English Legal System Flashcards
What is the role of judges in CRIMINAL cases at first instance?
INFERIOR JUSGES
District judges – sit in Magistrates’ Ct on their own and try criminal cases, deciding facts of law and delivering the verdict. Pass a sentence upon those who plead/ are found guilty. May hear family cases alongside 2 magistrates.
Recorders – part time judges who sit in Crown Court for 30 days a year. Role to try criminal cases.
Circuit judges – sit in Crown court and try TEW and indictable cases with a jury. Decide what evidence is admissible. May hear from witnesses, decide facts of law, sum up for the jury and pass sentence upon those who plead/ are found guilty.
SUPERIOR JUDGES
High Court judges – may sit in Crown Court to try serious criminal cases such as murder. Decide facts of a case and sum up for the jury. Pass sentence to those found guilty.
What is the role of judges in a CIVIL case of first instance?
INFERIOR JUDGES
District judges – deal with the majority of civil cases in County Court. Case manage and decide the track. Hear small claims (under £10,000) in their chambers. Hear larger civil claims in open court. Decide who has won/ lost and award a remedy of damages or an injunction.
Circuit judges – hear civil cases in County court. Case manage from the beginning and decide the track. Ensure the case proceeds efficiently. Decide the facts and who has won/ lost. Award a remedy of damages or injunction.
SUPERIOR JUDGES
High Court judges – sit on their own (occasionally with jury) in the High Court and try civil cases of £25,000 or above (or important points of law). May hear evidence from witnesses, decide who has won/ lost. Decide the amount of damages to be awarded or order an injunction.
What is the role of judges in CRIMINAL appeals?
INFERIOR JUDGES
Crown Court judges – sit with 2 magistrates to hear appeals from Magistrates’ Court
SUPERIOR JUDGES
High Court judges – may sit in QBD with 2/ 3 judges to hear case-stated appeals from Magistrates’/ Crown Court. Decide the point of law and may confirm/ vary or reverse the original conviction/ sentencing decision.
Lord Justices of Appeal – sit in the criminal division to hear criminal appeals. Sit as a panel of 3 (5 = important). Leave to appeal is decided by one judge as they receive approx.7000 applications a year. Of these, the Lord Justices will hear about 1600 criminal appeals and confirm/ reverse or vary the decision.
Justices of the Supreme Court –hear criminal appeals based on a point of general public importance. Sit in an odd number to reach a majority decision.
What is the role of judges in CIVIL appeals?
INFERIOR JUDGES
Circuit judges – hear appeals from a civil case decided by a District judge.
SUPERIOR JUDGES
High Court judges – hear civil appeals from County Court. Decide whether to confirm or reverse the decision on liability or remedy.
Lord Justice of Appeal - sit in a panel of 3 and hear over 1000 civil appeals a year. Decide to confirm/ reverse liability and/ or remedy awarded.
Supreme Court Justices – hear mainly civil appeals on complicated areas of law such as tax. There must be a legal point of general public importance. They sit in 5 or 7 to reach a majority decision. In important civil cases such as Brexit, they sit as an 11. They can use the Practice Statement to depart from a previous precedent if they feel it is right to do so. An early example was in the Herrington v BRB case where they departed from the precedent set in Addie v Dumberek over duty of care to trespassers.
Discuss the extent to which the judiciary is independent?
+ Immunity from suit
They have immunity from being sued for decisions made in the course of their judicial duties….even if they make a mistake! This allows a judge to perform his duties without fear of repercussions. It gives judges complete independence. Sirros v Moore – D tried to take action against a judge who wrongly imprisoned him, but C of A ruled no action could be taken as the judge had acted in good faith. This is an advantage because judges can apply the law without fear of repercussions.
+ Independence from legislature (Parliament).
This means that they are not allowed to be members of the House of Commons or the House of Lords. However, the rules regarding this are less strict for part-time judges (Eg. Recorders an Assistant Recorders can be MPs). One of the main reasons for the creation of the Supreme Court in 2009 was to separate the judiciary from the legislature. The Supreme Court has its own building and support staff. This is an advantage because it means that the judicial system is independent from those who make the law and therefore not open to abuse.
+ Independent from executive (Government).
Superior judges cannot be dismissed by the government, so they can make decisions which may displease the Government without the threat of being dismissed. Judicial independence is now guaranteed under s3 of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005. The fact that judges are now recommended for appointment by the JAC helps to keep judges independent from the executive. R (Miller) v Secretary of State for exiting the EU (2016) - Supreme Court ruled that the UK Government (the executive) may not initiate withdrawal from the EU without an Act of the UK Parliament permitting the government to do so. R (Miller) v Prime Minister (2019) – Supreme Court ruled that Boris Johnson’s order to prorogue Parliament was unlawful. This is an advantage because the judiciary is not afraid to go against the government – as seen by the Brexit case above which Lady Hale describes as one of her proudest moments!!
+ Independent from the case.
They must be completely impartial and independent from the case they try. The Pinochet Case - After the H of L ruled Pinochet could be extradited, it was discovered that one of the judges was an unpaid director of Amnesty International Charitable Trust. The case was retried with a new panel of judges. This is an advantage because it means that there can be no bias in cases and judges are impartial.
Government funding for civil cases
Legal ald is a government-funded scheme to help those In the lower Income brackets with the funding of cases. In 2012 the government passed the leg
Al, Semenong and Mmichmen: or Umenter, J43H3y Set 392 which set up the Legal Ald agency. This offers legal advice and legal representanion.
(LA helpline - provides advice in civil cases such as: Debt, Housing, Domestic abuse, Family issues, discrimination.
Citizsn Advies Offires - The Legal Aid agency has contracts with low fims end rat-fer-profit argenisations such as Citizens Advice offices. They con only give
advice to those on very low Incomes.
Duty solicitor scheme - Free advice and representation from a government funded solicitor for people who qualify - means tested and only available for
certain evil cases
End-Bong - Lawyers may work certain cases for free in order to help the community.
Under LASPO 2012, Legal Ald is not ayallable for:
Breach of contract cases, Personal injury claims, Trespass to the person, land or property, Debt, housing and welfare cases and Private family cases
Legal aid is available for:
Asylum/ Immigration cases, Children’s rights, Mental Health Tribunals and Private family cases with domestic violence/ abuse.
People receiving Income Support or Income-based Job Seekers* Allowance automatically quality for legal ald.
People in employment have their disposable income calculated. (wages left after bills)
below the minimum lovel - quality.
above the maximum level - do not quality.
in between the levels = a monthly contribution is made towards funding
Disposable capital (savings) must not exceed £8000. The value of a person’s home is included (first E100,000).
EMert testam
Merits test Is based on the likelihood of success, the amount of damages likely to be awarded, and the conduct of the parties
Private funding for civil cases (8)
1 Playing panderely
The client pays for their legal fees/court costs from their own finances. However, this can be expensive as solicitors fees can range from E150 to €600 an
hour!! People Who privately fund their cases may be on an income which means they do not qualify for public funding (legal ald). On issues of civil lavi, it is
possible to consult a barrister directly without seeing a solicitor first. This is cheaper because barristers don: have such high expenses as solicitors.
2 Legal insurance
Before the event insurance - This insurance is taken out BEFORE any legal proceedings have begun. E g. alter a car trash where the parties involved may
want to sue
Arter the event insurance - This type of insurance is usually quite expersive as it Is taken out AFTER a claim has begun! The person takes out an insurance
policy to protect them in case they lose their case
3. Conditional tee arrangements
They are also known as no win, no fee agreements. it is an arrangement whereby a client will not pry acy fees to their solicitor if they lose their case
They will anly pay the solicitor’s fees if they win. Updated rules in s44 and 46 of LASPO Act state that a success fee will also have to be paid on too of the
normal fees it the client wins their case. Clients must take out an insurance policy as they may need to cover the other party’s legal costs in case they do
losetheir case, if the client DOES wintheir case, they will be able to claim the normal Solicitor’s fees from the losing party BUT they will still have to pay the
success fee from their damages: The success fee for Pi claims cannot go beyond 25% of the damages
Evaluation of conditional fee arangements
Advantages
They help middle income familles who don’t quality for
public funding but who may not be able to privately fund
their case. They can get access to justice without paying
fees up front that they cannot afford.
They do not cost any moncy to the taxpayer. Taxes can go
to other departments such as the NHS or Education.
The insurance policies involved are generally affordable.
People can poy monthly, so it is more manageable
They are a widely available and well-known source of legal
funding. Lots of adverts on TV and ordine:
Useful in defamation cases which have never been publicly
funded. People have been left with reputations and
businesses, damaged because they cannot afford to fund a
def’amation case privately. This arrangement helps them
mani eve justice.
The solicitor won’t be paid if they don’t win, therefore
they may work harder to win your case!!
Disadvantages
No win no fee only applies to solicitors fees and does not
cover court costs, barristers fees armedical report costs-
could still end being expensive for the clienti
Yaumay lose the case and have to pay the winning party’s
solicitor fees. Therefors, there is still a fec even if you do
not win!
Some people may struggle to afford the Insurance
premium and it can no longer be claimed back by a
cia mant who wins a case
They will not take on your case unless you are likely to win.
Therefore, there is still no justice for some cases
Not always used by people the conditional fee was targeted
at, for exampis MGn Ltd v UK 2011 (Naomi Campbell case)
You have to pay a success fee from your compensation, 5o
It is a more expensive route than paying a solicitor upfront.
Government funding for criminal cases
State funding of legal cases was introduced after WW2 as part of the estabilshment of the welfare state.
Problem - costs ever increasing. New system introduced by LASPO Act 2012 - the Legal Ald Agency in the
Ministry of Justice, The legal aid agensy makes deals with law firms to provide legal services to people
charged with a criminal offence Mast service providers are solicitors.
Duty solicitor scheme - Anyone held at a police station has the right to free legal advice. Duty solicitor 24hrs a
day, Advice can be given over phone/ in person. In 2016 advice was given to over 650,000 suspects at police
Stations.
In order to ect representation in court for a criminal case, the defendant must be within one of five interests
of justiced factors:
1.
2
if matters arise against him, would the defendant be likely to lose his liberty or livelihood
or suffer severely damaged reputation.
The cose will involve corsideration of a point of law
The defendant is unable to understand the court proceedings or unable to state his own
case.
The case may involve tracing, interviewing or expert cross examination of witnesses
It is in the interests of another person that the person be represented (eg. Rape)
CalMeans teation - Magistrates Count
An in - or -out scheme as they are either eligible or ineligible Eligible- income support, under the age of 16,
under 18 in full time education. Others are tested on disposable income - the levels are very low’so about ¾
of adults do not qualify
Ean over £22,325 not entitled
Eem under £12,475 automatically entitled
Betwesn 112.479 - 822,325 may require a contribution
It you are convicted may have to pay prosecution costs
S. Means testing. - Crown Court
No limit on the upper level for disposable income - most defendants can receive legal aid.
Free for those on low incomes, those in the middle bracket betwean lon and £37000 pay towards it - those
above are not eligible
if tound guilty may have to pay extra trom capital, if not gulity may get a refund
Problems whith government funding
MENT tund nE C/ CIVIl ond CRIMINAL casea (22)
Mot enough logal serica providers on rabe of pay is so low, not ecssomicaliy viable, Few soliciors
specialke la wellare bentil, LAS?O,2012 aters the arierla, therefore continues to decilne, In the
I%. 5009 lew ilmes doing cvil legal aid went, by 3018 there were 1500t Law Simms
pplylas duty solchoes for almiant legal alt few rom 1652 la 2012 as 964 in 2022.
Funding la not anilable for many civil chims. E-g. Personal injury claims have to be funded privately.
Mary people choose no win no lee schemes This Is a disadvantage to people warting to bring an
employmere cleim against large companies: Therefore, mary people go w thout access to justice.
Ellalatine
Only people on very low levels con quailty. Only 36 of people quality for legal ald representation la
Megistrates” Court. March 2016 - over 20 lowers and directors of legal aid charities wrote a letter to
The Guardian newspoper. We believe the legaf aid reforms have had a severe impoct on the ability of
vulnerable people no access justice since they come into effect on 1 April 2013. the cuts have limited
Access to Justice for some of thase who need legal Ald the most!
Criteria net En
#the Lord Chancellen
In 2013 the Lord chanceller set criteria for making legal services available to individuals these criteria
was intended to restrict the circumatances in which legal ald was to be granted and were
controversial The legaliny of the guidance in s10 was challenged in the courts. The Court of Appeal
heldirhat legal aid would be grarted where failure to do so would be in breach of the ECHR, therefore
the guidence was revised
Lack of tunds
Each year the government sets a budget for all its deportments. Services such as health and education
have ta have largie amounts of money. This means that government moncy for legal cases is limited
Civil cases have beeg refused to save €350 million from the national budget. However, some people
would argue that the money is better spent on services such as NHS, especially when other rouses to
furdina (such as conditional fee arrangements) are avallable
Detail 2 types of ADR
Nerotiation
The process of sitting a disputa by trying to come to an agreement with the other party. This is usally a private
conversation and a cheup and quick way to resolve a dispute. If the dispute cannot be resolved initaly, the parties
may instruct a solicitor to send a letter and negotiate with the other party. This will incur a slight cost.
Mediation/ Conciliation
A neutral third party ascists partlas to a disputa tarazch a compromised settlement. Both parties must agras to
use mediction (except in family disputes).
Tha madiator Identities areas of agreement and keeps the parties talking. However, thay cannot suggest ideas for
solutions Medistion can be used for family disputes such as divorce and neighbour disputes
In family cans, partles must show they have attended a MIAM masting (Madlation Information and Assessment
Meetinz before they go to court. (The exception is in domestic abuse caves)
Examples of madiation services
CEOR - This is the Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution that was set up in London in 1991. Used by many
business to resolve commercial disputes: 2016 - 10 p00 madi atons took place saving approx. 2.3 billion pounds
in lewyer and court fees.
Kent family madlation service- offara mediation for family disputes such a proparty, finances and children.
West Sussex mediation service - offers medition services for neighbour disputes. Examples of issues include
nolse, pariding and boundary disputes in addition, offers madition for workplace and family disputes
Judges try to encourage mediation inorder to reduce court heerings. In Halsey y NH5, the hospital refused to
engage in ADR. When they won their cace in the court, the judge refused to allowthe loser to pay their legal fees
for them because of thair refust to us ADRI
Conciliation
4 neutral third party halps to resolva the disputa, but they hava a pro-active role and can suggest ideas for
solutions This is because the disputes are usually commercial ones end the conciliator is usually an expert in
commercial issues. Both parties must agree to use conciliation.
Arbitration (8 marks)
1. Thisiswhen the parties submitto an independent person (with expertise in the isue) called an ‘arbitrator’
They ara not a judge
2. It tha pyroameneco go to arbitation amade in wring, will be subject to the regulations contained in the
Arbitration Ast 1996
3. The decision to go to arbitretion can bemade before s dispute arises or at the point when a dispute arises.
4. Many companies add an agroomentto go to arbitration (in the event of a dispute arting) to their contracts. It is
known as a Scotty Auery clauso. It ansures that arbitrators who are experts in commarcial issues resolva the
dispute so thet it does not go to court. Many businesses such as travel firms use arbitrators to resolve issues from
dissatisfied customers.
S. livou do sign un agreementto go to arbitration, you cannot take the laue to court. Courts will refusa to deal
with matters that are subjectto an Arbltration agresment exceptin cases of small claims where the party can avoid
court by using the small claims track
6. Both perties must agree to use arbitration.
?. There is usually one arbitrator, but the parties can choose up to four.
S. The arbitrator will hear both sides of the argumant and make a legally binding decision.
9. Arbitration decisions are called awards. They we legally- binding and courts will enforce them
10. Arbitration is known as ‘privatised litigation’
Evaluation of ADR
what is the role of cvil courts at first instance
County Court
1. There are approx. 200 County Courts.
2. The government plans to close another 50 of
these.
3.Cases are heard by a Circuit judge or a District
judge.
4. On very rare occasions a judge will sit with a jury.
This only happens in cases such as defamation.
5. The main types of cases that the County Court
deals with are: contract and tort claims, recovery of
land, disputes over equitable matters such as trusts
up to £350,000.
High Court
Based in London but also has judges sitting in courts
in towns and cities throughout England and Wales. It
is divided into three divisions:
King’s Bench Division (KBD)
1. Deals with contract and tort cases over £100,000.
2. Hear smaller claims where there is an important
point of law.
3. Cases are normally tried by a single judge.
4. There is a right to jury trial for cases such as fraud
and libel.
5. The KBD also has an Administrative Court which
carries out judicial reviews - a check on decision-
making bodies such as Government.
Chancery Division
1. This division deals with disputes involving
bankruptcy, trusts, copyright & probate.
2. Juries are never used in the Chancery Division
therefore cases are heard by a single judge. 3.There
is a special Companies court that mainly deals with
winding up companies.
Family Division
1. Hears family cases where there is dispute about
which country’s laws should apply.
2. Hears all international cases concerning family
matters under the Hague Convention.
3. Cases are heard by a single judge and juries are
no longer used.
4. The Crime and Courts Act 2013 created a new
separate Family Court.
5. The majority of family matters that were
previously dealt with by the Family Division are now
dealt with by the Family Cour
what are the three tracks
Commencing a claim
1. Parties are encouraged to provide as much information to
each other when a potential claim arises, in order to prevent
the need for so many cases ultimately ending up in the
courtroom.
2. The claimant writes to the other party, stating why they feel
they are owed money and demand payment by a certain time.
3. Once the defendant has replied to the letter(s), and the issue
has still not been resolved, court action can begin.
4. The claimant must complete an N1 form and pay a fee for
issuing the claim.
5. A decision is made about which court is going to be used:
Small claims track
1. Started in 1973 to provide a relatively cheap and simple way
of making a claim for a small amount of money
2. Claims up to £10,000 (£1000 personal injury claim)
3. People are encouraged to represent themselves to keep
costs down (lawyers are discouraged)
4. If a lawyer is used, the winning party CANNOT claim the legal
costs for the lawyer’s fees from the losing party
5. Small claims cases are usually heard by a District Judge in
private (in the Judge’s chamber). The judge hears the case, asks
questions to both parties, makes a decision about who is liable.
Fast Track
1. This is for claims between £10,000 - £25,000.
2. Prior to the Woolf reforms in 1998, cases were expensive
and took far too long to be settled. Today, the court sets down
a strict timetable for pre-trial matters. This is done to prevent
one or both sides wasting time and running up unnecessary
costs.
3. The case should try to be heard within 30 weeks of the claim
being issued (average wait is likely to be 50 weeks!)
4. A Circuit Judge usually hears the case in an open court.
5. Hearings are limited to one day with only one witness-expert
being permitted to give evidence.
Multi Track
1. This is for claims more than £25,000
2. Case can be started in the County Court and remain there or
can be sent to the High Court.
3. A Circuit judge hears the case in open court. This can last for
several days
4. Circuit judge is expected to ‘manage’ the case from the start.
5. The judge will identify issues at an early stage, set timetables
and ask the parties to try ADR to avoid the hearing in court
appels from civil courts
Appeals from County Court
1. Small claims track -> appeal to next Judge
in hierarchy (e.g. if tried by District Judge,
appeal to a Circuit Judge)
2. Fast track cases heard by a District Judge -
> appeal to a Circuit Judge in County Court
3. Fast track cases heard by a Circuit Judge -
> appeal to a High Court Judge in the High
Court
4. Multi-track cases heard either by a
District or Circuit Judge -> appeal to the
Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
5. Second appeals =In exceptional cases
there is an extra route of appeal to the Court
of Appeal but only if for an important point
or another compelling reason. This is stated
in s55 Access to Justice Act 1999
Appeals from the High Court
1. An appeal from the High Court usually
goes to the Court of Appeal (Civil Division).
2. In rare cases there may be a leapfrog
appeal to the Supreme Court under the
Administration of Justice Act 1969.
3. This must involve a point of law of general
importance which concerns the
interpretation of an Act of Parliament or a
binding precedent which the trial judge must
follow.
4. Permission to appeal must be granted.
Further Appeals
1. From the Court of Appeal, there is a
further route of appeal to the Supreme
Court (only with permission to appeal).
2. If a case involves a point of EU law, ANY
court can appeal to the ECJ
evalaution of civil courts
Advantages
+ The process is fair. Everyone is treated alike. The judge makes an
impartial decision based on the facts of the case. The judge will be a
qualified legal expert (unlike a mediator!).
+ Legally binding outcome. Enforcement of the court’s decision is
easier, as any decision made by the courts can be enforced by the
courts. This is not the case for some ADR methods such as
conciliation where decisions are not legally binding or enforceable
by the courts.
+ There is an appeal process with specific appeal routes from
decisions made in the courts (discuss these). So, if the claimant is
unhappy with the decision, they should be able to appeal against it.
+ Legal aid to fund the case. This may be possible for some cases
(which? –quote LASPO 2012). This is usually in place to protect the
most vulnerable in society and ensure they get justice.
Disadvantages
- Cost. The costs of taking a case to court are often more than the
amount claimed. In the High Court, the cost can be hundreds of
thousands of pounds.
-Delay. There are many preliminary stages to go through that add to
the strength of a case. Even after the case is set down for a hearing
at court, there is still a long wait – usually a year! Some cases may
not be finished for years.
- Complicated process. There may be compulsory steps to be taken
before a case is started in court. E.G. Some cases require the parties
to use pre-action protocols and give the other party certain
information. There are forms to fill in before going to court. All of
this makes it complicated for a person to take a case without legal
advice or help.
- Uncertainty as the claimant has no guarantee of winning a case. If
they lose, they may have to pay the other party’s costs. This makes it
difficult to know how much a case is going to cost in advance.
what is the role of criminal courts at first instance
Magistrates’ Court
1. This court hears all cases at first instance. They are
heard by three magistrates or one District Judge.
2. Try all summary cases and less serious TEW offences
3. Deal with first hearing of indictable offences
4. Complete admin tasks such as Issuing arrest warrants to
police and extending police custody time. They decide
whether to accept or refuse bail applications and access to
legal aid.
5. Try cases in Youth Court (10-17)
Crown Court
6. This court can try more serious TEW and indictable
offences at first instance.
7. If the plea is guilty, the judge will sentence the D.
If the plea is not guilty, a jury trial will be arranged.
8. The jury decide the verdict based upon the facts of the
case and the judge decides the appropriate sentence
role of criminal appeal courts
- The Crown Court hear appeals from Magistrates’ Court.
A judge and two magistrates will rehear the case and
decide whether to confirm, reverse or vary the decision.
KBD - Hear appeals on a point of law. May confirm, reverse or
vary the original decision on conviction only.
Court of Appeal - This court is based in London but can have sittings
elsewhere in the UK. It has a criminal and a civil division. - It will hear appeals from the Crown Court.
Appeals are usually heard by 3 Appeal court judges.
Supreme Court - This is the highest court in the UK
There are 12 Justices of the Supreme Court, however
they do not sit all at the same time. - Most appeals are heard by 3 or 5 judges. They sit in an
odd number in order to reach a majority decision. The
largest number of 11 is used for important appeals such as
the 2019 appeal against the suspension of parliament. - It considers appeals of general public importance.
- The justices can depart from previous precedents if they
choose to do so
appelas from magistrates
- If pleaded not guilty, defence may appeal against conviction, sentence or both
to the Crown Court. - If pleaded guilty, defendant may only appeal against sentence (not conviction).
- Automatic right of appeal if it is made within 21 days of sentence. Case is
completely reheard by a Crown Court judge and two magistrates - They may confirm the conviction, reverse the decision and acquit the
defendant. They may decide to vary the conviction and find the defendant guilty
of a lesser offence. - Sentence may be confirmed, increased (only to magistrates’ maximum) or
decreased - If the appeal is on a point of law, the prosecution or defence can send a case
stated appeal to the QBD. - This is only available for an appeal against conviction and will be heard by 2/3
High Court Judges. - The Court may confirm, vary or reverse the decision. They can send the case
back to the Magistrates’ Court for them to apply the interpretation of the law.
There may be a further appeal from Crown to the Appeal Court (if leave to
appeal is accepted by them) and to the Supreme Court (if accepted as a point of
general public importance)
appeals from crown court
- The defence may appeal for leave to appeal and the application must be made
within 28 days.
Leave to appeal must be granted either by the trial judge or from the Court of
Appeal itself. - The defendant may appeal against conviction, sentence or both to the Court
of Appeal (Criminal Division)
The sentence may be reduced upon appeal, but not increased. - The only ground for allowing an appeal against conviction is that the
conviction is unsafe. It may be considered unsafe as something went ‘wrong’ at
the trial or there is new evidence which was not available at the original trial. - The Court of Appeal may admit new evidence in the interests of justice. The
Court of Appeal may order a retrial or quash the conviction. - Limited right of appeal for prosecution. CJA 2003 allows appeal on point of
law to prevent D being acquitted or if new evidence or if believed that jury had
been ‘nobbled’.
Appeal from Court of Appeal to the Supreme Court - The defence has the right to apply for leave to appeal from the Court of
Appeal (Criminal Division) to the Supreme Court - They may appeal against conviction, sentence or both to the Supreme Court
- The appeal must involve a point of public importance.
classification of offences
Summary offence = These are minor offences that are
only triable in Magistrates’ Court. They include examples
such as most motoring offences, shoplifting below £200,
criminal damage below £5000 and common assault.
Sentenced with up to 6 months prison or a community
order.
Triable-either-way offence = These are middle level
offences that are triable in either Magistrates’ Court or
Crown Court. It is dependent upon their seriousness.
Examples include theft (which can be of little or high
value), drugs offences and ABH. Sentencing is either
prison or a community order.
Indictable offence = These are the highest level of
offences that are triable in Crown Court only. Examples
include robbery, murder and rape. Given high sentencing
such as life imprisonment.
pre trail procedure for triable either way
Trial will take place either in the Magistrates’ Court or in the Crown Court
* Plea before venue - the defendant will be asked whether they plead guilty or not guilty
to the offence
* If the defendant pleads guilty the case is automatically heard in the Magistrates’ Court
and sentence will be passed. The magistrates retain the option of sending the defendant
to the Crown Court for sentencing if necessary
* If the defendant pleads not guilty a Mode of trial will follow. Magistrates will decide
on the most appropriate court to try the case. When deciding the magistrates will
consider whether they have the jurisdiction and whether they have adequate sentencing
powers.
* If the magistrates they feel they lack jurisdiction or sentencing power they will
transfer the matter to the Crown Court.
* If the magistrates accept summary jurisdiction the defendant is given the choice of
which court he/she wishes to be tried in.
* Upon completion of the trial and a guilty verdict, the magistrates retain the right to
send the case to Crown Court for sentencing.
What are the qualifications and selection for magistrates
Must be aged 18-75. Expected to work in/ near to where they sit (Courts Pet 2003
abolished 15 mile rule). Must be able to sit for 26 half days a year.
Six qualities - 1. Good character, 2. Understanding & communication, 3. Social awareness,
4. Maturity & sound temperament, 5. Sound judgement, 6. Commitment & reliability.
Disqualified if … serious criminal conviction, bankrupt, serving member of armed forces,
have family in the legal services.
Selection process - Apply to Local Advisory Committee (LAC). First interview asked about
6 qualities and views on local crime. Second interview is a test of judgement - role play to
sentence a case. If successful, name passed to Lord Chief Justice who appoints them (or
delegates a local judge to). Candidate appears in cour and swears an oath of allegiance.
NB. A candidate may pass but not be appointed if the racial/ gender balance of the bench
is not achieved.
What is the role of magistrates
Role of magistrates (B)
1. Deal with approx 97% of all criminal cases! Try ALL summary cases.
2. Hear preliminary hearings and Early Administration Hearings of criminal cases before
they are heard in full at the Crown Court. Remand and bail application hearings.
3. Try less serious T-E-W offences. Hear facts of summary and TEW cases and decide
verdict whether D is guilty/ not guilty.
4. Sentence those who plead or are found guilty - suitable punishment given using
sentencing guidelines.
5. Refer indictable cases to the Crown Court
6. Issue search and arrest warrants to the police and grant extensions to police custody.
7. Can complete additional training to sit in youth court. (10-17 yr olds)
8. Can hear appeals from Magistrates’ by sitting in Crown Court with a qualified judge.
What are the qualifications and selection for juries
Qualifications & Selection (B)
Three basic qualifications = Juries Act 1974 says you must be aged 18-76, registered to vote on electoral register and
have lived in UK for 5 years since aged 13.
Disqualified = people on bail, had a S+ year prison sentence (never sit), had a past prison/ community sentence (cannot
sit for 10 yrs), people with a significant mental disorder/ subject to the Mental Health Act 1983..
Discharged - people who have an impairment that prevents them from sitting on a jury (blind/ non-English speaking /
deaf (one deaf juror has sat - if no interpreter required)
Excused = people actively serving in the armed forces and people who have sat on a jury within the last 2 years.
Discretional excusal - the judge will decide if you can defer jury service (up to 2yrs) due to births/ deaths/exams..
CIA 2003 allowed police, lawyers and judges to sit on a jury if no connection to the case.
Selection = at random by a computer at the Central Summoning Bureau scrolling through the electoral register. 15
people are chosen and then 12 used from those who turn up. It is a legal obligation to serve on a jury
Vetting = routine police checks made (Mason) and may conduct wider background checks (ABC trial)
Challenge to the array = challenging the whole jury because it is unrepresentative and threat of bias. S5 Juries Act 1974
gives this right (Ford)
Challenge forthe cause - challenging an individual juror if believe they are disqualified or known to the case