Essay Attack Templates Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Personal jurisdiction refers to a court’s authority to exercise jurisdiction over a particular defendant. There are 3 bases for court authority: _____________.

A

(1) traditional,
(2) statutory, and
(3) constitutional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Personal jurisdiction refers to a court’s authority to exercise jurisdiction over a particular defendant. There are 3 bases for court authority: (1) traditional, (2) statutory, and (3) constitutional.

The traditional bases for a court to exercise jurisdiction include when the defendant:

A

(1) is present while served in the forum,
(2) consents to jurisdiction, or
(3) is domiciled in the forum.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Personal jurisdiction refers to a court’s authority to exercise jurisdiction over a particular defendant. There are 3 bases for court authority: (1) traditional, (2) statutory, and (3) constitutional.

States enact** long-arm statutes** to authorize a court jurisdiction over non-residents to the extent the ____________ of the U.S. Constitution permits.

A

Due Process Clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Personal jurisdiction refers to a court’s authority to exercise jurisdiction over a particular defendant. There are 3 bases for court authority: (1) traditional, (2) statutory, and (3) constitutional.

States enact long-arm statutes to ____________ to the extent the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution permits.

A

authorize a court jurisdiction over non-residents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Personal jurisdiction refers to a court’s authority to exercise jurisdiction over a particular defendant. There are 3 bases for court authority: (1) traditional, (2) statutory, and (3) constitutional.

Factors to assess whether an exercise of jurisdiction complies with the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution:

A

(1) minimum contacts between defendant and forum,
(2) relationship cause of action has with forum, and
(3) fair play and substantial justice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Personal jurisdiction refers to a court’s authority to exercise jurisdiction over a particular defendant. There are 3 bases for court authority: (1) traditional, (2) statutory, and (3) constitutional.

Factors to assess whether an exercise of jurisdiction complies with the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution:
(1) ______________,
(2) relationship cause of action has with forum, and
(3) fair play and substantial justice.

A

minimum contacts between defendant and forum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Personal jurisdiction refers to a court’s authority to exercise jurisdiction over a particular defendant. There are 3 bases for court authority: (1) traditional, (2) statutory, and (3) constitutional.

Factors to assess whether an exercise of jurisdiction complies with the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution:
(1) minimum contacts between defendant and forum,
(2) _____________, and
(3) fair play and substantial justice.

A

relationship cause of action has with forum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Personal jurisdiction refers to a court’s authority to exercise jurisdiction over a particular defendant. There are 3 bases for court authority: (1) traditional, (2) statutory, and (3) constitutional.

Factors to assess whether an exercise of jurisdiction complies with the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution:
(1) minimum contacts between defendant and forum,
(2) relationship cause of action has with forum, and
(3) _______________.

A

fair play and substantial justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

________________ must be (1) purposeful such that the defendant (2) reasonably foresees being hailed into the forum court.

A

minimum contacts

Factors to assess whether an exercise of jurisdiction complies with the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution:
(1) minimum contacts between defendant and forum,
(2) relationship cause of action has with forum, and
(3) fair play and substantial justice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Minimum contacts must be (1) ________ such that the defendant (2) reasonably foresees being hailed into the forum court.

A

purposeful

Factors to assess whether an exercise of jurisdiction complies with the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution:
(1) minimum contacts between defendant and forum,
(2) relationship cause of action has with forum, and
(3) fair play and substantial justice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Minimum contacts must be (1) purposeful such that the defendant (2) ____________ being hailed into the forum court.

A

reasonably foresees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Minimum contacts must be (1) ________________ (2) reasonably foresees being hailed into the forum court.

A

purposeful such that the defendant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Minimum contacts must be (1) purposeful such that the defendant (2) _______________.

A

reasonably foresees being hailed into the forum court

Factors to assess whether an exercise of jurisdiction complies with the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution:
(1) minimum contacts between defendant and forum,
(2) relationship cause of action has with forum, and
(3) fair play and substantial justice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Minimum contacts must be (1) purposeful such that the defendant (2) reasonably foresees being hailed into the forum court.

Purposeful -> ___________

Foresees -> There is foreseeability when a defendant knows or reasonably anticipates having to defend a lawsuit in a court resulting from minimum contacts.

A

The court reviews whether the defendant purposefully avails itself of the benefits and protections of the forum state’s laws.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Minimum contacts must be (1) purposeful such that the defendant (2) reasonably foresees being hailed into the forum court.

Purposeful -> The court reviews whether the defendant purposefully avails itself of the benefits and protections of the forum state’s laws.

Foresees -> There is foreseeability when a defendant knows or reasonably anticipates having to defend a lawsuit in a court resulting from minimum contacts.

A

There is foreseeability when a defendant knows or reasonably anticipates having to defend a lawsuit in a court resulting from minimum contacts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Minimum contacts must be (1) purposeful such that the defendant (2) reasonably foresees being hailed into the forum court.

Purposeful -> The court reviews whether the defendant ____________________.

Foresees -> There is foreseeability when a defendant knows or reasonably anticipates having to defend a lawsuit in a court resulting from minimum contacts.

A

purposefully avails itself of the benefits and protections of the forum state’s laws

17
Q

Minimum contacts must be (1) purposeful such that the defendant (2) reasonably foresees being hailed into the forum court.

Purposeful -> The court reviews whether the defendant purposefully avails itself of the benefits and protections of the forum state’s laws.

Foresees -> There is foreseeability when a defendant ________________ resulting from minimum contacts.

A

knows or reasonably anticipates having to defend a lawsuit in a court

18
Q

Factors to assess whether an exercise of jurisdiction complies with the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution:
(1) minimum contacts between defendant and forum,
(2) relationship cause of action has with forum, and
(3) fair play and substantial justice.

The relationship the cause of action has with the forum state warrants personal jurisdiction when, in the forum state:

A

(1) the defendant has systematic and continuous contact,
(2) the suit is related to the defendant’s conduct, or
(3) a product is placed in the stream of commerce.

19
Q

Factors to assess whether an exercise of jurisdiction complies with the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution:
(1) minimum contacts between defendant and forum,
(2) relationship cause of action has with forum, and
(3) fair play and substantial justice.

The relationship the cause of action has with the forum state warrants personal jurisdiction when, in the forum state:
(1) the defendant has ________________,
(2) the suit is related to the defendant’s conduct, or
(3) a product is placed in the stream of commerce.

A

systematic & continuous contact

20
Q

Factors to assess whether an exercise of jurisdiction complies with the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution:
(1) minimum contacts between defendant and forum,
(2) relationship cause of action has with forum, and
(3) fair play and substantial justice.

The relationship the cause of action has with the forum state warrants personal jurisdiction when, in the forum state:
(1) the defendant has systematic and continuous contact,
(2) the suit is ________________, or
(3) a product is placed in the stream of commerce.

A

related to the defendant’s conduct

21
Q

Factors to assess whether an exercise of jurisdiction complies with the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution:
(1) minimum contacts between defendant and forum,
(2) relationship cause of action has with forum, and
(3) fair play and substantial justice.

The relationship the cause of action has with the forum state warrants personal jurisdiction when, in the forum state:
(1) the defendant has systematic and continuous contact,
(2) the suit is related to the defendant’s conduct, or
(3) a product is _____________.

A

placed in the stream of commerce

22
Q

The relationship the cause of action has with the forum state warrants personal jurisdiction when, in the forum state:
(1) _________________,
(2) the suit is related to the defendant’s conduct, or
(3) a product is placed in the stream of commerce.

A

the defendant has systematic and continuous contact

23
Q

The relationship the cause of action has with the forum state warrants personal jurisdiction when, in the forum state:
(1) the defendant has systematic and continuous contact,
(2) ________________, or
(3) a product is placed in the stream of commerce.

A

the suit is related to the defendant’s conduct

24
Q

The relationship the cause of action has with the forum state warrants personal jurisdiction when, in the forum state:
(1) the defendant has systematic and continuous contact,
(2) the suit is related to the defendant’s conduct, or
(3) ________________.

A

a product is placed in the stream of commerce

25
Q

The relationship the cause of action has with the forum state warrants personal jurisdiction when, in the forum state:
(1) the defendant has systematic and continuous contact,
(2) the suit is related to the defendant’s conduct, or
(3) a product is placed in the stream of commerce

Systematic & Continuous -> _____

**Related to D’s Conduct ** -> Jurisdiction is proper if the claim arises out of the defendant’s conduct with the forum state.

Stream of Commerce -> The law is unsettled as to whether placing a product in the stream of commerce with the expectation that it be purchased by consumers in the forum state is sufficient.

A

The court weighs the quantity and nature of the defendant’s contacts with the forum, or its connection with the cause of action to determine if they are systematic and continuous.

26
Q

The relationship the cause of action has with the forum state warrants personal jurisdiction when, in the forum state:
(1) the defendant has systematic and continuous contact,
(2) the suit is related to the defendant’s conduct, or
(3) a product is placed in the stream of commerce

Systematic & Continuous -> The court weighs the quantity and nature of the defendant’s contacts with the forum, or its connection with the cause of action to determine if they are systematic and continuous.

**Related to D’s Conduct ** -> _____

Stream of Commerce -> The law is unsettled as to whether placing a product in the stream of commerce with the expectation that it be purchased by consumers in the forum state is sufficient.

A

Jurisdiction is proper if the claim arises out of the defendant’s conduct with the forum state.

27
Q

The relationship the cause of action has with the forum state warrants personal jurisdiction when, in the forum state:
(1) the defendant has systematic and continuous contact,
(2) the suit is related to the defendant’s conduct, or
(3) a product is placed in the stream of commerce

Systematic & Continuous -> The court weighs the quantity and nature of the defendant’s contacts with the forum, or its connection with the cause of action to determine if they are systematic and continuous.

**Related to D’s Conduct ** -> Jurisdiction is proper if the claim arises out of the defendant’s conduct with the forum state.

Stream of Commerce -> _____

A

The law is unsettled as to whether placing a product in the stream of commerce with the expectation that it be purchased by consumers in the forum state is sufficient.

28
Q

Factors to assess whether an exercise of jurisdiction complies with the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution:
(1) minimum contacts between defendant and forum,
(2) relationship cause of action has with forum, and
(3) fair play and substantial justice.

Factors courts consider in determining fair play and substantial justice include:

A

(1) the convenience to the parties and (2) state’s interest.

29
Q

Factors to assess whether an exercise of jurisdiction complies with the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution:
(1) minimum contacts between defendant and forum,
(2) relationship cause of action has with forum, and
(3) fair play and substantial justice.

Factors courts consider in determining fair play and substantial justice include (1) ________ and (2) state’s interest.

A

the convenience to the parties

30
Q

Factors to assess whether an exercise of jurisdiction complies with the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution:
(1) minimum contacts between defendant and forum,
(2) relationship cause of action has with forum, and
(3) fair play and substantial justice.

Factors courts consider in determining fair play and substantial justice include (1) the convenience to the parties and (2) _________.

A

state’s interest

31
Q

Factors to assess whether an exercise of jurisdiction complies with the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution:
(1) minimum contacts between defendant and forum,
(2) relationship cause of action has with forum, and
(3) fair play and substantial justice.

Factors courts consider in determining ________ include (1) the convenience to the parties and (2) state’s interest.

A

fair play and substantial justice

32
Q

Factors courts consider in determining ____________ include (1) the convenience to the parties and (2) state’s interest.

Convenience to Parties -> The exercise of jurisdiction must be reasonable, taking into account the litigant’s interests. The court will not find jurisdiction where requiring the defendant to defend in the forum would impose an unreasonable burden.

**State’s Interest ** -> A state has an interest in providing a forum for its citizens to resolve disputes.

A

fair play & substantial justice

33
Q

Factors courts consider in determining fair play and substantial justice include (1) the convenience to the parties and (2) state’s interest.

Convenience to Parties -> ________

**State’s Interest ** -> A state has an interest in providing a forum for its citizens to resolve disputes.

A

The exercise of jurisdiction must be reasonable, taking into account the litigant’s interests. The court will not find jurisdiction where requiring the defendant to defend in the forum would impose an unreasonable burden.

34
Q

Factors courts consider in determining fair play and substantial justice include (1) the convenience to the parties and (2) state’s interest.

Convenience to Parties -> The exercise of jurisdiction must be reasonable, taking into account the litigant’s interests. The court will not find jurisdiction where requiring the defendant to defend in the forum would impose an unreasonable burden.

**State’s Interest ** -> A state has an interest in providing a forum for its citizens to resolve disputes.

A

A state has an interest in providing a forum for its citizens to resolve disputes.