Essay plan Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Prosocial behaviors & ingroup help
(warneken & tomasello)
(baby jessica)
(FAO)

A

Predisposition- to help?
E- Warneken & Tomasello 2006- demoed that innate (book stacking, opening cabinet)
-helping or playing? if programmed to be “altruistic” why doesn’t carry over to childhood.

Baby Jessica- stuck in well, so much money- 1 million trust fund.

FAO- 800 million ppl behaviour. Most countries GDP (>0.8%) poorer countries give larger proportion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Altruism- academic sceptisicim
Inclined to coop?
Evol reasons-

(reyniers & bhalla)

(NSRM- cialdini et al)

A

historically seen as selfish beings.

-Tit-For-Tat Reciprocity or helping behaviors influenced by Social Norms .

Ptcpts follow social norms for helping cus care about Reputation.
E- Reyniers & Bhalla- call this “Reluctant Altruism”

Cialdini et al- emphasis Negative State Relief Model
-help cus don’t want to feel bad.

–found perceived oneness with victim stronger predictor than empathetic concern.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

defining altruism- empathy key?

Empathetic Concern- (bateson et al)

A

Bateson et al-

  • empathy feeling concern & distress for another.
  • proposed Empathy-Altruism Hypo- altruism directly linked to empathy- demoed via empathetic concern.

E- Bateson et al- ptcpts told confed shocked childhood trauma- ptcpts asked how felt- split into 2
= Egoistic Concern & Empatheitc Concern
-asked if wanted to stop experiement
-high empathy stayed= argued evidence for altruism.

–he accidentally measured ingroup (victim was student).

—–Cikara et al- lack of empathy sign of Intergroup Failure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Identifiable Victim Effect (IVE)-

small et al

A
  • may be 1 reason baby jessica got so much money.
  • -pref donate single person v group.

E-Small et al 2007- tell ptcpts about IVE reduce amount they give to all.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Cause of IVE

jenni lowenstein

A

Jenni & Lowenstein 1997- perceived impact of donation vividness of the situation.
Increase utilitarian decision for a group of ppl.
More empathetic concern to single victim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Psychological Numbing Effect (PN)-

slovic

A

(Mother Teresa Effect)- Slovic
-parsimonious with Weber’s Law- increase size of stimulus- decreased ability to detect changes in stimulus. - need loads of ppl to make us notice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Guilt

basil et al

A

Basil et al- guilt mediated empathy. Guilt stronger effect on donation than empathy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Reputation

grace & griffin - west

A

Grace & Friffin- ptcpts gave more when asked to wear charity ribbion
–West- “Conspicuous Compassion”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

God is watching

bateson & nettle

A

Increased donation when moral concepts made salient- religiousness poor predictor.
Bateson & Nettle- stylized eyes- bike theft/donations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The strategic side (3)

helping outgroup

A

Its not we help outgroup less, we help them for diff reasons.

  1. helping intergroup context places Group Needs at Forefront (SIT)
  2. (SIT) group Maintain Positive Distinctiveness. Group Membership is Fluid & need coop with others to Maintain.
  3. ingroup must help outgroup for benefits as providing Increases Group Rep = trustworthy.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Struggle for social dominance
(nadler & halabi)

(nadler- 2 types)

A

Nadler & Halabi- argue helping relations are Inherently Unequal - helper in position “Above”.

Nadler 2002- 2 types
1. Dependency-Oriented- full solution to prob is provided. Target perceived as incapable.

  1. Autonomy-Oriented- help is partial & temp. Foucs on helping target to help themselves.
  • –high status groups pref depend-ori, particularly when group hierarchies are unstable.
  • -lower status groups may refuse help (handouts).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Ingroup strategic motives

vanleewen & tauber

A

vanLeewen & Tauber- 3 motives for ingroup helping outgroup.

  1. Power & Autonomy- ingroup wanting Maintain Hierarchical relationship.
  2. Meaning & Existence- helping provide Sense of Purpose. Needed/valued “Scrooge Effect”.
  3. Impression Formation- ways help make our group Appear Positive- fair/competent.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Terror Management Theory (TMT)- (3)

A
  • very knowledge of our existential is 1 most fundamental motives directing human behaviour.
    1. Anxiety Buffering Hypo- if psych structure serve as anxiety buffer function then= Strengthening or Activating Structure should Decrease anx.
    2. Morality Salience Hypo- protection against anx, Reminding ppl of Source of anx, morality lead to Increased NEED for Protection Structure.
    3. Death Thought Accessibility Hypo- if provides protection & buffers against awareness, then Weakening Structure should Increase Accessibility of death related cognition while Strengthening should Decrease Accessibility.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Morality Salience Hypo
(rosenblatt et al)
(greenberg et al)

A

Rosenblatt et al- “pls describe emotions thought of your death arouse”, “physically happens when dead”
-court judges found treat legal transgress are sigh harsher after mortality made salient.

E- Greenberg et al & others- MS makes us fight wars, commit to ingroup etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

MS & prosocial behaviour

A

Jonas et al- after MS donation increased to own nations projects, not international projects.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Why death special

A

Lack meaning, Uncertainty.

Compatibility with with Evol psych.

Alternative method: Meaning Maintenance Model
Coalition Psych.