Employment law and Vicarious liability Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is vicarious liability?

Give an example

A

Where 1 person is liable for the torts of another

An employer is vicariously liable for torts committed by their employee while performing their work

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why would an injured person sue the employer rather than the employee?

A

The employer must have insurance to pay for damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the 2 conditions that must be satisfied for vicarious liability to arise?

A
  1. Employer-employee relationship (or similar)

2. During the course of employment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Give a case law example of vicarious liability

Briefly explain the case

A

Cox v Ministry of Justice (2016)

C managed a prison kitchen.
A prisoner negligently dropped a bag of rice on C’s back, causing injury.

C sued D as they were vicariously liable for the prisoner’s acts.

Held:
D were liable.
(Despite absence of traditional employer-employee relationship)

  1. Tort was committed as a result of the prisoner’s activity on behalf of D.
  2. Prisoner’s activity was likely to be part of D’s business activity
  3. D will have created the risk of tort committed by the prisoner by employing them.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the difference between a contract of service and a contract for service?

A

Contract of service = employee

Contract for service = self-employed
responsible for your own actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What might imply that there is a contract of service?

A

Implications such as whether the employer deducts PAYE Income Tax and National Insurance are indicators, but not conclusive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What tests or factors might be used to establish whether there is a contract of service?

A

Control test

Organisation

Mutuality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the Control Test?

A

Was the person under the direction AND control of the party with regard to the manner in which the work was done?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is meant by ‘organisation’ in establishing a contract of service?

When is this used?

A

The work done by the individual is an integral part of the employer’s business

In highly technical and professional situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is meant by ‘mutuality’ in establishing a contract of service?

A

There must be minimum mutual obligation:

> the engager must be obliged to pay a wage/ remuneration

AND

> the worker must be obliged to provide their work or skill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Give a case law example for establishing a contract of service

Briefly describe the case

A

Autoclenz v Belcher [2011]

C employed car valets.

D was a car valet and claimed they were entitled to minimum wage as they were workers, but C denied this.

The contract stated:

  • no obligation for valets to work
  • valets paid own tax and purchased own insurance, uniforms, materials etc
  • valets were required from time to time
  • could arrange for substitute to carry out tasks

Held:
D was employed by C, so they were entitled to backdated employment rights.

Due to the nature of the relationship between D and C
(D controlled what C did)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why do we have vicarious liability?

A
  1. Employer must have insurance
  2. Employer is making profit, so should bear the losses
  3. Employer has authority over employee’s actions
  4. Encourages employer to promote health and safety
  5. Encourages employer to employ the right employee
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Which 2 cases demonstrate a wrongful act being committed in the course of employment?

A

Jones v Tower Boot Company (1996)

Mohamud v Morrisons Supermarkets (2016)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Briefly describe Jones v Tower Boot Company (1996)

A

C was of mixed race and subjected to verbal and physical abuse from colleagues.

Held:
Acts carried out were in the course of employment.
Employers were vicariously liable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Briefly describe Mohamud v Morrisons Supermarkets (2016)

A

C was at a petrol station when a staff member responded to his question aggressively and told him to leave.

The employee then assaulted him.

Held:
D were vicariously liable for their employee’s actions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Which case law example demonstrates liability for independent contractors?

Briefly describe the case.

A

Hawley v Luminar Leisure Ltd (2006)

Doorman assaulted C, causing ‘accidental’ injury.

Doorman was employed by an agency who found him work at a nightclub.

Held:
D (nightclub owner) was viciously liable for the doorman’s actions.

The agreement for the provision of security services meant that the club had control over what the doorman did, but how he did it.

17
Q

What statute is there to protect employees?

A

Health and Safety at Work Act 1974

18
Q

What are the remedies available for vicariously liability?

A

Damages
= restoring the injured party to the position they would have been in, had the tort not been committed
(Duty to mitigate)

Injunctions
> prohibitory
> mandatory

19
Q

What are the time limits for damages claims in tort?

What is the upper limit for compensation awards in these cases?

A

Generally 6 years

3 years for personal injury and death
(but time may run from the tort became apparent e.g. industrial diseases)

No upper limit

20
Q

How is the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 enforced?

A

Health and Safety Executives

Can investigate and remedy hazardous premises and practices, through:
> Improvement notices
> Prohibition notices