essay on Us being too rigidan UK being too flexible Flashcards

1
Q

is US too rigid?

A

no?
it is not too rigid, and even where it is specific it is beneficial for the country
Although, there should be a better codification of modern rights, but this is more of an issue with America’s political scene than with the constitution itself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

3 arguments that US constitution is too rigid

A

Constitution is formally outdated
Amendment process is too convoluted
Rigidiness facilitates abuses of the system.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How many mass shootings was there in the UK in 2023?

A

632

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How many deaths was there as a result of firearms in the US compared to the UK in 2023?

A

Nearly 50,000 vs 20-30.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How does the rigidness of the constitution facilitate abuses of the system.

A

Rididly protected rights leads to constitutional corruption as seen in Citizens United v Federal Election Commtteee where 1st amendment rights were used to justify huge donations being made from corporations ot election ampaigns
Certain rights cannot be efficiently maintained, including gay rights being an informal amendment, abortion rights being able to be overturned easily and the failure to pass the ERA.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How can these 3 arguments that the US constitution is too rigid be countered?

A

The first two are issues with the right wing political landscape of America and the middle one is necessary for protecting the key principles of the constitution nad ensuring amendments aren’t made reactively.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the positives of the difficult amendment process?

A

Tyranny cannot happen as the principles of separation of power and checks and balances cannot occur as well as federalism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How does the rigid nature of the constitution benefit the country?

A

People are aware of the different powers of the government so can hold them in check when they are breaking them
People are aware of their rights so can be aware of when they a re not being protected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is an example of citizens being aware of their rights?

A

civil Rigths movement, which was able to be based on 1st amendment rights to assemble and protest and 14th amendment rights to due process and equal citizenship.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is an example of citizens being aware of their political systems?

A

Watergate 1972-74 where people could call out Nixon for overstepping executive power which led to nixon resigning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is another way in which the US isn’t too rigid?

A

there is a blend of specificity and vagueness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is an example of specificity in the US constitution?

A

article 1 section 8 which outlines congress’ power including that of the purse and the senate’s ability to ratify treaties. these are enumerated powers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is an example of vagueness in the constitution?

A

the final clause of article 1 section 8 which outlines that congress may make laws which are necessary and proper to the powers of congress - this is an implied power.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is hte benefit of vagueness?

A

It means that the US can modernise itself based on the government and give itself more or less power
It also means that informal amendments can be made which can modernise the constitution, especially through civil rights such as the 2015 Obergfell. Hodges rulin.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is the judgement on the UK constitution?

A

HTe constitution is too flexible, meaning that there is an inadequate protection of rights, unclear systems of government and corruption of parliamentary principles can occur.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is an example of the UK having inadequate protection of rights.

A

None of our rights are entrenched in the constitution in the same way the bill of rights is
Because of our flexibility we have achieved the equality act 2010 and the HRA 1998 however both of these could be struck down with a different piece of the constitution being changed.

17
Q

What is an example of unclear systems and rights in the UK?

A

People are unaware of their rights being taken away - such as in the Seirous Disruption Prevention Order 2021 which limited the right to protest
A lot of the slick running of parliament is down to non-legally binding conventions, which are inconsistent in application.

18
Q

What is an example of conventions being applied?

A

Ministers are responsible to parliament for the conduct of their departament and must resign if there is serious failures or misconduct
Estelle Morris, Secretary of State for Education and skills, resigned from her job in 2002 admitting to doubts of her own competence after a series of issues within her departament.

19
Q

What is an example of conventions not being applied when meant to?

A

Priti Patel, who was accused of bullying civil servants, breaking the ministerial code, yet did not resign and actually had the Prime Minister stick by her. 2020. If this were constitutional she would’ve had to step down.

20
Q

What are the 3 constitutional principles?

A

Unitary state
Parliamentary sovereignty
Rule of law

21
Q

How has unitary state not been upheld?

A

Due to devolution, we now have a more quasi-federal state, where there is two parliaments able to legislate over the same regions at the same time.

22
Q

How has rule of law not been upheld?

A

Senior elites can get away with it
tony Blair faced no consequences for breaking international law when starting the Iraq war
Boris Johnson not facing criminal charges for the partygate scandal during COVID 19.