Emotion & Cognition Flashcards
What is double dissociation
-Method of study where both brain damage and non-brain damage data is used to analyse how areas of the brain work
Describe three features of object recognition
- Modular – the object recognition system is built of specialised functional modules
- Constructive – it builds representations from sensory input and contextual information
- Semantic – higher level information about e.g. objects’ functions are built into the representation
How was the visual system originally divided?
- Dorsal pathway or ‘where’ system
- Ventral pathway ‘what’ system
Describe how the visual systems have different representation in the eye
- Temporal cortex (ventral pathway) has all receptive fields in the fovea this lends itself to fine dsircrimination
- Parietal cortex (dorsal pathway) has 60% of receptive fields outside fovea this lends itself to spatial recognition
- Receptive field = area where an object will cause neuron to fire
- Observed in lesion studies with monkeys (lesion to inferotemporal area = poor identification/ lesion to parietal area = poor spatial recognition
what neuropsychological evidence in humans has shown different pathways in object recognition?
-Temporal cortex lesions (ventral) ->
visual agnosia
-> Deficit in recognizing objects
-Parietal cortex lesions (dorsal) ->
Deficits of spatial awareness
-> hemispatial neglect ->
Optic ataxia
-Object tasks activate ventral system (fusiform gyrus)/ Spatial task dorsal activation (parietal cortex) in fMRI studies
What evidence shows the what vs where divide in object recognition is more fine grained is not as broad as originally hypothesised?
- Lesions to ventral system were seen to only effect perception but not vision for action (letter box study) suggesting these may be a better theory rather than just simply “what”
- Ventral system made up of different systems itself including systems for object constancy (recognising object from different angles)/ integrating features into whole object/ recognising functions of the object
Describe the different types of agnosia and what system they effect
- Affect temporal cortex, thus the ventral pathway
- Apperceptive agnosia= deficit in object constancy, caused by lesions to left fusiform cortex
- integrative agnosia= deficit in integration (can’t identify overlapping object but can when same objects are not overlapping/ can not integrate objects into one whole object ) caused by lesions to lateral occiptal complex
- Associative agnosia= unable to associate objects with their function (normally end up picking those that look most alike) caused by lesion to medial temproal lobe
- Prosopagnosia= deficit in face recognition caused by lesion to fusifrom face area (FFA)
- Overall tells us object recognition is a constructive process involving many modules and has a semantic element (meaning is automatically processed) not merely a retinal input but is made up of what we are aware of
How are faces processed?
- Holistically (whole face processed before individual features) which is different to other object recognition
- Faces encoded by spatial relations between features while objects may be coded on individual features themselves
- Possibly evidence for anatomical modularity
What is the expertise hypothesis?
- Face recognition may be as a result of expertise rather than FFA (evidenced inconsistently with experts in different fields such as bird experts)
- No other objects has selective pattern of activation like FFA, except other biological identification processes, showing a dedicated module and contradicts expertise hypo
Explain evidence against anatomical modularity
-Advancements fMRI have lead to multivariate analysis of patterns rather than univariate. Face recognition done across various brain regions not isolated to FFA
What is inattentional blindness?
-Seeing something but not being aware of it as it is not given attention
Define two types of selective attention
- Overt attention= purposely moving head or eyes towards stimulus
- Covert attention= paying attention to something while appearing to pay attention to another stimulus
What is the cocktail party effect?
- An example of covert attention where you can focus on the person you are speaking with as well as well as give attention to neighbouring conversations
- Evidenced with the dichostic listening experiment where participants would remember psychical aspects of speaker but not the content of the unattended channels
What does early selection refer to in terms of attention
- Early selection states that stimuli are processed based on psychical attributes and then are selected by attention
- Cueing effects were used to help evidnece this (arrow that indicated stim gave a quicker reaction time than arrow that indicated opposite location of stim)
- However this theory does not explain how information can still pass through filter (such as hearing ones name in a convo is often picked up upon). Dichotic tasks could also be biased by certain words in unattended stream so were not being filtered out at an early process on a semantic level
What is the spotlight model of attention?
- Attention enhances sensory processing of objects in the spatial location attention is directed
- However study has posed a object selection rather than spatial, objects cued in same object as target were reacted to faster than objects outside of object but same distance away
- Inhibition of return has also shown object selection where if the delay between cue and target becomes longer the uncued condition becomes faster
What does the late selection model of attention refer to?
-All stimuli receive semantic analysis before attentional selection filters what enters into awareness
How does load theory incorporate both early and late selection
- Low perceptual load evidences late selection as main task did not use up all attention so distractor had greater influence as it was also processed increasing rt’s
- High perceptual load evidences early selection as task used all attention so distractor was filtered out reducing rt’s
- fMRI shows high load increases activation in visual cortex in main task but low in non-main task (early selection) and low condition increased activity in task that appeared between main task trials as left over attention increased spotlight (late selection)
What are contralesional stimulus and ipsilesional stimulus?
- contra= things occurring on opposite side to lesion
- Ipsil= things occurring on the same side as the lesion
How can hemisphere neglect be tested?
- Cancellation tests (crossing lines out on page and see what lines are neglected)
- Most common area to cause neglect is damage to tempoparietal junction
Is neglect the same as being blind?
- No, stimuli on each side can often be detected but when presented together the contralesional side will often be missed and the ipsilesional stim being recognised
- This is known as visual extinction
- fMRI still shows activation of damaged hemisphere even though the subject reports no awareness
- Therefore, neglect is a product of a lack of attention, the person is not consciously aware of contra stim but is processing it unconsciously
What has hemisphere neglect contributed in terms of understanding attention?
- Fear stims in neglected field reduced visual extinction, it appears that if a stim is sufficiently meaningful or important it can break through the attention filter despite not being aware of it. Similar to the cocktail party effect
- Also shown objects being similar increase extinction but when processed at a semantic level, words with similar meaning less likely to be neglected compared to presentation of words with different meanings
- Pre-attentive info can affect processing, perceptual load studies that reduce targets also reduced preservation showing unperceived stimulus still influence our behaviour (evidence for late stage processing!)
- Attention operates on internal representations as well as external!, people with neglect report ipsilateral stimulus of memories (Italians and Florence landmark)
- Inhibits spatial memory, those with neglect revisited previously crossed out stimulus more often if the mark was invisible showing issues with internal as well as external attention
- attention operates within objects rather than spatial frame (will draw out right side of images rather than just images on the right side of a space) even if the object rotates attention neglects the original contralesional side again showing object based neglect
- Cueing increases reaction time in ipsilesional field compared to contralesional showing a difficulty in engaging from ipsilesional side
What is the difference between top-down and bottom-up attention?
- bottom-up= stimulus driven, features of objects can determine what we give attention to (these features compete especially if similar) such as a bright light drawing your attention
- top-down= personal relevance (cocktail party), emotional significance, goal relevance, semantic relevance are all examples of top-down approach as these are relevant to the person persons relationship with the object
How is attention competition resolved?
- Bottom-up not sufficient requires top-down measures indicating that a attentional template is required
- Neurons respond selectively to different stimulus’s (some prefer squares, others triangles etc) activity remaining high wins competition for the stimulus associated with the neuron. However, if the stimulus is negative neuron firing is suppressed meaning it will not win the “competition”
- This competition occurs in brain regions which process visual features (inferior temporal cortex) not in a separate specialised region. Neurons in visual region are co-opted to process stimuli and resolve attention competition
- Cueing can prime certain areas to direct attention before person is consciously aware of it
How has EEG evidenced neuron activation in attention
- Cueing can prime certain areas to direct attention before person is consciously aware of it, cue and target being congruent increases activation
- Inhibition of return reflected in firing rates in cueing tasks (higher for valid cue in short delay, higher for invalid cue in longer delay)