equity and trust law Flashcards

1
Q

what is the purpose of equity

A

equity is the means by which a system of law balances out the need for certainty in rule making on the one hand, with the need for sufficient judicial discretion to achieve fairness in individual factual circumstances on the other - clements and abass 2009

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are the two major conceptualisations of equity

A

thereotical and legislative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is trust

A

the trust is the most important creation of equity and is a rorm of ownership of things which allows someone to manage proorty fir someone fit - pearce and stevens 2015

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the theoretical approach

A

relate to the ideas of morality, justice and fairness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what ia the legalistic approach

A

body of law which developed out of common law,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what did lord dudley v lady dudley say

A

now equity is no part of the law but a moral virtue which qualifies, moderates and reforma the rigour, hardness, and the edge of the law, and is the universal truth. equity therefore does not destroy the law, but assists it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

history of equity

A

writ, royal writ system, provisions of oxford 1258, establishment of the court of chancery, court of chancery location fixed under edward the third in westminister hall, it had two purposes, court of chancery became independent under richard the second, conflict of common law and the chancellor, fusion, 1873 lrod chancellor lord selborne issued the supreme court of judicature bill, a no of provisions would be amended unto the supreme court of judicature act of 1875, court of chancery cease to exist, mew courts established having dual jurisdiction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

maxims of equity

A

equity will not suffer a wrong to be without a remedy, equity is equality, delay defeats equity, he who seeks equity must do equity, he who comes to equity mist come so with clean hands, equity acts in personam, equity will not perfect an imoerfect gift, equity follow the law, equity regards ad done that which ought t be done, where the equities are equal the first in time prevails

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

he who seeks equity must do equity

A

if an individual is looking to seek some kind of relief from equity, they must themselves act in a wy which is fair towards the opposing party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

equity follows the law

A

unless there is some reason to not to do so, equity will follow the rules of the common law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

where the equities are equal the first in time prevails

A

where there may be two claims in equity which both have merit in their own right. the person who makes their claim first will be the one which has priority over the other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

equity acts in personam

A

it looks to the person in each and every individual case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

individuals in a trust

A

settlor, beneficiary, trustee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

express trusts

A

created expressly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

chrcteristics of a trust

A

protect soem kind of property, entail transfer of oegal title to the trustee, trustee has duty to manage said assets, trust can be created during life or after death, trusts maybe expressly made or implied through a multitude of different systems, equitable obligations between the trustee and beneficiary, trustee powers outlined in the terms of the trust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

main requirements of an express trusts

A

certainty of intention, certainty of objects and subject matter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

how are express trysts created

A

through a deed, a will, an oral agreement etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

bare trust

A

tristee has no duty but to hodl the property on trust until the beneficiary decides they want a conveyance of the property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

executed trust

A

which the settlor has given clear direction as to the tranfor of legal title to any of the beneficiaries.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

discretionary trust

A

it will give the trustee a certain amount of power in reltion to how they will divide the trust property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

secret trust

A

created on the death of the settlor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

name implied trusts

A

resulting trust and constructiev trusts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

resulting trust

A

where there ia sime title or property hekd by one person, but that the true owner of all or part of the property is another individual on the basis of their contribution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

what is a fiduciary relationship

A

is someone who manages money or proerty for someone else

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

power of appointment

A

obligation not present, if power of appointment not exercised the result will be the default of the appointment, may or or mayeb a fiduciary relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

discretionary trust powers

A

has an obligation on the part of trustees to distribute the property given prescribed: mettoy pension trustees ltd v evans, fidiciary relationsuo between trustee and beneficiary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

kight v knight 1840

A

estate was an absolute gift. established the legal test of the three certainties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

certainty of intention

A

it must clear that they have the intention to create said trust anot not say any other kind of relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

the high commisioner of pakistan v prince mukarram jah 2020

A

trust created by a third party - not certainty of intention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

lambe v eames 1871

A

precatory language or words - not certainty of intention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

certainty of subject matter

A

include land, money, perosnal property, debt, equity securities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

hunter v moss 1994

A

intangible assets such as shares does not need to be clearly delimited from the most to form the subject matter - certainty of aubject matter sufficed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

re london wine co 1986

A

wine would not necessarily be delimited for each customer. there was no indication as to which exact bottle of wine each customer owed. no certainty of objects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

re gulbenkian’s st 1970

A

lord upjohn outlined the test for establishing the certainty of objects
: when determining the certainty of objects for a foxed trusts, it is a complete list of beneficiaries which must be cited and when determining the certainty of a powet an identofication of a person as veing part of class that is required.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

conceptual certainty

A

expressed language that is used to describe the beneficiaries or the class of beneficiaries : re barlow’s ill trusts 1979

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

conceptual uncertainty

A

no certainty of objects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

fixed trusts

A

one in which the property and the beneficiaries and the distribution is clearly defined

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

what is the general rule for a fixed trust

A

for certainty of objects the general rule is that fixed trust requires ascertainable beneficiaries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

what is evidential certainty

A

only required for the creatio of a fixed trust. A trust can fail on the basis that there may be an impossibility in the aquisition of information pertaining to who is the benefiary. example of this is haley and mcmurtry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

what is a discretionary trust

A

an amount of discretion that is given to the trustee in the distribution of proerty shares to a class of beneficiaries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

do you need a complete list of names in a discretionary trust?

A

no, mcphail v doulton 1971

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

what are the 3 tests laid in the case re baden 1973

A
  • Stamp lj- strict and literal applicaition of the class ought to be applied.
  • magan lj- application of the substantial numbers test. This suggests that the is or is not within the meaning of the trust does not imply that any person is or not in the trust
  • sachs lj- the claimant should be able to prove they are within the class
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

what is the consitution of a trust

A

ways and method by which the trustee takes legal title of the proerty held on trust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

milroy v lord 1862

A

shares had not been registered in the name of the trustees- no trust created

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

methods of constitution of a trust

A

case of richards v delbridge 1874 highlights 2 main methods by which satisfy the consitution of a trust. 1. through the transfer of legal title e.g. conveyance of proerty or through 2. trustee making self declaration that the property will be held on trust for the beneficiary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

how to transfer legal title to the trustee

A

nature of property willd etermine method which constitutes the establishment of a trust.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

how to transfer legal title if the trust si in land

A

method of conveyancing. unregistered title; examine deeds to property back 15 yrs. Except short term leases s54 2 lpa 1925

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

how to tranfer legal title if the trust is chattels

A

tangible property. Transfer of chattel require physical delivery of the item to the trustee.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

what are corporate securities

A

debt and equity interests in a company e.g. bonds and shares

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

how to transfer legal title if the trust is corporate securities

A

s.770 of companies act 2006 a company will be notified of an instrument of title for those who wish to register as owners of the shares in their business. includes share certificate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

process of self declaration

A

settlor can declare themselves the trustee if the proerty through the use of language or through use of conduct: paul v constance 1991

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

what is the exception to the self declaration

A

in context of kand s52 1 b lpa 1925 requires evidence of a trust in writing which is signed by the settor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

example of an equitable interest

A

fortuitous vesting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

what is fortuitous vesting

A

Principle tells us that, where there has been a promise to transfer property but this is not achieved, and if the proerty is vested in another capacity in the hands of the person to whom transfer is received, then it has been held that the perfecting of transfer may have taken place. Bird v strong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

what is donatio mortis causa

A

refers to the situations in which a gift is made in comtemplation of death.

55
Q

how to prove donatio mortis causa

A

3 main principles established in the case of cain v moon 1896
- a bequest is made in comtemplation of death
- there is the requirement that death is a conditioned element of the bequest
- some actual or constructive delivery of the property

56
Q

what is rhe every effort rule

A

donor of property made every effort to actually make a full and proper transfer of the proerty: re rose 1952

57
Q

milroy v lord 1862

A

per turner lj a settlor must hve done everything whic, accoridng to the nature of the property was necessary to be done in order to tramsfer the property.

58
Q

paul v paul

A

once the trust is propeerly created/ consituted the stellor loses his rights to the property

59
Q

milroy v lord maxim

A

for there is no equity in this corut to perfect an impercet gift

60
Q

jones v lock 1865

A

beneficiaries have gained rights by havign given given consideraiton enabling them to sue under contract law

61
Q

conveyance of land to a minor under 18

A

trusts of land and appointment of trustees act ToLATA 1996 sch 1 para 1 1

62
Q

re rose 1952

A

the every effort rule

63
Q

pennignton v waine 2002

A

it is unconscionable for thr ofnr o change their mind

64
Q

king v dubrey

A

deathbed gifts

65
Q

strong v bird 1874

A

rules on frotituous vesting

66
Q

dillwyn v llewellyn 1862

A

proprietary estopel

67
Q

formalities setting up trusts

A

capacty- mental capacity act 2005 ss2 1, 2 2 and 2 3 a
pepetuity period - perpetuties and acucmulaitons act 2009 s 5 1

68
Q

formalities stautory on contexts

A
  • validity of wills- wills act 1837 s 9, admisntariton of justice 1982 defauts harrison v gibson 2005
    conveyance fo land lpa 1925 s52 1 s53 1 b
69
Q

richards v delbridge

A

you can get a gift out of filed trust but you cannot get a trust out if failef gift

70
Q

what is maxim for intention

A

equity looks to intent and not form

71
Q

tito v waddel no 2 1977

A

the use of word trust is not conclsuive

72
Q

wright v atkyns

A

irrespective of whether the intent i express or imp;ied, there msut be a clear intention to speerate the legal itnerest in the property form the equitbale itnerest

73
Q

must have imeprative words

A

knight v knight
lambe v eames

74
Q

RE hamilton

A

must look at the whole of the words

75
Q

comisky v owring handbuyr 1905

A

later words can affect how ealrie worda re erceived

76
Q

re steels will trust

A

can be guided by similar wordign from earlier cases

77
Q

re adms and kensington vestry

A

unto the absolute use of my wie, in full cnfience that she will do what is riht as to the dispoal therof between my chidlren NO TRUST

78
Q

Comisky

A

the full confidence paired with vey detialed provisions TRUST

79
Q

STRANGE v barnard

A

the remaining part of what si left that he does not want - NO TRUST

80
Q

ANYTHIGN LEFT TO X

A

trust

81
Q

jones v lock

A

look u here, i give this to baby it is for himself

82
Q

palmer v simmonds

A

the bulk of my estate TOO VAGUE

83
Q

RE JONES such aprts of my … estate as she shall nto have sold

A

too vague

84
Q

for his sole use and at is detah, the remainig part of what is lef, that he does ot want for his own wnats and use

A

sprange v barnard

85
Q

re kolbs will trusts

A

whatever remaisn cna be avlid if clear what is to be tken first

86
Q

tangible property

A

london wines co shippers ltd re gldcorp exchange ltd

87
Q

itnnaigble proeprty

A

hunter v moss

88
Q

re knapton

A

where there is no method of detrmiantion he court will attemt to find one

89
Q

biyce v boyce

A

if the method determiantion fails the cpurt will not exercise its dircetion.

90
Q

biyce v boyce maxim

A

equity is equality

91
Q

fixed interest trust

A

compete list rule

92
Q

compkete lsit rule

A

irc v broadway cottages trust

93
Q

sdiscreitoanyr trust

A

class test

94
Q

ot computers ltd v firt naitona tricity finance ltd 2007

A

courts adopt a strict itnepretton- no division fo proerty until all the beneficiaries are ascertainabe.

95
Q

TYPES OF uncertainty

A

conceptual
evidential
ascertainbility

96
Q

vetsing

A

transferrign title of property

97
Q

formalities fo land vesting

A

lpa 1925 s52 1

98
Q

chatlles vesting

A

deed of gift or dleivery of the intem and itnention to transfer

99
Q

shares vetsign

A

must have share transfer form and regstraiton in the comp sharehodlign registe

100
Q

pilic comp vesting

A

no forality- process is automatic

101
Q

private company vest9ng

A

discreption to refuse regs. companies act 2006 s771

102
Q

debts vesting

A

msut be in wriing lpa 1925 s 136

103
Q

copyrights vesting

A

must e in wriying CDPA 1988 s90 3

104
Q

malott v wilsons 1903

A

te property wll re vest by opertaion of law in the setllor not the trustee

105
Q

incomplet consituiton maxim

A

A trust will nto fail for want of a trusee

106
Q

What is a powwr?

A

enables a oerosn to cact. when property is the suject of a power someone is empowered but not requried to dwal with the property in a certain way.

107
Q

re golays wll trust 1965

A

enoy oneof my fts during her lifetime and to receive a reaosnbale incoem from my other properties

108
Q

what is exhaustive

A

all the property or income under the trust must be distributed. no powerto decide not to distrbute all the fudn

109
Q

non exhaustive

A

not all trust incme need to be distrubtued trustees can accumukate for the benefit of the trust. needs express authorisaiton in te trust istrumen.

110
Q

mcpail v doulton

A

the trustees shoudl apply the income ‘at their absolute discretion to any of the officers or employees or ex officers or ex employees or any relaitves or dependeants of sc persons in such amount at such times and on such conditiosn if any as they may think fti.

111
Q

what it a power in mcpail v doulton

A

c of a held it was a power BUT H OF L held it was a trust.

112
Q

evidentiqal uncertainty

A

on a metter of evidence can specific persons prove that they are ,emebrs of the class in quesiron

113
Q

ascertanable

A

are the benefciaires capable of being physically located

114
Q

adminstratively workable

A

is the class so wide or too costly to locate that the funds woud be dissipated ahead of distribution

115
Q

can dt can aslo fial for capriousness

A

re gulbenkeins st 1968

116
Q

dt must survey the clas before deciding on dustrubtuion

A

borough v philcox

117
Q

SPECIAL power

A

powet to appoitn in class re dilke 1921

118
Q

Genral power

A

distribtion amoung a very wife class

119
Q

hybrid power

A

dstribute to anyone exceot re parks, hays setllemtn turtss, re 1982

119
Q

the client is not to be punished for the lawyers loevlyy drafting

A

re gulenkeins settlemtn 1968

120
Q

burrough v philcox

A

obligation to sonsider distributing only

121
Q

re manstys settlement

A

can fail for capriousness

122
Q

gourjus wt

A

use it or lose it.

123
Q

conditonal precedent

A

one Individal tes re allen, re barlows will trust

124
Q

condition subsequent

A

what even will consitute the occurence of the conditon specified

125
Q

tucks settlent trut

A
126
Q

re macadam

A

remuneration not entitled to

127
Q

keech v sandford

A

takig an opportunity not entiled to

128
Q

boardman v phipps

A

use of trust property for own benefit

129
Q

self dealing rule

A

canoot purchase trust property whe trustee ex parte lacey

130
Q

fair dealing rule

A

trustee can purchase beneficiarys intwres coles v trecoyhick

131
Q

fhr european venture llp v cedar capital partnerz llc

A

receivi g abribe secret commsiion

132
Q

loNRHO plc v fayed no 2

A

trust proeprty pruchased by innocent volunteer

133
Q

lysaght v edwards

A

vendor retains legal interets in land until completion/ mortgagees beneficial interest in proceeds of sale.

134
Q

re crippen

A

property benefit results for unlawful killing.

135
Q
A