End of Life Flashcards

1
Q

what are the outcomes for graduates?

(What the GMC says you should be able to do by the time you are graduating and starting work)

A

Summarise:

  • the current ethical dilemmas in medical science and healthcare practice;
  • the ethical issues that can arise in everyday clinical decision-making;

Apply ethical reasoning to situations which may be encountered in the first years after graduation

Demonstrate … appropriate clinical judgements when considering or providing compassionate interventions or support for patients who are nearing or at the end of life.

Understand the need to involve patients, their relatives, carers or other advocates in management decisions, making referrals and seeking advice from colleagues as appropriate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Are mortality rates changing?

A

Nope, still 100%

‘Death is a universal outcome, not a medical failure.

Dying badly, however, is often down to medical failure.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What we are dying from has changed, how has it?

A
  • Less common to die quickly
  • Rise in co-morbidities + frailty
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Has the concept of a good death changed?

A
  • Faith cultures (rites/rituals)
  • Individualist society + promotion of personal autonomy
  • Multicultural society, multiple beliefs
  • Informed choice, anticipatory care planning
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what makes a good death?

A
  • Communication - patient, carers/relatives, healthcare team
  • Symptoms well controlled
  • Not distressing
  • Time to plan
  • Preferred place of death
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what makes a bad death?

A
  • Poor communication
  • Perception of failure of healthcare team
  • Distressing symptoms
  • Sudden
  • Catastrophic event, e.g. bleed
  • No time to plan ahead or achieve goals
  • Disagreement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

where do people want to die?

What are Preferred Place of death, last 3months of life?

A
  • Office National Statistics
  • National Survey of Bereaved Ppl
  • England, 2015
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Where do people die?

A

Percentage of deaths (persons, all ages) in hospital, care home, home and hospice, England, 2004 to 2016

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is quality of life enhanced by?

A
  • Caring attitude of staff
  • Family visits
  • Physical environment
  • Maintaining control
  • Feeling safe/not alone
  • Art sessions
  • Smoking ?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is quality of life diminished by?

A
  • Lost independence
  • Lost activities
  • Pain/fear of pain
  • Feeling a burden
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Scenario 1 - Sandra

  • Sandra is 57
  • Life long smoker and is admitted electively for an endobronchial ultrasound guided biopsy (EBUS) of a lung mass
  • Unfortunately, she develops pneumothorax and requires further inpatient treatment
  • MDT happens and patient attends OP oncology clinic with her husband to discuss ongoing management and returns to the ward
  • The oncologist kindly makes some notes on TRAK care which include details relating to prognosis (not discussed with the patient)
  • As the FY2 on late shift, the nursing staff page you to speak with Sandra’s daughter
  • You have been looking after Sandra, but have never met her daughter as she works full time
  • You read through the notes to remind yourself of the details of the case and go to see Sandra and her daughter, who as been moved to a side room for infection control reasons (previous VRE in urine)

During the consultation, Sandra’s daughter asks, ‘so how long has she got?’ looking to her mother. Do you…

A) Quote the oncologist from the notes - 9 months.

B) Ask Sandra if she would like to know the answer

C) Tell the daughter while Sandra’s in the toilet

D) Explore Sandra’s ideas about her prognosis

E) Dodge the question…

A

B and D but also E. if you do not feel comfortable having a conversation with her

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

do people request for prognosis?

A

Many patients do want to know their prognosis, others will not:

  • Non-maleficence
  • Beneficence

Often families will want to know more than the patients:

  • Respect autonomy
  • Confidentiality

Giving the ‘gist’ rather than statistics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Scenario 2 - Mary

  • Mary is 84 and is admitted to hospital with painless jaundice
  • A CT reveals metastatic pancreatic cancer. There are no treatment options
  • Mary’s daughter Beth asks you not to tell Mary the CT results
  • She fears that Mary will ‘turn her face to the wall’ and may die more quickly

Do you tell the patient, Mary, that she has pancreatic cancer?

A) Yes

B) No

C) On the fence

A

A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

when deciing whether to disclose to mary whether or not she has cancer what do you need to think about?

A
  • Capacity
  • Benefit/best interest
  • Autonomy
  • What if the daughter has Power of Attorney?
  • What if the patient lacks capacity?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is Collusion?

A

Collusion refers to a secret agreement made between clinicians and family members to hide the diagnosis of a serious or life-threatening illness from the patient

Possible reasons for collusion need to be established

The next task is to establish the patient’s level of awareness by asking relevant and direct questions which elicits his view of what may be happening to him through the cues provided by the patient

This process helps break the barriers between the patient and relatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are some reasons families may wish to collude?

A
  • Disclosure causes the patient to lose hope
  • Disclosure leads to depression
  • Disclosure hastens the progression of the illness and death
  • Disclosure increases the risk of patient suicide
  • Disclosure may cause psychological pain for the patient
  • Family members themselves may not be aware of the nature and severity of the illness
  • Family members may be in denial
  • Family members may be in conflict
17
Q

Why collusion goes against the principles of best clinical practice in relation to patient factors

A
  • Collusion is at odds patient autonomy and to the right to self-determination
  • Revealing the diagnosis to relatives before revealing it to patients breaches patients’ right to medical confidentiality
  • Patients are unable to give informed consent if they are not aware of the underlying illness and thus may not obtain appropriate or optimum and timely treatment
  • Patients may not be able to complete unfinished business and tasks prior to their deaths
  • Patients who sense something amiss may come to distrust their relatives and clinicians
  • Many patients suspect the diagnosis anyway, given their symptoms and physical deterioration
18
Q

Why collusion goes against the principles of best clinical practice in relation to family factors

A
  • Family members will have to bear the burden of being untruthful or even deceptive to their loved ones, which may lead to guilt later
  • A barrier to communication is erected as family members become avoidant at a time when they are most needed by patients
  • Families will have no guidance in making treatment decisions, especially closer to the end of life
19
Q

Why collusion goes against the principles of best clinical practice in relation to clinician factors

A
  • Collusion results in a breakdown of the clinician–patient relationship and a loss of trust between patients and clinicians
  • Clinicians may face treatment non-compliance from patients and may be unable to provide optimal treatment, such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy
20
Q

Scenario 3 - Janet

  • 63yo care home manager
  • Diagnosed with Lung Cancer in Feb, given prognosis of 9 months
  • smoker, COPD
  • 2 weeks on, involved in RTA
  • C-spine fracture, transferred to neuro HDU
  • Required ventilation (non-invasive)
  • Type 2 respiratory failure, COPD + sepsis secondary to pneumonia
  • Weaning ventilation unsuccessful
  • Oncologist opinion sought prognosis – best case scenario, ‘a few months
  • Clinical Goal of Treatment - wean off ventilation
  • Clinical team raised question of cardiopulmonary resuscitation
  • Decision was made by a consultant intensivist to complete a DNACPR form
  • Janet has been communicating with family by writing notes
  • She has expressed her wishes to persevere with treatments and to ‘receive full active treatment’

Do you agree with the decision that Janet should have a DNACPR form completed?

A) Yes

B) No

C) I’m on the fence…

A
  • Successfully weaned off ventilation
  • Discharged home with the DNACPR form
  • Daughter finds the form at home and is ‘horrified’.
  • DNACPR form rescinded by the GP due to:
  • The patient’s wish
  • The families wishes
  • Janet is now refusing to discuss resuscitation
  • Refused to discuss her care or prognosis with palliative care team
  • March - Janet’s condition starts to deteriorate
  • Following further discussion, a DNACPR from was issued
  • The family are in agreement
  • Janet died on 7th March
  • Her husband, David, pursued a claim against the NHS health board for breech of her Human Rights, Article 8
  • In placing the first DNACPR notice, there was failure to adequately:
  • Consult Janet or members of her family
  • Notify her of the decision to impose the notice
  • Offer her a second opinion
21
Q

Are DNACPR forms a legal document and who are they for?

A
  • Not a legal document
  • Record of a decision
  • Provide guidance for clinicians who do not know the patient - Who may be summoned to assess patient in an emergency
  • Document decision in notes - If not discussed with patient, need to document rationale in notes
22
Q

do patients need to be aware of DNACPR forms? and what if the patient lacks capacity?

A
  • Patients must be made aware of DNACPR form unless there is ‘psychological or physical harm’
  • What if the patient lacks capacity? - Must inform those close to the patient, without delay, unless it is ‘not practical or appropriate’

When there is clinical certainty DNACPR will remain in place - Does NOT need to be reviewed

23
Q

what are the trends in patient characteristics for in hospital cardiac arrests?

A
24
Q

Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrests

A

Mean age 64

25
Q

Scenario 4 - Rose

  • Rose was diagnosed with MND last year
  • Her condition has deteriorated steadily since then – she is now unable to walk and is fully dependent on others for ADLs
  • She is on NIV 24 hours a day – when she takes it off she becomes breathless after a few minutes
  • It is her 70th birthday next week - she is having a party with her family/friends. The day after this she wants you to switch off her NIV

Would you switch off her NIV?

A)Yes

B)No

C)On the fence

A

The ethics bit behind this:

  • Autonomy
  • Capacity
  • Family
  • Conscientious objection
26
Q

withdrawl of treatment is whose decision and under what circumstances does it occur?

A

patient choice

  • It is a patient’s legal and ethical right to decide to refuse treatment
  • If the patient has capacity, this decision must be respected and complied with, even if this may lead to death
  • Continuing unwanted treatment is battery and is a criminal offence
  • Communication is key
  • Planning and preparation
  • When a treatment is started, patients should understand it can be withdrawn if they no longer want it
  • Symptoms should be anticipated and managed effectively
27
Q

Scenario 5 - Tony

  • Tony is 20 and has been in a persistent vegetative state for 3 years following a prolonged resuscitation attempt after severe head injury as a football match (overcrowding in stands)
  • There is no prospect of him ever regaining consciousness
  • He receives artificial nutrition and hydration through a PEG tube

Would you withdraw Tony’s nutrition + hydration?

A) Yes

B) No

C) On the fence

•His family feel he would not want to live like this. They would like to stop his feeding and allow him to die

A

the ethics bit:

  • Capacity
  • Best interests
  • Justice
28
Q

what happens in regards to withdrawing treamtent for a patient without capacity?

A
  • Doctor’s duty is to treat in patient’s best interests
  • Presumption that it will be in a patient’s best interests to prolong life, however there is no obligation to prolong life irrespective of the quality of that life or of the patient’s own views
  • For some patients, there will come a point where continuing to provide CANH (lcinically assisted nutrition and hydration) ceases to be in their best interests because it is not able to provide a quality of life the patient would find acceptable
  • In such a case the presumption in favour of prolonging life will have been rebutted
29
Q

Scenario 6 - John

  • John 89 yo
  • Nursing home resident
  • Pmhx: stroke, AF, cognitive impairment, DNACPR
  • Admitting to AMIA acutely unwell with chest sepsis
  • Treated IV antibiotics and improved
  • Reviewed by SALT, unsafe swallow and placed nil by mouth
  • Initial presentation due to aspiration pneumonia
  • Encourage them to consider as a family what they would wish if he was to become unwell again with pneumonia.
  • FY2 doctor discusses with John and his family about recommendation from SALT
  • Agreement that John should continue to eat and drink. - QoL
  • Does so knowing the risks of likely recurrent aspiration pneumonia
  • Discharged to his nursing home
  • 1 week later
  • John becomes unwell overnight and is reviewed by a OOH GP at 3am
  • Confused, Pyrexial, hypotensive, tachycardic and tachypnoeic
  • GP assumes sepsis secondary to aspiration pneumonia + Delirium

What would you do next?

A) Admit to ARI for treatment of sepsis with IV antibiotics

B) Manage in the nursing home with oral antibiotics + paracetamol

C) Write up for anticipatory care medication for symptom control

D) Phone the daughter

A

no right or wrong

would be good to phone daughter and see hwat he wants

ethics:

  • Non-maleficence
  • Agesim
  • Capacity

Anticipatory Care Plans

Advanced Directives - Change their mind?

30
Q

When is ‘letting die’ medically acceptable?

A
  1. Medical technology is useless
  • Medically futile
  • OR, unnecessarily burdensome
  1. Patients validly refuse a medical technology

• Ideally consensus patient, their family and other clinical staff

Non-maleficence

If neither of the above is satisfied - medical negligence

• May constitute a form of killing: when acts of a person, other than natural conditions, cause death

31
Q

Scenario 7 - Jim

  • Jim was diagnosed with metastatic lung cancer 6 months ago
  • His condition is deteriorating, his wife has to help him with ADLs including toileting, he feels breathless on minimal exertion and has severe pain around his chest wall
  • He is fearful of becoming a burden.
  • ‘I’m going to die anyway doctor so can you just give me an injection to end it now? Or at least prescribe me something so I can do it myself!’
A
32
Q

what is the difference between euthanasia and assisted suicide?

A
  • Euthanasia is the act of deliberately ending a person’s life to relieve suffering, e.g. a doctor administering a lethal cocktail of drugs explicitly to end a life
  • Assisted suicide is the act of deliberately assisting or encouraging another person to kill themselves
  • Physician assisted suicide involves prescribing lethal drugs intended explicitly to end a life. The person takes the mediations themselves or is assisted in some way to take them
33
Q

whata re arugemtns for assisted suicide/euthanasia?

A
  • Suicide is legal. Those who are so disabled they cannot take their own life are disadvantaged
  • Withdrawing and withholding life-prolonging treatment is widely accepted and practised
  • The suffering associated with some diseases outweighs the benefits of continuing to live

Respect for patient autonomy

34
Q

what are the arguemtns against assisted suicide/euthanasia?

A
  • Good palliative care obviates the need for PAS
  • Discourages palliative care research
  • Vulnerable patients are at risk - coercion, feeling like a burden, free up medical resources
  • Slippery slope - may lead to involuntary euthanasia for people deemed ‘undesirable’
  • Affects other people’s rights, not just the patient
  • Contrary to the aims of medicine - promotion of health and life. Patients may lose trust