Elizabeth I: The Beginning of her Reign Flashcards

Early Life, Religion, Marriage and Succession, Society & Economy

1
Q

When was Elizabeth born?

A

1533

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who was she largely raised by?

A

Henry VIII’s sixth and final wife, Catherine Parr.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

During this stable environment with Catherine Parr, what did Elizabeth develop?

A

Elizabeth developed her religious beliefs – moderate Protestantism within the Church of England that her father had created.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What Act legitimised Elizabeth under Henry VIII?

A

The 1544 Succession Act –> Elizabeth was named third in line of succession.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What THREE things did Elizabeth introduce in 1559? (Religious reforms)

A
  1. The Act of Supremacy
  2. The Act of Uniformity
  3. The Royal Injunctions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What helped Elizabeth secure the Religious Settlement? (in terms of foreign relations).

A

Elizabeth was helped in getting agreement on a settlement because of the signining of The Treaty of Cateau-Cambresis –> Series of peace agreements between France, England and Spain.
-This drew the long-running wars between them to a close and ended English military action against France.
-The French promised to return Calais in the future or pay an indemnity. (i.e. compensation).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the second event that enabled Elizabeth to get agreement on a settlement?

A

-A government-sponsored debate between Protestant and Catholic clergy in which some of the Catholic bishops made the mistake of suggesting that they did not accept Elizabeth’s authority over them, allowing her TO ARREST AND IMPRISON TWO OF THEM.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The issue of control over the Church was settled by the Act of Supremacy in 1559 - What was this?

ii) To make sure that the change of leadership was truly being accepted at parish level, what TWO things happened?

A

-The Act re-established the English monarch as Head of the Church, although Elizabeth chose to be titled ‘Supreme Governor’.

-The AoS also required all churchmen to swear an oath of loyalty to their new Supreme Governor.

ii)
-The Crown was given the power to order visitations to churches to ensure they were worshipping in the correct way –> Commissioners were sent out to investigate. The visitors required clergymen to take an oath, accepting the royal supremacy.
-A new court, The Court of High Commission, was established to persecute those whose loyalty was suspect i.e. (potential traitors).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was significant about Elizabeth’s decision to title herself ‘Supreme Governor’?

A

-This was a less controversial title than ‘Supreme Head’.
-Through this, Elizabeth was able to satisfy those people who still regarded the Pope as the rightful head of the Church or who felt that it was wrong for a woman to hold the top position.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What happened to the Marian bishops who refused to swear the oath of loyalty to Elizabeth?

A

-They were removed from their posts, as were some of the more important clergy such as deans and cathedral canons.
-Ordinary parish priests, on the other hand, were largely left alone.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the consequence of this? (think variation in services)

A

-There was CONSIDERABLE variation in how church serves were CONDUCTED.
-Traditional forms of worship continued in more conservative areas.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the ‘Act of Uniformity’ in 1559?

A

-The Act of Uniformity of May 1559 set out rules about the APPEARANCES OF CHURCHES.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What were the three things that the Act of Uniformity focused on?

A
  1. It established a new Prayer Book –> The Book of Common Prayer.
  2. The ‘Black Rubric’ which has reduced the significance of kneeling to receive communion, was removed, further pleasing traditionalists.
  3. The Act specified that any practices which had existed in 1549 (during Edward’s reign) such as decoration in churches and dress worn by the clergy should be those of the second year of Edward’s reign, before the limitations imposed later (This PLEASED traditionalists, but angered many clergy who had returned from exile abroad and expected a purer, more Calvinist, form of worship to be used).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was significant about the new Prayer Book that was established under the Act of Uniformity in 1559?

A

The Act of Uniformity had the purpose of establishing an agreed set of doctrines throughout the country, ending the quarrels between Catholics and Protestants.
-To achieve this, The Book of Common Prayer was issued. This was a FUSION of the two Prayer Books issued in Edward’s reign.
-It amalgamated the moderate language of the 1549 book with the more openly Protestant words in the 1552 book.
-It served brilliantly as a compromise between what Catholics and Protestants wanted to hear when they worshipped –> allowed both conservatives and radicals to accept the wording used during the Eucharist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

To make sure that there was uniformity of worship, what was attendance at Church made?

i) What happened to those who failed to attend?
ii) What happened to those who attended Catholic Mass?

A

-Attendance at Church was made COMPULSORY.

i) Anyone failing to attend could be FINED (although fines were small and not usually imposed) and the money collected was distributed to the poor.
ii) However, attendance at Catholic Mass, rather than the communion service of the Church of England, was treated as a serious offence with a heavy fine. Anyone saying Mass could face the death penalty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What were The Royal Injunctions of 1559?

A

The Royal Injunctions were 57 instructions (sent out to the clergy about the form of worship to be followed) and they made clear the protestant nature of the new Church.

  1. The Eucharist was to be administered from a plain communion table rather than an ornate altar, as Catholics used.
  2. They called for the removal from churches of ‘things superstitious’ - the traditional elements of worship such as the use of candles or going on pilgrimages. Pilgrimages were outlawed.
  3. Parish churches were required to purchase a bible in English and display a Bible written in English.
  4. Preachers had to be licensed by a Bishop before they could begin preaching.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What were the visitors chosen by Cecil to enforce the Injunctions like?

A

STRONGLY PROTESTANT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What was central to the issues between Catholics and Protestants?

A

Transubstantiation –> The question of what happened to the bread and wine during the Mass.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What did Catholics believe about what happened to the bread and wine during the Mass?

A

-For Catholics, the priest transformed the BREAD into CHRIST’S BODY and THE WINE INTO CHRIST’S BLOOD.
-This meant that anyone consuming the bread and wine would be taking God’s presence directly into themselves, allowing the cleansing of sin and spiritual renewal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What did Protestants believe about the significance of the bread and wine?

A

-Protestant reformers believed that the bread and wine WERE IMPORTANT SYMBOLS OF CHRIST’S PRESENCE.
-This meant that the bread and wine could merely be used to CREATE A MOMENT OF GREAT INTENSITY FOR THE CELEBRANT, but not necessarily more.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What was the SIGNIFICANCE of Elizabeth’s religious settlement?

A

-It used to be thought that a ‘PURITAN CHOIR’ IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS FORCED A MORE RADICAL SETTLEMENT upon Elizabeth than she would of liked.
-More recent research has suggested that E got the settlement that she wanted, despite strong opposition from Catholics in the House of Lords.
-The settlement was Protestant in Doctrine, but Catholic in appearance –> Elizabeth created it in order to maintain her own authority over the Church, and to make it as ACCEPTABLE to the majority of the population who were Catholic at the start of her reign, in order to prevent challenges to her position.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

How was Elizabeth’s religious settlement firmly Protestant?

A

-It used an English Prayer Book, an English Bible.
-It was separated from Rome.
-Its doctrine, established in the THIRTY NINE ARTICLES OF 1563 WAS CALVANIST.
-Many of the new bishops who were appointed and had been in exile during Mary’s reign and were religiously radical.
-Many of Elizabeth’s advisers, such as Cecil and Dudley, who were hugely influential, favoured further reform of the Church.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What were the Thirty Nine Articles of 1563?

A

-A definitive statement of what ‘Anglicanism’ meant.
-The result was the Thirty Nine Articles of faith, published in 1563 and made law in 1571.
-Like the rest of the settlement, this welded together parts from the different Protestant and Catholic traditions into a whole that was acceptable to as many people as possible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What were reactions to the settlement at home generally?

A

-Elizabeth hoped that the settlement would CALM THE TENSIONS THAT HAD BEEN GROWING SINCE HENRY VIII’S REIGN AND ALLOW ENGLAND TO AVOID THE SORT OF RELIGIOUS WARFARE THAT HAD BEEN SEEN IN THE GERMAN STATES OF THE HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE DURING THE 1550s and which could be seen in France at the start of 1560s.
-Elizabeth had good reason to be optimistic –> Reaction among most Catholics and Protestants to the changes were muted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

How many of the clergy lost or resigned their livings because they would not accept the settlement?

A

-Estimates suggest around 400 of the clergy lost of resigned their livings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What happened to virtually all of the Catholic bishops appointed by Mary who refused to accept the settlement?

A

-The Marian Catholic bishops were DISMISSED.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Why was the refusal and the subsequent dismissal of the Catholic bishops a positive thing for Elizabeth?

A

-It gave Elizabeth the opportunity to MAKE NEW APPOUNTMENTS WHICH CREATED A LEADERSHIP WITHIN THE CHURCH THAT WAS ENTHUSIASTIC ABOUT HER REFORMS.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What was the opposition to the settlement compared to Mary’s?

A

-Compared to the 800 or so Protestants that had fled abroad in Mary’s reign, the scale of refusal between 1559 and 1563 was minimal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

However, what kind of opposition to the settlement was evident from the start?

A

-LOCALISED opposition was evident from the start –> Some ministers simply ignored the new Book of Common Prayer and stuck to the traditional Catholic form of worship.
-Meanwhile, a survey of Justices of the Peace in 1564 found that only about HALF OF THEM COULD BE RELIED ON ACTIVELY TO SUPPORT THE SETTLEMENT.
-Some of the strongest reaction in England was against the financial side of the settlement and the seemingly minor issue of what priests wore to conduct services.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

What was the 1559 Act of Exchange? Why was it introduced?

A

-The disastrous war against France under Mary, and problems with Scotland at the start of Elizabeth’s reign, had created a DANGEROUS SHORTAGE OF MONEY IN THE ROYAL TREASURY.
-Elizabeth followed Henry VIII by taking taxes that were traditionally paid to Rome into her own money box (repealing Mary’s reinstatement of such taxation).
-Elizabeth adopted a controversial policy –> The Act of Exchange –> This allowed Elizabeth TO TAKE OVER PROPERTY BELONGING TO BISHOPS AND TO FORCE THEM ONLY TO RENT LAND TO HER.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

What were some of the foreign reactions to Elizabeth’s settlement?

A

-Elizabeth was concerned about the foreign reaction considering both France and Spain were Catholic powers and could pose a threat to the settlement.
-Although, neither showed much inclination to be critical –> France was becoming absorbed in civil war and Philip II of Spain was prepared to give Elizabeth the benefit of the doubt –> Neither Philip or the Pope saw the changes in England as PERMANENT and hoped that Elizabeth could be persuaded to return the Church to Rome.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Who offered to marry Elizabeth in 1559?

A

-Philip II of Spain offered to marry Elizabeth –> it was more of a gesture than a genuine offer.
-The offer was designed to keep the hopes open of Catholicism being maintained in England.
-However, as the 1560s progressed, Elizabeth began to regard Spain as more of a threat.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

How did France and Scotland become a threat in 1559?

A

-Mary, Queen of Scots was already married to Francis II, the heir to the French throne.
-They became KING AND QUEEN when Henry II of France was killed in a tournament held to celebrate the Peace of Cateau-Cambresis.
-THIS SOLIDIFIED THE ALLIANCE BETWEEN FRANCE AND SCOTLAND and was a threat to Elizabeth, especially as Mary also had a claim to the throne of England, being a grand-daughter of Henry VII.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

How did Elizabeth respond to the Scottish Protestant rebellion against the Scottish regent Mary of Guise?

A

-In Scotland, a group of PROTESTANT NOBLES LED A REBELLION AGAINST THE FRENCH CATHOLIC REGENT IN SCOTLAND, MARY OF GUISE, who had been ruling Scotland on behalf of her daughter, Mary, Queen of Scots, ever since she had inherited the throne at the age of six days.
-WILLIAM CECIL persuaded Elizabeth TO SEND IN SECRET LIMITED ARMS AND MONEY TO THEM.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

What happened in relation to Elizabeth’s support for the Protestant nobles rebellion against Mary of Guise in 1560?

A

-In 1560, a peace settlement (THE TREATY OF EDINBURGH) was reached.
-The French troops stationed in Scotland were withdrawn.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

After this treaty had been signed, what complication arose?

A

-The young French king, Francis II, died suddenly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

What did the death of her husband mean that Mary, Queen of Scots did?

A

-Mary RETURNED TO SCOTLAND as Queen but a widow.
-Who she married next was of VITAL CONCERN FOR ENGLISH INTERESTS.
-Her eye went in the direction of LORD DARNLEY, who had himself a distant claim, through his mother, to the English throne.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

What happened in France after Francis II died?

A

-In 1562, the French state COLLAPSED INTO CIVIL WAR between rival groups of nobles and their clients for control of the Crown.
-Catholic families, including the Guises, were ranged against HUGUENOT FAMILIES (the Protestants in France who were followers of John Calvin) , led by the Prince of Conde.
-Essentially conflict broke out between Catholics and Protestants in France.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

What was the impact of this civil war in France on England?

A

-A weakened France was good news for Elizabeth because it removed that immediate threat.
-However, it also tipped the balance of power decisively to Catholic Spain.

40
Q

Who prompted Elizabeth to intervene in the French Civil War by granting support to the Huguenots? What was the reason behind this?

A

-Elizabeth embraced the idea of intervening in support of the Huguenots.
-Robert Dudley, her favourite, encouraged Elizabeth to intervene.
-He, Elizabeth, and other ministers hoped that in return for England’s support for the Huguenot rebels, IT WOULD FORCE THE FRENCH CROWN TO RETURN CALAIS TO THE ENGLISH and Calais would be recovered as an English possession.

41
Q

What was the Treaty of Hampton Court in September 1562?

A

-The treaty in which ENGLAND PROMISED LOANS AND MILITARY AID TO THE HUGUENOTS.

42
Q

What did the English receive in return for their aid to the Huguenots?

A

-The English received control over Le Havre in return.

43
Q

How did this intervention end in failure for Elizabeth?

A

-The Huguenot army became disillusioned and defeated and reached a temporary truce with the Catholics.
-The two sides (Catholics and Protestants) then united against the English, planning to oust the English from Le Havre.
-This forced Elizabeth to agree to an unfavourable Treaty of Troyes in 1564 (between the English and French governments).

44
Q

What was agreed in the unfavourable Treaty of Troyes?

A

-Elizabeth HAD TO ACCEPT THE PERMANENT LOSS OF CALAIS.
-This was a huge blow to Elizabeth’s prestige.

45
Q

What was the significance of the outcome of this intervention for Elizabeth?

A

-Elizabeth was cautious about supporting Protestant causes in the future. and in her foreign policy later on.
-She realised that ill-defined campaigns were unlikely to succeed, even if being fought in the name of religion.
-She was also acutely aware of the potential problems in assisting rebels against a legitimate monarch.

46
Q

What was the Council of Trent?

A

-The council was a MEETING OF EUROPE’S LEADING CATHOLIC CLERGY TO DISCUSS THE FUTURE OF THE CHURCH, called by Pope Paul III.
-The Council produced a SERIES OF HARDLINE DECREES ending the possibility of a peaceful compromise with Protestants.
-Some wanted Elizabeth excommunicated, but others, including Philip II, hoped to be able to persuade Elizabeth to change her religious settlement.
-However, E became concerned at the threat of either or both France and Spain attacking England.

47
Q

What was the significance of Philip II ruling the Netherlands for Elizabeth?

ii) What did Philip do in 1563?

A

-The Netherlands (ruled by Philip II of Spain) VITAL for English trade.

ii) In 1563, Philip BANNED THE IMPORT OF ENGLISH CLOTH TO THE NETHERLANDS
-Officially, this was to “protect the Netherlands against infection by plague from England”, BUT the ban reflected annoyance that the balance of trade had turned in England’s favour while Elizabeth turned a blind eye to PIRACY in the Channel and to English merchants spreading Protestant ideas in Netherlands.

48
Q

How did Elizabeth respond to Philip’s ban of the import of English cloth to the Netherlands?

A

-Elizabeth responded by banning all imports from the Netherlands.
-However, both sides backed down and normalised trade relations in 1564.

49
Q

Why was the question of Elizabeth’s marriage deemed urgent?

A

-Elizabeth was already 25 years old and in normal circumstances, would have already been married off to some European prince as part of England’s foreign policy.
-Her councillors and members of Parliament were keen that she should marry and produce a male heir to guarantee the succession.

50
Q

Why was organising or negotiating a marriage difficult with Elizabeth?

ii) What did Elizabeth reportedly say to Parliament on the subject of her marriage that sums up her approach

A

-Elizabeth gave deliberately vague answers on the subject of marriage.
-The eagerness of Elizabeth’s councillors and members of Parliament for her to marry caused tension with Elizabeth WHO FELT THAT MARRIAGE WAS A MATTER OF THE ROYAL PREROGATIVE.

ii) “I have already joined myself in marriage to a husband, namely the kingdom of England”.

51
Q

What were the POSITIVES to Elizabeth remaining unmarried?

A

-Keeping foreign suitors waiting made for good diplomacy when England faced several threats from abroad.
-Elizabeth was able to USE HER CHARMS TO DABBLE IN COURTSHIP WHERE THE REAL PURPOSE WAS TO AID INTERNATIONAL DIPLOMACY AND PREVENT FRANCE AND SPAIN FROM ACTING TOGETHER AGAINST HER.

52
Q

What were the general positives of Elizabeth marrying a foreign prince? Or an English nobleman?

A

-If the potential husband was foreign, that might help establish or reinforce England’s alliances.
-If the husband was English, there was the danger of upsetting the balance of power within the English nobility (i.e. marrying an Englishman had the danger of creating factional conflict).

53
Q

What were some of the dangers England might face with a foreign husband for Elizabeth?

A

-There was the danger of England becoming a satellite of the husband’s territories.
-The question was Catholic of Protestant? —> It became clear that England was to be Moderate Protestant in belief, but with a degree of latitude allowed to those who were either more extreme Protestants or those who hankered after Catholicism -> Any marriage may well have upset the delicate balance that had been achieved in Elizabeth’s religious settlement.

54
Q

Who were the potential suitors/husbands for Elizabeth?

A

-ROBERT DUDLEY.
-PHILIP II OF SPAIN
-ARCHDUKE CHARLES.
-PRINCE ERIK OF SWEDEN
-EARL OF ARUNDEL.

55
Q

Suitors from Europe: Philip II of Spain - How did Elizabeth respond?

A

-The first volunteer to marry Elizabeth was Philip II of Spain.
-He wanted England to work with Spain IN THE STRUGGLE AGAINST FRANCE (i.e. he hoped to obtain England as an ally).
-Philip also wanted to ensure that France, through Mary Queen of Scots DID NOT GAIN INFLUENCE IN ENGLAND - including being recognised as heir to the throne.
-Elizabeth was EVASIVE - She never seriously considered him because of his Catholicism.

56
Q

Suitors from Europe: Austrian Archduke Charles - How did Elizabeth respond?

A

-Austrian Archduke Charles was PHILIP II’s COUSIN.
-He was also the son of the Holy Roman Emperor, Charles V.
-He was also Catholic –> It is clear that Elizabeth had no intention of marrying him, but diplomatic channels were kept open for nearly a decade.
-The aim was to MAKE SURE THAT THE HABSBURGS REMAINED FRIENDLY TOWARDS ENGLAND.

57
Q

Suitors from Europe - Prince Erik of Sweden - How did Elizabeth respond?

A

-Erik of Sweden was PROTESTANT and heir to the Swedish throne.
-Elizabeth returned his friendship and she benefited from many lavish gifts that were bestowed.
-However, Elizabeth had no intention of marrying him. There also would be little benefit to this marriage in terms of European diplomacy.

58
Q

How serious of a contender was the Earl of Arundel?

A

-During 1559, rumours were rife in England about possible eligible bachelors from among the nobility.
-One was the Earl of Arundel, but he was Catholic.

59
Q

For Elizabeth, who was the only real contender for her hand in marriage?

ii) What would have been the risks behind this marriage?

A

-ROBERT DUDLEY - He was undeniably Elizabeth’s favourite.
-Dudley was 27 years old and began in 1559 TO MONOPOLISE ELIZABETH’S ATTENTION.
-This drew much unfavourable comment from those at court and beyond.
ii) Marrying Dudley, an Englishman, had the danger of CREATING FACTIONAL CONFLICT.

60
Q

What event discredited Dudley as a suitor for Elizabeth?

A

-THE SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES OF HIS WIFE’S DEATH IN 1560.

-Dudley’s wife, AMY ROBSART, was ill, and it was assumed that, if she died, he and Elizabeth would marry.
-By 1560, it was clear there was serious romance.
-Then, in September 1560, Amy Robsart was found dead with a broken neck at the bottom of a flight of stairs.
-The circumstances appeared to be suspicious as the servants had been sent away before the accident happened.
-There were WILD RUMOURS that Dudley had hired killers. Some of the rumours even included Elizabeth in the conspiracy.
-Marriage was off the cards - Yet Dudley and Elizabeth remained close friends for the rest of his life until his death in 1588, just after the Spanish Armada had been defeated.

61
Q

Why did Elizabeth’s chief secretary, William Cecil, do nothing to dispel the rumours concerning Dudley + Elizabeth’s involvement in the conspiracy?

A

-Cecil believed that Elizabeth SHOULD BE AVAILABLE TO BE USED AS A MARKETABLE PAWN IN THE EUROPEAN MARRIAGE MARKET.
-Secondly, any marriage involving Dudley would have likely marked the end of Cecil’s career ambitions at court.

62
Q

What happened in 1562 that created a succession CRISIS?

A

-In October 1562, Elizabeth became seriously ill with smallpox, creating a succession crisis.
-There was a serious epidemic at the time and a substantial proportion of sufferers were dying.

63
Q

Although Elizabeth thankfully recovered, what was significant about her contracting smallpox?

A

-It brought home to everyone THE IMPORTANCE OF AGREEING ELIZABETH’S MARRIAGE AND A SUCCESSION TO THE THRONE.
-If Elizabeth had died, England could easily have descended into a civil war.

64
Q

From 1563 onwards, what became clear about Elizabeth’s approach to marriage?

A

-It became obvious that Elizabeth’s preferred policy WAS NOT TO MARRY.
-She was simply playing for time, whether dealing with petitions from Parliament or foreign ambassadors making a case for an advantageous marriage to an eligible European.
-It became almost a GAME, and continued on and off WELL PAST THE AGE WHEN ELIZABETH WOULD HAVE BEEN CAPABLE OF BEARING A CHILD (in her forties).

65
Q

How did Elizabeth react in 1566 when Parliament, prompted by members of the council, again pressed her to marry?

A

-Elizabeth reacted with fury, banishing Leicester and the Earl of Pembroke from the Presence Chamber, and summoning members of both houses of Parliament to express her displeasure.

66
Q

Who did Elizabeth begin marriage negotiations with in 1579?

A

-In 1579 - when Elizabeth was in her mid-forties, the Duke of ANJOU was welcomed to England. Elizabeth flirted with the idea of marrying Anjou, who she found personally attractive.
-Elizabeth’s advisers were horrified by the potential of a child, under French influence, inheriting the throne.
-This highlights how Elizabeth was STILL ABLE TO USE HER CHARMS TO DABBLE IN COURTSHIP WHERE THE REAL PURPOSE WAS TO AID INTERNATIONAL DIPLOMACY.
Ultimately, Elizabeth decided against the marriage.

67
Q

Who were contenders for the succession?

A

-Under the terms of Henry VIII’s will, the Protestant Lady Catherine Grey was next in line, but she had disgraced herself by her secret marriage to the Earl of Hertford and had been imprisoned in the Tower.
-Elizabeth’s closest relative was the Catholic Mary, Queen of Scots, who was staunchly Catholic –> The prospect of her succeeding Elizabeth horrified councillors.
In 1568, Mary fled to England to seek help from her cousin, Elizabeth, who kept her confined, not knowing what to do with her.

68
Q

In practice, as Elizabeth lived to be almost 70, who was the only practical possibility to succeed her?

A

-The son of Mary, Queen of Scots, James VI of Scotland.
-The succession was universally accepted.

69
Q

Conclusion on Elizabeth’s ultimate decision not to marry?

A

-Can be criticised for putting her own personal needs before those of the nation by refusing to marry.
-HOWEVER, a case can be made for her procrastination. By keeping options open, she helped ENGLAND’S DIPLOMACY IN EUROPE AT A TIME WHEN THE COUNTRY WAS THREATENED BY A DOMINANT SPAIN AND THE NEED TO BUILD UP TRADE RELATIONSHIPS WITH AS MANY COUNTRIES AS POSSIBLE.
-If she had made a decision about the succession in the middle of her reign, and, for example, disallowed Mary Queen of Scots, it would have been extremely likely that there would not have been unanimous agreement on any of the alternatives.

70
Q

What sector continued to dominate society in Elizabethan England?

However, what had changed?

A

THE ARISTOCRACY continued to dominate society in Elizabethan England.

However, their ability to threaten the position of the crown was reduced.

71
Q

What had happened to all four DUCAL titles between the end of Henry VIII’s reign and Elizabeth’s?

A

The FOUR DUCAL TITLES (Somerset, Northumberland, Suffolk and Norfolk) were executed for treason.

After the 1572 execution of Norfolk (for his secret plan to marry Mary, Queen of Scots), NO MORE DUKES WERE CREATED.

The danger to the crown of ‘over-mighty’ novels had largely been ended by Elizabeth’s reign.

72
Q

How did the lesser nobility concentrate on enhancing their prestige?

A

-By BUILDING GRAND HOUSES (such as Burghley House, built by Lord Burghley) partly in order to win favour and rewards from the Queen who reduced the costs of her court by regularly visiting and staying with members of the nobility.

73
Q

How did the GENTRY grow during Elizabeth’s reign?

A

-The gentry grew during Elizabeth’s reign and became richer.
-They ranged from nationally significant figures such as Sir Christopher Hatton, to modest country gentlemen.
-As the power of the greater nobility declined, the gentry became increasingly important in local administration, through acting as Justices of the Peace, and were one of the means through which the crown extended royal control over the country.

74
Q

What happened to land incomes during Elizabeth’s reign?

A

-During Elizabeth’s reign, LAND INCOMES INCREASED, especially after 1570, but the POORER SECTIONS OF SOCIETY became WORSE OFF due to the spread of enclosure and the continued decline in real wages.

75
Q

What was the POPULATION total by the end of the END of Elizabeth’s reign?

A

-The population was approximately 4 million and most people lived in the countryside.
-London had a population of about 150,000.
-Norwich and Bristol were the largest regional cities, but few other cities had a population greater than 5000.

76
Q

How can this growth in population be explained?

A

-Diseases such as influenza, cholera, malaria and typhus, as well as the Bubonic Plague, were all still common, especially in cities and towns in the summer months.

However, it is possible that younger people were building up more immunity.

77
Q

What were the problems concerning the poor under Elizabeth?

A

-Although wages rose, purchasing power fell due to inflation and poor harvests driving up food prices.
-Consequently, there was a growing problem of POVERTY and VAGABONDAGE (people wandering from place to place with no home or job).
-Cecil feared this could result in a threat to law and order.

78
Q

Why were Tudor governments slow to act in response to the issues with poverty?

A

-Tudor governments were slow to act simply because it was NOT an established field of activity.
-In the past, the Church, monasteries, families and charitable houses had been deemed sufficient.
-The Church had been the main source of charity but the Reformation had destroyed most of the institutions which provided it.
-There was still some private charity but it was not sufficient.
-When the government felt compelled to take action, measures were piece-meal and ill-thought out.
-Parliament did not pass any effective legislation until the 1570s so until then local approaches were followed, successfully in places like Norwich, but less so elsewhere.

79
Q

What was an example of an ill-thought out measure taken by the government in 1552?

A

-In 1552 ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO REDUCE BEGGING BY MAKING BEGGARS REGISTER AND BE GIVEN PERMISSION TO BEG.
-If they begged without a license, they were to be WHIPPED and RETURNED TO THEIR PARISH OF ORIGIN AND FINED.

80
Q

What was the attempt in 1563 to reduce the numbers of so-called VAGABONDS roaming in the countryside? (The Statue of …)

A

-THE STATUTE OF ARTIFICERS (apprentices) was ambitious in its scope.
-It AIMED TO ENFORCE POTENTIAL WORKERS TO TAKE ON SEVEN-YEAR APPRENTICESHIPS, TIED TO A PARTICULAR PLACE, thereby restricting freedom of movement.
-It also aimed to FIX PRICES AND WAGES.
-The local Justices of the Peace were given responsibilities for carrying out the Act by having powers to punish and send culprits back to their original parishes.

81
Q

What was the TUDOR APPROACH to poverty?

A

-The Tudor approach distinguished between the deserving poor (the old, the widows and the sick) who deserved help and the underserving poor (those who were able to work) who deserved punishment.
-There was no distinction between the lazy and those who were genuinely seeking work.

82
Q

When was the big change towards the approach to poverty? What year?

A

-The big change was in 1572 when an Act of Parliament made a distinction between those who were genuinely unemployed and the ‘idle poor’.
-Some local areas had already started charities to provide for the ‘deserving’.

However, in 1572, THE POOR RELIEF ACT MADE DONATIONS TO LOCAL AUTHORITIES COMPULSORY.
This established the principle that local ratepayers should pay for the relief of their own poor.

83
Q

What TWO things were introduced in 1576?

A

-In 1576, Houses of Correction were set up to punish those who refused to work.
-The Poor Law Act of 1576 attempted to CREATE A NATIONAL SYSTEM OF POOR RELIEF IN WHICH TOWNS WERE REQUIRED TO MAKE PROVISION FOR THE EMPLOYMENT OF THE DESERVING POOR.

84
Q

What were the issues in the 1590s?

A

-Social problems again became acute in the 1590s due to inflation, poor harvests, high taxation and the effects of war against Spain.
-Governments were afraid of riots and rebellions –> There were FOOD RIOTS in London and the south east in 1595 and in East Anglia in 1596-97.
-These events spurred the Privy Council into taking further action, especially with the effects of continuing bad harvests which were causing greater distress.

85
Q

What did The Poor Law Act of 1597 confirm?

A

-THE COMPULSORY POOR RATE.
-It also required the setting up of PAUPER APPRENTICESHIPS to TRAIN BOYS UNTIL 24 and GIRLS UNTIL 21.
-More Houses of Correction were built so that the able-bodied poor could be put to work.
-The ‘impotent poor’ (people unable to work as they were too old, too young or had a disability) were to be PROVIDED FOR IN ALMS HOUSES OR POORHOUSES.
-Vagrants were still treated in the same harsh way as before.

86
Q

What were the terms of The Poor Law Act of 1601?

A

-It remained the basis of England’s treatment of the poor until the nineteenth century.
-Parishes were required to IMPOSE RATES FOR, AND TO ADMINISTER, THE POOR RELIEF SYSTEM.
-Each parish had to appoint an overseer who was responsible for collecting the rates and distributing relief to the poor.
-The main roles were GIVING RELIEF TO THE IMPOTENT POOR, SETTING THE ABLE-BODIED TO WORK AND APPRENTICING POOR CHILDREN, and their actions were supervised by JPs.

87
Q

Why was The Poor Law Act of 1601 significant?

A

-The Poor Law Act of 1601 was significant because IT REPRESENTED THE GOVERNMENT (as opposed to the Church, or private charity) ACCEPTING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE PROVISION OF A MINIMUM LEVEL OF RELIEF TO THE DESERVING POOR, AND IT REMAINED THE BASIS OF POOR RELIEF UNTIL THE VICTORIAN PERIOD.
-A clear distinction had been made between the LAZY AND OTHER UNEMPLOYED PEOPLE, but there was no real acceptance that many were unemployed and unable to support themselves through no fault of their own.

88
Q

What was the treatment of the undeserving poor like?

A

HARSH –> The able-bodied poor were whipped, and in 1572, an Act allowed them to be branded.
-In 1597, an Act stated that first-time offenders WERE TO BE WHIPPED AND SENT BACK TO THE PARISH OF THEIR BIRTH.
-Repeat offenders were to be EXECUTED.

89
Q

What ECONOMIC problems did England face at the start of Elizabeth’s reign? (Key THREE things)

A

-Bad Harvests
-High Mortality Rate
-High Taxation.

-There was a fear amongst the ruling classes of social instability. However, it was difficult for the government to do anything about this.
-The government relied on local JPs, whose effectiveness varies, to deal with the problems, or on royal proclamations, which were often ignored.

90
Q

What did the high mortality rate mean? What was introduced in endeavours to rectify the situation?

A

-The high mortality rate meant that there was A SHORTAGE OF LABOUR and that WAGES ROSE, which was seen as a problem by the ruling classes.
-There were various attempts to deal with it - for example, the Council of the North tried to LIMIT WAGES, and COUNTIES LIKE NORTHAMPTONSHIRE TRIED TO SET ACCEPTABLE WAGES FOR VARIOUS TRADES.
-In 1563, The Statute of Artificers tried to establish rules for labourers.

91
Q

What made these attempts to deal with the shortage of labour and rising wages largely ineffective?

A

-Because the government lacked the means to enforce them.

92
Q

How did Elizabeth manage to stabilise the currency (following the debasement of the coinage)?

A

-Northumberland and Mary had begun to tackle the problems caused by the debasement of the coinage, BUT IT WAS ELIZABETH’S GOVERNMENT WHICH FINALLY RESOLVED THEM.
-DEBASED COINS WERE CALLED IN AND REPLACED WITH PROPERLY MINTED COINS, RESTORING CONFIDENCE IN THEIR VALUE.
-The Government avoided resorting the debasement again, despite the financial pressures it faced.

93
Q

What was TRADE like under Elizabeth?

A

-The value of trade within England greatly exceeded that of foreign trade.
-The biggest development was THE GROWTH OF THE COAL TRADE FROM NEWCASTLE TO LONDON, THOUGH SOME WAS ALSO EXPORTED TO EUROPE.
-A WIDE RANGE OF LUXURY GOODS WERE IMPORTED, POSSIBLY DUE TO THE GROWING PROSPERITY OF THE PROPERTIED CLASSES.
-The cloth trade with the Netherlands declined, though was still the major port of England’s trade.
-The Antwerp market was declining anyway, and Cecil was anxious to end England’s reliance on a single (Spanish controlled) port. Instead, trade was directed to the port of Emden in Germany, and particularly to Amsterdam in the north which, unlike Antwerp, was not under Spanish control.

94
Q

Prosperity: How did the landowners do during Elizabeth’s reign?

A

-In general, landowners did well during Elizabeth’s reign.
-They had been able to INCREASE THEIR LANDHOLDINGS by ACQUIRING CHURCH LAND, OFTEN AT LOW PRICES DURING THE REIGNS OF HVIII AND EDWARD VI.
-Landowners benefited from rising incomes from their land during Elizabeth’s reign.
-Consequently, there was a building boom of unprecedented scale as landowners BUILT COUNTRY HOUSES TO REFLECT THEIR WEALTH AND STATUS.

95
Q

Depression: What was the situation like for many in Elizabethan England?

A

-REAL WAGES FELL.
-This was largely due to increase in food prices caused by POOR HARVEST.
-9 out of the 44 harvests during Elizabeth’s reign were poor, and from 1594-97, there were four
successive poor harvests, which was catastrophic for some.
-By 1596, real wages had collapsed to HALF THE LEVEL OF ONLY NINE YEARS EARLIER –> This caused the one real subsistence crisis of Elizabeth’s reign from 1596-97.
-There was distress throughout the Kingdom, but starvation in the North.
-Both in rural areas and in the centre of Newcastle, the corporation reported burying 25 homeless people who had starved to death.

96
Q

Where in England were economic conditions most severe?

A

-The impact of the economic hardship of the mid-1590s was more severe IN THE NORTH.
-From taxation records, it is clear that the wealthiest part of the country was the south-east, followed by Norfolk and Suffolk.
-The poorest areas were the north and the West Midlands.
-The inventories (lists) of goods left by labourers in Hertfordshire suggest they left goods WORTH THREE TIMES THOSE OF LABOURERS IN THE NORTH.