equity and trust law Flashcards

1
Q

what is the purpose of equity

A

equity is the means by which a system of law balances out the need for certainty in rule making on the one hand, with the need for sufficient judicial discretion to achieve fairness in individual factual circumstances on the other - clements and abass 2009

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are the two major conceptualisations of equity

A

thereotical and legislative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is trust

A

the trust is the most important creation of equity and is a rorm of ownership of things which allows someone to manage proorty fir someone fit - pearce and stevens 2015

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the theoretical approach

A

relate to the ideas of morality, justice and fairness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what ia the legalistic approach

A

body of law which developed out of common law,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what did lord dudley v lady dudley say

A

now equity is no part of the law but a moral virtue which qualifies, moderates and reforma the rigour, hardness, and the edge of the law, and is the universal truth. equity therefore does not destroy the law, but assists it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

history of equity

A

writ, royal writ system, provisions of oxford 1258, establishment of the court of chancery, court of chancery location fixed under edward the third in westminister hall, it had two purposes, court of chancery became independent under richard the second, conflict of common law and the chancellor, fusion, 1873 lrod chancellor lord selborne issued the supreme court of judicature bill, a no of provisions would be amended unto the supreme court of judicature act of 1875, court of chancery cease to exist, mew courts established having dual jurisdiction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

maxims of equity

A

equity will not suffer a wrong to be without a remedy, equity is equality, delay defeats equity, he who seeks equity must do equity, he who comes to equity mist come so with clean hands, equity acts in personam, equity will not perfect an imoerfect gift, equity follow the law, equity regards ad done that which ought t be done, where the equities are equal the first in time prevails

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

he who seeks equity must do equity

A

if an individual is looking to seek some kind of relief from equity, they must themselves act in a wy which is fair towards the opposing party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

equity follows the law

A

unless there is some reason to not to do so, equity will follow the rules of the common law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

where the equities are equal the first in time prevails

A

where there may be two claims in equity which both have merit in their own right. the person who makes their claim first will be the one which has priority over the other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

equity acts in personam

A

it looks to the person in each and every individual case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

individuals in a trust

A

settlor, beneficiary, trustee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

express trusts

A

created expressly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

chrcteristics of a trust

A

protect soem kind of property, entail transfer of oegal title to the trustee, trustee has duty to manage said assets, trust can be created during life or after death, trusts maybe expressly made or implied through a multitude of different systems, equitable obligations between the trustee and beneficiary, trustee powers outlined in the terms of the trust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

main requirements of an express trusts

A

certainty of intention, certainty of objects and subject matter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

how are express trysts created

A

through a deed, a will, an oral agreement etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

bare trust

A

tristee has no duty but to hodl the property on trust until the beneficiary decides they want a conveyance of the property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

executed trust

A

which the settlor has given clear direction as to the tranfor of legal title to any of the beneficiaries.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

discretionary trust

A

it will give the trustee a certain amount of power in reltion to how they will divide the trust property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

secret trust

A

created on the death of the settlor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

name implied trusts

A

resulting trust and constructiev trusts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

resulting trust

A

where there ia sime title or property hekd by one person, but that the true owner of all or part of the property is another individual on the basis of their contribution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

what is a fiduciary relationship

A

is someone who manages money or proerty for someone else

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
power of appointment
obligation not present, if power of appointment not exercised the result will be the default of the appointment, may or or mayeb a fiduciary relationship
25
discretionary trust powers
has an obligation on the part of trustees to distribute the property given prescribed: mettoy pension trustees ltd v evans, fidiciary relationsuo between trustee and beneficiary
26
kight v knight 1840
estate was an absolute gift. established the legal test of the three certainties
27
certainty of intention
it must clear that they have the intention to create said trust anot not say any other kind of relationship
28
the high commisioner of pakistan v prince mukarram jah 2020
trust created by a third party - not certainty of intention
29
lambe v eames 1871
precatory language or words - not certainty of intention
30
certainty of subject matter
include land, money, perosnal property, debt, equity securities
31
hunter v moss 1994
intangible assets such as shares does not need to be clearly delimited from the most to form the subject matter - certainty of aubject matter sufficed
32
re london wine co 1986
wine would not necessarily be delimited for each customer. there was no indication as to which exact bottle of wine each customer owed. no certainty of objects
33
re gulbenkian's st 1970
lord upjohn outlined the test for establishing the certainty of objects : when determining the certainty of objects for a foxed trusts, it is a complete list of beneficiaries which must be cited and when determining the certainty of a powet an identofication of a person as veing part of class that is required.
34
conceptual certainty
expressed language that is used to describe the beneficiaries or the class of beneficiaries : re barlow's ill trusts 1979
35
conceptual uncertainty
no certainty of objects
36
fixed trusts
one in which the property and the beneficiaries and the distribution is clearly defined
37
what is the general rule for a fixed trust
for certainty of objects the general rule is that fixed trust requires ascertainable beneficiaries
38
what is evidential certainty
only required for the creatio of a fixed trust. A trust can fail on the basis that there may be an impossibility in the aquisition of information pertaining to who is the benefiary. example of this is haley and mcmurtry
39
what is a discretionary trust
an amount of discretion that is given to the trustee in the distribution of proerty shares to a class of beneficiaries
40
do you need a complete list of names in a discretionary trust?
no, mcphail v doulton 1971
41
what are the 3 tests laid in the case re baden 1973
- Stamp lj- strict and literal applicaition of the class ought to be applied. - magan lj- application of the substantial numbers test. This suggests that the is or is not within the meaning of the trust does not imply that any person is or not in the trust - sachs lj- the claimant should be able to prove they are within the class
42
what is the consitution of a trust
ways and method by which the trustee takes legal title of the proerty held on trust
43
milroy v lord 1862
shares had not been registered in the name of the trustees- no trust created
44
methods of constitution of a trust
case of richards v delbridge 1874 highlights 2 main methods by which satisfy the consitution of a trust. 1. through the transfer of legal title e.g. conveyance of proerty or through 2. trustee making self declaration that the property will be held on trust for the beneficiary.
45
how to transfer legal title to the trustee
nature of property willd etermine method which constitutes the establishment of a trust.
46
how to transfer legal title if the trust si in land
method of conveyancing. unregistered title; examine deeds to property back 15 yrs. Except short term leases s54 2 lpa 1925
47
how to tranfer legal title if the trust is chattels
tangible property. Transfer of chattel require physical delivery of the item to the trustee.
48
what are corporate securities
debt and equity interests in a company e.g. bonds and shares
49
how to transfer legal title if the trust is corporate securities
s.770 of companies act 2006 a company will be notified of an instrument of title for those who wish to register as owners of the shares in their business. includes share certificate.
50
process of self declaration
settlor can declare themselves the trustee if the proerty through the use of language or through use of conduct: paul v constance 1991
51
what is the exception to the self declaration
in context of kand s52 1 b lpa 1925 requires evidence of a trust in writing which is signed by the settor.
52
example of an equitable interest
fortuitous vesting
53
what is fortuitous vesting
Principle tells us that, where there has been a promise to transfer property but this is not achieved, and if the proerty is vested in another capacity in the hands of the person to whom transfer is received, then it has been held that the perfecting of transfer may have taken place. Bird v strong
54
what is donatio mortis causa
refers to the situations in which a gift is made in comtemplation of death.
55
how to prove donatio mortis causa
3 main principles established in the case of cain v moon 1896 - a bequest is made in comtemplation of death - there is the requirement that death is a conditioned element of the bequest - some actual or constructive delivery of the property
56
what is rhe every effort rule
donor of property made every effort to actually make a full and proper transfer of the proerty: re rose 1952
57
milroy v lord 1862
per turner lj a settlor must hve done everything whic, accoridng to the nature of the property was necessary to be done in order to tramsfer the property.
58
paul v paul
once the trust is propeerly created/ consituted the stellor loses his rights to the property
59
milroy v lord maxim
for there is no equity in this corut to perfect an impercet gift
60
jones v lock 1865
beneficiaries have gained rights by havign given given consideraiton enabling them to sue under contract law
61
conveyance of land to a minor under 18
trusts of land and appointment of trustees act ToLATA 1996 sch 1 para 1 1
62
re rose 1952
the every effort rule
63
pennignton v waine 2002
it is unconscionable for thr ofnr o change their mind
64
king v dubrey
deathbed gifts
65
strong v bird 1874
rules on frotituous vesting
66
dillwyn v llewellyn 1862
proprietary estopel
67
formalities setting up trusts
capacty- mental capacity act 2005 ss2 1, 2 2 and 2 3 a pepetuity period - perpetuties and acucmulaitons act 2009 s 5 1
68
formalities stautory on contexts
- validity of wills- wills act 1837 s 9, admisntariton of justice 1982 defauts harrison v gibson 2005 conveyance fo land lpa 1925 s52 1 s53 1 b
69
richards v delbridge
you can get a gift out of filed trust but you cannot get a trust out if failef gift
70
what is maxim for intention
equity looks to intent and not form
71
tito v waddel no 2 1977
the use of word trust is not conclsuive
72
wright v atkyns
irrespective of whether the intent i express or imp;ied, there msut be a clear intention to speerate the legal itnerest in the property form the equitbale itnerest
73
must have imeprative words
knight v knight lambe v eames
74
RE hamilton
must look at the whole of the words
75
comisky v owring handbuyr 1905
later words can affect how ealrie worda re erceived
76
re steels will trust
can be guided by similar wordign from earlier cases
77
re adms and kensington vestry
unto the absolute use of my wie, in full cnfience that she will do what is riht as to the dispoal therof between my chidlren NO TRUST
78
Comisky
the full confidence paired with vey detialed provisions TRUST
79
STRANGE v barnard
the remaining part of what si left that he does not want - NO TRUST
80
ANYTHIGN LEFT TO X
trust
81
jones v lock
look u here, i give this to baby it is for himself
82
palmer v simmonds
the bulk of my estate TOO VAGUE
83
RE JONES such aprts of my ... estate as she shall nto have sold
too vague
84
for his sole use and at is detah, the remainig part of what is lef, that he does ot want for his own wnats and use
sprange v barnard
85
re kolbs will trusts
whatever remaisn cna be avlid if clear what is to be tken first
86
tangible property
london wines co shippers ltd re gldcorp exchange ltd
87
itnnaigble proeprty
hunter v moss
88
re knapton
where there is no method of detrmiantion he court will attemt to find one
89
biyce v boyce
if the method determiantion fails the cpurt will not exercise its dircetion.
90
biyce v boyce maxim
equity is equality
91
fixed interest trust
compete list rule
92
compkete lsit rule
irc v broadway cottages trust
93
sdiscreitoanyr trust
class test
94
ot computers ltd v firt naitona tricity finance ltd 2007
courts adopt a strict itnepretton- no division fo proerty until all the beneficiaries are ascertainabe.
95
TYPES OF uncertainty
conceptual evidential ascertainbility
96
vetsing
transferrign title of property
97
formalities fo land vesting
lpa 1925 s52 1
98
chatlles vesting
deed of gift or dleivery of the intem and itnention to transfer
99
shares vetsign
must have share transfer form and regstraiton in the comp sharehodlign registe
100
pilic comp vesting
no forality- process is automatic
101
private company vest9ng
discreption to refuse regs. companies act 2006 s771
102
debts vesting
msut be in wriing lpa 1925 s 136
103
copyrights vesting
must e in wriying CDPA 1988 s90 3
104
malott v wilsons 1903
te property wll re vest by opertaion of law in the setllor not the trustee
105
incomplet consituiton maxim
A trust will nto fail for want of a trusee
106
What is a powwr?
enables a oerosn to cact. when property is the suject of a power someone is empowered but not requried to dwal with the property in a certain way.
107
re golays wll trust 1965
enoy oneof my fts during her lifetime and to receive a reaosnbale incoem from my other properties
108
what is exhaustive
all the property or income under the trust must be distributed. no powerto decide not to distrbute all the fudn
109
non exhaustive
not all trust incme need to be distrubtued trustees can accumukate for the benefit of the trust. needs express authorisaiton in te trust istrumen.
110
mcpail v doulton
the trustees shoudl apply the income 'at their absolute discretion to any of the officers or employees or ex officers or ex employees or any relaitves or dependeants of sc persons in such amount at such times and on such conditiosn if any as they may think fti.
111
what it a power in mcpail v doulton
c of a held it was a power BUT H OF L held it was a trust.
112
evidentiqal uncertainty
on a metter of evidence can specific persons prove that they are ,emebrs of the class in quesiron
113
ascertanable
are the benefciaires capable of being physically located
114
adminstratively workable
is the class so wide or too costly to locate that the funds woud be dissipated ahead of distribution
115
can dt can aslo fial for capriousness
re gulbenkeins st 1968
116
dt must survey the clas before deciding on dustrubtuion
borough v philcox
117
SPECIAL power
powet to appoitn in class re dilke 1921
118
Genral power
distribtion amoung a very wife class
119
hybrid power
dstribute to anyone exceot re parks, hays setllemtn turtss, re 1982
119
the client is not to be punished for the lawyers loevlyy drafting
re gulenkeins settlemtn 1968
120
burrough v philcox
obligation to sonsider distributing only
121
re manstys settlement
can fail for capriousness
122
gourjus wt
use it or lose it.
123
conditonal precedent
one Individal tes re allen, re barlows will trust
124
condition subsequent
what even will consitute the occurence of the conditon specified
125
tucks settlent trut
126
re macadam
remuneration not entitled to
127
keech v sandford
takig an opportunity not entiled to
128
boardman v phipps
use of trust property for own benefit
129
self dealing rule
canoot purchase trust property whe trustee ex parte lacey
130
fair dealing rule
trustee can purchase beneficiarys intwres coles v trecoyhick
131
fhr european venture llp v cedar capital partnerz llc
receivi g abribe secret commsiion
132
loNRHO plc v fayed no 2
trust proeprty pruchased by innocent volunteer
133
lysaght v edwards
vendor retains legal interets in land until completion/ mortgagees beneficial interest in proceeds of sale.
134
re crippen
property benefit results for unlawful killing.
135