Equity Flashcards
What is a chancellor?
The old Virginia term for a judge hearing equitable claims.
What is a cross-bill?
The old Virginia term for cross-claims and third-party complaints
What is the difference between default in Virginia courts and default in federal courts?
In Virginia, default is a big deal - party’s that go into default will not be rescued as they might be in federal courts
What is unique about divorce and annulment cases in Virginia?
-
Common
- They make up the majority of equity proceedings in Virginia
- No default
- They cannot be resolved by default - if a defendant fails to appear within 21 days of service, evidentiary submissions still have to be presented to the judge
- No procedural waiver generally
- All procedural steps must generally be followed
- Waiver of notice
- __Notice of any further proceedings is not required unless the defendant filed a timely answer
What happens in a mixed case including both legal and equitable claims?
Assuming there is a timely demand for a jury to hear the legal claims (e.g., by requesting on the face of the complaint),
- The legal claims will be decided by the jury first
- Then the equitable claims will be decided by the judge
Can there ever be a jury in equity cases?
There is a statutory right to a jury in two situations, and the jury verdict is binding on the chancellor:
- Quiet title actions
- Defendant files a Plea in Equity
- Defensive pleading that sets forth a single dispositive state of facts that, if proven, would give the defendant a complete exoneration on the claim
- E.g., illegality, time bar, res judiciata, etc.
- Defensive pleading that sets forth a single dispositive state of facts that, if proven, would give the defendant a complete exoneration on the claim
- The chancellor may also seat an advisory jury to hear certain factual issues, but the verdict is not binding
- Initiated by either:
- Plaintiff’s request
- Defendant’s request
- Sua sponte
- Just must make an independent decision of the case
How can review of an equitable judgement or order be sought?
From the trial court by:
-
Motion to suspend, modify, or vacate judgment
- Must be decided within 21 days after entry of decree
- Court must sign a written order either suspending, modifying, or vacating judgment
- May be based upon:
- New evidence
- Mistake of law
- Mistake of fact
-
Bill of review
- __Must be filed within 6 months after entry of decree
- May be based upon:
- New evidence
- Mistake of law
-
Appeal
- __Must be filed within 30 days after entry of decree
- Heard by:
- Court of appeals
- As a matter of right
- For domestic relations appeal
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- Based on its discretion
- For all other civil appeals
- Appellant must file petition for appeal
- Within 3 calendar months
- Including assignments of error
- Court of appeals
What is required in order to get a new trial based on new evidence?
This generally does not work
Must prove that the evidence:
- Could not have been discovered earlier with reasonable diligence
- Is not merely cumulative, corroborative, or collateral
- Is material
- Would produce an opposite result
What are the steps to approach an equitable remedies question?
- Are the general requirements for equitable relief satisfied?
- Legal remedy must be inadequate
- Equitable relief must be feasible
- Are the particular requirements for equitable relief satisfied?
- E.g., the particular requirements for an injunction, specific performance, recission, reformation, etc.
- Are any equitable defenses available?
- E.g., unclean hands, laches, unconscionability, etc.
What court hears equitable claims?
The Circuit Court, unless it is a FOIA case, which is heard by the GD court
What are the general requirements for equitable relief?
Equity relief is always discretionary
- The legal remedy must be inadequate
- __Was the subject matter unique or rare?
- Would setting an amount of damages have been speculative?
- Was the defendant insolvent?
- Would multiple lawsuits have been required to protect the plaintiff?
- Will irreparable harm occur?
- The equitable remedy must be feasible
-
Does the court have jurisdiction over:
- The person?
- The property subject to the lawsuit?
- Would enforcement of the equitable relief require protracted supervision?
- Does the court lack standard for measuring the party’s compliance with the equitable relief?
-
Does the court have jurisdiction over:
What are the two types of injunctions?
- Prohibitory
- Prevents a threatened wrong or injury
- Mandatory
- Redresses an already inflicted wrong or injury
How do you obtain injunctive relief?
- Equity will balance the hardships on the parties
- Injunctive relief is normally available for:
- Continuous or repeated trespass
- Conversion of a unique chattel
- Stopping unfair competition
- Injunctive relief is sometimes available for:
- Eliminating a nuisance:
- Provided it is a private nuisance
- But not a public nuisance
- Preventing waste (i.e., damage to real property)
- But not if it is ameliorative (i.e., changes the character but increases the value)
- E.g., buldozing an old house but adding a nicer one
- But not if it is ameliorative (i.e., changes the character but increases the value)
- Eliminating a nuisance:
- Injunctive relief is never available for:
- Defamation
- Commercial defamation (i.e., trade libel)
- Invasion of privacy
- Unless it involves name or likeness
- Enjoining pending criminal proceedings
- Enjoining threatened criminal proceedings (unless extraordinary circumstances)
- Injunctive relief is normally available for:
What is temporary injunctive relief, and what term is used in Virginia?
Injunctive relief that is necessary to preserve the status quo
In Virginia, it is called a preliminary injunction
How do you obtain preliminary injunctive relief?
You must show:
- Substantial likelihood the moving party will win
- Irreparable harm to the movant unless the status quo is preserved
- Harm to the moving party outweighs hardship caused to the restrained party
- Public interest will not be adversely affected
What is the exception to the general rule that equity courts “balance the hardships”?
Real covenants exception
- If P sues D for violating a real property covenant:
- P does not have to show any harm
- D cannot escape the injunction unless he shows exceptional harm from injunction
What is specific performance?
An equitable remedy by which:
- A party to a contract
- Is ordered to perform according to its terms
When is specific performance available?
In addition to the general requirements, there are three key requirements:
- A valid contract exists, including:
- Offer
- Acceptance
- All contract conditions have been met, and
- Mutuality of remedy exists
How do you extablish the existence of a valid contract?
You must establish:
-
Certainty of terms
- The contract must be reasonably certain as to:
- Offer and acceptance
- Consideration (i.e., presume that any consideration is enough)
- Terms for performance
- The contract must be reasonably certain as to:
- Existence of consideration
- __The amount of consideration is not considered unless its inadequacy is so extreme that the contract is unconscionable (which is very tough to show in Virginia)
How do you determine whether all conditions have been fulfilled in a contract?
Two main issues involving this:
- “Time is of the essence” provision
- Insists upon full performance by a specified date
- Failure to comply will prevent specific performance unless the court uses discretion based on:
- Delay was only slight (few hours or days)
- Delay did not cause injury to other party
- Invalidating contract would cause extreme hardship
- Requirement was been waived (e.g., agreement to rescheduling)
- Marketable title
- Failure to comply will prevent specific performance unless the court uses discretion based on:
- Deficiency in title is minor
- Specific performance will be granted, but with a reduction in price
- Requirement has been waived
- __Specific performance will be granted, but with a reduction in price
- Deficiency in title is minor
- Failure to comply will prevent specific performance unless the court uses discretion based on:
What is mutuality of remedy?
It means that one party cannot get specific performance if the other party would not have been able to get it
Remedies are mutual if:
- Both parties are able to perform, and
- Both parties can be bound
- E.g., neither party is:
- A minor
- Incompetent
- Out of state
- E.g., neither party is: