Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

E2 - Epi > Epi - L4 - Cohort Studies > Flashcards

Epi - L4 - Cohort Studies Flashcards

1
Q

what is a cohort-study?

A

they are OBSERVATIONAL studies allowing researchers to be passive observers of natural events occurring in naturally-exposed and unexposed (comparison) groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the group allocation based on?

A
  1. exposure status
    or
  2. group membership (something in common), not group allocation based
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

when is this mostly useful?

A

when studying a RARE EXPOSURE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what are other known names for cohort studies?

A

incidence studies

longitudinal studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

how do you come up with a measure of association?

A

cohort studies commonly generate the Risk of disease/ outcome for each, then a Risk Ratio/ Relative Risk (RR) as measure of association

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

why would you choose to do a Cohort-Study?

A
  1. unable to force group allocation
  2. limited resources
  3. the EXPOSURE OF INTEREST IS RARE and little is known about its associations/ outcomes
  4. more interested in incidence rates or risks for outcome of interest (more than effects of interventions)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are the 3 ways you can conduct a cohort study?

A

prospective
retrospective
am bidirectional

*group assignment is STILL based on EXPOSURE status or Group Membership (something in common)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Prospective Cohort Studies

A

exposure group is selected on the basis of a past or current exposure and both groups (exposed and non-exposed) followed INTO FUTURE to assess for outcomes of interest (which has yet to occur), and then compared

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Retrospective cohort studies

A

aka historical

at the start of the study, both exposure and outcome of interest have already occurred, BUT groups still allocated based on past history of exposure

  • retrospectively start at time of exposure and follow forward to the point of outcome occurrence (known), in the present
  • exposure still has to occur BEFORE outcome of interest and group allocation is based on exposure status, not disease
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

ambidirectional cohort studies

A

uses RETROSPECTIVE design to assess past differences (up to present), but also ADDS FUTURE DATA collected on additional outcomes PROSPECTIVELY from start of the study
- looking for outcomes in the past, and known in the present, but also into the future

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is a cohort and what are some examples?

A

a cohort refers to a group with something in common:

  • birth cohort: individuals assembled based on being born in a geographic region in a given time period
  • inception cohort: individuals assembled at a given point BASED ON SOME COMMON FACTOR; useful for single-group assessments for incidence rate determination

exposure cohort: individuals assembled based on some common exposure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

cohort sizes may or may not change over time, what are the names suggesting the numbers?

A

fixed

closed

open (dynamic)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

fixed cohort

A

a cohort which can’t gain members but CAN have loss-to-follow-ups; fixed at the start, can only lose numbers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

closed cohort

A

a fixed cohort with NO loss-to-follow-ups; this is made possible if the study is quick, leaving no room for people to die or leave the study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

open (dynamic) cohort

A

a cohort with new additions and some LTFUs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

how do you select an exposed study population?

A

allocate subjects based on pre-defined criteria of ‘exposure’
- scientifically and consistently determined

17
Q

how do you best select an unexposed study population?

A

make the groups as close as possible (coming from the same cohort/ population (yet not exposed))

18
Q

what 3 sources can the unexposed group come from?

A
  1. internal
  2. general population
  3. comparison cohort
19
Q

Internal

A

best, if feasible

patients from the same ‘cohort,’ yet who are unexposed (most similar)

if there are only levels of exposure, you may have to use the lowest exposure group as comparator (if there is not a ‘no exposure’ group internally-available)

20
Q

general population

A

used as a second choice;

21
Q

comparison cohort

A

least acceptable

simply attempt to match groups as close as possible on numerous personal characteristics (can’t control for other potentially harmful exposures in comparison cohort; also causing disease)

22
Q

what are some of the strengths of Cohort-Studies?

A
  • good for assessing MULTIPLE OUTCOMES of ONE exposure; hard to control for other exposures if more than one plausible for being associated with an outcome
  • useful when EXPOSURES are rare
  • useful when calculating Risk and RR’s
  • less expensive
  • good when ethical issues limit use of interventional
  • good for long induction/ latent periods (retrospective)
  • able to represent ‘temporality’ (prospective)
23
Q

what are some weaknesses of cohort-studies?

A
  • can’t demonstrate causation
  • hard to control for other exposures if more than one plausible for being associated with an outcome (primarily retrospective)
  • retrospective; cannot control for other Exposures (if not known/assessed) or potential changes in amount of study-exposure during study frame
  • not good for long induction/ latent periods (prospective; retrospective much better here)
  • can be impacted by unassisted confounders (more so with retrospective)
  • can be impacted by various biases, SELECTION and RECALL BIASES
  • limited by available data
24
Q

Advantages of Prospective Cohort studies:

A
  • can obtain a greater amount of study-important information from patients (more control over specific data collection process; interviews/ lab assessments/ physicals)
  • follow up/ tracking of patients may be easier (IF you plan ahead!)
  • better at giving answer to ‘temporality’ (simple association vs. causal inference [hill’s criteria])
  • may look at multiple outcomes from a supposed single exposure
  • can calculate incidence and incidence rates
25
Q

what are some disadvantages of Prospective cohort studies?

A
  • time, expense, and LTFU
  • not efficient for rare disease (use Case-Control study in this situation)
  • not suited for long induction/ latency conditions
  • exposure may change over time
26
Q

what are some advantages of retrospective cohort studies?

A
  • best for long induction/ latency conditions
  • able to study rare exposures
  • useful if the data already exists
  • saves time and money compared to prospective studies
27
Q

what are some disadvantages of retrospective cohort studies?

A
  • requires access to charts, databases, employment records (may not be complete/ thorough enough for study)
  • “information” may not factor in or control for other exposures to harmful elements during study period or over time
  • patients may not be available for interview if contact necessary for missing or incomplete data
  • exposure (or its ‘amount’) may have changed over time
28
Q

what are they key biases with cohort-studies?

A

healthy worker effect and

selection bias: HOW exposure status is defined/ determined

E2 - Epi (6 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions