Employer's Liability Flashcards
Give 3 examples of where there will be a presumption that a statute will allow a tortious cause of action. 2 cases.
- Statute protects limited class - Lonrho v Shell.
- Statute does not provide sanction - Lonrho v Shell (and if it does, if the sanction is inadequate compared to the claimant’s loss - Groves v Wimborne).
- Statute complements (rather than contradicts) common law.
When will a duty of care be owed in respect of breach of statutory duty? Case.
When claimant falls within protected class - Chipchase v British Titan.
How will a breach of statutory duty be established? Cases.
- Absolute obligation - strict liability - Starks v Post Office.
- Qualified duty - claimant must prove breach - Nimmo v Alexander Cowan.
What is the test for causation in fact for breach of statutory duty? Case.
But for test - McWilliams v Arol.
What is the test for causation in law for breach of statutory duty? Case.
No need to consider remoteness - loss simply needs to be of the type the statute was intended to prevent - Gorris v Scott.
Will the defence of consent be available in respect of breach of statutory duty? Case.
No - Wheeler v New Merton Mills.
What is the courts approach to finding contributory negligence in noisy, repetitive factory work? Case.
Hesitant. Caswell v Powell Duffryn.
Is there an established duty of care in common law negligence between employer and employee? 4 manifestations. Cases.
Wilson & Clyde Coal v English: 1. Competent staff. 2. Adequate plant, equipment and machinery. 3. Safe system of work & supervision. Latimer v AEC: 4. Safe place of work (i.e. premises).
Give two provisos to the duty to provide competent staff. Case.
Waters:
- Employer must be aware of risk.
- Duty will extend to psychiatric harm, e.g. caused by bullying.
Will the duty to provide a safe system of work include stress-induced psychiatric harm? Case. Proviso? Case.
Yes - Walker v Northumberland. But risk must be reasonably foreseeable - Hatton v Sutherland.
Will the duty to provide a safe place of work include out-of-office locations? Case.
Yes - General Cleaning Contractors v Christmas.
Will consent usually be allowed as a defence for employers to negligence claims?
Very rarely - Smith v Baker.
What is the test to establish whether someone is an employee for the purposes of vicarious liability? Case.
Ready Mixed Concrete.
- Work for remuneration?
- Subject to control?
- Does not have to provide tools, staff, etc?
According to Salmond, for what acts will an employer be vicariously liable? Case applying?
Lister v Helsey Hall.
- Acts authorised by employer, expressly or impliedly.
- Unauthorised modes of carrying out authorised acts.
Will employers be vicariously liable for personal torts? Case. Exception. Case.
No - Warren v Henleys. Unless closely connected to employment - Lister v Helsey Hall.