Estates in Land Flashcards

1
Q

Provide the language to create, the duration, the transferability, and the future interest for the following:

Fee Simple or Fee Simple Absolute

A

Language to Create: “To A and his heirs.” “To A.”

Duration: Absolute ownership, of potentially infinite duration.

Transferability: Devisable, descendible, alienable.

Future Interest: None.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Provide the language to create, the duration, the transferability, and the future interest for the following:

Fee simple determinable

A

Language to Create: “To A so long as…” “To A until…” “To A while…” (Language providing that upon the happening of a stated event, the land is to revert to the grantor.)

Duration: Potentially infinite, so long as event does not occur.

Transferability: Alienable, devisable, descendible, subject to condition.

Future Interest: Possibility of Reverter (held by the grantor)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Provide the language to create, the duration, the transferability, and the future interest for the following:

Fee Simple Subject to Condition Subsequent

A

Language to Create: “To A, but if X event happens, grantor reserves the right to reenter and retake.” Grantor must carve out right of reentry.

Duration: Potentially infinite, so long as the condition is not breached and, thereafter, until the holder of the right of entry timely exercises the power of termination.

Transferability: Alienable, devisable, descendible, subject to condition.

Future Interest: Right of Entry/Power of Termination (held by grantor).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Provide the language to create, the duration, the transferability, and the future interest for the following:

Fee Simple Subject to an Executory Limitation

A

Language to Create: “To A, but if X event occurs, then to B.”

Duration: Potentially infinite, so long as stated contingency does not occur.

Transferability: Alienable, devisable, descendible, subject to condition.

Future Interest: Executory interest (held by third party).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Provide the language to create, the duration, the transferability, and the future interest for the following:

Life Estate

A

Language to Create: “To A for life.” “To A for the life of B.”

Duration: Measured by life of transferee or by some other life (pur autre vie).

Transferability: Alienable, devisable, and descendable if pur autre vie and measuring life is still alive.

Future Interest: Reversion (if held by grantor); Remainder (if held by third party)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the rules of construction for defeasible fees?

A
  1. Words of mere desire, hope, or intention are insufficient to create a defeasible fee. Courts disfavor restrictions on free land use, and thus courts will not find a defeasible fee unless clear durational language is used.
  2. Absolute restraints on alienation are void. An absolute restraint on alienation is an absolute ban on the power to sell or transfer, that is not linked to a reasonable time limited duration.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the distinguishing characteristics of the life estate from the other estates in land?

A

The life tenant’s entitlements are rooted in the important doctrine of waste.

1, The life tenant is entitled to all ordinary use and profits from the land.

  1. The life tenant must not commit waste, i.e. cannot hurt the future interest holders.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the thr ee species of waste?

A
  1. Voluntary or affirmative waste: this is overt conduct that causes drop in value. The life tenant must not consume or exploit natural resources on the property (such as timber, oil, or minerals).
  2. Permissive waste: this is neglect - when the land falls in to disrepair. This is the life tenants obligation to simply maintain the premises in reasonably good repair. The life tenant is also obligated to pay all ordinary taxes on the land to the extent of income or profits from the land. If none, then the life tenant is required to pay all ordinary taxes to the extent of the premises fair rental value.
  3. Ameliorative waste: the life tenant must not engage in acts that will enhance the property’s value unless all future interest holders are known and consent.

**In NY: **a life tenant may make reasonable improvement unless the remaindermen object, called the “prudent homeowner” rule.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the four exceptions to voluntary waste?

A

Remember PURGE:

  1. Prior Use: meaning that prior to the grant, the land was used for exploitation. Here, the life tenant may continue to exploit, unless otherwise agreed.

Note: Prior use and the open mines doctrine - if mining was done on the land before the life estate began: the life tenant may continue to mine, but is limited to the mines already open. Thus, the life tenant must not open any new mines.

  1. Repairs: the life tenant may consume natural resources for repairs and maintenance.
  2. Grant: the life tenant may exploit if granted that right.
  3. Exploitation: meaning when the land is only suitable for exploitation. (i.e. Blackacre is a quarry).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the future interests capable of creation in the grantor?

A
  1. Possibility of Reverter: It accompanies only the fee simple determinable.
  2. ** The Right of Entry, also known as the Power of Termination:** it accompanies only the fee simple subject to condition subsequent.
  3. Reversion: A reversion is a fture interest that arises in a grantor who transfers an estate of lesser quantum than she started with, other than a fee simple determinable or a fee simple subject to condition subsequent.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the different future interests in transferees?

A
  1. Vested Remainder: there are three species of that -
    a. the indefeasibly vested remainder;
    b. the vested remainder subject to complete defeasance (also known as the vested remainder subject to total divestment), and
    c. the vested remainder subject to open.
  2. Contingent Remainder
  3. Executory Interest: there are two species of this -
    a. the shifting executory interest, and
    b. the springing executory interest
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is a remainder? What is the difference between vested and contingent remainders?

A

A remainder is a future interest in a grantee that is capable of becoming possessory upon the expiration of a prior posessory estate created in the same conveyance in which the remainder is created.

A remainder is vested if it is both created in an ascertained person and is not subject to any condition precedent.

A remainder is contingent if it is created in an unascertained person or is subject to a condition precedent, or both.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the rule of destructibility of contingent remainders?

A

At common law, a contingent remainder was destroyed if it was still contingent at the time the preceding estate has ended.

Today however, the destructibility rule has been abolished, and when the life estate ends, it reverts back to the grantor subject to the remaindermen’s now B’s springing executory interest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the Rule in Shelley’s Case?

A

At common law, the rule would apply to one setting only:

O conveys “to A for life, then, on A’s death, to A’s heirs.” A is alive.

Under the rule, the present and future interests merge, giving A a fee simple absolute.

However, the rule has been abolished, so when O conveys “to A for life, then to A’s heirs:”

A has a life estate.

A’s as yet unknown heirs have contingent remainder.

O has reversion, since A could die without heirs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the Doctrine of Worthier Title?

A

It is also known as the rule against a remainder in grantor’s heirs. The doctrine is still viable in most states today. It applies when O, who is alive, tries to create a future interest in his heirs.

O, who is alive, conveys “To A for life, then O’s heirs.”

If the Doctrine of Worthier Title did not apply, A has life estate and O’s heirs have contingent remainder, because O is still alive and a living person has no heirs.

Instead, because of the Doctrine of Worthier Title, the contingent remainder in O’s heirs is void. Thus, A has life estate and O has reversion. However, grantor’s intent controls. If grantor clearly intends to create a contingent remainder in his heirs, that intent is binding.

New York has abolished the Doctrine of Worthier Title.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the difference between the three different vested remainders?

A
  1. Indefeasibly Vested Remainder: The holder of this remainder is certain to acquire an estate in the future, with no strings attached.

Example: “To A for life, remainder to B.” A is alive, B is alive. A has a life estate, and B has an indefeasibly vested remainder.

  1. Vested Remainder Subject to Complete Defeasance: also know as the vested remainder subject to total divestment. Here, the remainderman exists, his taking is not subject to any condition precedent. However, his right to possession could be cut short because of condition subsequent.
  2. Vested Remainder Subject to Open: the remainder is vested in a group of takers, at least one of whom is qualified to take. Each class member’s share is subject to partial diminution because additional members can join in.
17
Q

What is a shifting and a springing executory interest?

A

An executory interest is a future interest created in a transferee (a third party), which is not a remainder and which takes effect by either cutting short some interest in another person (“shifting”) or in the grantor or his heirs (“springing”).

  1. Shifting executory interest: it always follows a defeasible fee and cuts short someone other than the grantor. In a grant from O “to A for life, then to B and his heirs; but if B predeceases A, then to C and his heirs,” C has a shifting executory interest because it divests a transferee’s preceeding estate.
  2. Springing executory interest: this always cuts short a fee simple in the grantor or his heirs. O conveys: “To A, if and when he marries.” A is unmarried - and has a springing executory interest. O has a fee simple subject to A’s springing executory interest.
18
Q

What are the three forms of concurrent ownership?

A
  1. Joint Tenancy: two or more own with the right of survivorship.
  2. Tenancy by the Entirety: a marital interest between married partners with the right of survivorship.
  3. Tenancy in Common: two or more own with no right of survivorship.
19
Q

What is a joint tenancy?

A

Distinguishing Characteristics:

a. Right of Survivorship - when one tenant dies, his share goes automatically to the surviving joint tenant.
b. Joint tenants interest is alienable, but not devisable or descendible.

Creation of a Joint Tenancy:

a. The four unities - joint tenants must take their interests:
i. Time: at the same time
ii. Title: by the same title (i.e. in the same instrument)
iii. Identical shares: with identical shares AND
iv. Possession: with the right to possess the whole.

To remember: T-TIP

b. Grantor must clearly express the right of survivorship.
c. Use of a straw: a middleman in order to ensure the four unities are present. In New York, by statute, there is no need for a straw.

20
Q

How can a joint tenancy be severed?

A

Remember SPAM - sale, partition and mortgage:

  1. Severance and Sale
    a. A joint tenant can sell or transfer her interest during her lifetime, and can do so secretly. One joint tenant’s sale severs the joint tenancy as to the seller’s interest because it disrupts the four unities. Buyer is a tenant in common. To the extent that we started with more than two joint tenants in the first place: joint tenancy remains in tact as between the other non-transferring joint tenants.
    b. In equity, a joint tenant’s mere act of entering into a contract for the sale of her share will sever the joint tenancy as to the contracting party’s interest/share. This is the doctrine of equitable conversion.
  2. Severance and Partition: There are three variations -
    a. By voluntary agreement;
    b. Partition in kind: a court action for physical division of the land if in the best interest of all.
    c. Forced sale: a court action, if in the best interests of all, the property is sold and proceeds are divided proportionally (i.e. it is a single building, and can’t be partitioned).
  3. Severance and Mortgage: One joint tenant’s execution of a mortgage or a lien on his or her share will sever the joint tenancy as to that now encumbered share only in the minority of states, to follow the theory of mortgages. By contrast, the majority of states follow the lien theory of mortgages, whereby a joint tenant’s execution of a mortgage on his or her interest will not sever the joint tenancy.

**New York **follows the lien theory of mortgages.

21
Q

What is a tenancy by the Entirety?

A

It is created by conveying to a married partners who share the right of survivorship. It arises presumptively in any conveyance to married partners, unless stated otherwise.

It is a very protected form of co ownership:

a. Creditors: Creditors of only one spouse cannot touch this tenancy.
b. Unilateral conveyance: Neither tenant, acting a lone, can defeat the right of survivorship by unilateral transfer to a third party.

22
Q

What are the distinguisehing features of a tenancy in common?

A
  1. Each co-tenant owns an individual part and each has a right to possess the whole.
  2. Each interest is devisable, descendible, and alienable. There is no survivorship rights between tenants in common.
  3. The presumption favors tenancy in common.
23
Q

What are the rights and duties of co-tenants?

A
  1. Possession: Each co-tenant is entitled to enjoy and possess the whole. If one co-tenant wrongfully excludes another co-tenant from possession of the whole or any part, he has committed wrongful ouster.
  2. Rent from co-tenant in exclusive possession: Absent ouster, a co-tenant in exclusive possession is not liable to the others for rent.
  3. Rent from third parties: A co-tenant who leases all or part of the premises to a third party must account to his co-tenants, providing their fair share of the rent income.
  4. Adverse possession: unless he has ousted the other co-tenants, one co-tenant in exclusive possession for statutory adverse possession period cannot acquire title to the exclusion of the other. Ther is no hostility, because there was never any ouster.
  5. Carrying costs: Each co-tenant is responsible for his or her fair share of carrying costs (such as taxes and mortgage interest payments), based upon each tenant’s share.
  6. Repairs: The repairing co-tenant enjoys a right to contribution, for reasonable and necessary repairs, provided that she has told the co-tenant about the need. Contribution will be proportional to each tenant’s share.
  7. Improvements: During the life of the co-tenancy, there is no right to contribution for “improvements.” However, at partition, the improving co-tenant is entitled to a credit, equal to any increase in value she caused. Attendantly, at partition, the so-called “improver” bears full liability for any drop in value she caused.
  8. Waste: A co-tenant must not commit waste - voluntary (willful destruction), permissive (neglect), or ameliorative (changes that increase value..
  9. **Partition: **A joint tenant or tenant in common has a right to bring an action for partition.