Eric Birling

Question 1

Mysterious… and why?

Answer 1

‘Yes, I remember-‘
‘pale and distressed’
‘half-shy, half-assertive’
Mystery contrasts Mr/Mrs Birling’s straightforward capitalist views - his ambiguity gives the audience hope for a change
Ambiguity may also connect to fear of father’s disapproval

Question 2

Controversial… and why?

Answer 2

‘Easily turns nasty’
‘Insisted on giving her money’’
‘Pretty and a good sport’
Men still had power so he may have used his power to justify his actions
Women were seen as objects/powerless and he abused this stereotype for his own benefit

Question 3

Contrast to his father… and why?

Answer 3

‘Not the kind of father a chap can go to’
‘Could have kept her’
‘Letting ourselves out nicely’
The contrast shows the distinct theme of generational difference as Eric is more compassionate - reflects Priestley’s ideologies and hope for the newer generations

Question 3

Central argument

Answer 3

Eric shows/gives the hope for change while also demonstrating the risk of society continuing this way

Question 4

Conclusion

Answer 4

Priestly does this to give the audience hope for change and to also understand their responsibility