environmental assessment Flashcards
1
Q
EA sources of law
A
- aug 28: new IAA replaced CEAA
- IAA gives fed gov role in EAs
- provs and territories have own EA laws
2
Q
OMR case role in EA law
A
- environment big complex issue shared btwn jurisdictions
- brought up status of EAs as a decision making tool, legitimate process
3
Q
what is EA
A
- legally required process to evaluate impacts of projects
- identifies actual or potential impacts about environment and how to mitigate
- promotes better decision making about project proceeding (ideal)
4
Q
who conducts EA
A
- proponent, often hires consulting company
- government reviews EA
- conflict of interest: proponent hires company, if too many impacts may not rehire
- once report published public can comment
- if public mad can hire company to make another EA
5
Q
government wants to do project that requires EA?
A
- department responsible must do EA
6
Q
burden on business of EA
A
- EA laws vary across country, can be frustrating for businesses operating in diff provinces
- fed and prov EA on same project: can be slow process, some projects may be discontinued bc lengthy EA, introduces uncertainty for businesses
7
Q
EA alternatives?
A
- no EA
- strict regulations that dont consider specific circumstances - good for environment, but no consideration of diff businesses and locations
- EA tries to find a balance between business and society interests
8
Q
EA decision makers
A
- fed: minister environment, canadian impact assessment agency
- provincial: minister of environment
9
Q
advanced EA
A
- cumulative effects assessments
- public consultations
- strategic level assessments
10
Q
federal impact assessment
A
- if EA required it will be listed under physical activities regulations
- national parks, military, mining, nuclear energy, fossil fuels, electrical transmission and pipelines, renewable energy
11
Q
old vs new: agencies
A
old: 3 agencies (CEAA, NEB, NE)
new: 1 agency: IAA
12
Q
old vs new: EA needed?
A
- same
- prescribed by regs
- ministerial discretion can designate project
- if project on fed land needs permission
13
Q
new in IAA: decision making phase
A
- whether to carry out assessment
- whether to coordinate with other jurisdictions
- scope of assessment
- can end project befroe doing EA if there are obvious unacceptable impacts
- agency must offer to consult with other jurisdictions that have powers related to project
14
Q
new in IAA: expanded scope
A
- need for project
- indigenous traditional knowledge
- contribution to sustainability
- gender issues
- impact on ghg emissions
- impact on indigenous rights
15
Q
danger of EA by provs only
A
- subject to influence by company: more vulnerable to economic interests, pressure to approve project
- desire to keep certain businesses operating bc politics: economic benefits most relevant to province
16
Q
northern pulp problems
A
- wants to pump effluent into northumberland strait
- forestry industry that if NP stopped industry will collapse
- people say it will only be short term loss
- can expect unbiased decision maker?
17
Q
NP: justice fichaud
A
- province paying NP for treatment plant design and engineering (secret revealed in court by NP)
- province should have consulted pictou landing before spending
- province acting as investor and regulator - not fair judgement
- after paying it would be unlikely to deny approval
- contractual approval would likely facilitate statutory approvals
18
Q
prov EA law
A
- NS environment act, part 4
- if proposed undertaking listed in EA regulations then subject to EA (class I or II)
- minister can decide to require EA
19
Q
auditor general
A
- independent of gov
- appointed by and reports to house of assemnly
- issues independent opinion on gov financial reports
- conducts performance audits on public sector operations
20
Q
AG on EA
A
- 2013-2016: 54 EAs, 53 approved
- NSE not evaluating if terms and conditions achieve goals
- NSE monitoring of conditions weak - no timelines or indication of who doc should be submitted to, only 75/276 projects in tracking system
- increases risk to environment
21
Q
EA cases in NS
A
- if unhappy with EA –> judical review, only way to challenge decision is in court
- if not directly affected by EA, standing is a hurdle - must be public interest litigant