Equity - NY Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Equitable relief is not available when

A

an adequate legal remedy exists.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

A legal remedy may be inadequate or unavailable when…

A

(1) Money damages are insufficient to fully compensate for irreparable harm.
(2) Damages are uncertain or unfairly speculative.
(3) The subject matter of the lawsuit (e.g. a contract for the sale of specific land) is unique
(4) The defendant is insolvent
(5) Compensation for the harm would require the filing of successive lawsuits; or
(6) The nature of the defendant’s conduct is willful.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Equitable remedies are personal, enforceable, and discretionary. Elaborate.

A

Personal: They compel or prohibit conduct by a party or parties.

Enforceable: Courts will not award equitable relief when such relief is not enforceable. e.g. Courts will not grant specific performance on a contract for personal services because, among other reasons, the court cannot exercise continuing control over the employment relationship.

Discretionary: Even when no adequate legal remedy exists, the court may refuse to grant equitable relief. In other words, equitable relief will not be granted as a matter of right.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Unlike money judgments, equitable remedies are ________.

A

directly enforceable by a court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

An injunction may be sought as the primary form of relief. For example, when a plaintiff brings suit on a claim of discrimination, the remedy he seeks may be an injunction against future discrimination by the defendant.

In addition, injunctive relief may be sought as ancillary to a pending lawsuit that preserves the status quo until a full hearing or trial can occur. These ancillary remedies (often referred to as interlocutory injunctions) include temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions.

The requirements for the issuance of an injunction are:

A

i) A showing that a remedy at law is inadequate or unavailable;
ii) A showing that the injunction is enforceable by the court; and
iii) A showing that the harm to the plaintiff outweighs the burden of the injunction on the defendant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Injunctive Relief can take two forms:

A

(1) Mandatory (2) Prohibitory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is a mandatory injunction?

A

A mandatory injunction is one that requires an affirmative act by the defendant. For example, in a suit by the state of New York against the EPA, the court may order the EPA to develop regulations for the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions. A mandatory injunction is most frequently applied in cases of nuisance, trespass, and protection of easements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a prohibitory injunction?

A

A prohibitory injunction forbids a defendant from engaging in harmful or illegal conduct. For example, the defendant may be ordered to cease its conduct in discriminating against customers based on race or national origin.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a temporary restraining order?

A

An ancillary remedy that may be sought to maintain the status quo (usually for no longer than 10 days) pending the issuance of a preliminary injunction. It may be issued ex parte.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What must be shown to get a TRO?

A

(1) Irreparable harm to the plaintiff will occur unless the TRO is issued;
(2) The benefit to the plaintiff heavily outweighs the burden/harm to the defendant;
(3) The plaintiff is likely to succeed on the merits of her claim(s);
(4) The interests of the general public favor the issuance of the TRO; and
(5) The status quo must be maintained.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

In terms of a TRO: what is irreparable harm?

A

The definition of “irreparable harm” is not uniform among courts. It does, however, include harm of the type that cannot be measured by any pecuniary standard.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The issuance of a TRO (is/ is not) appealable.

A

is not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

In New York, courts may issue a TRO without notice if…

A

the plaintiff, on a motion for a preliminary injunction, shows that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result unless the defendant is restrained before a hearing can be held. Upon issuing a TRO, the court must set the hearing for the preliminary injunction at the earliest possible time. N.Y. C.P.L.R. 6313.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What must be shown to get a preliminary injunction?

A

i) May be issued only after the defendant receives notice and an evidentiary hearing is held;
ii) May be issued after an examination of the same factors used for issuance of a TRO; and
iii) Can remain in effect pending a trial on the merits (after which it expires, or by further order of the court, becomes permanent).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

When it appears that the defendant threatens or is about to commit an act “in violation of the plaintiff’s rights respecting the subject of the action, and tending to render the judgment ineffectual,” courts are authorized to issue a…

A

preliminary injunction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

At the preliminary injunction stage, you are more likely to get a ___ rather than a ____ injunction.

A

prohibitory, mandatory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What questions should be asked to determine whether equitable remedies are available?

A

i) Are damages measurable? If so, equity relief will generally not be available.
ii) If damages are difficult to measure (i.e., the harm is of a type that cannot be compensated with money), equitable relief may be available.
iii) When considering injunctive relief, consider whether a TRO, a permanent injunction, or both should be sought.
iv) If a permanent injunction is sought, the student must show that the injunction is enforceable by the court, and the balance of hardships favors the plaintiff.
v) Finally, inquire whether the defendant may assert any equitable defenses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

In most instances, trespass, even without damage to the land, can be compensated with money damages. However…

A

when the trespass is continuous, equity may enjoin the harm. For example, when a plaintiff’s land is contaminated by hazardous waste that seeped onto his land from a neighboring property, an injunction may issue to prevent future releases of waste into the environment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Acts by a defendant that interfere with a plaintiff’s use and enjoyment of her land constitute the tort of nuisance. A private nuisance is one that interferes with a specific plaintiff’s use and enjoyment, while a public nuisance is one that harms numerous persons coming within the zone of harm created by the defendant.

An injunction may be available against a _________, but equity will not enjoin a ____________, unless the plaintiff can prove special harm not suffered by the public generally.

A

private nuisance; public nuisance

EXAM NOTE: Be wary of the situation in which the nuisance is created by the operation of a factory or other business enterprise. In such circumstances, the balance of hardships factor becomes paramount. Most courts will not grant an injunction when the economic consequences to the business outweigh the economic consequences to the plaintiff. In other words, the courts are reluctant to grant an injunction that prohibits operation of the factory or business. Damages must suffice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

An act (or failure to act) by a person in lawful possession of property that causes unjustifiable diminution of a future interest in the property constitutes waste. Generally, a legal remedy in damages is available, measured by the reduction in value of the future interest caused by the harmful acts (destructive waste) or the failure to act (permissive waste).

However,

A

in some instances the harm cannot be easily measured in dollars, as when the destruction of a stand of trees cannot be measured by the value of the resulting lumber. In such a case, a prohibitory injunction may issue.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

A plaintiff has an easement appurtenant that allows use of a neighbor’s road to access a public highway. The neighbor blocks the road. What equitable relief may the plaintiff successfully argue for?

A

There is no way that this is compensable in money because the plaintiff still needs a way to access the public highway, so a prohibitory injunction may be issued by the court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

A plaintiff has a right to remove part of another’s land (profit). In this instance, can equitable relief be issued if the landowner obstructs the plaintiff?

A

Yes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

If you have a chattel which is wrongfully converted, can you get injunctive relief?

A

Your argument will succeed if the chattel is unique. This is because damages are not compensable in money because the chattel cannot be duplicated in the market.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

In terms of privacy torts, where can you get equitable relief?

A

Intrusion upon seclusion

25
Q

Trademarks Infringement, Trademark Dilution, Trade Secrets, Trade Libel, Unfair Competition, Interference with Contracts/Business Relationships, Copyright Infringement, Right to Publicity, and Patent Infringement can all be enjoined (T/F)

A

True

26
Q

To get specific performance in contract cases, a party must establish all of the following:

A

i) The existence of a valid contract and the fulfillment of all its conditions;
ii) The inadequacy of legal remedies;
iii) That enforcement is feasible and fair;
iv) Mutuality of performance—specific performance will be denied when the injured party has not yet performed his part of the bargain or his performance cannot be secured by the court’s order; and
v) The absence of any defenses.

27
Q

In terms of specific performance, when is a legal remedy inadequate?

A

Think: rare or unique

OR

Defendant is insolvent

OR

Damages are speculative

OR

Necessity for Multiple Lawsuits

OR

Liquidated Damages are contracted for as the sole remedy

OR

Property Rights are involved

28
Q

What is the Doctrine of Equitable Conversion? (Hint: Sale of Land)

A

During the executory period between the signing of the land sale contract and the closing, the buyer is deemed the equitable owner of the land and the seller is the equitable owner of the balance of the purchase price. Therefore, each party has a basis upon which to seek specific performance upon a breach by the other.

Under the doctrine, if the real property is destroyed by casualty loss during the executory period, the seller is still entitled to the purchase price and may seek specific performance. If the seller has a change of heart and refuses to convey, the buyer, as equitable owner, may seek specific performance.

29
Q

Covenants not to compete will be enforced via equity if

A

Covenant is expressly contained in the k, services involved are unique, covenant is reasonable - reasonably necessary for the protection of the employer, limited in geographical scope and duration.

If the covenant essentially makes it impossible for the former employee to earn a living, specific performance will not be granted.

The same reasonableness requirement exists when such a non-compete covenant is contained in a contract to sell a business. Such a covenant is also impliedly limited by the anti-trust/restraint of trade restrictions of federal and state law.

New York is a state that will specifically enforce covenants not to compete in personal services contracts. The parties must show, as mentioned above, that the services are unique and other legal remedies would not suffice. The covenant must also be reasonable.

30
Q

Courts will enforce equitable remedies in personal service contracts (T/F)

A

False. Courts equate this to involuntary servitude.

31
Q

Courts will enforce equitable remedies in construction contracts (T/F)

A

False. Courts fear the inability to supervise these types of contracts.

32
Q

Courts will enforce equitable remedies in employment contracts (T/F)

A

False. Legal Damages will have to suffice - too difficult to supervise.

33
Q

Courts will enforce recission where there is mutual mistake if…

A

both parties are mistaken as to a material fact,

34
Q

Courts will not enforce recission where only one party makes a mistake unless…

A

A mistake by one party (unilateral mistake) will not result in rescission unless (i) the non-mistaken party was aware of the mistake and took advantage of it, or (ii) if the mistaken party suffers severe hardship if forced to accept the bargain.

35
Q

Courts will enforce recission if there is a misrepresentation if

A

the misrepresentation is material, is either intentional or unintentional, and is relied upon by the other party.

36
Q

Recission can be defended by arguing

A

laches or unclean hands. Also, when the plaintiff has a choice between legal and equitable remedies. P can’t have both.

37
Q

Lenny leases property from Joe for nine years at the rate of $5,000 per year. Lenny made the deal with Joe on the assumption that he would build deer blinds on the land and hunt on it during that time. However, neither Lenny nor Joe knew that the county prohibited deer blinds and hunting in that area. Can Lenny get recission?

A

Lenny would be entitled to rescission due to the mutual mistake of law.

38
Q

Attorney Client Contracts are subject to recission (T/F)

A

True

39
Q

Reformation, as a remedy, requires all of the following:

A

i) A valid original agreement;
ii) The original agreement must have been in writing; and
iii) The agreement fails to accurately express the intent of the parties.

40
Q

A contracts to sell B 100 acres known as Blackacre. The deed, however, conveys 90 acres. B accepts the deed, only to learn later that less than 100 acres was conveyed. Can B get reformation?

A

Because the original deed was not based on fraud, it was enforceable as written, but did not comport with the intent of the parties. B is entitled to reformation, and the court will revise the deed to reflect the intent of the parties.

41
Q

Reformation is available when there is:

A

Fraud, Mutual Mistake of Fact or Law, or Unilateral Mistake if one party is aware of a mistake in the agreement and doesn’t disclose it

42
Q

How do you defend against reformation?

A

Unclean Hands, Laches, Undue Hardship

43
Q

Reformation is not allowed where:

A

There is a sale to a bfp

44
Q

Reformation is allowed even if:

A

Plaintiff is Negligent, PER would normally bar the evidence, Statute of Frauds would normally bar the evidence

45
Q

Reformation is allowed in cases dealing with gifts if

A

the donor’s intentions aren’t clearly expressed in the document. (Unless donee has relied)

46
Q

What is unclean hands?

A

A plaintiff seeking equitable relief must not have engaged in any wrongdoing toward the defendant or the subject matter of the litigation that related to the specific transaction that is the subject matter of the litigation and caused prejudice to the defendant.

47
Q

What is laches?

A

When a party unreasonably delays initiating or pursuing her claim, the doctrine of laches bars the lawsuit if the defendant is prejudiced by the delay. Even when an applicable statute of limitations has not run, the doctrine of laches may bar the suit. Laches cannot be a bar to an action at law—it is a defense only in actions seeking equitable relief.

48
Q

What is undue hardship?

A

On occasion, a plaintiff may establish all of the prerequisites for the granting of equitable relief, but the court may refuse to impose an equitable remedy if doing so will cause undue hardship to the defendant. The plaintiff’s only remedy, if at all, is at law.

The standard that courts apply in determining undue hardship will differ slightly depending on the nature of the case, as follows:

  1. When Injunctive Relief Is Sought

When a party seeks an injunction in tort cases (e.g., private nuisance, trespass) courts generally engage in a “balancing-of-the-equities” analysis whereby the relative hardships of the parties are reviewed. In a private nuisance case, for example, when a plaintiff seeks the closure of a polluting factory, the court will balance the economic effect of the closure against the injury to the plaintiff. The court may refuse to grant a prohibitory injunction against operation of the factory if it judges the economic cost to the defendant to be too high.

  1. When Specific Performance Is Sought

Undue hardship is often an issue in cases involving land sale contracts and casualty loss. At common law, the risk of casualty loss during the executory period falls upon the buyer. If the property is destroyed by a hurricane (a casualty loss), the buyer must still pay the purchase price to the seller under the doctrine of equitable conversion. In cases when the buyer has not insured himself against such loss, courts will sometimes deny specific performance to the seller because of the undue hardship to the defendant buyer who now has a worthless property for which he must otherwise pay the full purchase price.

49
Q

What is estoppel in terms of defenses to equitable remedies?

A

If a party acts improperly and the other party relies on his actions to that party’s detriment, the party acting improperly may be estopped from asserting a defense. This can also happen in cases when there was a duty to act and a party failed to do so. Simcuski v. Saeli, 377 N.E.2d 713 (N.Y. 1978).

50
Q

What is a suit to quiet title?

A

A plaintiff in possession of land may bring an equitable action to remove clouds on title. If successful, a court may grant an order of quiet title on which the plaintiff may rely to resolve any future disputes concerning title to the property.

51
Q

Constructive Trust may be imposed when:

A

i) The defendant has legal title to real property belonging to the plaintiff;
ii) The defendant will be unjustly enriched if title remains in him; and
iii) The legal remedy is inadequate.

52
Q

Constructive Trust may not be imposed when:

A

i) An equitable defense applies; or

ii) Legal title is transferred to a bona fide purchaser for value without notice of the fraud, mistake, etc.

53
Q

What is an equitable lien?

A

An equitable lien is another vehicle to prevent unjust enrichment. It may be imposed by a court on real property of the defendant when the defendant has unlawfully obtained other property of the plaintiff. Such a lien gives the plaintiff priority over other creditors because the imposition of the equitable lien relates back to the point in time when defendant unlawfully obtained title to the property.

Unlike a constructive trust, an equitable lien does not require transfer of title to the plaintiff. Instead, the plaintiff receives a security interest in the property that may be used to satisfy the debt.

54
Q

Defendant converts some of Plaintiff’s dairy cows, sells them, and uses the proceeds to purchase Whiteacre. Plaintiff may not seek the imposition of a constructive trust against Whiteacre because title to that property was not obtained unlawfully from the grantor. Nevertheless, the defendant is unjustly enriched by the conversion of the cows. Plaintiff may then seek

A

the imposition of an equitable lien against Whiteacre as security to recover the value of the cows.

55
Q

What is subrogation?

A

Subrogation is another equitable doctrine intended to prevent unjust enrichment. When one party involuntarily discharges the debt or other obligation owed by the defendant, he may seek repayment from the defendant.

Equity accomplishes this by essentially reviving the discharged obligation and placing the plaintiff in the shoes of the original creditor. The plaintiff may then recover all that the original creditor was entitled to from the defendant.

56
Q

Civil Contempt is ______, Criminal Contempt is ______

A

Remedial; punitive.

57
Q

Define: Writ of Assitance

A

When a defendant is ordered to deliver possession of real or personal property, a writ of assistance may issue to the local sheriff or other law enforcement agency to ensure that the plaintiff is placed in possession of the property.

58
Q

Define: Writ of Sequestration

A

A writ of sequestration is a device that may be used to deprive the defendant of income, rents, etc., from real property by holding the property until the defendant complies with the decree.