EPI Final Exam Flashcards
How to Calculate Prevalence Period
existing cases at start + new cases over a period of time/ size of population at start of time period = %
How to calculate prevalence point
existing cases at “point” in time/ size of population at “point” in time = %
a single point in time
how to calculate incidence proportion (cumulative incidence= CI)
number of people developing the outcome/ number of people at risk
CI=IR x time
estimation for risk in a population “at risk” (candidate population)- fixed population
how to calculate incidence rate (IR)
number of people developing the outcome/ total time at risk
estimates change in risk over time in a population at risk- fixed or dynamic population (instantaneous risk)
how to calculate incidence density
number of new cases / sum of the person-time of the at-risk population
how to calculate person time incidence
the number of new cases/ person time at risk through observation
how to calculate crude death rate
number of death in a given period/ the population exposed to risk of death in that period
how to calculate proportionate mortality
number of deaths from a given cause in a specific period of time/ total number of deaths in the same period
how to calculate case fatality rate
proportion of individuals with a disease who die from the disease
what is age adjustment
standardization
- provides a valid comparison using a single number for each population
- transform a measure based on a specific factor composition of a reference population
- referred to as the direct method of standardization
why is age adjustment used
almost all diseases occur at different rates in different age groups, so for accurate analysis- its going to be important to take this into account
what are age specific rates
total number of health events for the specific age group of interest/ total population in that age group
how are age specific rates used
multiplying the age-specific rates of disease by age- specific weights
what is the formula for risk difference/excess risk
Re-Ru/Ru = RR -1 (expressed as percent
the null value is 0%
not a proportion just a ratio
“relative risk”- often described as the percent change relative to the reference risk
what is the formula for risk ratio
RR = Re/ Ru
Risk ratio & rate Ratio
Rate Ratio : Rr = IRe/ IRu
Prevalence ration = Pe/Pu
what is the formula for odds ratio
(a/b)/ (c/d) or ad/bc
what is the formula for relative risk
deaths or disease risk in a specific population/ risk of people from all other groups
how do you calculate and interpret risk difference/excess risk
RE-Ru/Ru = RR -1 (expressed as a percent)
- increase linearly above one and exponentially below one
RR= Rm/Rf and RR = Rf/Rm
how do you calculate and interpret risk ratio
no effect (null value) is 1.0 RR >1 indicates GREATER risk for exposed population relative to reference population
RR < 1 indicates lesser risk for exposed population relative to reference population
how do you calculate and interpret odds ratio
odds of the first group/ odds in the seconds grouphow
how do you calculate and interpret relative risk
death or disease risk in a specific population/ risk of people from all other groups
definition of attributable risk
amount of proportion of incidence of disease or death in individuals exposed to a specific risk factor
definition of population attributable risk
risk in the total population that would not have occurred if exposure had not occurred )may also be expressed as number of cases)
PRD = R total - Ru
what type of epi study uses case control sutdies
main features:
- individuals with the outcome are identified (cases)
- individuals without the outcome are identified (controls or referents)
- exposure is determined for cases and controls at an appropriate time IN THE PAST (there is no follow-up)
- the association between exposure and health outcome is quantified using the odds ratio
what type of epi study uses cohort studies
population with one or more common characteristics or experiences
experimental (intervention) studies
Observational Cohort Studies
- prospective cohort
- retrospective cohort
what type of epi study uses ecological studies
data representing entire populations are used to evaluate an association
exposure status and outcome status are single values applied to the entire population
correlations can be positive, negative, or zero
may not represent the association that exists on the individual level (ecological fallacy)
more complicated relationships can be masked
what type of epi study uses cross sectional studies
Assess prevalence of population in characteristics at a “point in time” this means information on current status is collected from a participant only once (no follow up)
information on individuals associations but lacks temporal relationship between :exposure” and outcome
measure of association is the odds ratio (not an estimate of RR for cross-sectional studies)
classified by whether the data is provided by participants for come from an evaluation - interview or examination
conditions to use a case control study
exposure data are difficult or expensive to obtain
small number of participants
disease is rare
disease has long induction and latent period
little is known about the disease
conditions to use a cohort study
good evidence is needed for risk factor
exposure is rare
desire accurate measurement of exposure
little is known about the exposure
limitations: expensive, long time commitment
conditions to use an ecological study
One of the least valid
data representing entire populations are used to evaluate an association
exposure status and outcome status are single values applied to the entire population
correlations can be positive, negative, or zero
may not represent the association that exists on the individual level (ecological fallacy)
more complicated relationships can be masked
conditions to use a cross sectional study
Almost the least valid
strengths: inexpensive and quick , generalizability , useful for public health planning
limitations: prevalence is the measure of disease frequency, not time separation between exposure and outcome, data are prone to bias and often self reported
death rate
number of people dying from a condition in a specified population/ number of people in the specified population = deaths per 100,00
What is external validity
the relevance of internally valid study results to populations with characteristics different from the source population, also called generalizability
What is internal validity
the extent to which studies result represent the true association between a factor of interest and the health-related outcome for the source population
What is the major differences between internal and external validity
When the goal of the study is to evaluate a potential association between a factor and health related outcome, there are two types of validity
when the goal of the study is to estimate a characteristic of a source population, then there is onyl one validity
What is systematic error
always results in bias
what is random error
may result from bias for an individual measurement but not necessarily an average measurement
what is included under systematic error
misclassification, information, selection
what is confouding
mixing of effects between a factor of interest, a health outcome, and a third factor that is a risk factor for the health outcome of interest, but is not of interest in the study. This third factor is often referred to as a confounder
what are the 3 criteria for confounding
- variable must be a risk factor for the outcome in BOTH the exposed and unexposed populations
- the potential confounder must be associated with the exposure in the population that produced the cases
- the confounder can not be an intermediate step in the causal pathway between the factor of interest and the health outcome
what is selection bias
bias that occurs at the selection of participants