ELS - Law making: statutory interpretation (C5) Flashcards
What are the 5 main reasons a statute may have an unclear meaning?
- A broad term
- Ambiguity
- A drafting error
- New developments
- Changes in the use of language
What does ‘a broad term’ mean in relation to the unclarity of a statute’s meaning and give an example of a case that highlights this
Words may be designed to cover several possibilities; leading to problems with how wide this should go.
Brock v DPP 1993
What does ‘ambiguity’ mean in relation to the unclarity of a statute’s meaning?
Where a word has two or more meanings; it may not be clear which meaning should be used
What does ‘a drafting error’ mean in relation to the unclarity of a statute’s meaning and give an example of a case that highlights this
There may have been an error upon drafting the Bill that Parliament did not notice.
R v Burstow (1997)
What does ‘new developments’ mean in relation to the unclarity of a statute’s meaning and give an example of a case that highlights this
New technology may mean that an old Act of Parliament does not cover present day situations.
Royal College of Nursing v DHSS (1981)
What does ‘changes in the use of language’ mean in relation to the unclarity of a statute’s meaning and give an example of a case that highlights this
The meaning of words can change over the years.
Cheeseman v DPP (1990)
What are the three rules of interpretation?
- The literal rule
- The golden rule
- The mischief rule
What is the literal rule in legal terms?
A rule of statutory interpretation that gives the words their plain ordinary or dictionary meaning
Give an example of a case that demonstrates the use of the literal rule
Whiteley v Chappell (1868)
London & North Eastern Railway Co. v Berriman (1946)
What is the golden rule in legal terms?
A rule of statutory interpretation. It is a modification of the literal rule and avoids an interpretation that is absurd or repugnant
Give an example of a case that demonstrates the use of the golden rule
Adler v George (1964)
Re Sigsworth (1935)
What is the mischief rule
in legal terms?
A rule of statutory interpretation that looks back to the gap in the previous law and interprets the Act so as to cover the gap
Give an example of a case that demonstrates the use of the mischief rule
Smith v Hughes (1960)
Eastbourne Borough Council v Stirling (2000)
Royal College of Nursing v DHSS (1981)
What is the purposive approach in legal terms?
An approach to statutory interpretation in which the courts look to see what is the purpose of the law
Give an example of a case that demonstrates the use of the purposive approach
R v Registrar-General, ex parte Smith (1990)
R (on the application of Quintavalle) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (2003)