ER Translocation Flashcards
Which protein would you stain for to visualise the ER?
Calreticulin which is an ER chaperone
You would use anti-calireticulin antibody
What is the entry point into the secretory pathway?
The endoplasmic reticulum
How has most research into the ER been carried out?
On microsomes
These are ER vesicles with ribosomes attached, which work as proxies for the entire ER.
How do you prepare microsomes?
They form when you homogenise a cell and separate the contents by density gradient fractionation
Describe the structure of signal peptides
Found on the N-terminal region of a protein
about 20 amino acids long
with basic/positively charged amino acids in the first few residues
hydrophobic stretches
alpha helical structure
small amino acids like alanine, serine or glycine are found at the signal peptide cleavage point
How wide is the lipid bilayer in amino acids?
17-18 amino acids
When does ER import happen for most mammalian proteins?
co-translation
If you add the ER after translation, what would you find?
protease sensitive protein with an intact signal sequence
If you add the ER before translation, what would you find?
protein is protected from protease and signal sequence is cleaved
When does ER import happen for most yeast proteins?
post-translation
Who proposed the Signal Hypothesis?
Blobel and Dobberstein (1975)
What is the Signal Hypothesis?
that information for targeting a protein to the ER lies at its N terminus. It emerges from the ribosome first, triggers the attachment of the free ribosome-nascent chain complex to the ER membrane for cotranslational importation through a channel.
This must start before the protein gets too long/folded.
Once in the lumen, the signal peptide is cleaved off and the protein can fold - it is a one way process.
What is the speed of translation?
100 amino acids per minute
How was the signal recognition particle discovered?
Walter and Blobel (1981) noticed that washing microsomes with salt to remove peripherally associated proteins, preprolactin were protease sensitive.
Fractions of proteins were added back and it was found that a large protein was what made preprolactin resistant.
What are the components of SRP?
P54 = recognises and binds to hydrophobic stretches on the ER signal sequence as protein leaves the ER
P68/P72 = sends ribosome to the ER
P9/P14 blocks translation while translocation happens by binding to aminoacyl site
What ensures that the ribosomes docks with the ER membrane and not other membranes?
Signal Recognition Particle (SRP)
The ER is targeted, not by the emerging signal peptide, but by the P68/72 proteins of the ribosome-nascent chain-SRP complex.
These SRP proteins interact with a duplex of receptors (SRP a and β receptors), unique to the ER membrane.
How can a ribosome-nascent chain complex move to the ER fast enough before chain extension and protein folding preclude import?
Signal Recognition Particle (SRP)
A ribosome-nascent chain complex does not have to move to the ER within milliseconds in order to ensure that the protein isn’t too extended or folded for import, because the binding of SRP P9/14 blocks the ribosome A site, preventing tRNA access and hence precluding continued translation.
This pause in translation gives time for the ribosome-nascent chain-SRP complex to find and dock with the ER membrane.
Describe the SRP cycle?
GTP binds to both SRP54 and the SRP receptor.
Then a conformational change “locks” the complex onto the membrane.
This leads to the transfer of the ribosome to other proteins.
SRP54 and SRP receptor are GTPases so GTP hydrolysis leads to SRP release (when BOTH are bound).
SRP dissociates from the signal peptide and elongation cycles can resume.
Is SRP found elsewhere?
SRP homologues have been found in fungi and bacteria, eg E. coli
However, in these systems, only a small number of proteins are targeted to the ER (or periplasm) in a ribosome-dependent, SRP-dependent manner.
Most targeting in lower eukaryotes and bacteria is SRP-independent
How was the existence of protein-conducting channels investigated in the ER
Simon and Blobel (1991) used electrochemical methods: used electrodes on either side of a membrane which separated two chambers. Allowed microsomes to fuse with the membrane. Measured currents across the membrane to measure ion movement across channels.
How was the existence of protein-conducting channels in the ER membrane shown?
Measured membrane potential.
No potential at first bc while docking of ribosomes opens the channel, nascent protein blocks it.
Adding puromycin to mimic the 3’ end of charged tRNA caused the nascent protein to fall off quickly, resulting in a flux of chloride ion which could be measured.
If we get rid of ribosomes all together, do protein-conducting channels remain?
If you add salt to strip the ER membrane of ribosomes, the flux stops so we can conclude that the channels only work when translating ribosomes are physically attached
How was the environment of the mammalian protein translocation channel of the ER membrane investigated?
Crowley et al (1993) probed the signal peptide using fluorescence spectroscopy - A fluorescent probe (NBD) was incorporated into the signal peptide of nascent chains. Fluorescence of NBD is affected by the hydrophobicity of its environment. In a nonpolar/hydrophobic environment it fluoresces for 7-8ns whilst in an aqueous environment its fluorescence lifetime is just 1ns.
What is the environment of the mammalian protein translocation channel of the ER membrane? - is it aqueous or hydrophobic?
Crowley et al (1993) found that it was aqueous because When NBD-Lys was incorporated into the signal peptide of a truncated preprolactin and fluorescence lifetimes measured, the NBD had a lifetime of 1ns
What were the special requirements of Crowley et al’s experiment?
- Truncated protein length to synchronise translation: so that signal peptides are in the ER channels during excitation of the fluorescent probe
- Deleted lysines in preprolactin and added a single one at the 5’ end for NBD to bind to.
- Lysyl tRNA needed to be purified, labelled with NBD and returned.
How would you test the contents of the protein conducting channels in the ER membrane?
collisional quenching of fluorescence
If iodide ions are able to collide with excited NBD molecules, the excited state will be lost and fewer photons will be emitted (i.e. fluorescence intensity drops).
How does collisional quenching of fluorescence work?
Quench (stop) fluorescence by adding quencher (iodine ions) and measure fluorescence intensity.
Put iodide ions in the cytosol vs in the ER lumen and see which condition results in no fluorescence
How did collisional quenching of fluorescence show whether channels are filled with cytosol?
Add iodide ions to the cytosol .
When translating ribosomes are membrane-bound, there is no change in fluorescence intensity.
This shows the cytosol is not what makes the channel aqueous and there must be some kind of seal