Environment Flashcards

1
Q

Define GLOBAL WARMING

A

Global warming is the increase in the Earth’s temperature, widely believed to be due to heat trapped by greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define SHALLOW/REFORMIST ECOLOGY

A

Shallow or reformist ecology is a green ideological perspective that harnesses the lessons of ecology to human needs and ends, and is associated with values such as sustainability and conservation. It is supported by mainstream politicians and political parties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define DEEP/RADICAL ECOLOGY

A

Deep ecology is a green ideological perspective that gives priority to the maintaining the ecological balance of nature; it is associated with values such as bio-equality, diversity and decentralization. It is supported by environmental NGOs such as Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define RESOURCE PROBLEMS

A

Resource problems relate to the relationship between the increasing need for resources (due to population growth, and industrialisation), and their depletion.
Examples include: fossil fuels, shrinking rain forests, over fishing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define SINK PROBLEMS

A

Sink problems are the problems caused by the damage done by waste products of economic activity.
Examples: air and water pollution, green house gases, global warming.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the IPCC?

A

The International Panel on Climate Change is an international panel of scientists and researchers that provide advice on climate change to the international community.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are examples of international attempts to combat climate change?

A
  1. The International Panel on Climate Change was created in 1988
  2. The ‘Earth Summit’ held in Rio in 1992 was the first summit held to address the problem in a cooperative way.
  3. 1997 Kyoto Protocol - developed countries pledged to cut their emissions by an average of 5%.
  4. Paris Agreement in 2015.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define ECOLOGY

A

Ecology is the study of the relationship between between living organisms and their environment. It highlights the interconnectedness of nature.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

A

Environmental issues are sink and resource problems that threaten the ecological balance of the Earth. They are global issues as they cross borders and cannot be solved by states acting independently.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define the TRAGEDY OF THE COMMONS

A

The tragedy of the commons is the disparity between rational individual behaviour, which works in self interest, and satisfying the needs of the collective. Before the introduction of enclosures, common land was often subject to overgrazing due to each herder being able to keep as many cattle as they wished. The number of cattle then often exceeded capacity allowed, bringing tragedy to all;
‘freedom in the commons brings ruin to all’ - Garrett Hardin
‘We can never do merely one thing. Any intrusion into nature has numerous effects, many of which are unpredictable.’ - Hardin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Define a FREE RIDER

A

A free rider is an individual or state who benefits from a good without paying for it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the implications of the tragedy of the commons for global environmental policies?

A
  1. There is a lack of international effort - states are self interested and would rather benefit their own needs than those of the collective. States free ride within the international system
    EXAMPLE; USA pulled out of Paris and refused to ratify the 1997 Kyoto protocol
  2. A move towards world government - environmental legislation is weak due to international anarchy. Sovereignty is shared between 193 sovereign states and there is no overriding authority to force them to obey legislation they did not subscribe to.
    These global environmental issues require global solutions.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

A

Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. It is therefore based on the idea of cross-generational justice and the notion that future generations are entitled to living standards at least as prosperous as those enjoyed by present. Brundtland report (1987)
It suggests that we can benefit from both environmental and economic wellbeing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the reformist approach to tackling environmental problems?

A

Promotion of sustainable development and adaption and mitigation techniques. They argue that environmental degradation can be tackled without major intervention at national or global levels, and economic growth is good, as long as it is controlled.
‘Getting richer, slower’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the radical approach to tackling environmental problems?

A

They entirely reject materialistic and consumerists values and call for 0 economic growth achieved through strong sustainability. they argue that change is required culturally as well as politically (e.g. changing the lifestyles of those in very developed countries) and that supranational organisations are the best way to get states to collective take action.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Why is the idea of sustainable development controversial?

A
  • According to climate change sceptics, the idea has gone too far. It undermines state sovereignty and hinders economic growth (through slowing it down).It also places limitations on the global South that did not exists when the global North was developing, putting limits on the number of people that can be lifted out of poverty.
  • According to radical ecologists, the idea has not gone far enough. It places too much emphasis on the needs of humans and masks the real problem (which is the fundamental flaws of capitalism). They campaign for 0% economic growth.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What are examples of international efforts to tackle climate change?

A

The Rio Earth Summit (1992), the Kyoto Protocol (1997), the Copenhagen summit (2009), the Paris Climate Agreement (2015).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Outline the features of the Kyoto Protocol

A

Held in Kyoto in 1997. Achieved two binding targets:

  1. Developed world countries signed up to an agreement to reduce emissions by an average of 5% on 1990 levels by 2012.
  2. Flexibility mechanisms were introduced to allow carbon trading, which became known as ‘cap and trade’.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Outline the features of the Rio Earth Summit

A

Held in Rio de Janeiro in June 1992. It was the first conference to really bring the issue of climate change to the international stage.
Two international agreements came out of it:
1. The Convention on Biological Diversity - countries to adopt national policies to protect the environment through sustainable development.
2. The UNFCCC - the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, a non-binding agreement to stabilise CO2 emissions to 1990 levels.
Also established the Commission on Sustainable Development.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Outline the features of the Copenhagen Accord

A

Held in Copenhagen in December 2009. Drafted by the USA, China, India, Brazil and South Africa. 163 countries participated.
From it came:
1. A ‘pledge’ to prevent 2C warming on pre-industrial levels.
2. Developed countries to submit plans for cutting emissions to be checked by the UN
3. Developing countries to submit reports on emissions to measure and verify them.
4. Developed countries should subsidise cleaner technologies in poorer countries so they can industrialise without massively adding to global pollution levels.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Outline the features of the Paris Climate Agreement

A

Held in Paris in December 2015. All 193 states signed up to it. Its main provisions:

  1. To keep global temperatures rises ‘well below 2C’ and endeavour to limit them further to 1.5C.
  2. To achieve carbon neutral economies
  3. To review each country’s contribution every 5 years, so they can increase their commitment.
  4. Rich countries to help poorer ones by providing ‘climate finance’, helping them to adapt to climate change and switch to renewable energy sources.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What are the strengths of the Rio summit?

A
  • 172 states attended and 2400 NGO representatives did too
  • Large numbers of journalists help to spread the Summit’s message around the world
  • Acknowledged the interrelationship between global issues such as human rights, gender equality, environmental protection etc. These issues could not be addressed individually.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What are the weaknesses of the Rio summit?

A
  • Nothing binding was agreed
  • Arguably too many interests were given a voice.
  • Tensions about how climate change mitigation would be paid for was evident between developed and developing countries.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What are the strengths of the Kyoto Protocol?

A
  • First to introduce legally binding targets concerning the reduction of greenhouse gases
  • Recognised ‘common but differentiated responsibilities of developing and developed states’.
  • Provided a mechanism for the idea that carbon was a commodity - carbon trading and ‘cap and trade’.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What are the weaknesses of the Kyoto Protocol?

A
  • Inadequate targets (only 5%)
  • Critics of carbon trading argue that it allows states to exploit their targets and not take climate change seriously. The low prices of carbon does not incentivise businesses to ‘go green’ and it is cheaper to emit.
  • Only applied to 41 developed states, and none from the South - intensified the North/South divide and allowed large developing nations, such as China, to continue emitting heavily.
  • The USA did not ratify the treaty and pulled out in 2001, despite emitting 25% of all greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Canada withdrew in 2011
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What are the strengths of the Copenhagen Accord?

A
  • Developing countries expressed a commitment to action for the first time
  • Under Obama, the USA was setting national targets and demonstrating that their policies were shifting - they set a target of 4% cut on 1990 levels by 2020.
  • 192 states attended.
  • Prepared the ground for subsequent action on climate change and set up a platform for follow up annual climate summits (Cancun 2010, Durban 2011). These set out a path for ground breaking agreements at Paris.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What are the weaknesses of the Copenhagen Accord?

A
  • No binding agreements for any country
  • North/South divide as wide as ever
  • Vagueness as to where the funds for the Greens Climate Fund would come from, due to the aftermath of the global economic crisis
    It was seen by many as a failure, or at least a step backwards.
28
Q

Define the UNFCCC

A

The UNFCCC is the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. It was a non-binding agreement to stabilise CO2 emissions to 1990 levels.

29
Q

Define the CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISMS

A

CDMs were introduced at Kyoto by the US government. Their purpose is to promote clean development in developing nations.

30
Q

What are the strengths of the Paris Agreement?

A
  • It provides a framework for further action, helping to poorest and most vulnerable states adapt to the effects of climate change.
  • It provides a timetable for action - stock is taken and pledges are reviewed every 5 years, which makes sure that all states are doing as they promised.
  • Encourages investment into clean sources of energy, rather than fossil fuels.
  • All states signed up to it.
  • Starts to involve the private sector
31
Q

What are the weaknesses of the Paris Agreement?

A
  • Based on voluntary pledges of states, meaning there was no specific percentage cut to commit to, as with Kyoto. NOT BINDING.
  • The fundamental problem of fossil fuel dependency remains, which could only be solved with drastic reform of whole economies.
  • It comes too late, and offers too little - the number of countries involved watered down the targets significantly. Money offered by developed states will provide adaptation techniques rather than mitigation against climate change.
  • Current pledges lead us to 3C warming.
32
Q

Define COPs

A

COPs are Conferences of the Parties. They are meetings organised by the United Nations to bring countries together to discuss climate change and commit to reducing carbon emissions.

33
Q

Define MITIGATION

A

Mitigation is the process of moderating or reducing greenhouse gas emissions in order to limit climate change.

34
Q

Define ADAPTATION

A

Adaptation is changing in the light of new circumstances; in particular, learning to live with climate change.

35
Q

Define ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES

A

Environmental policies refer to international attempts to mitigate the effects of environmental issues, in particular human-induced climate change.

36
Q

Define ANTHROPOGENIC

A

Anthropogenic refers to anything that is caused by human activity. The IPCC has proven that climate change is anthropogenic.

37
Q

What are INDCs?

A

Intended nationally determined contributions - pledges by states to cut their emissions. At Paris in 2015, all states came with their own INDCs which signalled that they recognised they all needed to make a contribution.

38
Q

What is the difference between weak and strong sustainability?

A

Strong sustainability is favoured by radicals - it focuses on the need to sustain and preserve natural capital, seeing human capital as nothing more than a ‘blight on nature’.
Weak sustainability is favoured by reformists, although they reject the term ‘weak’. It argue that human capital can be substituted for natural capital - i.e. better roads of a new airport can compensate for the loss of natural habitat. Economic growth should be limited but it is desirable.

39
Q

According to radical ecologists, what are the causes of environmental degradation?

A

The modern capitalist society and its values, structures and institutions.
They believe that green capitalist policies are contradictory.

40
Q

According to reformist ecologists, what are the causes of environmental degradation?

A

“The imbalance between modernisation and justified economic concerns. Market capitalism is largely accepted as they believe that environmental issues can be adequately dealt with without significant constraint on the capitalist market economy.

41
Q

According to radical ecologists, what are the solutions to environmental degradation?

A
  • A rejection of consumerist and material values
  • 0 economic growth
  • Establishment of a supranational body to enforce environmental legislation.
  • Cultural as well as political change (i.e. change in the lifestyles of consumers in the West, as their lifestyles are the most damaging to the environment).
42
Q

According to reformist ecologists, what are the solutions to environmental degradation?

A
  • Market ecologism - attempts to adjust markets to take into account damage done to the environment (e.g. green taxes).
  • Human ingenuity and the development of green technologies
  • Sustainable development
  • International regimes and states working together to tackle environmental issues through global governance
43
Q

Define HUMAN CAPITAL

A

Human capital is the skills, knowledge, and experience possessed by an individual or population, viewed in terms of their value or cost to an organization or country.

44
Q

Define NATURAL CAPITAL

A

Natural capital can be defined as the world’s stocks of natural assets which include geology, soil, air, water and all living things.

45
Q

What are the implications of sustainable development?

A
  • Economic and environmental goals should be considered in conjunction with one another. (reformist idea)
  • Slowing down the exploitation of finite fossil fuels and increased investment in renewable sources of energy.
  • Is it a tool used by the developed world to limit growth in the developing world?
  • Radicals view it as weak sustainability
46
Q

How are the SDGs funded?

A

One of the ways is through the UN recommendation of 0.7% of annual GDP.

47
Q

What are some important SDGs?

A
  • No poverty
  • 0 hunger
  • Clean water and sanitation
  • Affordable and clean energy
  • Sustainable cities and communities
  • Climate action
  • Protecting life on water and land
48
Q

Who are examples of reformist and radical ecologists and climate sceptics?

A

Radical - Arne Naess
Reformist - Al Gore, mainstream politicians and parties
Sceptics - Donald Trump (and the whole Republican party), Scott Pruit is head of the EPA, Nigel Lawson (ex Chancellor of the Exchequer), Bjorn Lomberg (although he is a special case, in that he thinks climate change is anthropogenic, but that there is no point doing anything to combat it, as it does not make economic sense).

49
Q

What are the potential impacts of free riders on global environmental policies?

A

The free riders may ‘cancel out’ the efforts of other states in relation to protection of the environment.
For example, the USA pulled out of Paris while the EU committed to a 40% cut in emissions by 2030 in 2014.

50
Q

What are potential solutions to the tragedy of the commons?

A
  • Privatisation (overcome the commons) - if ownership of common resources was divided between states, each would have a direct interest in maintaining the resource. Each state bears the full cost of unsustainable practices and each controls how the resource is managed.
    EXAMPLE: the Law of the Sea (1982)
  • Establishment of agreements, norms, regulations and rules
  • Use of the dominance principle by great powers - greats powers could pressure smaller states to reduce their emissions. This then brings the problem of who should pay for adaptation and mitigation techniques.
51
Q

What are examples of resource problems?

A

Deforestation, overfishing (two thirds of fish stocks are overexploited), population growth

52
Q

What are examples of sink problems?

A

The pollution of air and water, particularly the ‘high seas’ which no states have direct control or ownership over. Currently only 1% of the world’s oceans are protected.

53
Q

Define the GLOBAL COMMONS

A

The global commons are areas and natural resources that are unowned and so are beyond national jurisdiction e.g. the atmosphere, the oceans, out space and cyber space, and Antarctica.

54
Q

What are examples of international law introduced to try to protect the global commons?

A
  • The Law of the Sea (1982)
  • The Antarctic Treaty (1959)
  • The Outer Space Treaty (1967)
55
Q

What are consequences of climate change?

A
  • Changing weather patterns, such as super storms
  • Political instability due to climate refugees - climate conditions in Syria between 2006 and 2010 affected over 60% of the population
  • The spread of infectious diseases e.g. the Zika virus in Africa
  • Species extinction - over 50% of all animal species may be extinct by 2100
  • Sea level rises due to melting glaciers - causes flooding in low level areas such as Miami and the rver deltas in Bangladesh.
56
Q

What is the view of Bjorn Lomberg?

A

He is a sceptic who believes that climate change is happening and that it is human induced, but there is little point doing anything about it because it has gone too far and action against it would not make economic sense.

57
Q

Why do environmental issues cause tension between the developed and developing world?

A
  • Historical culpability of Northern states that used carbon emitting industries to economically benefit. The North argues that those who carried this out are mostly dead now and at the time the negative effects of carbon were unknown.
  • Placing limits on carbon emissions places limits on the ability of Southern states to grow as the renewable technology simply hasn’t caught up yet. Southern states argue that they have a ‘right to develop’ as they need to pull so many of their citizens out of poverty.
  • Population as a criterion - Southern states argue that the population of states should be taken into account when calculating emissions targets.
    EXAMPLE: in the mid 1990s the USA had around 5% of the world’s population, but emitted around 25% of all emissions. India had around 16% of the population, but emits just 3% of global carbon emissions.
  • Those in the South suffer disproportionately from the effects of climate change, compared to those in the North, due to their lack of defences (and money to pay for them).
58
Q

How can the issue of the North/South divide be bridged?

A
  • There is growing recognition that the environment is a global issue affecting all states, so states MUST work together to tackle it, as it is in their own best interest.
  • Northern countries subsidise cleaner technologies in poorer countries to allow them to develop.
    EXAMPLE: In 2015 the IEA reported that China was the biggest investor in renewable energy.
59
Q

Why do states find it so difficult to agree over environmental issues?

A
  • The tragedy of the commons
  • The huge costs of adaptation and mitigation and deciding who should pay for them
  • Developing vs. developed state interests
  • Anarchic international system
60
Q

What are examples of mitigation strategies?

A
  • Greater use of renewable energy (hydro-power, solar, wind, bio)
  • Switching from coal to gas, which emits less CO2
  • More fuel efficient vehicles
  • Shifts from road transport to rail, public transport and non motorised transport
    Radicals would go further and suggest strategies of population control, wilderness preservation and simple living.
61
Q

What are examples of adaptation strategies?

A
  • Relocation of towns and villages away from coastal zones
  • Improved sea walls and storm surge barriers.
  • Improved climate sensitive disease control
  • Adjustment of planting dates and crop varieties.
62
Q

Why are adaptation techniques preferred to mitigation ones?

A
  • Differences in costs (adaptation is cheaper and therefore more attractive to most states, but developing ones in particular.
  • Adaptation is easier to get voter support for (because it is cheaper). Voters will be able to see physical improvements against climate change (e.g. a flood barrier).
  • According to Bjorn Lomberg, global warming has now gone too far and mitigation strategies are ineffective.
  • Mitigation allows other states to free ride, whereas adaptation does not - it is in a states best interest to protect themselves through relative gains.
  • Mitigation requires global governance and cooperation, whereas adaptation is done by a single state and benefits only that state.
63
Q

What are examples of radical action to tackle climate change?

A
  • Government legislation
  • Carbon pricing, such as the ETS scheme in the EU
  • Carbon taxes
  • Subsidies
64
Q

What is the Emissions Trading Scheme?

A

It requires a cap on the level of emissions allowed by each business - they are allowed a certain number of carbon ‘permits’. If a business emits under the ‘cap’ tey can keep the permits for next year or sell them to over emitting rivals. If a business emits past the ‘cap’, they can buy more permits from rivals or face paying a fine.

HOWEVER: if the prices of permits are too high (for extremely large, high emitters) then this could threaten production and cause a loss of jobs, relocation etc.
If the prices are set too low, there is no financial incentive for the business to cut emissions as it is cheaper to pay the price/fine.

65
Q

Can only radical action tackle climate change?

A

plan + 8/5

66
Q

Besides conferences, what other initiatives have been set up to tackle climate change?

A
  • The EU has independently promised 40% cuts in emissions by 2030.
  • the G7 move to phase out fossil fuels and the transformation of energy sources to cleaner ones by 2050.