Enforcement of Foreign Consistorial Judgments (L14) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

How does a petitioner test the validity of a foreign judgment?

A

A petitioner should raise an action for declarator of recognition, or non-recognition, of a relevant foreign decree.
DMPA 1973, s7(3A).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What effect did the Jurisdiction and Judgments (Family, Civil Partnership and Marriage (Same Sex Couples) (EU Exit) (Scotland) (Amendment etc.) Regulations 2019 (SSI 2019/104) (‘2019 Exit Regulations’) have on consistorial judgment enforcement?

A

In light of UK withdrawal from the EU without a negotiated settlement, the Exit Regs revoked the European family law regime (‘Brussels II bis’) for Scotland and reinstated the ‘old’ recognition rules so that they apply to ALL overseas divorces, annulments and legal separations).

The 2019 Exit Regulations amended the Family Law Act 1986.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Which piece of legislation governs consistorial judgment enforcement?

A

Family Law Act 1986, Part II.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the distinction made between different types of foreign divorces under FLA86?

A

S46(1): divorces obtained ‘by means of proceedings’; and
S46(2): divorces obtained ‘otherwise than by means of proceedings’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are s46(1) ‘proceedings’ divorces?

A

Proceedings’ divorce etc recognised if:
It was effective where it was obtained; and
On the date of the commencement of the proceedings:
Either party was a habitual resident/domiciliary/national of that country.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are s46(2) ‘non-proceedings’ divorces?

A

‘Non-proceedings’ divorce etc recognised if:
It was effective where it was obtained; and
On the date on which it was obtained:
Both parties was domiciled there/ one is so domiciled and the other’s domicile recognises the divorce; and
Some connection by both parties to the court of origin.
Neither party was habitual resident in UK for one year prior to date of divorce.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How does the case of Botwe v Brifa [2021] demonstrate a s46(2) divorce NOT being enforced?

A

Recognition of the divorce failed because both parties had habitual residence in the UK.
English court accepted that the Ghanaian divorce was effective in Ghana, but wouldn’t recognise it because they had been habitually resident in the UK.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How does the case of Duhur-Johnson v Duhur-Johnson [2005] show a foreign divorce NOT being enforced?

A

Nigerian divorce.
Evidence was hard to give to the court that the Nigerian divorce was effective in Nigeria.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does FLA86 s51(1) provide as a ground to refuse to recognise a foreign divorce?

A

Res judicata: divorce irreconcilable with prior judgment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does FLA86 s51(2) provide as a ground to refuse to recognise a foreign divorce?

A

No subsisting marriage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does FLA86 s51(3)(a) provide as a ground to refuse to recognise a foreign divorce?

A

No notice/opportunity to take part (s46(1) only).
If one spouse wasn’t told about the proceedings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does FLA86 s51(3)(b) provide as a ground to refuse to recognise a foreign divorce?

A

No evidence divorce is effective where obtained (s46(2) only).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does FLA86 s51(3)(c) provide as a ground to refuse to recognise a foreign divorce?

A

Recognition manifestly contrary to public policy (s46(1) and (2)).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How does the case of Kendall v Kendall [1977] demonstrate refusal to recognise a foreign judgment as it would be contrary to public policy?

A

A couple who lived in Bolivia. Husband on a short-term contract there.
Couple decided the wife would take the children back to England, he said he would follow in a few months.
Before the wife left, husband told her there were documents for her to sign to take the kids away. They were written in Spanish.
Husband doesn’t return for a year, informed her they were divorced and he was remarried.
The document she signed was power of attorney for him to bring divorce.
Bolivian court decreed the divorce. English court refused to recognise it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How does s54 define a s46(1) divorce?

A

‘Proceedings’ means ‘judicial or other proceedings’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Was the Quazi v Quazi [1979] case a proceedings divorce, and why?

A

Couple were Pakistani nationals and Muslims.
Married in India, moved to England.
Husband went to Pakistan and pronounced divorce under Muslim Pakistani law. Required to give notice to public authorities and his wife.
There was a 90 day formal reconciliation period before the divorce was deemed to be final.
He went to England and sought a declaration that the marriage had been dissolved in Pakistan.

“Other proceedings” can’t just mean quasi-judicial proceedings.
Notice requirements, reconciliation period. This means a proceedings divorce. He was a Pakistani national so had the connection to the country. Divorce recognised.

16
Q

Was the Chaudhary v Chaudhary [1984] case a proceedings divorce, and why?

A

Bare talaq.
Couple domciled in the state of Kashmir.
No technicalities in this divorce. No agency involved.

“… the word ‘proceedings must import a degree of formality and at least the involvement of some agency, whether lay or religious, of or recognised by the state, having a function that is more than simply probative …” (per Oliver LJ).

17
Q

Was the Botwe v Brifa [2021] case a proceedings divorce, and why?

A

Customary Ghanaian divorce. In Ghana, there had to be registration of this divorce for it to be effective.

Was the registration fundamental to the validity?
If the involvement of the state is fundamental to the divorce, then it is a PROCEEDINGS divorce.

“It is important to establish whether the ‘judicial or other proceedings’ are fundamental or integral to the grant of the divorce (in this situation, the statute contemplates the intervention of the state or official agency, in some measure, in effecting the dissolution of the marriage), or (if there are any proceedings at all) they are ancillary to the divorce (i.e. simply providing some formal evidence of the divorce). If the former, then the route to follow is contained in s46(1); if the latter, then it is s46(2).”

18
Q

What is a transnational divorce?

A

A divorce effected by procedure which takes place in more than one country.
NOTE: s44 FLA 1986.

e.g. R v ex parte Fatima [1984] 2 All ER 458.

19
Q

What does the case of Berkovits v Grinberg [1995] tell us about transnational divorces?

A

The court will recognise an overseas divorce if it is obtained by one set of proceedings instituted in the same country as that in which the divorce is ultimately obtained.

20
Q

Which set of rules governs the EU rules on consistorial proceedings enforcement?

A

From 01/08/22 – Brussels II ter.
Up to 31/07/22 – Brussels II bis.

21
Q

To which cases do the EU rules on consistorial proceedings enforcements apply?

A

The EU rules apply in EU Member State courts regarding the recognition of divorces etc from any other EU Member State.

22
Q

What is Brussels II ter Article 30?

A

General rule of recognition.

(ex-art 21, BII bis).

23
Q

What is Brussels II ter Article 38?

A

Limited grounds for non-recognition.

(ex- art 22, BII bis).

Manifestly contrary to public policy.
Natural justice.
Res judicata: irreconcilable with prior judgment of forum.
Res judicata: irreconcilable with prior judgment of another state.

24
Q

What is Brussels II ter Article 69?

A

Jurisdiction of court of origin cannot be reviewed.

(ex-art 24, BII bis).

Rapisarda v Colladon [2014] EWFC 35.

25
Q

What is Brussels II ter Article 70?

A

Differences in applicable law are irrelevant.

(ex- art 25, BII bis).

26
Q

What is Brussels II ter Article 71?

A

Substance of judgment must not be reviewed.

(ex- art 26, BII bis).

27
Q

Which piece of legislation governs the recognition of UK divorces and legal separations abroad?

A

1970 Hague Convention on the Recognition of Divorces and Legal Separations applies among Convention Contracting States.

Otherwise, the residual national rules of the overseas country will apply.