epi/biostats Flashcards

1
Q

Cross-sectional study

A

Design: collect data from group of people to assess frequency (and risk factors) of disease at one point in time

Measures disease prevalence; can not establish causality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Case-control study

A

Design: Retrospective. Compare group of people w/ disease to group without disease. Look at prior exposure/risk factor.

Measures odds ratio (OR)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Cohort study

A

Design: Prospective or retrospective. Compare group with exposure to group without exposure and then look at difference in disease.

Measures relative risk (RR)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Twin concordance study

A

Compare freq of both twins developing disease

Measures heritability and influence of environmental factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Adoption study

A

Compares siblings raised by biological vs adoptive parents -> measures heritability and environmental influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Ecological study

A

Analyzes populations instead of individuals for disease prevalance or risk factors etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Sensitivity

A

True (+) rate -> probability the test detects disease when it is present
= (test+ w/disease)/(all with disease)
=TP/(TP+FN)

Rules OUT disease and indicates LOW FN

Used for screening

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Specificity

A

True (-) rate -> probability negative result when disease not present
=(test- w/out disease)/(all without disease)
=(TN/TN+FP)

Rules IN disease and indicates LOW FP

Used for confirmation after screening

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Positive predictive value (PPV)

A

PPV= TP/ (TP+FP)

Varies directly with prevalence or pretest probability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Negative predictive value (NPV)

A

NPV= TN/(TN+FN)

Varies indirectly with prevalence or pretest probability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Odds ratio

A

Used in case-control studies

Odds group w disease were exposed/ Odds group without disease were exposed

OR=(a/c)/(b/d)

a= +disease, +risk
b= -disease, +risk
c= +disease, -risk
d= -disease, -risk
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Relative risk

A

Used in cohort studies

Risk developing disease in exposed group/ risk of disease in unexposed groups

RR=[a/(a+b)]/[c/(c+d)]

= [(+disease and risk)/(all +risk)]/
[(+disease and -risk)/(all -risk)]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Attributable risk

A

AR= difference in risk btwn exposed and unexposed

=(a/a+b) - (c/c+d)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Relative risk reduction

A

proportion of risk reduction attributable to intervention

RRR=1-RR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Absolute risk reduction

A

ARR= difference in risk attributable to intervention = -AR= (c/c+d) - (a/a+b)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Number needed to treat (NNT)

A

NNT=1/ARR

17
Q

Number needed to harm (NNH)

A

NNH=1/AR

18
Q

Precision

A

random error decreases precision

Increased precision-> decreased std and increased statistical power (1-beta)

19
Q

Accuracy

A

systemic error or bias decreases accuracy

20
Q

Berkson bias

A

study pop. selected from hospital is less healthy than general pop.

21
Q

recall bias

A

awareness of disorder alters recall by subjects. common in retrospective studies

22
Q

procedure bias

A

subjects in different groups treated differently

23
Q

Hawthorne effect

A

observer effect - modify behavior in response to awareness of being observed

24
Q

confounding bias

A

factor is related to both exposure and outcome but not on causal pathway-> distorts or confuses effect of exposure on outcome

25
Q

normal distribution

A

w/in 1 std= 68%
w/in 2 std=95%
w/in 3 std= 99.7%

26
Q

power

A

1-beta;
beta=type2 error: stating no difference when there is a difference

Increase power and decrease beta:

  • Increased sample size
  • Increased expected effect size
  • Increased precision of measurement
27
Q

t-test

A

check difference btwn means of 2 groups

ex: mean BP btwn men and women

28
Q

ANOVA

A

check differences btwn means of 3 or more groups

ex: mean BP btwn multiple ethnic groups

29
Q

chi-square test

A

check differences between 2 or more categorical outcomes (not mean values)

Ex: comparing percentage of members of different ethnic groups who have essential HTN