Equitable Remedies Flashcards

1
Q

What are the three steps in approaching equitable remedies questions?

A

1) Are the general requirements to be eligible for equitable relief satisfied?
There are two such general requirements:
A. the legal remedy must be inadequate
B. equitable relief must be feasible

2) What are the PARTICULAR requirements for the particular equitable remedies that could be applicable on the facts of the Bar Exam question?
3) Are there any equitable DEFENSES which would prevent otherwise available equitable relief?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

When is a legal remedy inadequate? Common examples?

A

When money damages would not make a P whole.

EX’s:

  1. Where the subject matter is unique or rare (includes any real estate).
  2. Where setting an amount of damages would be speculative.
  3. Where defendant is insolvent (making money damages unworkable).
  4. Where multiple lawsuits would be required to protect the plaintiff.
  5. Where irreparable harm will occur.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is required for an equitable remedy to be feasible?

A

One of the following must be present in the forum:

1) The defendant;
2) Property subject to suit

The court must have the capacity to determine (through applicable standards) and supervise compliance (not complex or long term)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

For which TORTS are injunctions generally available?

A
  1. Continuous/repeated trespass
  2. Conversion of unique chattel
    3) Unfair competition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

For which TORTS are injunctions sometimes available?

A

1) To eliminate nuisance, provided that it is PRIVATE

2) To prevent waste (damage to real property) - but NOT ameliorative waste

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

For which TORTS are injunctions usually NOT available?

A

1) Defamation (including commercial defamation)
2) Invasion of privacy

(Rationale: Q concerns with prior restraints)

  1. Pending / threatened criminal proceedings
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the requirements for obtaining a temporary (preliminary) injunction?

A

1) Substantial likelihood the moving party will prevail on the merits;
2) Irreparable harm to the movant unless the status quo is preserved
3) Harm to the moving party outweighs hardship of the injunction to the opposing party
4) Public interest will not be adversely affected by injunction

There must be a hearing and, usually, an injunction bond

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the specific requirements for obtaining specific performance?

A

1) Valid contract exists (terms must be definite & clear)
2) All contract conditions have been met; AND
3) Mutuality of remedy exists.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does a “time is of the essence” provision require? Is specific performance appropriate if it is not fulfilled?

A

This provision insists upon full performance by a specified date.

No, unless the court determines that:

a. the delay was very slight (a few hours or days at most);
b. the other party suffered no injury on account of the delay;
c. invalidating the contract would work extreme hardship on the late party; OR,
d. the requirement was waived

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

If a seller cannot convey marketable title specific performance will ordinarily not be
granted unless…

A

The deficiency is minor (specific performance is appropriate, with a reasonable reduction in price)

The deficiency was waived by the buyer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does mutuality of remedy mean?

When does it exist?

A

Mutuality of remedy means that one party to a contract is not entitled to specific performance unless the other parties would also be entitled to have the contract specifically enforced.

When both parties are able to perform AND can be bound under the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

If there is a covenant not to compete, equity will grant specific performance if the restrictions are reasonable as to:

The three keys areas of the agreement (all of which must be reasonable) are:

A

● the employer’s legitimate interests in protecting its business.
● the employee’s fair opportunity to accept other jobs in the industry
● the public interest

1) Specific activities prohibited;
2) Geographic limitations
3) Duration (1 year is OK; 5 is not)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

In order to be a trade secret (subject to injunction to prevent disclosure), the information needs the following two characteristics:

A

1) confidential and not otherwise available; AND

2) gives the owner a competitive advantage;

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is rescission?

A

A remedy by which a voidable contract is put to an end and the parties are treated as though it have never been made

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is reformation?

A

The contract is salvaged by changing the terms to conform to the originally intended agreement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When will equity cancel a contract (through rescission)?

Is tender (return of all consideration) necessary for rescission?

A

If, at the time it was entered into, there was:

(a) mutual mistake as to a material fact,
(b) unilateral mistake coupled with either (i) misrepresentation (even innocent) or (ii) some other form of inequitable conduct; OR
(c) some other contract grounds - duress, undue influence, lack of capacity, etc.

No.

17
Q

When will a contract be reformed?

A

When there was either:

(a) Any mutual mistake; OR
(b) Unilateral mistake coupled with knowing misrepresentation (fraud)

Must be established by clear and convincing evidence!

18
Q

Will the Statute of Frauds block reformation (assuming grounds are proven)?

A

No.

19
Q

What must the P show to obtain restitution?

A

That the defendant (1) obtained a benefit from the plaintiff, (2) upon request of the defendant, or in circumstances showing that defendant should have known that P expected recompense.

20
Q

Is restitution available against the Commonwealth?

Against counties/cities/town?

A

No - immune from suit for equitable causes of action.

Yes.

21
Q

When is a constructive trust an appropriate remedy for achieving restitution?

A

If the property that a defendant wrongfully obtained can be traced to some asset defendant still has, the court may impose a constructive trust, which in effect declares that the plaintiff is the beneficial owner of the asset and that the defendant must disgorge it in a specified form.

22
Q

What are some other forms of equitable relief?

A

1) Equitable accounting (court orders review of finances of a party)
2) Receivers (court appoints peson to manages a business or property pending disposition) (drastic step)
3) Partition of property
4) Contribution (D seeks pro rata recovery from joint tortfeasors/obligors)
5) Equitable indeminification (party without fault is liable for damages caused by negligence of another - e.g. vicarious liability)
6) Creditors suits

23
Q

What is the preferred outcome when partitioning property?

A

Partition in kind: physically splitting the parcel among the owners

If physical division, called “laying off shares” of land, is not reasonably workable, then the property can be sold with the proceeds to be divided. The property should be sold in a manner that generates a good sales price.

An attorney handling such a case can recover the fee from the client who retained the attorney, and from any other co-owner who was not separately represented in the partition suit.

24
Q

When may judgment creditors and lien creditors obtain equitable relief, and by filing what?

A

When efforts to enforce their rights under a judgment by legal enforcement remedies have failed

A creditors bill

25
Q

When may general creditors bring a creditors bill?

A

Only when such action is necessary to preserve the assets of a defunct company

26
Q

When do creditors bills typically arise on the bar exam?

A

In response to voluntary transfers, which can be voided if the creditor can prove: (1) no consideration, (2) that the creditor preexisted the transfer; AND (3) that the debtor was insolvent at the time of the transfer and as a consequence of it

In response to fraudulent conveyances, where the transferor intended to defraud the creditor through the transfer (regardless of solvency)

27
Q

Equitable defenses may raised against all classes of litigants except…

A

Government bodies and localities

28
Q

When is the defense of unclean hands applicable?

Must the conduct be illegal or actionable?

A

When the P is guilty of improper conduct proximately related to the same transaction for which the P seeks equitable relief

No.

29
Q

Does the statute of limitations apply to equitable actions?

A

No

30
Q

When is the defense of laches available?

A

When the P (adult) waits an unreasonable time before suing, resulting in prejudice to D

31
Q

Is unconscionability available in equitable actions?

A

Yes, if the consideration for a contract is grossly out of proportion to the true value of the deal

32
Q

When do the defenses of impossibility/hardship apply?

A

When performance is not within the capacity of the person bound, or when the burden is disproportionate to the benefit

Key point: equity relief is always discretionary

33
Q

How does a party show fraud?

A

By alleging a knowing misrepresentation of present fact (not opinion or a statement about a future event) seeking reliance by the other party

Fraud must be proven by clear and convincing evidence

34
Q

What is the defense of equitable estoppel?

A

When a party makes a representation which foreseeably induces someone to act in reasonable reliance, to his detriment, the party making the representation may be barred by this defensive doctrine from asserting rights inconsistent with the representations.