ERMS Flashcards
Methods of Knowing
which ones are scientific and which are not?
Non-scientific
1. Intuition
2. Authority
3. rationalism
4. empiricism
Scientific
5. The scientific method
Intuition
limitations
Relying on guts, emotions, & instincts to guide us
- intuition can be wrong
Authority
Limitations
Accepting new ideas becuase some authority figure states they are true
- not always trustworthy
Rationalism
limitations
using logic and reasoing to acquire new knowledge
if premises are wrong/errored then the conclusion will not be valid
empricalism
limitations
acquiring knowledge through obzervation ad experience
can be deceiving, cant or dont want to experience evrything
The scientific Method
limitations
systemically collecting and evaluating evidence to test ideas and answer questions
Capital T truth
truth that is the same for everybody
Features of science (3)
- Systematic empiricism
- empirical questions
- public Knowledge
systematic empricism
carefully planning, making, recording, and analyzing multiple obzervations
Empirical questions
questions asked about the facts of the world which can be answered by systemic empiricism
- there is a “true” answer
- not about values, morals, “oughts”
Public Communication
Scientific findings must be openly and truthfully communicated, put in context of other research, and critiqued.
Psudo science has
- anecdotes
- evidence =proof
- confirmation bias
- hand-pick evidence
- no peer review
- overstates findings q
Basic Research
attempts to answers fundamental questions about human behvior
applied research
attempts to apply theory to solve practical problems and develop potential solutions
research questions
questions about the research
Peer Review
process of scientists reading, critiqueing other work prior to publication to make sure it fits the neccasary rigor of science/is done correctly.
allows science to self-correct & build off of eachother
hypothesis
specific falsifiable prediction of how you expect a research question should be answered
operationalization
turning something thats a construct and making it measurable and testable
Null hypothesis
H0: no relationship
why is converging diverse evidence so strong
replication and conceptual replication
what is research strategy
general approad and goals for a study
- experimental
- quasi
- non-exp
research design
design of particular study
- group vs indiv.
- same indiv. vs diff indiv.
- lab vs naturalistic
- # of variabbles and types
- measurements and protocols
relationships can be
- general
- linear
- curvilinear
- positive
- negative
experiment
answers cause-and-effect questions about the relationship between two variables
quasi-experiment
atttempt to produce a semi cause-and-effect explanation, using a variables that can’t be manipulated
non-experiment
demonstrates relationship between variables =- does not attempt to explain it
within-in subject variables
participants experience all conditions or gtouping for that variable
between subject variables
participants are assigned to different conditions
how do we use manipulation
research manipulates one variable by changing/assigning tis calue to create 2+ conditions
experiment features
- manipulation
- conditions
- measurment
- control
- comparison
conditions
experiment levels to independent variable
- if I am studying the effects of 2 different pain medications of headaches, I may give people who have headaches either Tylenol or Bayer (the treatment groups; thus in this example there are two levels of the IV; one level is Tylenol, the other is Bayer, but both are part of the experimental condition).
measurement
a second vairbale is measured, resulting in a set of scores for every condition
control
all other varibales are controlled to be sure that they do not influence the variables being examined q
comparison
the scores inone condition are compared with the scores in another condition
independent vairbale (IV)
the variable that is manipulated by the researcher
dependent variable
the variable that is obzerved by the researcher
extraneous variables
all other varibales in the study other than IV and DV. can be participant variables, or eenviroment variable
steps to establish causation
- temporal precedent: demonstrate that the “cause” happens before the “effect” occures. (iv must happen firt, change in DV must follow)
- control: Demonstrate that one specific variables is responisible for changes in the other
Types of manipulation
- experimental condition
- control condition
- no-treatment control condition
- placebo control condition
- placebo affect
- waitlist control condition
experimental condition
treatment condition whichc receives an experimental manipulation
.
.