Enteral Nutrition, Monitoring and Complications Flashcards
Which of the following is true regarding infectious complications associated with enteral feedings?
1: Bacterial contamination may originate from the patient’s throat, lung, and stomach
2: Length of enteral product hang time is not correlated with bacterial contamination
3: Open systems typically have less exogenous bacterial contamination
4: Bacterial counts at the enteral tube site should be cultured routinely
1: Bacterial contamination may originate from the patient’s throat, lung, and stomach
Bacterial contamination may occur both exogenously through the feeding equipment and endogenously through retrograde contamination of the feeding apparatus from the patient’s own infected secretions. There is a correlation between prolonged length of enteral product hang time and bacterial contamination. Open systems provide more opportunity for contamination due to nursing manipulation when adding more formula to the bag. There is no need for routine cultures in the uncomplicated enterally-fed patient unless the site shows signs of cellulitis.
References:
Mathus-Vliegen EM, Bredius MW, Binnekade JM. Analysis of sites of bacterial contamination in an enteral feeding system. JPEN. 2006(6):519-525.
Mrs. Jones suffered from a stroke two weeks ago and has significant dysphagia. A PEG was placed and an isotonic enteral formula has been infusing continuously at goal rate for two days. The tube is being flushed with 30mL free water three times daily. Mrs. Jones begins to complain of bloating and is mildly distended (to 4 cm from baseline) upon examination. Which of the following interventions would be the best initial strategy to reduce her unpleasant symptoms?
1: Determine when last bowel movement occurred and consider a cathartic if constipation is evident
2: Hold the tube feedings and initiate a pain reliever
3: Switch to a higher fiber formula
4: Use a more concentrated formula administered through bolus feeding
1: Determine when last bowel movement occurred and consider a cathartic if constipation is evident
Abdominal distention upon enteral tube feeding may result from rapid administration of feeding, i.e. bolus feeding; use of hyperosmolar solution, i.e. concentrated formulas; medications that slow peristalsis, i.e. pain relievers; excess air in the stomach or intestines; tube migration from stomach to small intestine; infection; cold formula; inadequate fluid provision leading to constipation; bacterial contamination; and, fat, fiber or lactose intolerance. Aggressive bowel regimens need to be considered in these patients to reduce distention and prevent impaction. Holding enteral feedings is generally not indicated unless abdominal girth exceeds the baseline measurement by at least 8 to 10 cm. Agents such as narcotics or diphenhydramine have well-documented anticholinergic effects often resulting in constipation. Fiber promotes regular bowel movements but also produces excess gas that can increase distention in many patients. Providing more free water to the GI tract usually helps to decrease distention.
References:
Magnuson BL, Clifford TM, Hoskins LA, Bernard AC. Enteral Nutrition and Drug Administration, Interactions, and Complications. NCP. 2005(6):618-624.
Your patient has been discharged home to hospice with end-stage ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis). He is receiving enteral feedings and complains of nausea. A decision is made to discontinue enteral feeding. Which of the following is true regarding the dying patient.
1: Intravenous hydration should be used to reduce symptoms of nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and respiratory distress
2: Dehydration, starvation, and ketosis produces a euphoric state that enhances the perception of hunger
3: The most common symptom when nutrition and hydration are witheld is dry mouth
4: Electrolyte imbalance should be expected and may produce a degree of analgesia
- the most common symptom of withholding nutrition and hydration is dry mouth
Artificial feeding and hydration do not always ensure comfort. Starvation produces a euphoric state that increases comfort and reduces the perception of hunger. During starvation, the body begins to use fat as the predominant energy source leading to increased ketone production with a resulting euphoria. Feeding even small amounts can prevent ketonemia and prolong the sense of hunger. The most common symptom when feeding or fluids are witheld is dry mouth, which is easily alleviated with good mouth care. Intravenous hydration in the terminal patient can increase secretions and congestion to thereby raise the risk of nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and respiratory distress.
References:
Andrews MR, Geppert CMA. Ethics. In: Gottschlich MM.ed. The A.S.P.E.N. Nutrition Support Core Curriculum: A Case-Based Approach - The Adult Patient. Silver Spring, MD: A.S.P.E.N.; 2007:740-760.
One method of minimizing the complications associated with refeeding syndrome is to initiate an electrolyte replacement protocol before nutrition therapy begins. Which of the following is true regarding such a plan?
1: Potassium, magnesium, and calcium should be closely monitored
2: Patients considered not-at-risk should also be included in the protocol
3: The protocol should replete all electrolytes ONLY via the feeding tube
4: Feeding should be delayed until the risk of electrolyte imbalance is eliminated
2: Patients considered not-at-risk should also be included in the protocol
Refeeding syndrome describes the occurrence of electrolyte disturbances when attempting to initially feed the undernourished patient. Potassium, magnesium, and phosphorus need to be closely monitored; whereas calcium does not. Patients considered not-at-risk should also be included since methods for screening “at-risk” are inadequate. The protocol should replete all electrolytes via the intravenous, oral or feeding tube route depending on the condition of the patient. Feeding should not be delayed but instead initiated slowly and then advanced based on electrolyte levels and clinical response.
References:
Flesher ME, Archer KA, Leslie BD, McCollom RA, Martinka GP. Assessing the metabolic and clinical consequences of early enteral feeding in the malnourished patient. JPEN. 2005;29(2):108-117.
Which of the following is true regarding the use of magnet tracking for non-invasive verification of nasogastric tube placement?
1: pH can be monitored
2: Checks the tip position related to the pylorus
3: Provides a 3-dimensional localization
4: Shows a time-delayed perspective of the tube tip location
- Provides a 3-demensional localization
pH is not monitored in this placement technique. The magnet follows the tip placement relative to the lower esophageal sphincter, not the pylorus. The display shows a real-time perspective of the tube tip location with a 3-dimensional localization.
References:
Bercik P, Schlageter V, Mauro M, Rawlinson J, Kucera P, Armstrong D. Noninvasive verification of nasogastric tube placement using a magnet-tracking system: a pilot study in healthy subjects. JPEN. 2005;29(4):305-310.
In the patient with a newly placed gastrostomy or jejunostomy tube, observation of which of the following conditions at the tube exit site would signal concern for infection?
1: Serosanguineous drainage
2: Foul-smelling drainage
3: Coffee-ground drainage
4: Greenish-yellow drainage
2: Foul-smelling drainage
Initially, a small amount of serosanguineous drainage can be expected at the gastrostomy or jejunostomy tube exit site. Coffee-ground drainage generally suggests an upper GI bleed, whereas greenish-yellow drainage may indicate leakage of enteric contents, such as bile. Foul-smelling drainage around the tube exit site is a sign of infection.
References:
Kirby DF, Opilla M. Enteral access and infusion equipment. In: Merritt R, ed. The A.S.P.E.N. Nutrition Support Practice Manual 2nd ed. Silver Spring, MD: A.S.P.E.N.;2005:54-62.
Which of the following feeding schedules would be most appropriate for a critically ill patient with labile and poorly controlled blood glucose concentrations?
1: Bolus
2: Continuous
3: Gravity drip
4: Nocturnal infusion
2: Continuous
A continuous infusion may facilitate more steady and predictable blood glucose concentrations in critically ill patients. Intermittent feeding schedules, such as bolus, gravity drip, or nocturnal infusion may cause fluctuations in blood glucose concentrations, making them more difficult to control.
References:
Charney P, Hertzler R. Management of blood glucose and diabetes in the critically ill patient receiving enteral feeding. NCP. 2004;19:129-136.
Which of the following is a major risk factor for aspiration in critically ill patients?
1: Gastric residual volume <150 mL
2: Decreased level of consciousness
3: Age
4: Small diameter feeding tube
2: Decreased level of consciousness
Decreased level of consciousness is a major risk factor for risk of aspiration. Other major risk factors include documented previous aspiration, vomiting, tracheal intubation, neuromuscular disease, persistent high gastric residual volumes, and prolonged supine positioning. An association between gastric residual volume amounts and aspiration risk has not been validated. Small bowel feeding should be considered when residual volumes are 250 mL or more on 2 or more consecutive assessments. Age is an additional factor that can increase risk but it is not a major factor in identifying the risk of aspiration. A large diameter feeding tube is also a factor that may increase the risk of aspiration.
References:
Malone AM, Seres DS, Lord L. Complications of Enteral Nutrition. In: Gottschlich MM, ed. The A.S.P.E.N. Nutrition Support Core Curriculum: A Case-Based Approach - The Adult Patient. Silver Spring, MD: A.S.P.E.N.; 2007:246-263.
Which would NOT be appropriate management of hypergranulation around the PEG site?
1: Keep the area dry
2: Tube stabilizing device
3: Occlusive dressing
4: Silver nitrate cauterization
3: Occlusive dressing
Granulation tissue may form within feeding tube tracts and may grow out onto the skin surface. Hypergranulation typically develops when the exit site remains moist or the tube is not stabilized and moves more than ¼ inch in the stoma. The main concern when granulation occurs is that it can cause even more moisture accumulation under the external bolster, increasing the risk for skin breakdown. If the tissue is excessive (>0.25 inch for adults or >2 mm in pediatric patients), it may be cauterized with silver nitrate sticks or other cauterizing device. The area may be treated topically with triamcinolone cream. Preventative education should stress the need for keeping the area dry and the tube stabilized. An occlusive dressing may promote the retention of moisture at the exit site and therefore should not be used to manage hypergranulation.
References:
Kirby DF, Opilla M. Enteral access and infusion equipment. In: Merritt R, ed. The A.S.P.E.N. Nutrition Support Practice Manual 2nd ed. Silver Spring, MD: A.S.P.E.N.;2005:54-62.
Which of the following tube feeding orders best reflects the use of an intermittent schedule?
1: Polymeric formula, 240 mL administered over one hour, five times per day
2: Pre-digested formula administered at 50 mL per hour over 24 hours
3: Fiber-containing formula administered at 100 mL per hour over 12 hours
4: 2 kcal/mL concentrated formula, 120 mL administered over 30 minutes one time per day
Intermittent feedings are generally an amount of 200-300 mL administered over 30-60 minutes every 4-6 hours, whereas continuous feedings are delivered at a prescribed rate without interruption. Cyclic feedings are generally administered over 8-20 hours per day, depending on the patient’s volume tolerance.
References:
Lord L, Harrington M. Enteral Nutrition Implementation and Management. In: Merritt, R, ed. A.S.P.E.N. Nutrition Support Practice Manual. 2nd ed.Silver Spring, MD; A.S.P.E.N.; 2005:76-89.
Which of the following is an appropriate situation for nutrition support nurses to insert a nasogastric feeding tube without physician supervision?
1: Pre-operatively just prior to transfer to the operating room (OR)
2: Under fluoroscopy in an endoscopy suite
3: In a patient with head and neck trauma admitted to the ICU
4: Post CVA on the inpatient medical unit
- Post CVA on the inpatient medical unit
It is within the scope of practice for registered nurses to insert nasogastric feeding tubes in the uncomplicated patient on the inpatient floor. If a patient is being transferred to the OR and requires enteral access, the tube should be placed in the OR either by the anesthesia staff or the surgeon after the patient is under sedation. Fluoroscopy requres a radiologist to be in attendance, so this would not be done un-supervised. A patient with head or neck pathology should have direct visualization by pharyngoscopy or have the tube placed with surgeon assistance.
References:
deAguilar-Nascimento JE, Kudsk KA. Clinical Costs of Feeding Tube Placement. JPEN. 2007;31(4):269-273.
A patient with oral cancer, who has gained 10 pounds since starting home bolus enteral feedings via gastrostomy tube complains of pain and pressure on the " inside of his stomach" but no redness or drainage at the exterior gastrostomy site. Which of the following is the most appropriate response for the clinician?
1: Tell the patient to take over the counter pain medication and rotate the G tube 180 degrees each day.
2: Refer the patient to the gastroenterologist or enterostomal nurse.
3: Decrease the infusion volume of the formula to half of the current volume to avoid excessive distention of the stomach.
4: Change to a slower tube feed infusion by using a gravity bag for feedings.
Tube complications can be a serious problem if not managed in a timely manner. Any new occurrence of pain at or near the tube site should be promptly evaluated by the patient’s gastroenterologist or enterostomal nurse. Pain may indicate the presence of infection or pressure necrosis on the inside or outside of the body. It might also indicate intraperitoneal leakage which can be life threatening. Weight gain after tube placement places a patient at greater risk of pressure necrosis and ulceration at the tube site because of increase in abdominal girth. In the usual clinical presentation, buried bumper syndrome is noted as excessive pain at the PEG site. Excessive tightening of the external bolster may lead to ischemic necrosis of the gastric wall and migration of the internal bolster either into the gastric wall, abdominal wall, or even into subcutaneous tissue and skin. Incidence of this complication ranges from 0.3% to 2.4% of patients.
References:
Baskin WN. Acute complications associated with bedside placement of feeding tubes. NCP. 2006;21:40-55.
Constipation in the enterally fed patient is most often associated with all EXCEPT
1: rapid or bolus infusion.
2: obstruction.
3: lack of adequate hydration.
4: prolonged bed rest.
- Rapid or bolus infusion
Constipation is a gastrointestinal complication associated with enteral nutrition and may be caused by lack of adequate hydration, long-term fiber-free feedings, prolonged bedrest, impaction, obstruction and narcotics.
References:
Leung FW. Etiologic factors of chronic constipation: review of the scientific evidence. Dig Dis Sci. 2007;52(2):313-316.
In the adult enterally-fed patient, watery diarrhea and bloating are most often the result of
1: lactose content of the enteral formula.
2: sorbitol content of liquid medications
3: sorbitol content of the enteral formula
4: lactose content of liquid medications
2: sorbitol content of liquid medications
Although lactose intolerance is well known to result in watery diarrhea and bloating, the vast majority of adult enteral products are lactose free and the lactose content of most individual dosage forms of medication is too small to result in significant problems. Sorbitol is not an ingredient of enteral products but the cumulative daily dose of sorbitol from liquid medication can easily equal purgative dosages.
References:
Rollins CJ. General Pharmacological Issues. In: Matarese LE, Gottschlich MM, eds. Contemporary Nutrition Support Practice A Clinical Guide. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2005:315-336.
Approximately 20% of enterally fed patients report nausea and/or vomiting. If delayed gastric emptying is suspected as the causative factor, which of the following is LEAST likely to improve the patient’s symptoms?
1: Reduce or discontinue narcotic medications
2: Switch to a low fat enteral formula
3: Provide enteral formula as a small bolus of 50 to 100 mL per feeding
4: Use a more concentrated enteral formula
- use a more concentrated enteral formula
Although the etiology of nausea and vomiting is multifactorial, delayed gastric emptying is a common source of tube feeding intolerance. Reduction or discontinuation of narcotic meds, use of low fat formulas, administering enteral formula at room temperature and reducing the rate and/or volume of tube feeding infusion may all improve gastric emptying and reduce the symptoms of nausea and vomiting. Concentrated enteral solutions generally contain more fat and can further contribute to enteral intolerance by presenting a higher osmotic load to the GI tract.
References:
Malone AM, Seres DS, Lord L. Complications of Enteral Nutrition. In: Gottschlich MM, ed. The A.S.P.E.N. Nutrition Support Core Curriculum: A Case-Based Approach - The Adult Patient. Silver Spring, MD: A.S.P.E.N.; 2007:246-263.
The initiation of enteral tube feeding should be delayed when the patient is
1: hemodynamically unstable.
2: at a decreased level of consciousness
3: post-operative day 2.
4: scheduled for discharge.
1: hemodynamically unstable.
Early EN is encouraged to attenuate the rapid depletion of nutrient stores after metabolic stress or to help maintain normal immune function. EN initiation should be delayed until the patient is fully volume rescucitated, hemodynamically stable, and mesenteric perfusion has been restored in order to reduce the risk of intestinal ischemia.
References:
Thompson C. Initiation, Advancement, and Transition of Enteral Feedings. In: Charney P, Malone A., eds. ADA Pocket Guide to Enteral Nutrition. Chicago, IL: American Dietetic Association; 2006:123-154.
When initiating and advancing enteral feedings in the hospitalized patient, which of the following is most appropriate?
1: 1/2 strength formula at 25cc per hour, advance to goal rate and strength over 5-7 days
2: 240 cc bolus feeds of full strength hypertonic formulas every 4 hours
3: full strength formula at 10-40 mL/hour and advance by 10-20 mL/hr every 8-12 hours until goal rate is achieved
4: 1/4 strength formula at goal rate. Advance to full strength over 3-5 days
- Full strength formula at 10-40 ml/hr and advance by 10-20 ml/hr every 8 to 12 hours until goal rate achieved
Currently, it is recommended that feedings in adults and children be initiated with full strength formulas at a slow rate and steadily advanced. This approach allows goal rates to be achieved earlier and reduces the risk for microbial contamination by minimizing the number of times the formulas is manipulated. This regimen has been noted to be well tolerated.
References:
Lord L, Harrington M. Enteral Nutrition Implementation and Management. In: Merritt, R, ed. A.S.P.E.N. Nutrition Support Practice Manual. 2nd ed.Silver Spring, MD; A.S.P.E.N.; 2005:76-89.
While a patient is receiving speech therapy, oral foods have been introduced during the daytime hours. Polymeric tube feeding is required during the night at a rate of 75 mL per hour over 8 hours. The night feeding is an example of
1: bolus feeding.
2: intermittent feeding.
3: cyclic feeding.
4: continuous feeding.
- Cyclic feeding
Cyclic feedings are generally administered over 8-20 hours per day, depending on the patient’s tolerance. This cycle allows freedom from the feeding equipment for a few hours each day and insures that nutrient requirements are met. During the day, the patient is likely to experience hunger and gradually increase the oral intake during the transition from enteral to oral feeding. Intermittent feedings are usually given in rates of about 200-300 mL over 30-60 minutes every 4-6 hours. Continuous feedings are uninterrupted, and bolus feedings are the infusion of a predetermined volume of formula over a short period of time via gravity or syringe at specified time intervals.
References:
Lord L, Harrington M. Enteral Nutrition Implementation and Management. In: Merritt, R, ed. A.S.P.E.N. Nutrition Support Practice Manual. 2nd ed.Silver Spring, MD; A.S.P.E.N.; 2005:76-89.