Endodontics Flashcards
Pathological Resorption: 52 - 94 Management of complex cases: 95 - 140 Retreatment Procedures: 141 -175
Endodontic material
Types of stainless-steel files
Files:
1. K file – have a square cross section
2. Flexofile – have a triangular cross section
3. Hedstroem file
4. Barbed broaches – only used for removing pulpal tissue when present, not suitable for use in narrow, curved canals
Most canal treatments are started with hand instruments followed by the completion by rotary instruments.
Hand instruments are especially useful at the early phases of instrumentation to establish a glide path, prior to using rotary instruments.
In anatomically challenging cases an in treating instrumentation complications, hand instruments may be the only solution.
Flexofiles
Used for most instrumentation:
preparation of a glide path – defined as a smooth, patent passage from the coronal orifice of the canal to the radiographic terminus (apical constriction). A successful glide path is an uninterrupted passage that can be reproduced when small-size files are used in sequence in the canal.
Apical gauging – apical gauging implies measuring/assessing the apical diameter of the canal, where the instrument fits snuggly and resist further apical movements. This ensures apical terminus of the prepared canal. Ni-Ti instruments are preferred for gauging because of their flexibility. They are inserted straight in and straight out, without any rotation. This is done after preparation of root canal. They have a nonaggressive tip (batt tip)
Hedstroem files – very stiff files, can only be used in up and down motion, file cuts when moved in the coronal direction. Today only used in retreatment cases to help remove gutta-percha or an overfilling of the root canal.
Interappointment medicaments:
Use of non-setting calcium hydroxide paste in endodontics, non-setting paste, powder mixed with sterile water.
Aims –
1. To reduce and prevent multiplication of microorganisms that remain following careful cleaning and shaping.
2. Prevent reinfection through coronal or apical leakage
Calcium hydroxide uses –
1. Inter-appointment intracanal medicament
2. Pulp capping
3. Apexification
4. During treatment of root perforations, root fractures, root resorption and dental trauma.
5. Root canal sealer
The European society of endodontology’s quality guidelines suggest that when we carry out root canal treatment, we are obliged to do a clinical and radiographic follow-up at least:
- 1 year after treatment
- Further follow-up for up to 4 years – if bony healing is not complete according to Strinberg Acta Odontol Scand 1956: 14: 1-175
When is root canal retreatment indicated:
- Persistent periapical pathology following root canal treatment
No radiographic signs of bony healing after 4 years - New periapical pathology associated with a root filled tooth.
Initial healing but a new radiolucency develops some time later.
Root canal system has become infected after previous treatment. - A new restoration is planned for a tooth and radiographic assessment shows an inadequate root canal filling and/or a periapical radiolucency.
The Toronto study is a publication on the treatment outcome in endodontics shows the following for initial treatment.
Primary treatment
- Without periradicular periodontitis = 92%
- With periradicular periodontitis = 74%
- Overall = 81%
The Toronto study then later went to do a publication: treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto study—phases 3 and 4: orthograde retreatment.
Retreatment
- Without periradicular periodontitis = 89-100%
- With apical periodontitis = 56-84%
A study done by Ng et al. 2011: a prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment: part 1: periapical health.
The conclusion from this study was that success was based on periapical health
- Primary RCT 83%
- Secondary RCT 80%
A systematic review done by Ng: outcome of secondary root canal treatment: a systematic review of the literature.
17 studies were included ranging from 1961-2005, the overall success rate was found to be 77%
The studies had three prognostic factors; these three factors all determine the success rate of secondary root canal treatment.
- Pre-operative periapical lesions
- Apical extent of root canal filling
- Quality of coronal restoration
The terms to describe the outcome of RCT is no longer success or failure, they are the following.
Healed
- Clinically – no signs/symptoms
- Radiological – no residual radiolucency, or scarring after surgery
Healing
- Clinical – no signs or symptoms
- Radiological – reduced radiolucency in follow-up < 4 years
Asymptomatic function
- Clinical – no signs or symptoms combined with no or persistent radiolucency, reduced in size or unchanged.
Persistent/recurrent/emerged disease
- Clinical – with or without symptoms
- Radiological – new, increased, unchanged or reduced after >4 years
Prevention of post-treatment disease
Guidelines on the quality of root canal treatment
- Rubber dam isolation
- Proximity of preparation to apical constriction
- Sufficient taper of preparation – allowing for adequate irrigation and disinfection of the root canal. This will also allow enough space for interappointment medicament if required (non-setting calcium hydroxide)
- Correct extension of root canal obturation without extrusion
- Adequate coronal seal to prevent re-infection
Indications for root canal retreatment
- Previous treatment has failed
Signs of inflammation or infection - Persistent symptoms, sinus tract (chronic abscess), swelling, pain.
- Failure of previous treatment because of technical reasons
- Existing pathology and new restoration planned for tooth.
A = radiograph of mandibular with inadequate root filling and asymptomatic apical periodontitis.
B = the tooth has been retreated conservatively through the crown.
C = complete periapical repair is evident at the 6-month control.
This image shows 4 potential areas where microbes can be post treatment.
- Intraradicular microbes: if the preparation of the canal is not at its correct length, then microbes will persist at the constriction and spread.
- Extraradicular microbes: this is when microbes have invaded the host response system and established themselves in the periapical tissues.
- Foreign body reaction to extruded gutta- percha.
- True cyst which is cavity that has walled itself off from the root canal system.
Causes of post-treatment disease
Microbial causes
- Intraradicular microbes: Intraradicular infections, either persistent or secondary are the major causes of endodontic treatment failure.
Persistent = where the microbes were not removed during the initial treatment
Secondary = where the microbes have entered the root canal system via coronal leakage
- Extraradicular microbes
- Radicular cyst
- Cracked teeth, vertical root facture = allowing microbes to enter the root canal system
- Coronal leakage
Non-microbial causes
- Cholesterol crystals in the periapical tissues
- Foreign body reactions in the periapical tissues
Intraocular infections in root canal treated teeth can be classified in two groups
- Persisting infection: inadequate isolation/disinfection during treatment
- New secondary infection through leakage
Radiographically you can see if a poor root canal filling has been placed, and often associated with periapical radiolucency, it is worth to note that radiographs do not indicate the biological status of the root canal.
Persistent bacteria
- Those that remain in the root canal system after root canal disinfection and interappointment dressing gram positive bacteria appear to be more resistant to antimicrobial treatment and can adapt to harsh environmental conditions in instrumented and medicated root canals.
However, they do not always maintain an infectious process
- Residual bacteria may die after obturation
- Residual bacteria may be present in insufficient numbers and virulence
- They may be located in areas where they have no access to periapical tissues
In canals that are apparently well treated tend to have – 1-5 species
In canals with inadequate treatment tend to have 10-20 species like untreated canals.
In retreatment cases nine times more likely to harbour Enterococcus Faecalis, candida in 18%
Common microbes associated with retreatment cases:
- Enterococcus faecalis
- Streptococcus
- Lactobacillus
- Actinomyces
- Propionibacterium
- Candida albicans
The possible origins of these microbes:
- Contamination during initial treatment
- Leaving a tooth on open drainage
- Coronal leakage post-treatment