explain why this is an ethical situation, what the “issues” are, and how an “ethical” person would resolve them. Explain how YOUR ethical philosophy has helped you read a conclusion about how to resolve or analyze this situation.
Employees’ worth to their employers may diminish before they are eligible for retirement. In such cases, the employer is faced with the dilemma of choosing between retaining an old and trusted yet unproductive worker for 5 or 10 more years, or firing that worker and jeopardizing his or her retirement benefits. - Should an employer have an ethical obligation to keep such unproductive, but loyal employees? What if the employee had been a problem his or her entire career? Are there certain circumstances where your answer to these questions would be different?
- What is the duty of an unproductive employee to his or her employer? Is there an ethical obligation to retire when productivity begins to wane? If a person is simply “coasting” for his or her last few years, is that person “unethical?” Be sure to explain your answer. (Points : 30)
- (TCOs 1, 7, 9) How do you feel St. Thomas Aquinas would have solved the above ethical situation differently or the same as you did using your philosophy? Please explain the reasons for the similarities or differences. (Points : 40)
- (TCOs 1, 2, 4, 9) A first-term junior senator has placed a bill before the Senate that promises to correct tax inequities that affect thousands of workers. However, the bill is being held up in committee. The senior senator who serves as Sub-Committee Chairperson is responsible. The senator, however, has learned of a secret scandal in the Chairperson’s personal life. The junior senator visits the Chairperson and tells him that unless the bill is released from committee, he will divulge the scandal to the press. The Chairperson then releases the bill from committee and it is passed—and becomes law.
Identify and tell what ethical philosophy the senior and junior senators are using, if any.
Now, use your ethical philosophy to analyze the situation. Explain how, using your philosophy, you would have solved this situation either the same way as the characters in the situation did, or differently. Why? (Points : 30) - (TCOs 5, 6) You work for a grocery store and a new manager is hired to oversee your department. He comes into your department (the butcher shop) and explains to you that for the past 6 months, your department has been losing money for the store because of the waste and spoilage going on from having to discard unsold meat and poultry. He tells you that from now on, he wants you to package ground meat in smaller, more compact packages, with older meat on the bottom of the package (so it is not visible to the customer) and the fresher meat on the top, where it is visible to the customers. In this way, you can move more of the older meat and still receive the top dollar for it. As he leaves the department where you were having the discussion, he turns and says, “And by the way, one more month of losses like we had last month from this department, and you can kiss your job goodbye.”
Will you repackage the meat in the way he requested?
Why or why not? Explain what ethical analysis you used to come to this conclusion. (Points : 30) - (TCOs 6, 8) Analyze your answer above using the Front Page of the Newspaper ethical dilemma resolution model. Show your steps. (Points : 40)
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ethc-445-devry/ethc-445-final-exam
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
DEVRY ETHC 445 Week 3 DQ 2 Living in Our State of Nature
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ethc-445-devry/ethc-445-week-3-dq-2-living-in-our-state-of-nature
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ETHC 445 Week 3 DQ 2 Living in Our State of Nature
Social Contract theorists say that morality consists of a set of rules governing how people should treat one another that rational beings will agree to accept for their mutual benefit, on the condition that others agree to follow these rules as well.
Hobbes runs the logic like this in the form of a logical syllogism:
1) We are all self-interested,
2) Each of us needs to have a peaceful and cooperative social order to pursue our interests,
3) We need moral rules in order to establish and maintain a cooperative social order,
Therefore, self-interest motivates us to establish moral rules.
Thomas Hobbes looked to the past to observe a primitive “State of Nature” in which there is no such thing as morality, and that this self-interested human nature was “nasty, brutish, and short” – a kind of perpetual state of warfare
John Locke disagreed, and set forth the view that the state exists to preserve the natural rights of its citizens. When governments fail in that task, citizens have the right—and sometimes the duty—to withdraw their support and even to rebel. Listen to Locke’s audio on the lecture tab and read his lecturette to be able to answer this thread.
Locke addressed Hobbes’s claim that the state of nature was the state of war, though he attribute this claim to “some men” not to Hobbes. He refuted it by pointing to existing and real historical examples of people in a state of nature. For this purpose he regarded any people who are not subject to a common judge to resolve disputes, people who may legitimately take action to themselves punish wrong doers, as in a state of nature.
Which philosophy do you espouse?
In coming to grips with the two and considering your experience of society as it is today, think out loud about what you experiences as the State of Nature, and tell us what you would be willing to give up in exchange for civil order and personal security?
You might consider what you have already given up in exchange for security as well as what might be required in coming days.
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ethc-445-devry/ethc-445-week-3-dq-2-living-in-our-state-of-nature
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
DEVRY ETHC 445 Week 3 Quiz
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ethc-445-devry/ethc-445-week-3-quiz
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ETHC 445 Week 3 Quiz
Inferring a claim based on data is deductive logic, but what happens when the inference circumvents logical reasoning?
A car salesman says this, in order to get you to buy a new car from him:
Are you for or against the war on terrorism?
All those old people are cheap. They never give me a fair tip when I park their cars in the valet parking lot. What kind of fallacy is operating here?
If children cannot be executed for their crimes, why should we execute people with learning disabilities who have the mental capacity of children?
What kind of fallacy is operating here?
as well as what might be required in coming days.
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ethc-445-devry/ethc-445-week-3-quiz
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
DEVRY ETHC 445 Week 5 DQ 1 Life and Death - Politics and Ethics
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ethc-445-devry/ethc-445-week-5-dq-1-life-and-death-politics-and-ethics
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ETHC 445 Week 5 DQ 1 Life and Death - Politics and Ethics
There are three basic propositions in standard Utilitarianism (Please be sure to listen to Mill’s audio lecture before joining this threaded discussion)
1. Actions are judged right and wrong solely on their consequences; that is, nothing else matters except the consequence, and right actions are simply those with the best consequences.
2. To assess consequences, the only thing that matters is the amount of happiness and unhappiness caused; that is, there is only one criterion and everything else is irrelevant.
3. In calculating happiness and unhappiness caused, nobody’s happiness counts any more than anybody else’s; that is, everybody’s welfare is equally important and the majority rules.
In specific cases where justice and utility are in conflict, it may seem expedient to serve the greater happiness through quick action that overrules consideration for justice. There is a side to happiness that can call for rushed decisions and actions that put decision-makers under the pressure of expediency.
Here is a dilemma for our class:
You are the elected district attorney. You receive a phone call from a nursing home administrator who was a good friend of yours in college. She has a waiting list of 3,000 people who will die if they don’t get into her nursing home facility within the next 3 weeks, and she currently has 400 patients who have asked (or their families have asked on their behalf) for the famous Dr. Jack Kevorkian’s (fictitious) sister, Dr. Jill Kevorkian, for assistance in helping them die. The 3,000 people on the waiting list want to live. She (the nursing home administrator) wants to know if you would agree to “look the other way” if she let in Dr. Jill to assist in the suicide of the 400 patients who have requested it, thus allowing at least 400 of the 3,000 on the waiting list in.
1. How would we use Utilitarianism to “solve” this dilemma?
2. What ethics did your friend, the nursing home administrator, use in deciding to call you?
3. What ethics are you using if you just “look the other way” and let it happen?
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ethc-445-devry/ethc-445-week-5-dq-1-life-and-death-politics-and-ethics
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
DEVRY ETHC 445 Week 6 DQ 1 Applying Rand’s Objectivism
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ethc-445-devry/ethc-445-week-6-dq-1-applying-rands-objectivism
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ETHC 445 Week 6 DQ 1 Applying Rand’s Objectivism
Ayn Rand’s Objectivist philosophy has been touted by her detractors as the philosophy of self-interested selfishness.
Her four epistemological principles are:
1. Metaphysics: Objective reality of the world and the objects in it.
2. Epistemology: Reason as the one and only key to understanding.
3. Ethics: Self-interest in what behavior is but also what it should be.
4. Politics: Capitalism through the performance of deeds by individuals who are self-interested.
In the early 1960’s, a student asked a spokesman for Objectivism what would happen to the poor in an Objectivist’s free society.
The spokesman answered, “If you want to help them, you will not be stopped.”
If one reads Rand’s works, Atlas Shrugged, or The Fountainhead, one will conclude that this would be the answer Ayn would have given to that student as well.
What do you conclude from the answer given by the Objectivist spokesperson?
Is Objectivism, like Moral Relativism, the opposite of ethics?
And what clue in what she taught leads to your conclusion?
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ethc-445-devry/ethc-445-week-6-dq-1-applying-rands-objectivism
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
DEVRY ETHC 445 Week 6 DQ 2 Working Conflict Resolution Methods
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ethc-445-devry/ethc-445-week-6-dq-2-working-conflict-resolution-methods
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
ETHC 445 Week 6 DQ 2 Working Conflict Resolution Methods
Different ways to analyze ethical behaviors and dilemmas exist, and many of them will help direct you to the correct or “best” solution to a problem.
As we discussed in week 1 in the “tough choices” .pdf, sometimes right vs. right or wrong vs. wrong decisions have to be made.
In the lecture this week, you are given three ethical dilemma resolution models to try out on a dilemma provided there. Please review that interactive before posting to the threads this week, and let’s bring your questions and comments about the “proposed” solutions here to the threads. We will talk about that through mid-week, and then I will post a new dilemma here where we will, as a group, begin analyzing it using the different methods.
You will need to be able to use these three models (Blanchard and Peale, Laura Nash and Front page of the Newspaper) on the final exam … so let’s be sure to practice all three of them together this week.
So, to start this off, let’s address the dilemma in the Week 6 Lecture interactive (at the bottom of the page). You MUST read the lecture and run the interactive in order to participate in the threads this week!
1. Review the sample solution to the Laura Nash method.
Do you agree with that analysis? If so, what parts do you think really helped you work through the dilemma? If not, which parts do you not agree with?
2. Review the sample solution to the Front Page of the Newspaper method.
Do you think this is one of those types of dilemmas for which this model works? If not, why not? If so, why? How did using this method help you work through the dilemma?
3. Review the sample solution to the Blanchard and Peale method.
Do you agree with the analysis? If not, why not? If so, in what way did this help you analyze this dilemma?
Pick ONE of the above 3 questions and let’s get started. Or, respond to another student with details about why you agree or disagree with their analysis. Feel free to kindly debate with each other. Do not take things personally if someone disagrees. Be sure to show that you have viewed the lecture and interactive and that you attempted an analysis for “high quality” posts this week. After Wednesday, I will bring in another scenario and we can analyze that one together as a class.
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.assignmentcloud.com/ethc-445-devry/ethc-445-week-6-dq-2-working-conflict-resolution-methods
For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com