Environmental Justice Flashcards

1
Q

When we think of Environmental Justice what should we consider

A

Distribution
Regulation
Participation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Justice is

Ethics is

A

Practised that emerged on the ground

Philosophy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Environmental ethnics are

A

Concern with Anthropocene
View humans are at centre they only count morally

Leopold non-anthropocentric view it is the community which is expanded across land- land being all

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Environmental Justice is

A

Interested in divide between humans and non humans is put into practise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

John Rawls argues

A

1) each individual has an adequate scheme of equal basic liberties compatible with the same scheme of liberties for all
2) social and economic inequalities operate to the greatest benefit of the least advantaged members of society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Sen argues

A

Against rawl, if we souly focus on distribution, we don’t acknowledge ppl have different capacities for understanding rights and liberties
Must think on ground

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Martha NUssbaums

A

10 capabilities including
-life: able to live a normal life without reduction in its worth

  • bodily health including reproduction nourishment and shelter
  • bodily integrity ability to move and exercise
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Theories of justice

A

Offer rationale for pursuing improved structures of distribution or capabilities for exerting human freedom

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Environmental justice is not a theory

A

It names practises that work from the ground up to connect unequal social structures to environmental harms and goods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Environmental justice vs social justice

A

EJ- ground up to connect unequal social structures to environmental harms and good

SJ- works from ground up to argue political terms of equality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Environmental Justice Distribution

A

Began by focusing on the concrete and inequitable distribution of risks and exposed to hazards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Cancer Valley Mississippi River

A

Health outcomes has meant levels of pollution are recognised, population predominantly African American
Racial divide

Help if NGO’s gathered data to prove air quality was bad for leading health problems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Recognition

A

Critiques have sort to connect EJ not only to how social structures distribute Environmental norms by why certain actors are not given recognition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Ok Tedi Mine

A

Cooper and gold mine
1980’s over 2 billion tons of waste dumped into Ok Tedi and fly rivers
Polluted 1000km of water and 2000km of rainforest

Took company to court community built a network for gaining voice for indecency’s people across the world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Participation

A

Recognition calls for participation
Argued EJ can be achieved on through shifts in social structures so more equal
Power structures must change to allow those with less power to participate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Social structures: violence, fast, slow and geopolitical

A

Analysis of EJ can help us understand the different speeds scales and spatial dynamics of structural violence

17
Q

Bhopal chemical explosion

A

30 years later still water pollution
Poison has effected generations
Dis- scale is far away powers won’t prioritise
Reg- illness classified as ST, physical life altering illnesses not appropriately acknowledged
P- weak government didn’t blame the international organisations

18
Q

Epistemic injustice

A

A wrong done to someone specifically in their capacity as the knower

19
Q

Testimonial injustice

A

When a listener discredits the speaker

20
Q

Hermeneutical injustice

A

A gap in the collective understanding such that a wrong cannot be articulated and puts someone at an h fair disadvantage

21
Q

Theorising from the ground up

A

Understanding EJ requires a commitment to study the different ways that individuals communities and groups experience and articulate injustices regarding distribution recognition and participation
Social science that is able to engage with scientific + epidemiological dimension of human relationships

22
Q

Schlosberg

A

2004
Argues looking at justice as distribution is limited and can’t encompass the broad demands for justice made by global EJ

Illustrates limits of insistence on a uniformity in movements

Global EJ movement embodies potential for integrated movement of justice

23
Q

Schlosberg 2

A

2013
Idea of EJ reflected the lived experience of the reality of injustice on ground

Importance of these have helped push the concept to be embraced

EJ has therefore moved from being a reflection about social injustice to relationship between en and provision of justice itself