Equities - Formalities Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Gift

A

The three certainties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Trust with self as trustee

A

1) Three certainties
- Intention is ascertained by words or conduct (Paul v Constance)
- Merely precatory words will not suffice (Re Adams & Kensington Vestry)
2) Beneficiary principle
3) Rules against perpetuity
- For discretionary trusts: Rule against remoteness of vesting - max 125 years
- For Non-charitable purpose trusts: Rule against ailienability 0 limited to 21 years, or allow trustees to spend all trust capital on the purpose.
4) Formalities for declaration
- Land: Evidenced in writing, signed by the transferor (53(1)(b)) LPA
- Other: None needed (writing desired)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Trust with someone else / others as trustee(s)

A

1) Three certainties
2) Beneficiary principle
3) Rules against perpetuity
4) Formalities of declaration
5) [and] transfer of property in correct manner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Formalities (testamentary trust)

A

s.9 Wills Act:

  • In writing, signed by testator
  • Signature must be made or acknowledged in the presence of two witnesses present at the same time
  • Each witness must attest and sign the will or acknowledge their signature in testator’s presence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Formalities (inter vivos trusts)

A

Generally no formalities (Paul v Constance)

Exception: Land

  • s.53(1)(b) - a declaration of trust for land must be manifested and provided by some writing, otherwise unenforceable.
  • must be signed by the person declaring the trust

Exception - s.53(2) If one can establish that an implied trust was constructed, then it suspends the formalities of s.53(1)(b).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Grey v IRC

A

Disposition of already subsisting equitable interest requires application of s.53(1)(c) i.e. must be in writing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Vandervell v IRC

A

Exception to Grey v IRC - disposition could be oral if absolutely entitled beneficiary instructs trustee to transfer legal title with the intention of also transferring the equitable title. - use SvV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Saunders v Vautier

A

Beneficiary can claim benefit from trust if 18y/o and of sound mind and no contingencies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly