Enforcement of Contractual Rights/Problems, Discharge of Contract Flashcards
unenforceable contract (3)
statutes of frauds
sales of goods act
illegality
Enforceable contract - Requirement of Writing
jurisdiction vs common law vs statutory
Some contracts in jurisdictions must be in writing to be enforceable
in common law no contracts have to be in writing
for statutory contacts they need to be in writing
Statutes of Fraud purpose
and where it is effect in Canada
ensure fraud was not perpetrated through lack of sufficient writing in contracts, less lying, liars cannot win cases
everywhere except BC and MB
Statute of Fraud indicated that certain types of contacts are not unenforceable because they are not in writing. List 4-6 examples
- Promise to answer for damages out of estate
- Guarantee of debt of another without indemnification
- Agreement made in consideration of marriage
- Agreement concerning land
- Agreement not performed for one year
- Ratification of infants/minority contract
- What does writing mean? - if contract falls within scope of statute of fraud there must be?
- What is it?
- Memorandum
- written record in existence containing critical essential terms of the contract
What does writing mean? - Critical/Essential Terms of the contract and which party signs incase of suing
identity of parties, subject of consideration, possession date, signed by parties.
only party to be sued needs to have signed it
What does writing mean? - What if contract falls within scope of statute of fraud and there is no memoradndum (3)
contract rendered unenforceable by statute/court
neither party gets a remedy
Court won’t help with parties pre relationship or transfer of goods
Courts Method to limit statute of fraud - Doctrine of part performance
enforces contracts concerning land if plaintiff, suffering loss, can show they initiated performance of contract with reliance on it, courts accept in lieu of memorandum
Act of performance can suggest existence of contract, deposit not enough
Sales of Goods Act and regards to illegality and courts
Sales of chattels in Manitoba over 50$ and Receipt is sufficient. With regards to illegality, can affect property relationships but courts won’t get involved.
1.Doctrine of Substantial Performance 2. goal
performance that is not technically complete may still be legally sufficient—assuming that the defects are not “material” to the agreement
Equity attempt to limit unfair potential of the statutes of fraud as liars (part performance) victorious in courts
how courts review contracts to avoid bias towards enforceability: Literal plain, strict approach
restricts interpreting to dictionary, but can have more than one dictating certainty
how courts review contracts to avoid bias towards enforceability: Liberal Approach
looks to intent of parties in drafting the agreement, Stresses circumstances around contract, negotiation, knowledge of parties (context)
Parol Evidence rules (3)
- rule of evidence
- create certainty in contracts
- submit element to fact finder to consider
Where there is a situation of bargaining or negotiation where parties have to put in a final form of agreement, parol evidence states
a term previously agreed upon by the parties but not included in the final written form of contract will not later be permitted to add to or contradict the contract
What does “parol” mean in the contract context
extrinsic (not part of) to or outside the written agreement
Parol Evidence Rules apply to two things and describe what they reduce to
oral agreement which reduce to writing
and written agreement reduced to formal document under seal