English Legal System Flashcards

Question

superior judges

Answer 1

lord chief justice, justices of supreme court, lords justice of appeal, high court judges

Answer 2

circuit judges, recorders, district judges

Answer 3

sit in the country court and hear complex civil cases in the fast track, and can hear criminal cases in the crown court. in civil cases they hear evidence and decide winner, in criminal the jury decides the facts and judge decides the law and and sentence if guilty

Answer 4

part-time judges for 5 year periods and hear both criminal and civil cases, usually as a form of training to become a circuit judge.

Answer 5

sit in the county court and hear small claims cases. This is the first role for a judge, and they do not hear criminal cases.

Answer 6

judges can protect citizens from an unlawful act by a government, are not influenced by parliament or cabinet which means they have security of tenure and immunity from suit, independence from legislature and case means law is applied fairly and avoids corruption and maintains faith in the judiciary

Answer 7

means they cannot be removed if they go against the wishes of the other two arms, as stated in act of settlement 1700

Answer 8

means anything judges carry out as a judge cannot be prosecuted, and cannot be sued. This principle was confirmed in sirros v moore. they cannot be sued for defamation, so can be free to judge.

Answer 9

parliament, cabinet and judiciary can each keep checks on each other and avoids corruption when separate

Answer 10

judges cannot be members of the house of commons, and the creation of the supreme court in 2009 separated the judiciary from the house of lords.

Answer 11

can be no conflict of interest in the case heard

Answer 12

trained, unpaid members of local community who deal with summary offences such as minor theft and criminal damage, they have no qualifications so are lay and have no jurisdiction to hear civil cases

Answer 13

local advisory committee are 12 people who are both magistrates and non-magistrate persons who appoint new magistrates. they make recommendations of who should be appointed a new magistrate to the senior presiding judge of the area, who makes the official appointment. any applicants must give 2 references, and then go through two interviews: the first interview looks to see if the candidate has the 6 attributes needed, as well as their attitudes towards crime. the second interview is more “hands-on”, with tasks such as analysing two criminal cases and sentencing.

Answer 14

good character, understanding and communication, social awareness, maturity and sound temperament, sound judgement, commitment and reliability

Answer 15

between 18-74 at appointment. not many under 27 year olds get appointment = not enough experience.

Answer 16

- 40% of magistrates were retired from other work in the year 2000. - most magistrates were drawn from professional and managerial ranks. - 51% of magistrates are women compared with 18% of the top ranks of judges. - 8% of magistrates are from ethnic minorities compared with 4% of the judiciary.

Answer 17

voluntary but must sit 26 half days or 13 full days per year, sit on panel of 3, can provide arrest warrants, hear summary offences, plea before venue, may sit on crown court appeals

Answer 18

limited sentencing powers, so cannot hear serious offences. they can refer either-way offences to the crown court for sentencing if needed. magistrates can hear and sentence summary offences, which require no more than 6 month custodial sentence.

Answer 19

arrange for a child to be taken into care or put up for adoption, help separated parents make arrangements for their children, enforce child maintenance orders, make court orders to prevent domestic abuse. these magistrates can get advice from the child’s guardian or a family court adviser during the case.

Answer 20

51% women means good gender balance which represents society, unpaid so costs are low and cases solved quickly, local so have good local knowledge of the area standards and expectations of people, historic right to trial by peers

Answer 21

few magistrates from minority backgrounds (only 8%) which limits usefulness as not a good representation of diverse society, middle-aged and middle class makes them out of touch with majority of defendants, inconsistencies in offending and outcome is not certain,

Answer 22

as soon as you are 18, you could be called for jury service provided you are registered to vote (this means you are on the electoral roll). this is the case until you are 76 years old. you must live in the UK for 5 years,

Answer 23

due to serious criminal conviction, such as life imprisonment or being detained to protect the public. if you are detained, have a suspended sentence or any kind of community sentence, you will be disqualified for 10 years.

Answer 24

jury summons to randomly selected people, many jurors attend court, prosecution and defence teams review jurors, challenges made to the array on the basis of a bias panel, jurors are sworn in

Answer 25

jury refused to convict someone who disclosed national secrets in the public interest

Answer 26

jury equity - based on will of the people and the principle of fairness, open justice allows ordinary people to understand the legal system and be part of it, historic right to trial by peers, to be judged by those in the community

Answer 27

perverse decisions i.e. ponting’s case, jury misconduct i.e. r v young, pressure i.e. r v sutcliffe, lack of understanding in complex cases such as fraud cases

Answer 28

claims which value 10,000 or less, personal injury which values 1,000 or less. usually heard by a district judge in the county court

Answer 29

claims which value £10,000 - £25,000. usually heard by a district or circuit judge. happens in the county court.

Answer 30

county court: claims up to £100,000 and personal injury up to £50,000. high court: claims over £100,000 and personal injury over £50,000. heard by a circuit or high court judge

Answer 31

the woolf reforms

Answer 32

more fair and accessible, different judges with different experience levels, small claims and fast track are faster for smaller issues, multi track can go to high court, reduces the need for legal representation

Answer 33

fill in N1 form and send to court with a fee, defendant receives a copy of the N1 form from the court, defendant has 14 days to respond and choose: a) settle out of court b) ignore and forefeit c) defend claim in court d) counterclaim, if defendant chooses c or d there will be an allocation to court and the trial date is set

Answer 34

stage is run by judge who listens to both parties, witnesses can be called although for small claims and fast track the aim is to be quick, judge will ask questions although parties can have legal representation if they wish to pay. this is discouraged as can make the trial longer and expensive, judge decides outcome and remedies such as damages

Answer 35

under access to justice act 1999, either party has the right to appeal - this involves an appeal to the HC from county or to court of appeal. an appeal can only progress with approval from original court or the appeal court, an appeal will usually only progress in the situation of a legal area of great importance or if the appeal has a strong chance of success

Answer 36

refuse the appeal, uphold the decision, set aside the decision, vary the initial order or judgement, refer claims or issues back to a lower court, order a new trial if necessary

Answer 37

the process where parties in a dispute come to a compromise or settle their dispute without going to court, the main reason people are encouraged to use ADR is to save the expense of using courts and to save time in the court system

Answer 38

fair process, trial conducted by legal experts and experienced judges, any decision made can be enforced through courts, appeal routes if the claimant is unhappy, possible to get legal aid

Answer 39

happens directly with the other party, solicitors can negotiate a settlement. private, quick and cheap method of settling a dispute although it usually requires lawyers. can be used at any point in the dispute but may not be successful and requires cooperation between parties, usually used by large companies when dealing with eachother

Answer 40

a neutral mediator helps parties to reach a compromise solution, a mediator consults each party and sees how much common ground there is. carry offers to and fro while keeping confidentiality. mediators only facilitate the agreement and do not give their own view - only works when families can cooperate and can be made binding if a mediation agreement is signed

Answer 41

similar to mediation however the third part helping to resolve the dispute will play a more proactive role, the conciliator will suggest grounds for compromise and the basis for a settlement, conciliator cannot seek evidence or call witnesses - does not necessarily lead to a resolution and may continue to court

Answer 42

informal procedure where the parties submit claims to private arbitration, governed by the arbitration act 1996. parties choose 1-3 arbitrators who are usually specially trained who make decisions about complaint from the papers and evidence presented. some contracts state arbitration must be used in a dispute called the scott v avery clause

Answer 43

quicker than court based resolution, more informal, parties have more control of the process, decision makers are experts, limited need for legal representation, effect of an award is usually legally enforceable, cheaper than court, maintains relationships

Answer 44

lack of state funding and representation, may be an imbalance in parties as lack of legal aid, availability and success of process is dependent on agreement, mediators and arbitrators may be hard to get and costly, limited appeal rights, may not be suitable for complex law, not bound by precedent so can’t predict outcome

Answer 45

can be used globally, can be accessed by most, cheap and often free, built in to may websites such as ebay

Answer 46

impersonal, no witnesses allowed, only simple cases, may end up at court anyways

Answer 47

used by services such as ebay, also the financial ombudsman service to resolve disputes regarding consumer and financial matters. consumers can solve disputes online and works with parties to determine an outcome

Answer 48

specialist courts whose judges and members hear wide ranges of cases such as tax, employment, and immigration and asylum

Answer 49

use human resources at their workplace by making a formal complaint, if not solved in 30 days, an employee can fill in an ET1 form to make a claim, the employee is then able to respond to this claim

Answer 50

judge, employer representative and employee representative

Answer 51

many steps such as going to HR and then ACAS before actual tribunal, can be overwhelming especially if employer is powerful, may be off putting, confrontational so may damage the relationship

Answer 52

free and so are accessible to all, conciliation is supported as part of the process which can be more satisfying and allow parties to come to an agreement, sit seperate to the courts so are fast and informal, opportunities for reviews and appeals

Answer 53

an offence that has a maximum sentence of 6 months imprisonment or of a 5000 pound fine for any offence, this is the least serious type of criminal offence, dealt with in the magistrates court

Answer 54

an offence which carries out the maximum sentence, the most serious and are dealt with by judge and jury in the crown court - although preliminary hearing is in the magistrates

Answer 55

can be treated as either summary offence or indictable offence, mid level seriousness or are debatable, can be tried in either court - if not guilty, usually goes to crown court

Answer 56

their sentencing powers are unlimited

Answer 57

intends that unless there are strong reasons to the contrary an individual will be remanded on bail with appropriate conditions attached

Answer 58

individual has been accused of committing a serious offence, has previous convictions for similar offences, may disappear before trial, may interfere with witnesses, will commit further offences before trial

Answer 59

heard in the magistrates court, hearing where a clerk will check details of defendant and plea which in 90% of cases is guilty, if guilty magistrates determine the sentencing, if not guilty the date and details of court will be set

Answer 60

first hearing at the magistrates court where details checked and there will be a bail hearing, case then moves to crown court where a plea made and hearings set, an indictment is prepared if additional charges and prosecution and defence share info and evidence and law argued along with alibi

Answer 61

under the magistrates court act 1990 there is a plea before venue at the magistrates court, defendant enters plea - not guilty: decision about mode of trial and bail. trial could be at crown court if requested or if magistrates believe it goes beyond their powers after considering interests of justice and seriousness. if trial is at magistrates may still be sentenced at the crown court. if defendant pleads guilty the sentencing happens at the magistrates court but may be sent to crown court

Answer 62

can be used by both prosecution or defence as it is about point of law, goes to the administrative court of the KBD - court is asked to set out how decision was made infront of high court judges. these cases result in either: reversed decision, confirmed decision, varied decision, remitted decision

Answer 63

the main route of appeal is by the defence, this is when the defence appeals against their conviction or sentence. at the crown court, a judge and two magistrates will rehear the case. the decision may be: reversed, upholded, increased or reduced

Answer 64

appeal by both prosecution and defence: case stated appeals, appeals to the crown court, appeals to the court of appeal

Answer 65

following a case stated appeals to the supreme court, this is only for pressing matters of law such as in C v DPP where doli incapax was challenged

Answer 66

only available on the grounds of jury tampering, or if there is new and compelling evidence under the criminal justice act 2003

Answer 67

factors which indicate higher culpability, including: previous convictions, hate crimes. factors which indicate more serious degree of harm, including: multiple victims, vulnerable victims

Answer 68

factors indicating a lower culpability, including: mental illness or disability, age, minor role. offender mitigation, including: remorse, co-operation

Answer 69

non custodial sentences: community orders, fines, discharge. custodial sentences: life sentences, fixed term

Answer 70

under the criminal justice act 2003, can choose tailor mode sanction which avoids imprisonment: rehab, community service, curfews, travel ban

Answer 71

discharges mean no other sentences are sat, could be conditional - so if another offence is committed there are two sentences

Answer 72

given for the most serious crimes, judges must give a life sentence for murder but can for other homicides or serious assaults if multiple.

Answer 73

for other crimes, judges choose imprisonment based on the guidelines - these are for a set period and are usually found in a statute of the crime

Answer 74

punishment: should be undesirable. deterrence: should be put off committing crime because of punishment. rehabilitation: should be helped to change their behaviour so they don’t reoffend. protection: to stop community feeling unsafe after being harmed. reparation: in order to fix a damaged community, including restorative justice