Equity Rule Statements Flashcards
Establishing Boundary Lines
Assert ownership of the disputed land and seek to establish that the wrongful action is occurring on plaintiff’s land
Rescission at law
When a contract is voidable for fraud is executory on both sides, the injured party may simply disaffirm, refuse to perform, and use fraud as a defense to the action at law for damages, which the counter-party may bring if and when it seeks to force performance.
Rescission at law is ineffective as to land titles.
In Virginia, the grounds for rescission are: (i) fraud; (ii) innocent misrepresentation; (iii) mutual mistake.
Laches and Statutes of Limitations
While it is true that the statutes of limitation do not directly apply in equitable causes of action, the equitable time bar of laches should conform to the statutory limitations period for a claim that is recognized in both legal and equitable causes of action.
Equitable claims do not generally have a specific statutorily prescribed limitations period. Laches is an affirmative defense that will bar an equitable claim if: (i) there was an unreasonable delay in bringing suit after an adult plaintiff learns of the grounds of the claim; (ii) the defendant has suffered prejudice during the period of plaintiff’s unwarranted delay.
Prejudice: usually means that a witness or documentary evidence has been lost; a change in legal position during the period when no suit was pending; or substantial investment of money which wouldn’t have been expended had plaintiff complained timely.
Unjust enrichment
In Virginia, unjust enrichment requires a showing that: (i) the plaintiff conferred a benefit on the defendant; (ii) defendant knew of the benefit and reasonably should have expected to repay plaintiff; and (iii) defendant accepted or retained the benefit without paying for its value.
Bar of Legal and Equivalent Equitable Claim
Under Virginia law, a claim barred under a legal theory of recovery must be deemed barred under an analogous equitable theory.
Nuisance generally
Nuisance is in essence any intangible interference with one’s enjoyment of land by means of noxious fumes, smells, vibrations, noise, illumination, or otherwise offensive activities including ecological and environmental nuisances.
Private Nuisance
A private nuisance will be enjoined if: (i) it threatens irreparable loss; (ii) it is substantial; (iii) the balance of the hardships does not favor the other party.
Private nuisance interferes with rights or interests unique to the individual bringing the suit.
Public Nuisance
Public nuisance is a nuisance that affects an indefinite number of people. A private person may seek to enjoin a public nuisance only if three conditions are met: (i) the alleged public nuisance violates a specific right of the person seeking the injunction and causes the individual harm not shared by the public at large; (ii) the injury is serious; (iii) the private inconvenience suffered outweighs any public benefit from the status quo.
Public nuisances are ordinarily prosecuted by public officials such as the attorney general, the Commonwealth Attorney, or the city or county attorney.
Injunction Predicated Upon Trespass
A court will enjoin a trespass only in cases of irreparable injury caused by: (i) repeated violations that would not be adequately remedied by successive lawsuits; (ii) a continuous trespass; or (iii) a single trespass if the harm threatened is unique.
Factors for a Permanent Injunction
A court will grant an injunction if: (i) plaintiff has a legally recognized right that has been or is about to be infringed upon by the defendant; (ii) there is no adequate remedy at law; (iii) an injunction is practicable, feasible, and effective to vindicate plaintiff’s rights; (iv) the balance of the hardship favors the plaintiff; (v) the injunction will not adversely affect the public interest; (vi) there are no equitable defenses against the plaintiff.
Rescission in Equity
Rescission abrogates the original contract or transfer of property ab initio.
Rescission in equity will be granted only if rescission at law does not adequately protect plaintiff’s rights. Rescission at law is ineffective as to land titles.
In Virginia, the grounds for rescission are: (i) fraud; (ii) innocent misrepresentation; (iii) mutual mistake.
Mutual Mistake
A contract can be rescinded for mutual mistake of a material fact on the part of the parties. In cases of mutual mistake, equity will rescind the conveyance if the error goes to the substance of the contract, so that the purchaser does not get what he bargained for and the vendor sells that which she did not intend to sell.
Merger in Land Sales Contracts
The general rule is that prior stipulations and understandings are merged into the final and formal contracts executed by the parties and when a deed has been delivered and accepted as performance of an antecedent contract to convey, the contract is merged into the deed. However, the merger rule does not apply to nontitle matters.
Fraud
Fraud is defined as either: (i) an intentional misrepresentation of a present or past fact; (ii) nondisclosure of an important matter; or (iii) an intentional misrepresentation of a present state of mind.
Reformation
Reformation is permitted when there is clear and convincing evidence of an earlier agreement oral or written which specifies certain terms for a conveyance and the later drawn legal document that effectuates the conveyance inaccurately portrays the terms of the initial agreement with the result that the grantor receives less than he bargained for.