Enzymology P2 Flashcards
What is rational protein engineering?
Synthesis - new enzymes, designer proteins, new proteins, improved enzymes and engineered antibodies (e.g. to fight cancer cells)
Initially worked well, but subsequent injections lead to a immune response fighting the antibodies (as they were foreign)
Analysis - to understand enzyme function, recognition and structure/activity relationships
How can we ‘improve’ enzymes?
Improve thermostability, pH optimum and substrate specificity etc…
This depends on what we define as ‘improved’ conditions
How can we assess an improved enzyme?
Assess substrate specificity:
Substitute Kcat into Michealis Menten equation
v = Kcat[E][S]/(Km + [S])
At equal [E] when [A]=[B]
(Va/Vb) = (Kcat/Km)a / (Kcat/Km)b
The ratio will tell us how well the enzyme is working to see if we have improved the enzyme
Describe an early example of enzyme engineering?
Engineered Trypsin: normally cleaves next to a lysine, but now cleaves a glutamate
This new enzyme didn’t have any activity
Therefore it is much easier to destroy activity than it is to create activity
How would we engineer an enzyme - give an example?
In order to engineer an enzyme we need to understand everything about the enzyme
Example: Lactate dehydrogenase
We want to change the substrate pyruvate to oxaloacetate so the dehydrogenase works with that instead of pyruvate
New substrate is bigger and more negative
What factors did Prof JJ Holbrook in Bristol look at to engineer an enzyme?
Overall active site charge balance
Influence of substrate and active site volumes
Direct electrostatic complementarity
Describe alteration of LDH in relation to: overall active site charge balance?
This charge balance is just in the active site
They chose 2 mutations:
Asp197 to Asn - charge buried in protein
Greater change
Glu107 to Gln - charge exposed to solvent
Limited change
To see if any change were made we can plot Log Kcat/Km of the substrates
Effect is more pronounced if charge is buried
Describe alteration of LDH in relation to: influence of substrate and active site volumes?
Thr246 to Glycine - T246G
This leads to a bigger active site
This gave a switch in specificity from pyruvate to oxaloacetate
The active site is now too big for pyruvate - therefore can allow water molecules in also, interrupting the mechanism
Didn’t make a huge overall difference
Describe alteration of LDH in relation to: direct electrostatic complementarity?
Gln102 to Arg - Q102R
This is very successful - increases specificity for oxaloacetate 10^6 = 10^3 increase
Now pyruvate is 10^3 specificity which is a 10^4 decrease
Direct electrostatic complementarity is most important
How do we make alterations of LDH away from a natural substrate?
Branched substrates for LDH don’t function well at all
We need to introduce more flexible space into active site
We do this by trying to make the JAW and loop more flexible and hydrophobic e.g.
More flexible - A235G, A236G
More hydrophobic - Q102M, K103V, P105S
Or do both
We find that engineering proteins we can’t just do a single amino acid swap - we need combinations of mutations
= synergistic mutations
How else can we alter an enzyme’s function if not interaction with substrate?
We can alter the interaction with the co-factor
e.g. Glutathione reductase and NADPH
Describe glutathione reductase?
This catalyses the redox of glutathione
This reduces the di-sulfide bond = reduced glutathione
This is being used as an example as we are engineering the specificity of the cofactor
Dimeric enzyme
Contains FAD
Contains a redox active disulphide bridge
What is the mechanism of glutathione reductase?
NADPH binds in the active site next to the FAD
FAD effectively divides the active site into two parts
One has the redox active site where glutathione binds and the other where NADPH binds
The electrons in the charge transfer complex can be used to reform the disulphide bridge
How/why are we focusing on changing the NADPH cofactor affinity?
The only difference between NADH and NADPH is a phosphate group
The active site/pocket for NADP+ is formed with 2 Arginine residues (very positive)
They electrostatically bind the negative phosphate
The pocket is even more positive as it contains His and Lys relatively close to the active site surface
We may want to change the enzymes cofactor as for example NADH is a lot cheaper than using NADPH
How can we approach altering cofactor activity in glutathione reductase?
As we are dealing with a cofactor there are a lot of enzymes that bind NADPH
We can take a more bioinformatic approach
Positive pocket for NADPH
Conserved motifs
Describe alteration of glutathione reductase in relation to: the positive pocket for the cofactor?
Alter the postive amino acid residues from arginine to leucine and methionine
We knocked out the NADPH activity but didn’t increase NADH activity - destroyed activity
Describe alteration of glutathione reductase in relation to: conserved motifs?
NADH/NADPH amino acid residues are highly conserved across organisms
It seems they had a pattern
NADPH
GxGxxAxxxA
NADH
GxGxxGxxxG
Therefore altering alanine to glycine
After many synergistic changes - this increased the activity of NADH greatly
How can we measure the switch in specificity?
(Kcat/Km)desired / (Kcat/Km)natural
Mutant/Wild type
The equation above on both lines
For glutathione reductase alterations = 17,700 fold specificity change