Equitable Remedies and Injunctions Flashcards
What must P show to get an injunction (instead of money damages)?
- P has no adequate remedy at law
- D is insolvent
- Harm is immeasurable in terms of $
- Tortious conduct is repetitive or ongoing
- P has a protectable right
- anything that corresponds with a substantive
tort will do.
- anything that corresponds with a substantive
- Injunction would be enforceable
- Balance of hardships tips in favor of P.
What could make an injunction unenforceable?
Any time the court would have to get in the swamp of deciding what is or isn’t adequate.
E.g. forcing a newspaper to print a retraction, probably grudging, and court would have to say “that is or isn’t good enough.”
E.g. forcing a person who doesn’t want to work to work - also known as involuntary servitude!
What three specific defenses are available for a D who wants to stop P from getting an injunction once they’ve passed the 4-part test?
- Unclean Hands
- Laches
- First Amendment protects D’s conduct/speech, or the injunction would be an unlawful prior restraint.
Define unclean hands defense to injunction.
when P is guilty of some kind of offsetting misconduct.
Define the laches defense to injunction.
Prejudicial delay - and D changed his position in detrimental reliance on P’s acquiescence.
What must P additionally show to get a preliminary injunction?
- Likelihood of success on the merits
2. P would suffer irreparable harm without the injunction.