Elements Of Crime Flashcards
What is the “Act”?
Actus Reus
Needs to be voluntary
* Whooley - Involuntary sneeze
* Hill V Baxter - Swarm of bees
Actus Reus
What are the 6 expectations where omission can be the actus reus?
Actus Reus
- Statutory obligation (Road Traffic Act - Failure to wear seatbelt/Report an accident)
- Relationship (Gibbons V Proctor - Starve child)
- Duty taken on (Instan - Neglected aunt)
- Contractual Duty (Pittwood - Not putting crossing gate down at train station
- Duty of a public official (Dytham - Police officer not breaking up fight)
- Dangerous situation (Miller - matress on fire
Actus Reus
What is “State of Affairs”?
Just by ‘being somewhere’ you are guilty
(Larsonneur - Illegal immigrant)
What is Direct Intention?
Does the D desire the exact outcome
(Mohan)
What is Oblique Intention?
Is the D aware that the outcome is a virtually certain consequence of their outcome?
(Woolin)
What is Recklessness?
Is the D aware of the risk and takes it anyway
Subjective test - Cunningham
When is Causation used?
Only applies to consequence crimes (where the action has lead to an illegal consequence to be a crime e.g ABH, murder etc)
What is Factual Causation?
‘But for’ the D’s actions would the consequence have happened anyway?
(White - not factual cause, poison in the tea)
(Pagett - factual cause, used girlfriend as a human shield)
What is Legal Causation?
‘De minimis’ - is the D’s act more than a minimal cause of the consequence (Malcherek and Steel)
What is an intervening act?
No break in the chain of causation
- Could be from the victim’s own unreasonable act (Roberts - reasonable and Williams - Unreasonable so broke the chain)
- Act of a third party (Smith and Jordan - didn’t break the chain and Jordan, where poor medical treatment broke the train) and ‘act of god’
What is Transferred Malice?
The D can transfer malice from their intended victim to their actual victim and still fulfill the MR aspects of the crime
Two cases of transferred malice
Mitchell and Latimer - you can transfer intent from person to person
Pembilton - you can’t transfer malice from person to property
What is the coincidence and continuing act theory?
The AR and MR have to happen at the same time