Estate Planning Flashcards
(171 cards)
Olivia is married and owns and manages several rental properties. She is concerned that if she became incapacitated, the properties would not be properly managed and her tenants would be upset. Of the following arrangements, which one could fulfill Olivia’s desire to plan for the management of her rental properties in the case of her unanticipated physical or mental incapacity?
a) A durable power of attorney.
b) Owning the property as joint tenancy.
c) Owning the property as tenancy by the entirety.
d) All of the above.
d) All of the above.
- Any of the methods can be used to plan for asset management in the case of incapacity. A durable power of attorney would give the power holder the ability to manage the property if Olivia becomes incapacitated. If the property is owned joint tenancy or tenancy by the entirety, the joint tenant could manage the property in the event of Olivia’s incapacity.
Which of the following types of ownership are only held by married couples?
- JTWROS.
- Tenancy in common.
- Tenancy by the entirety.
- Tenants by marriage.
a) 1 only.
b) 3 only.
c) 1, 2, and 4.
d) 1, 2, 3, and 4.
b) 3 only.
- Of the property types listed, only tenancy by the entirety is an ownership form exclusive to married couples. Tenants by marriage is not a form of property ownership.
Christina and Preston have lived in Arizona since their marriage. Christina received an inheritance from her father during their marriage. Christina and Preston are moving to Massachusetts for a new job and have some questions regarding their move to a common law (separate property) state from a community property state. Of the following statements, which is true?
a) When a couple moves from a community property state to a common law (separate property) state, separate property will generally remain separate property.
b) When a couple moves from a common law (separate property) state to a community property state, separate property will generally become community property.
c) Community property avoids probate at the death of the first spouse and automatically passes to the surviving spouse by operation of law.
d) To get the step-to fair market value in basis at the death of the first spouse, a couple who lives in a common law (separate property) state can elect to treat their separate property as community property
a) When a couple moves from a community property state to a common law (separate property) state, separate property will generally remain separate property.
- Answer A is the only correct statement. When a couple moves from a community property state to a common law (separate property) state, separate property will generally remain separate property. Answer B is incorrect because separate property does not generally become community property when a married couple moves from a common law state to a community property state. Answer C is incorrect because community property may be disposed of by will and does not automatically pass to the surviving spouse by operation of law. Finally, answer D is incorrect because couples living in common law states cannot elect community property treatment at the death of the first spouse in order to get a step-up in basis.
Meredith has owned 100% of the stock of Meredith’s Medical Supplies, a corporation, for 22 years. In the current year, she gifted 50% of the business to her daughter, Izzie, who lives in California. Izzie does not work at the business and reinvests any income in the company. With respect to the transfer of the business interest, which of the following statements is/are true?
a) Izzie’s 50% interest in Meredith’s Medical Supplies is community property, owned equally by Izzie and her husband.
b) If Izzie’s husband dies tomorrow, both his share of Meredith’s Medical Supplies and Izzie’s share of Meredith’s Medical Supplies would receive a step-to fair market value in basis.
c) Izzie owns 50% of Meredith’s Medical Supplies outright, and the interest will not be considered com-munity property.
d) If Izzie dies tomorrow, the executor of her estate would include 25% of the value of Meredith’s Medical Supplies in her gross estate
c) Izzie owns 50% of Meredith’s Medical Supplies outright, and the interest will not be considered community property.
- Answer C is correct because gifted property is generally considered separate property. Answer A is incorrect because gifted property is generally considered separate property unless Izzie elected to treat the property as community property, or commingled the assets. In this case, Izzie does not commingle the assets and the problem does not mention that she elected community property status over the assets. Answer B is incorrect because Izzie’s interest in Meredith’s Medical Supplies will not be included in her husband’s gross estate. Separate property is only included in the gross estate of the separate property owner. Because the interest is not in her husband’s gross estate, it does not receive a step-to fair market value. Answer D is incorrect because if Izzie dies tomorrow she must include 100% of the value of all of her assets owned as separate property (thus 50% of Meredith’s Medical Supplies).
In 2014, brothers Darryl and Larry, agree to purchase real property and title it as joint tenancy with right of survivorship. At the time of the purchase, Darryl did not have any cash, so Larry paid the $50,000 purchase price himself. Over the next five years, Darryl and Larry allocated the income and expenses of the property equally, and luckily for them the value of the property increased to $350,000. In 2019, Larry dies, how much will his executor include in his federal gross estate as the value of this real property?
a) $50,000.
b) $175,000.
c) $300,000.
d) $350,000
d) $350,000
- The contribution rule applies to property owned as a joint tenancy with right of survivorship. Because Darryl did not contribute any amount towards the original purchase price of the property, Larry’s executor must include the full fair market value of the property in Larry’s gross estate for federal estate tax purposes.
In 2014, Ray and Debra, having been married for 3 years, agree to purchase some real property and title it joint tenancy with right of survivorship. At the time of the purchase, Debra did not have any cash, so Ray paid the $50,000 purchase price himself. Over the next five years, Ray and Debra allocated the income and expenses of the property equally, and luckily for them the value of the property increased to $350,000. In 2019 Ray dies, how much will his executor include in his federal gross estate as the value of this real property?
a) $50,000.
b) $175,000.
c) $300,000.
d) $350,000
b) $175,000.
- When a married couple owns property joint tenancy with right of survivorship, there is an automatic assumption that each spouse contributed 50% to the original purchase price. In this case, the contribution rule will deem that each would include 50% of the value of the property in the decedent’s federal gross estate. At Ray’s death, his executor will include 50% of the value of the property or $175,000 (50% x $350,000) in Ray’s federal gross estate.
Carol’s executor has located all of her property. Given the following list, what is the total value of Carol’s probate estate?
Life Insurance Face $1,000,000 Beneficiary is James, Carol’s son
401(k) Balance $350,000 Beneficiary is Carla, Carol’s Daughter
Vacation Home Value $460,000 Titled Tenancy by Entirety with Jim
Automobile Value $24,000 Owned by Carol
a) $24,000.
b) $484,000.
c) $834,000.
d) $1,024,000.
a) $24,000.
- Only the automobile, valued at $24,000, would be included in Carol’s probate estate. Because Carol has a named beneficiary, the life insurance and the 401(k) will transfer per contract law to the listed beneficiaries. The property owned tenancy by the entirety will transfer automatically, per the state law, to Carol’s husband Jim.
Crystal loans Holly $650,000, so that Holly can buy a home. Holly signs a note, with a term of 5 years, promising to repay the loan. The home is the collateral, but because Crystal and Holly have been friends since childhood, Crystal does not charge Holly interest. Of the following statements which is true?
- The imputed interest is considered a taxable gift from Crystal to Holly.
- The imputed interest is taxable income on Crystal’s income tax return.
- The imputed interest is an interest expense deduction for Crystal.
- Holly can deduct the imputed interest on her income tax return.
a) 2 only.
b) 2 and 4.
c) 1, 2, and 4.
d) 1, 2, 3, and 4.
c) 1, 2, and 4.
- The loan is greater than $100,000 and does not meet any of the exceptions to imputing interest. Crystal will have imputed interest income based on the applicable federal rate and the imputed interest will also be considered a taxable gift to Holly. Because the loan is secured by Holly’s personal residence, Holly will also have an itemized deduction equal to the imputed interest. Crystal does not have an interest expense.
Timothy made the following transfers to his only daughter during the year:
1. A bond portfolio with an adjusted basis of $130,000 and a fair market value of $140,000.
2. 2,000 shares of RCM Corporation stock with an adjusted basis of $126,000 and a fair market value of $343,000.
3. An auto with an adjusted basis of $15,000 and a fair market value of $9,000.
4. An interest-free loan of $2,000 for a personal computer on January 1st. The applicable federal rate for the tax year was 8%.
What is the value of Timothy’s gross gifts for this year?
a) $271,000.
b) $492,000.
c) $494,000.
d) $498,000
b) $492,000.
- The total of gross gifts is the fair market value of all gifted property before any deductions for gift splitting, the marital deduction, or the annual exclusion. Because the loan in Statement 4 is less than $10,000, it meets one of the exceptions of the imputed interest rules. The fact that the basis in Statement 3 is higher than the FMV is ignored for purposes of calculating the total gross gifts. The double-basis rule will apply to the donee in a subsequent sale. $140,000 + $343,000 + $9,000 = $492,000
Celeste and Raymond have been married for 29 years. Last year, Raymond sold his extremely successful automotive repair shop and his net worth now exceeds $10 million dollars. Celeste and Raymond have twin daughters, Kelly and Shelly, who will be 35 next month. Celeste and Raymond, neither of whom have given any gifts in the past, would like to give their daughters the maximum amount of cash possible without paying any gift tax. How much can Celeste and Raymond each give to Kelly and Shelly this year?
a) $15,000.
b) $30,000.
c) $11,430,000.
d) $22,860,000.
c) $11,430,000.
$15,000 (for 2019) per child (annual exclusion)
$11,400,000 (for 2019) per parent (applicable gift tax exemption)
Total that can be gifted per parent without paying gift tax = $11,430,000
While completing Joelle’s tax returns, Joelle’s CPA asked her if she made any gifts during the year. Joelle faxed her the following information. Of the following, which would not require the filing of a gift tax return?
a) Joelle created a revocable trust under the terms of which her son is the income beneficiary for his life and her grandson is the remainder beneficiary. Joelle created the trust with a $6,000,000 contribution and the trust made an income distribution in the current year.
b) Joelle opened a joint checking account in the name of herself and her sister with $75,000. The day after Joelle opened the account, her sister withdrew $35,000 to purchase a car.
c) Joelle created an irrevocable trust giving a life estate to her husband and a remainder interest to her daughter. Joelle created the trust with a $1,000,000 contribution.
d) Joelle gave her husband one-half of an inheritance she received from her uncle. The inheritance was $3,000,000
d) Joelle gave her husband one-half of an inheritance she received from her uncle. The inheritance was $3,000,000
- The transfer in Answer D would qualify for the unlimited marital deduction, so it is not a taxable gift and Joelle would not have to file a gift tax return. All of the other transfers would create taxable transfers and would require a gift tax return to be filed. The transfer in Answer a to a revocable trust would still be subject to gift tax reporting because the trust has current beneficiaries, as Joelle’s son received an income distribution in the current year.
Donna and Daniel have lived in Louisiana, a community property state, their entire marriage. Currently, their combined net worth is $4,000,000 and all of their assets are community property. After meeting with their financial advisor, Donna and Daniel begin a plan of lifetime gifting to reduce their gross estates. During this year, they made the following cash gifts: Son $80,000 Daughter $160,000 Republican National Committee $75,000 Granddaughter $15,000 What is the amount of the taxable gifts to be reported by Donna? a) $59,000. b) $90,000. c) $196,000. d) $255,000
b) $90,000.
- Because the assets are community property, the gifts are deemed to be made 50% by each spouse. Gift splitting is not an issue. The cash payment to the Republican National Committee is not a gift for gift tax purposes
- Donna can exclude up to $15,000 for the non-Republican national Committee gifts
Charles had been working with an estate planner for several years prior to his death. Accordingly, Charles made many transfers during his life in an attempt to reduce his potential estate tax burden, and Charles’ executor, Tom, is thoroughly confused. Tom comes to you for clarification of which assets to include in Charles’ gross estate. Which of the following transactions will not be included in Charles’ gross estate?
a) Charles gave $40,000 to each of his three grandchildren two years ago. No gift tax was due on the gifts.
b) Charles purchased a life insurance policy on his life with a face value of $300,000. Charles transferred the policy to his son two years ago.
c) Charles and his wife owned their personal residence valued at $250,000 as tenants by the entirety.
d) After inheriting a mountain vacation home from his mother, Charles gifted the vacation home to his daughter to remove it from his gross estate. Charles continued to use the property as a weekend getaway and continued all maintenance on the property.
a) Charles gave $40,000 to each of his three grandchildren two years ago. No gift tax was due on the gifts.
- The $40,000 gifts to his grandchildren are excluded from his gross estate because only gifts of life insurance within three years and any gift tax paid on a gift within three years are included in a transferor’s gross estate. The life insurance policy included in Answer B is included in the Charles’ gross estate because transfers of life insurance within three years of death are included in the decedent’s gross estate. Any property owned at the decedent’s date of death, as in Answer C, is included in the decedent’s gross estate. (Do not confuse gross estate inclusion with probate inclusion.) Even though Charles gave the mountain home in Answer D to his daughter, and the value of the property generally would not be included in Charles’ gross estate, the fact that Charles continued to utilize the property each weekend and maintained the property would cause inclusion in his gross estate.
Before her death, Alice loaned Jerry $400,000 in return for a note. The terms of the note directed Jerry to make monthly payments including interest at the applicable federal rate. If Alice dies before the note is repaid, which of the following affects the valuation for Alice’s gross estate?
- Jerry’s inability to make payments timely.
- The market rate of interest.
- The remaining term of the note.
- Alice forgives the note as a specific bequest in her will.
a) 1 only.
b) 1 and 2.
c) 1, 2, and 3.
d) 2, 3, and 4.
c) 1, 2, and 3.
- If Alice dies before Jerry repays the note, the note is included in Alice’s gross estate at the fair market value of the note plus any accrued interest due at Alice’s date of death. This fair market value is affected by the interest rate, maturity date, and Jerry’s ability to make the note payments, but not by Alice’s forgiveness of the note in her will. The forgiveness of the note is deemed a specific bequest and the fair market value of the note is still included in Alice’s gross estate.
During the year, Johnson created a trust for the benefit of his six children. The terms of the trust declare that his children can only access the trust’s assets after the trust has been in existence for 15 years and the trust does not include a Crummey provision. If Johnson transfers $72,000 to the trust during the year, what is his total taxable gifts for the year?
a) $0.
b) $12,000.
c) $60,000.
d) $72,000.
d) $72,000.
- Because the trust does not include a Crummey provision, the transfer to the trust is a gift of a future interest not available to be offset by the annual exclusion. As such, the entire transfer to the trust for the year is subject to gift tax.
Harry, age 60, owns 400 shares of ABC Corporation, which he expects to increase 300% over the next four years. Harry eventually wants to transfer the stock in ABC Corporation to his son, Billy, but Billy is currently incapable of managing the stock or the income from the stock. Harry expects Billy to be responsible in five years. Of the following, which transfer method would work best to remove the expected appreciation of the stock from Harry’s gross estate and protect the property for Billy?
a) Private annuity.
b) SCIN.
c) GRAT.
d) QPRT.
c) GRAT.
- The GRAT with a term of five or more years will allow Harry to transfer the stock to Billy at a gift tax cost equal to the current fair market value of the stock (before the 300% appreciation) less the sum of the annuity payments that will be paid back to Harry. This transfer method is not as ideal as a direct gift of the property because the annuity payments will return to Harry and will be included in his gross estate. Also, if Harry dies during the term of the GRAT, the full fair market value of the stock, at Harry’s date of death, will be included in Harry’s gross estate. Neither a private annuity nor a sale will meet Harry’s goals because both give Billy access to the stock immediately. A QPRT is also not an option because a QPRT is a special GRAT which transfers a personal residence
Dave transferred $1,500,000 to a GRAT naming his two children as the remainder beneficiaries while retaining an annuity valued at $500,000. If this is the only transfer Dave made during the year, what is Dave’s total taxable gift for the year?
a) $0.
b) $974,000.
c) $1,000,000.
d) $1,474,000
c) $1,000,000.
- The remainder interest is a taxable gift from Dave to his children equal to the value of the property contributed to the GRAT less the value of the annuity retained, $1,500,000-$500,000 = $1,000,000. Because the remainder interest is a gift of a future interest it is not eligible for the annual exclusion.
A trustee is subject to which of the following?
a) Prudent Man Rule.
b) Trustee’s Ethical Code.
c) Uniform Trustee Provisions.
d) Fiduciary Responsibilities Doctrine.
a) Prudent Man Rule.
- A trust fiduciary must follow the Prudent Man Rule demonstrating a duty of loyalty and duty of care on behalf of the trust’s beneficiaries. The Prudent Man Rule specifically states that the trustee, as fiduciary, must act in the same manner that a prudent person would act if the prudent person was acting for his own benefit after considering all of the facts and circumstances surrounding the decision. None of the other options are existing codes, provisions, or doctrines.
Which of the following situations would not cause the inclusion of an irrevocable trust in a grantor’s gross estate?
a) The grantor has retained the right to receive the income from the irrevocable trust.
b) The grantor has retained the right to use the assets contributed to the irrevocable trust for the remainder of his life.
c) The grantor retains an annuity from the irrevocable trust for a term of years less than his life expectancy.
d) The grantor retains the right to revoke the trust.
c) The grantor retains an annuity from the irrevocable trust for a term of years less than his life expectancy
- If the grantor retains an annuity from an irrevocable trust, this right alone will not cause the inclusion of the irrevocable trust in his gross estate. A GRAT is an irrevocable trust in which the grantor retains an annuity from the trust. If the grantor outlives the trust, the assets of the irrevocable trust will not be included in his gross estate. All of the other situations would cause the inclusion of an irrevocable transfer in a grantor’s gross estate.
Stephanie contributed $450,000 to a revocable living trust 8 years ago. She named herself as the income beneficiary and her only son as the remainder beneficiary. The term of the trust was equal to Stephanie’s life expectancy. Stephanie died this year, when the fair market value of the trust’s assets is $2,000,000. How much is included in Stephanie’s probate estate related to the revocable living trust?
a) $0.
b) $345,800.
c) $450,000.
d) $2,000,000.
a) $0.
- The question asks for the amount included in Stephanie’s probate estate. Because a revocable living trust transfers assets per the trust document, $0 of the value of the trust is included in Stephanie’s probate estate. Remember, however, that the full value of a revocable living trust is included in a decedent’s gross estate.
Justin’s grandfather contributed $350,000 to a simple irrevocable trust naming Justin as the income beneficiary and his brother, Ryan, as the remainder beneficiary. At the time of the transfer Justin’s grandfather paid $12,000 of gift tax. This year, the trust generated $14,000 of taxable dividend income and $3,000 of capital gains. What amount of taxable income will Justin include on his federal Form 1040 from this trust this year?
a) $0.
b) $12,000.
c) $14,000.
d) $17,000
c) $14,000.
- Since Justin is the income beneficiary of a simple irrevocable trust, he is taxed on the current year income of the trust. This year, Justin will include $14,000 on his federal Form 1040. Justin is not taxed on the capital gains unless they are distributed to him
Of the following statements regarding an Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust (ILIT), which of the following is true? a) A contribution to an ILIT that includes a Crummey power is eligible for the gift tax annual exclusion.
b) Contributions to an ILIT are not taxable gifts until the insured dies and the transfer is deemed complete.
c) ILITs are designed so the insured retains ownership of the life insurance policy.
d) The grantor of an ILIT is deemed the owner of the life insurance policy to the extent he remains the insured of the life insurance policy.
a) A contribution to an ILIT that includes a Crummey power is eligible for the gift tax annual exclusion.
- Answer A is a correct statement. Answer B is incorrect as contributions to an ILIT are taxable gifts, and are not eligible for the annual exclusion without a Crummey provision. Answer C is incorrect because an ILIT is designed to prevent an insured party from having ownership of the life insurance policy on his life. Answer D is an incorrect statement
Which of the following is not a correct statement regarding a power of appointment trust?
a) The trust will qualify for the unlimited marital deduction if the surviving spouse is given a general power of appointment over the trust’s assets.
b) Powers of appointment trusts are irrevocable trusts that can be created either during lifetime or at death.
c) A general power of appointment trust qualifies the grantor’s contributions for the gift tax annual exclusion if the beneficiary is allowed to take withdrawals at his discretion.
d) A special power of appointment trust that limits the surviving spouse’s right to an ascertainable standard qualifies the trust for the unlimited marital deduction
d) A special power of appointment trust that limits the surviving spouse’s right to an ascertainable standard qualifies the trust for the unlimited marital deduction
- A special power of appointment trust that limits the surviving spouse’s right to an ascertainable standard (health, education, maintenance and support) does not qualify the trust for the unlimited marital deduction. All of the other statements are true statements regarding power of appointment trusts.
Chris donated one of his original creation paintings to his alma mater, Backwoods University. His adjusted basis in the artwork was $400 and the fair market value was $150. Chris also contributed 100 shares of XYZ corporation that had an adjusted basis of $50 and a fair market value equal to $1,000 (held long-term). Ignoring the AGI limitations, what is the maximum amount Chris can deduct in relation to these donations?
a) $200.
b) $1,150.
c) $1,300.
d) $1,400.
b) $1,150.
- The painting has a fair market value less than its adjusted basis, and is considered ordinary income property. When the fair market value is less than the adjusted basis, a contribution of ordinary income property is limited to the fair market value ($150). Because Chris created the painting, we do not have to worry about the related-use test. The contribution of stock is a contribution of capital gain property and the deductible amount is equal to the fair market value of the stock ($1,000). The total of both items, and the deduction for the year, equals $1,150.